More South of Citgo Witnesses Ignored by CIT

I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, to discover that the CIT-heads are full of it with regard to the account of Dawn Vignola.

At the time, there was only vacant land and buildings under construction in between their building and the Pentagon, and these did not obstruct their view of the heliport. Since then, shorter buildings have been built in that area, but they still can still clearly see the upper floors of the Pentagon. In person everything appears much larger and clearer than it does on the accompanying video; when the camera is zoomed in, it actually gives a better idea of how large everything appears in person. Dawn and Tim had a clear view of the impact side and the airspace over the Pentagon, and would have seen the plane fly over- or seen something else hit- if that had happened. In addition, Dan’s office across the Potomac River had a view of the airspace over the Pentagon; he was looking at it while on the phone with Dawn, and saw the black smoke rising, but did not see a plane flying over or away from the Pentagon.

Good job by Erik Larson, who is a "Truther", but is not delusional like the creeps from CIT.

Well, At Least I'll Recognize the Others On the Scaffold...

The CIT posts photos of their "enemies" Of course, the CIT-heads, like seven year old boys, consider anybody who calls them idiots as "their enemies". Not, say, Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld or Condoleezza Rice. Not the mainstream media, who won't take up their "proof". Not Reprehensor, who banned their theories from 9-11 Blogger. Not Lloyd England, the taxi cab driver whom they have accused of being in on the plot after the fact.

Nope, their enemies are a couple of posters over at JREF and I. And to be fair, I probably don't merit inclusion. I've taken a couple looks at the Pentacon, but debunking that comes down to repeating one phrase over and over: When the physical evidence disagrees with the eyewitnesses, go with the physical evidence. Doesn't every episode of CSI drive that point home?

The Two Dumbest Truthers?

Have got to be the yahoos behind the Citizen's Investigative Team, Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis. They claim that poor taxicab driver Lloyd England, whose cab was damaged by one of the light poles hit by Flight 77, must be in on the plot. Why? Because what happened to him doesn't fit their idiotic theory of the flight path of Flight 77, which, in their fevered fantasies, didn't hit the Pentagon. It's a classic example of how data that doesn't fit a conspiracy liar's fantasy, does not result in a change in the theory; it becomes evidence of the coverup.

That they would accuse a tired old man of being part of the coverup (and yes, I see the figleaf question mark; note my figleaf question mark at the top as well) is just a sign of how desperate these kooks are.