Another Truther Hero Reveals His Feet of Clay
James talked yesterday about Pete Carroll's foolish 9-11 ramblings from a couple years back, and how the Truthers at ASU revered him as a hero. No surprise, today Carroll revealed that he is also an idiot in play selection.
I was watching the game and after the fantastic reception by Kearse, I turned to the guy next to me and said, "They'll give the ball to Lynch four times in a row if needed; no way Wilson throws another pass." My prediction looked pretty solid when Marshawn took the ball down to the one on the initial play.
And even after the interception the game was not over, but then that #72 for Seattle encroached with New England up against the goal line. That guy has been offsides so many times this postseason it's getting to be a joke--I think he was flagged on two consecutive plays in their first-round game.
posted by Pat @ 8:00 PM
28 comments
28 Comments:
He must have been thinking "Only an idiot would throw up the middle in this situation, they'll never expect it!"
And don't get me started on that Bennett guy...
This just in, let's see where it goes:
"French citizen Zacarias Moussaoui, dubbed the "20th hijacker," made the revelations in court papers filed in a New York federal court by lawyers for victims of the attacks who accuse Saudi Arabia of supporting Al-Qaeda.
He said he created a digital database of Al-Qaeda donors, including members of the royal family such as former intelligence chief Prince Turki al Faisal and Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who was Saudi ambassador to United States for 22 years until 2005."
Read the rest here:
http://news.yahoo.com/9-11-plotter-says-saudi-royals-backed-al-191658750.html;_ylt=AwrBT6Kyd9JU9ekAnTdXNyoA
It's mostly old wine in a new bottle. It's good that he mentioned Prince Bandar Bush, whose wife Princess Haifa wrote a check for a benefactor of two of the alleged hijackers.
It's good that he mentioned Prince Turki who, as ambassador to the USA, attended State of the Union addresses and who--according to the conservative French newspaper Le Figaro--met with Osama bin Laden in the American Hospital in Dubai around July 7, 2001.
ànd why is it good that he mentioned them?
As you earlier stated, it is mostly old wine in a new bottle.
Nothing new here, just like always with the truther movement...
It's good that the mainstream media is reporting these things so that ignorant people like you who didn't know them can have a chance to learn them.
This comment has been removed by the author.
It's good that the mainstream media is reporting these things so that ignorant people like you who didn't know them can have a chance to learn them.
I'm glad to see that you now agree that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and are no longer into truther conspiracies.
Anyway, as promised earlier, here are some of Brian's greatest hits now that he's been posting hysterical spam at this board for 6 years. On a side note, isn't hilarious that Brian began posting here just as 9/11 truth went dead because Bush left the White House, and all Bush derangement conspiracy theories got replaced with Obama derangement conspiracy theories? Brian's been the only truther left here for a long, long time.
Anyway, Here's Brian's "meatball on a fork" idiocy in all its glory. Such wonderful technical drawing skills you have, Brian!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x205525
Needless to say, the ridicule was merciless, and Brian, as always, was left squealing and crying and telling the girls there that he'd be vindicated some day.
There was the time Brian ran away squealing and crying from a debate challenge from Willie Rodriugez:
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2011/05/brian-good-chickens-out-on-debate-with.html
And of course, you can scroll down here to see the letter Carol Brouillet wrote to Brian when he was banned from the truth movement because he was stalking her:
https://sites.google.com/site/briangoodexposed/
"You have a crush on me and erroneously hold delusions about me."
Well, yeah, Carol, he's Brian Good. He's mentally ill and lives with his parents. He has delusions about a lot of things, most notably 9/11.
Ian, your belief that evidence of Saudi and Bush connections to the 9/11 op somehow negates 9/11 conspiracies--especially given the blatant efforts to cover up those connections---is just more of your usual ignorant iananity.
Sibel Edmonds has information that Osama bin Laden and the Taliban worked as US operatives right up until 9/11. The conservative newspaper Le Figaro says that Osama met with CIA agent Larry Mitchell in Dubai in July of 2001.
There's nothing idiotic about the "meatball on a fork" theory. In fact, its legitimacy was proven by the videos showing the persistence of the towers' lower
core structures after the outer floors had been stripped away.
I never ran away from debate with Willie Rodriguez. He ran away from me. Here I am; here he is not. I can succinctly explain why his hero story is an impossible lie. He's a washed-up con artist.
I never stalked Carol Brouillet, and she doesn't say I did. She was complaining about what she wished was in my mind.
You know nothing about 9/11, so all you can do is lie about me.
Yup, that's the kind of hysterical squealing I expected, Brian. As usual, I win and you lose.
Unfortunately, I'll be spending some of my big paycheck on a winter weekend getaway, so I won't be able to humiliate you more this weekend. You wouldn't know about weekend getaways, as you can't afford a trip to Tahoe. You can't even afford a decent haircut!
Lying isn't winning, and only a loser thinks it is.
Yes, that's why you keep posting hilariously obvious lies. Because you're a loser who lives with his parents.
"She was complaining about what she wished was in my mind". So, in typical stalker fashion, Brian thinks the victim is wishing for the unwanted attention.
I still can't figure out why Brian's parents never sent him to a mental hospital for the treatment he desperately needs.
Lyin Ian, I didn't lie about anything. I didn't stalk anybody, and I didn't have any stalker fantasies. You are libeling me. Cease and desist.
You don't know anything about 9/11, so all you can do is lie about me.
Sibel Edmonds has information
Nope, you just made that up.
Sibel was only a temp working for a few months for the FBI, translating Turkisch documents. She got that job after 911.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Sibel shows how desperate the truther movement is.
They grasp on to her and then make up all kind of stuff about her...
Lying isn't winning, and only a loser thinks it is.
Very good mirrortalk, Brian...
But if you know yourself so well, why don't you just stop doing it?
The conservative newspaper Le Figaro says that..
Which has been proven wrong years ago..
But of course, you ignore that.
It's good that the mainstream media is reporting these things so that ignorant people like you who didn't know them can have a chance to learn them.
So basicly you admit that none of it is true, Brian...
Th, your apparent belief that you can transform reality by decree reveals your solipsistic nature.
Sibel Edmonds says she has information that Osama bin Laden and the Taliban worked as US operatives right up until 9/11. She was not a temp at the FBI. She was hired by the FBI.
It has never been proven wrong that Larry Mitchell met with Osama in Dubai in July of 2001. You make stuff up.
Don't tell me what I admit. You're not even competent to repeat what I say, let alone interpet it.
your apparent belief that you can transform reality by decree reveals your solipsistic nature.
mirrortalk, Brian.
Sibel Edmonds says she has information that Osama bin Laden and the Taliban worked as US operatives right up until 9/11.
She can say that she went to the moon and back.
Doesn't make it tru, Brian.
She was not a temp at the FBI. She was hired by the FBI.
She was hired as a temp by the FBI, worked there for a few months doing translations from Turkisch to English.
She did that in the period after 911.
It has never been proven wrong that Larry Mitchell met with Osama in Dubai in July of 2001.
You mean you ignored it.
You make stuff up.
mirrortalk, Brian.
Don't tell me what
You are not entitled to tell me what to do and what not to do, Brian.
You're not even competent to repeat what I say, let alone interpet it.
Also very good mirrortalk.
Which is why you constantly contradict yourself.
Your blather is not worth reading, let alone responding to. You make stuff up, you lie, and you don't know what you're talking about.
th, you say "mirrortalk" like a two-year-old says "no".
I don't try to change reality by decree. I summarize reality in pithy statements of fact. You make completely counterfactual statements without any effort to back them up.
Sibel Edmonds says she has information that Osama bin Laden and the Taliban worked as US operatives right up until 9/11.
You denied that fact, you can't refute it, and now you're down to trying to poo poo it while making no effort to show that it is wrong.
Her languages are Persian, English, Azerbaijani, and Turkish. (Not "Turkisch")
I never ignored any proof that CIA agent Larry Mitchell did not meet with Osama in Dubai in the summer of 2001. NO such proof has been offered by you. You make stuff up and you lie.
Your belief that I contradict myself is based on your own analytical incompetence, which causes you to project erroneous interpretations on simple sentences.
th, you say "mirrortalk" like a two-year-old says "no".
You are not entitled to determine how i say things.
Also, you are the one using mirrortalk.
If you don't like me pointing that out to you, stop doing so.
I don't try to change reality by decree.
Yes you do, but you don't dare to admit it..
I summarize reality in pithy statements of fact.
You are not entitled to determine that about yourself.
You make completely counterfactual statements without any effort to back them up.
mirrortalk, proven by the fact that you haven't shown any pictures of wimpy fires, nor shown any quotes of the FDNY contradicting with each other.
Sibel Edmonds says she has information that Osama bin Laden and the Taliban worked as US operatives right up until 9/11.
She can say that she went to the moon and back, but that doesn't make it true..
You denied that fact,
No, i don't deny that she said that.
But like i said: she can say anything. Doesn't make it true.
while making no effort to show that it is wrong.
I don't need to make an effort.
If Sibel has information, she should reveal it to the world.
But she doesn't.
She only says she has the information..
Her languages are Persian, English, Azerbaijani, and Turkish. (Not "Turkisch")
So she did not translate Afghan documents coming from Bin Laden, Brian.
Those aren't written in those languages.
I never ignored any proof that CIA agent Larry Mitchell did not meet with Osama in Dubai
Nice try, Brian.
You ignored the fact that Le Figaro has no proof they ever met, besides the news article from a Pakistani news paper that they got the information from.
That is the whole point.
There is no reliable source for the article.
You make stuff up and you lie.
And here we go again:
mirrortalk.
Your belief that I contradict myself
Not a believe, but a fact, as others have pointed out.
is based on your own analytical incompetence,
You are not entitled to determine what my incompetences are, as you have pointed out yourself earlier.
Your blather is not worth reading, let alone responding to. You make stuff up, you lie, and you don't know what you're talking about.
Again mirrortalk.
Which is proven by the fact that you read the comments and respond to them..
Actually TH his last post is proof that he contradicts himself in the SAME post. Oh In his mind he never said he WOULDNT respond to you, only that you aren't WORTH responding to. Proving he betrays even his own values. Classic mental deficiency.
Sham, again you're ignoring the context of the remark. Th's post was not worth reading at 6:30 on Friday night when I didn't have time for it. It was worth a response on Saturday morning at 8:00 when I got up earlier than I needed to and had some time on my hands.
You clowns would think it was a contradiction if I was hungry before dinner and not hungry after.
So you admit having mood swings, Brian...
that explains quite a lot.
Funny stuff. Yeah that's why you said it wasn't WORTH responding too. Cuz worthiness is a clear reference to time. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Post a Comment
<< Home