Sunday, January 24, 2010

More South of Citgo Witnesses Ignored by CIT

I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, to discover that the CIT-heads are full of it with regard to the account of Dawn Vignola.

At the time, there was only vacant land and buildings under construction in between their building and the Pentagon, and these did not obstruct their view of the heliport. Since then, shorter buildings have been built in that area, but they still can still clearly see the upper floors of the Pentagon. In person everything appears much larger and clearer than it does on the accompanying video; when the camera is zoomed in, it actually gives a better idea of how large everything appears in person. Dawn and Tim had a clear view of the impact side and the airspace over the Pentagon, and would have seen the plane fly over- or seen something else hit- if that had happened. In addition, Dan’s office across the Potomac River had a view of the airspace over the Pentagon; he was looking at it while on the phone with Dawn, and saw the black smoke rising, but did not see a plane flying over or away from the Pentagon.


Good job by Erik Larson, who is a "Truther", but is not delusional like the creeps from CIT.

Labels: , , ,

91 Comments:

At 24 January, 2010 14:04, Blogger Billman said...

C'mon Pat. Why must you "lie?" It's obvious that anyone who says they witnessed the plane south of Citgo is a paid-off shill for the government. (Getting that out of the way).

 
At 24 January, 2010 14:18, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Oh boy, another CIT post! C'mon, CIT guys, challenge us to tell the witnesses to their faces that they are wrong.

 
At 24 January, 2010 14:25, Blogger Billman said...

In 2007, they were interviewed by Citizen Investigation Team (CIT), who attempted to discredit their testimony.

But not investigate them for anything... no they just want to discredit people without doing any real investigative work. And before Brian Good comes on and says asking questions to descredit is part of an investigation, or some other dumb shit like that, I will have to say no, that's bullshit. Part of an investigation is to gather information. Not qoute mine or engineer what's said to fit your insane theory.

blogger Steven Welch alleged that Tim was ‘coaching’ Dawn in her account, and claimed neither testimony could be considered credible.

Because her husband was in the background telling her what HE saw so she could relay that through the phone?

So when me and my wife were interveiwed by the police a year ago, and I was doing roughly the same thing Tim was.. that couldn't be taken as credible then..

Uh... it's sort of natural when an event like 9/11 happens, to want to tell everyone what you saw that you even talk over your wife or whoever else is near.

But no, this obviously means he's a paid shill for the government.

CIT insists they’re objective and have not done anything improper in their investigation and reporting.

Oh, so attempting to use an investigation to discredit someone isn't improper? Cue Brian Good.. "Billman. When the truth is concerned... blah blah blah."

From the blogger's site:
In an effort not to succumb to the other side's heavy-handed tactics, I'll only allude

(because like all troofers, you're too chicken shit to make an actual accusation...)

with a subtle tap on the gentle reader's shoulder, by quoting Dawn's last observation,

"This was right, aimed right at it. But unfortunately I think it hit the heliport,and it didn’t look like it damaged too much of the Pentagon"
This was followed by her prompter's (Tim Timmerman's) correction: "Fortunately."

You do get it don't you?


ZOMG! HAXXORS! I DO GET IT! IT PROVES 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! ...Somehow..

 
At 24 January, 2010 15:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not sure Ranke is delusional. I think he may simply be a very cynical liar. I wouldn't be surprised if his intention all along was to play an elaborate prank on the Truth movement, and once he got famous in the media as a truther he would reveal that the whole thing was a hoax. He just never got famous enough that anyone would care.

 
At 24 January, 2010 16:21, Anonymous New Yorker said...

I'm not sure Ranke is delusional. I think he may simply be a very cynical liar. I wouldn't be surprised if his intention all along was to play an elaborate prank on the Truth movement, and once he got famous in the media as a truther he would reveal that the whole thing was a hoax. He just never got famous enough that anyone would care.

He's no more delusional than you are, Brian.

 
At 24 January, 2010 16:21, Anonymous Marc said...

Man, you guys haven't figured it out yet?

Teh evil black-ops team smuggled the 767 into the Pentagon inside briefcases and then reasembled it inside. Then they blew it up.

Why do I have to figure this stuff out by myself? [he said hoping his sarcasm was obvious]

 
At 24 January, 2010 16:26, Anonymous KDLarsen said...

C'mon Pat. Why must you "lie?" It's obvious that anyone who says they witnessed the plane south of Citgo is a paid-off shill for the government.
Hell, one CT nutjob once remarked that everyone at the Pentagon were 'Faithful Christians', just like Bish, and thus they could be relied on to keep quiet about a possible fly-over!

 
At 24 January, 2010 16:38, Anonymous piedpipeline said...

I wouldn't be surprised if his intention all along was to play an elaborate prank on the Truth movement
Do you see conspiracy and elaborate tricks everywhere? Is it that hard to believe that there are actually people out there who believe insane things? Or are you just bothered by the fact that they all gravitate towards the "Truth" movement?

 
At 24 January, 2010 18:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pp, no it is not hard to believe that people believe insane things, and many of you who post here prove it every day.

Craig is such a persistent liar, though, and such an ingenious sophist, that I suspect that it's very possible that he doesn't really believe any of what he says.

 
At 24 January, 2010 18:43, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pp, also I tend to suspect lying over insanity because I've met a hell of a lot of liars in my life, but I haven't met very many insane people.

 
At 24 January, 2010 18:45, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Pp, no it is not hard to believe that people believe insane things, and many of you who post here prove it every day.

Yes! Like the guy babbling about radio beacons and patsies and the US invasion of Canada and CIA heroin rings and pyroclastic flows and thermite and MIHOP and LIHOP together and smoldering carpets and nomadic fires and non-explosive jet fuel and.......

Craig is such a persistent liar, though, and such an ingenious sophist, that I suspect that it's very possible that he doesn't really believe any of what he says.

He believes it because he's insane and ignorant, just like you.

 
At 24 January, 2010 19:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Insanity, n.
1 : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder
2: a : extreme folly or unreasonableness b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable

 
At 25 January, 2010 02:40, Anonymous Dylan Unsavery said...

Craig is such a persistent liar, though, and such an ingenious sophist, that I suspect that it's very possible that he doesn't really believe any of what he says.

Insert David Ray Grifter for Craig and I'm with you on this. Craig is merely a loon who hoped to sell videos to the terminally gullible.

 
At 25 January, 2010 05:34, Anonymous Bikerman said...

Good job by Erik Larson, who is a "Truther", but is not delusional like the creeps from CIT.

Anybody who is a "truther" is just as delusional as someone who believes fairies are about to fly out of their ass.

The Pentagon flyover theory pushed by the CITers is no more or less absolutely and completely insane than the "controlled demolition" of WTC7 using the magical fairy dust known as "super thermite" or any other stupid troother theory.

 
At 25 January, 2010 08:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heh, why do you kookloon ultra-nationalists keep insisting nano-thermite doesn't exist, referring to it as "magic dust" or whatever the mockery of the day is?

Clearly it existed (Tillotson et al, '99). You can debate about how much of it existed, how effective it was, how far DoD was with its research, yes.

But you can't pretend it doesn't exist or didn't exist before 2001. It did.

(Which is why Ryan Mackey openly discusses the thermodynamic properties of various nano-thermite formulations at JREF. He knows and admits it exists, only you kookloon flagsucking bootlickers don't, making it quite apparent how much it scares you)

 
At 25 January, 2010 08:56, Blogger Pat said...

Do try to keep up, Truthers. Superdupernanothermite is now considered by Steven Jones to have been a fuse and that they used conventional explosives in the towers.

 
At 25 January, 2010 09:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pssst, Pat, we know that. You're the one who is 'behind'. We're the ones breaking the inconvenient truths to you drumbeat marching zealots.

Here's a scoop, Pat: 12V battery current ignites the chips.

Didn't you know? Weird paint, that.

 
At 25 January, 2010 11:33, Anonymous kookloonultranationalist said...

"kookloon ultra-nationalists" that's a new one! I like it.
Clearly only far-right jingoists dismiss truthers as nutcases. You know, far-right jingoists like Noam Chomsky and Bill Maher.
Do any of the sane posters here know why nano-thermite's existence changes anything, given that the mechanism of structural failure of all three buildings at the WTC has already been explained over and over again?
Do any on the insane side of the isle have a source proving the existence of "nano-thermite"?

 
At 25 January, 2010 12:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do any on the insane side of the isle have a source proving the existence of "nano-thermite"?

Tillotson TM, Simpson RL, Hrubesh LW (1999), Nanostructure High Explosives Using Sol-gel Chemistry, 98-ERD-048, LLNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Annual Report FY1999, https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/238334.pdf (p 8-11 or 181 of
255)

 
At 25 January, 2010 12:58, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Nanostructure High Explosives"

I leave the rest as an exercise by the class.

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

KLU, the mechanism of structural failure has NOT been explained. The handwaving argument implicitly invokes Bazant's piledriver theory, but won't actually go so far as to assert it. NIST stops their analysis at the moment of collapse initiation, and thus fails to address the biggest mysteries: the faiklures' symmetry, totality, and speed.

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Exercise that putrid walnut leftover of a brain of yours and actually read the source, you deceitful cretin. Is reading a bridge too far for you wide-eyed pseudoskeptic parade monkeys? Are you generally stupid or are you a full-time specialist?

"In addition, we developed a new synthesis route for preparing inorganic oxidizing gel networks from inexpensive hydrated iron salts. By adding a metal fuel (e.g., aluminum) to the sol prior to gelation, we were successful in synthesizing pyrotechnic nanocomposites
(thermites, as shown in the figure)"

Pg. 181 (8-11)

Nano-thermite exists. It's as real as the trailer parks most of you drooling primates live in. Depending on the formulation, it can be used as propellant, igniter or explosive.In fact, it has even found uses in the medical industry in the same way nitroglycerin has.

This blog is Darwin's zoo. You folks.... are a standing refutation of intelligent life. One step down from plankton on the evolutionary ladder. Taking a break from rodeo and groping your sister for some reading is apparently too much to ask.

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow. I'm starting to see why they don't even bother arguing with you morons anymore. Let me quote everyone else here:
"Seek professional help, Brian."
And stop projecting, you're the only unemployed prole who lives in a trailer park.

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:50, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
KLU, the mechanism of structural failure has NOT been explained."

Sure it has.

You're just too fucking stoooopid to understand it.

"NIST stops their analysis at the moment of collapse initiation"

Which was their charter. What's wrong with that?

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:50, Anonymous KookLoonUltranationalist said...

NIST stops their analysis at the moment of collapse initiation,
Because that is what real structural engineers are concerned with. They want to know how the structural integrity failed. Explaining your hallucinations about the collapse is not their job, that is the job of the psychiatrist you should be visiting.
and thus fails to address the biggest mysteries: the faiklures' symmetry, totality, and speed.
As is obvious in any of the youtube videos you watch a hundred times a day, the collapse wasn't symmetrical. The speed of the collapse isn't a mystery to anyone who has passed middle school physics. Perhaps you can show us otherwise with your sophisticated rake-on-rake models? Or maybe a meatball and a fork?

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:51, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Exercise that putrid walnut leftover of a brain of yours and actually read the source, you deceitful cretin. Is reading a bridge too far for you wide-eyed pseudoskeptic parade monkeys? Are you generally stupid or are you a full-time specialist?"


Insanity, n.
1 : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder
2: a : extreme folly or unreasonableness b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable

 
At 25 January, 2010 14:55, Anonymous concernedshrink said...

Does anyone else think petgoat has developed multiple personalities? He posts a calm paragraph about how NIST fails to explain the (nonexistant) symmetrical collapse of WTC 7 then posts another ranting and raving about his trailer park and Darwin's zoo...

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:03, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Actually, I believe that is two different kookloons, boron with his passive-aggresive posting of crap that has already benn refuted time after time after time, but he still has to "ask questions.

The other is Krazee, the Balless Wonder Klown™, with his putrid, hate filled rants which are unconnected to reality as the rest of us know it.

But it's always fun making fun of the mentally challenged Tw0000ers™.

(May ghod forgive me)

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:09, Anonymous concernedshrink said...

Anon at 14:06 can't be Krazee, it's grammatically sound writing and the writer uses unnecessarily large words in an attempt to sound smart but only reveals his lack of experience in a real academic environment.
This is a fun game! Guess the troofer.
Plus I thought Boron posts with that image... of what I think is a person.

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You idiots. Has it occurred to you that the radio button "Anonymous" is available to more than just this imaginary "Brian" character you guys seem obsessed with? I came here specifically to school you incompetent hacks about nano-thermite. The issue at hand here is not whether nano-thermite was present in WTC dust. That is another discussion, one which I would also win. The issue at hand is that some of you ultra-nationalist loserkooks actually have the gall to deny the very existence of nano-thermite.

After quoting Tillotson (just one of multiple sources, but relevant because of the fact that Tillotson's experiments are often subject of discussion) multiple times, you underdeveloped numbskulls still can't get it through your trailer park pot heads that nano-thermite exists. Fine. Then I will quote Ryan Mackey, prominent pseudoskeptic cited often by Pat Curley.

(emphasis mine)

"The advantages of the nanothermite -- the real nanothermite made by Tillotson and his team -- are that it is more uniform and predictable, has a relatively fast reaction time, and has a substantially LOWER ignition temperature than normal thermite, yet high relative to some other compounds including explosives. However, it has an extremely low energy density, about 1/30th that of ordinary gasoline, and 1/3 that of TNT."

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:26, Blogger Triterope said...

Has it occurred to you that the radio button "Anonymous" is available to more than just this imaginary "Brian" character you guys seem obsessed with?

You see, Brian, this is why I've asked you to pick a name like 20 times now. Not only does your insistence on "Anonymous" make your stupidity indistinguishable from other peoples' stupidity, but said others are claiming you don't even exist. You want to exist, don't you Brian? PICK A GODDAMN NAME. NOW.

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:34, Anonymous trutherologist said...

The issue at hand here is not whether nano-thermite was present in WTC dust. That is another discussion, one which I would also win.
By all means, please educate us poor ignorant sheeple.

Lab notes:
Notice the word "win." This is consistent with the theory that truthers are really just concerned with "winning" arguments on blogs, fascinating.
This subject is quite irate and is quite set on proving his vast intellect, consistent with the narcissism and superiority complexes prevalent among truthers. His repeated reference to trailer parks suggests economic insecurity on the part of the subject.
The more we understand this disorder, the closer we come to a cure!

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course Mackey the sophist believes Jones is a liar.

Point is, he admits nano-thermite is REAL. Now I don't ever want to see you neocon lickspittles ask for "proof" or a "source proving" that nano-thermite exists ever again.

It exists.

It is also known as Metastable Intermolecular Composite or by its corresponding acronym 'MIC', nano-energetics or energetic materials.

(Secret) military R&D for the last fifteen to twenty years has mostly been focusing on creating sol-gels (xerogels, aerogels) of nano-thermite. Tillotson is one of the pioneers st LLNL.

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:43, Anonymous trutherologist said...

I dunno LL, this guy sounds a lot more assertive than Brian and keeps calling us "ultra-nationalists" and babbling on about trailer parks.
But I'm confident that he's going to explain to us:
A. How do you know it exists, and can you verify this with evidence?
B. What is "nano" about nano-thermite?
C. Where is the evidence that it was used to bring down which buildings?

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:55, Anonymous trutherologist said...

Hmm.. "nano-thermite" does exist. Of course that proves absolutely nothing about 9-11. The Russians just built a thermobaric weapon (Father of all Bombs) using nano-technology. I'm eagerly awaiting an explanation as to how this technology was used to bring down the WTC.

 
At 25 January, 2010 15:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

By all means, please educate us poor ignorant sheeple.
You're welcome. Just tune your arrogance to your knowledge level. (Hint: you're going to have to be modest)

Lab notes:
Notice the word "win." This is consistent with the theory that truthers are really just concerned with "winning" arguments on blogs, fascinating. This subject is quite irate and is quite set on proving his vast intellect, consistent with the narcissism and superiority complexes prevalent among truthers. His repeated reference to trailer parks suggests economic insecurity on the part of the subject. The more we understand this disorder, the closer we come to a cure!


Your faux-psychoanalysis is all you have left, shanty town. Rest assured: winning is not a priority. Taking off the kid gloves with this particularly malignant, cultist and McCarthyist form of pseudoskepticism is. No Einstein-grade intellect is required, just brutal honesty. Honesty, you treasonous rat, do you know it?

Talking about mental disorders: let me help you identify yours: Dunning-Kruger syndrome coupled with a mind-reader complex.

P.S. I live in a nice city apartment. And you?

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:06, Anonymous trutherologist said...

I fail to see what is Mccarthyist about debunking conspiracy theories. You, and many others, make the incorrect assumption that people who do not agree with you are right-wing nuts. Why hasn't 9-11 "truth" caught on with even leftist thinkers like Chomsky?
You seem much more intelligent than the usual truthers, and harder to provoke with faux-psychoanalysis (which I admit was my goal).
You've already convinced me of the existence of nano-thermite, maybe you will now be able to prove that nano-thermite was used to take down the WTC?

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:06, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Reality as the Debunker Cult tries to propel it! Arhoolie's the name, kicking your ass is what I'm all about.Poor,poor pitiful PornBoy is some kind of whiner,ain't he? Not one thread on leaky faucet Anthony Shaffer stepping up.Hmmm.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ah here comes Krazee to bask in the glory of someone who actually forms coherent sentences.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:21, Anonymous trutherologist said...

Anon, seriously, you're the first "member of the opposition" to appear on this site who is making any sense. I'm curious to hear your perspective and sources of information. Here, I'll even start. My alt-news sites include:
http://www.isgp.eu/
http://cryptogon.com/
I avoid any site run by christian fundamentalists.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:33, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I came here for three reasons:

* To vent my anger at arrogant stupidity.
* To call SLC frequenters names in various enjoyable ways.
* To set the record straight about nano-thermite. It exists.

See y'all yokels the next time 'round.

With great disdain,
Not Brian.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:42, Anonymous NotBriansnewfan said...

You fail to realize that some frequenters of this site are undecided. You've vented your anger and managed to convince at least one person (me) of nano-thermite's existence and that not all truthers are morons like Krazee. AT LEAST let me know where you get your news.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:45, Anonymous Phil said...

You fail to realize that some frequenters of this site are undecided.

Anyone who is "undecided" is a nincompoop.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:47, Anonymous Anonymous said...

He never told us how the NWO used nano-thermite brought down the WTC. Since the Russians are the only ones with a working weapon using this technology... THE RUSKI'S DID 9-11!!

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:49, Anonymous Bikerman said...

Wow. I'm starting to see why they don't even bother arguing with you morons anymore.

You are a LIAR!!!! If you really "don't bother arguing with us "morons" any more, then GO AWAY.

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:19, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"...cultist..."

See?

Told ya!

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:20, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"...the Debunker Cult...."

See?

Told ya so!

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:22, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"I came here for three reasons:

* To vent my anger at arrogant stupidity.
* To call SLC frequenters names in various enjoyable ways.
* To set the record straight about nano-thermite. It exists."


Epic fail.

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:23, Anonymous paul w said...

Hey, truthers, we're waiting; what is nano about nano-thermite?
















*crickets*















*crickets*




















*crickets*













Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:34, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone know who the Truther with 'roid-rage was?

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:53, Blogger Billman said...

Tillotson TM, Simpson RL, Hrubesh LW (1999), Nanostructure High Explosives Using Sol-gel Chemistry, 98-ERD-048, LLNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Annual Report FY1999, https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/238334.pdf (p 8-11 or 181 of
255)


Uh huh... Nanostructured high explosives.. big deal. Those exist.

That's not NANO-STRUCTURED SUPER THERMITE. Which doesn't...

Nano-thermite exists. It's as real as the trailer parks most of you drooling primates live in. Depending on the formulation, it can be used as propellant, igniter or explosive.In fact, it has even found uses in the medical industry in the same way nitroglycerin has.


You haven't been coming here for very long, genius. Nanothermites have been around forever. WE here know this. They're used in fireworks, ammunition, etc... but they aren't used in any mega building destroying explosives (except in underwater demolitions).

NANOSTRUCTURED SUPER THERMITE does not exist currently. Nor did it back in 2001. It has been proposed as early as... 2005 I believe. But it still does not physically exist. And other nanostructured materials proposed that could have lead to the idea of the specific NANOSTRUCTURED SUPER THERMITE that you troofers believe in, were thought up in early 2001. But as for an actual product, it didn't exist then, and still doesn't now.

WE KNOW Nanothermites exist... (i.e. the afformented fireworks, primers in ammunition).

But the specific Nanostructured SUPER DOOPER MEGA THERMITE that jones claims exists, which is supposed to have properties that all other nanostructured thermites don't, DOES NOT EXIST.


(Secret) military R&D for the last fifteen to twenty years has mostly been focusing on creating sol-gels (xerogels, aerogels) of nano-thermite. Tillotson is one of the pioneers st LLNL.

Aerogels aren't an explosive (unless that something new they've decided to try to apply them to). They're lighter than air materials they are trying to use for space travel as an exteremly light weight thermal insulator. Now you're saying they EXPLODE?!!! WOW! Not much use as a thermal insulator if they fucking explode.

Get your shit straight, holmes.

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:56, Blogger Billman said...

Has it occurred to you that the radio button "Anonymous" is available to more than just this imaginary "Brian" character you guys seem obsessed with?

Brian's not imaginary. Some of us have his phone number. And his address... etc... that's pretty extreme to go to make up an imaginary person to taunt.

Though, it worked in the Shawshank Redemption.

 
At 25 January, 2010 17:59, Anonymous Bikerman said...

Not to mention.... The reason twoof morons are obsessed about "thermite" in the first place is Steve Jones' brain dead paper where he found it in dust samples supposedly collected from a crazy lady's apartment near WTC.

1) The chain of custody of his samples is a freaking joke.
2) He claimed that the normal chemical signature of pulverized wallboard that he found had to be caused by "thermite" because he's a dumb stupid idiot.

Jones is a moron.

 
At 25 January, 2010 18:16, Blogger Billman said...

Not to mention.... The reason twoof morons are obsessed about "thermite" in the first place is Steve Jones' brain dead paper where he found it in dust samples supposedly collected from a crazy lady's apartment near WTC.

1) The chain of custody of his samples is a freaking joke.
2) He claimed that the normal chemical signature of pulverized wallboard that he found had to be caused by "thermite" because he's a dumb stupid idiot.

Jones is a moron.


Not to mention the chemical spectrograph he claims is "ZOMG! NANOSTRUCTURED SUPER THERMITE" exactly matches the chemical spectrograph of Kaolinite, I.E. the sulfur shit that's in wallboard.

Oh wait. That's basically what you said. It beared repeating though.

 
At 25 January, 2010 18:46, Anonymous Anonymous said...

P.S. I live in a nice city apartment. And you?
Is that what they're calling the projects these days...
I think I recognize this guy's hyper-aggressive style. He was on here a few months back claiming that David Shayler only went crazy because "they" made him. Of course it could be different tweeker.
Truthers really hate this site don't they?

 
At 25 January, 2010 18:47, Anonymous Marc said...

Why go to the trouble of risking an important black-op/fasle-flag/insert your crack-pot theory here mission using an experimental agent like Nanothermite (that probably doesn't exist)? If the plan was to bring down the WTC, and your plan involves a controlled demolition, then why not use a truck-bomb instead of hijacking commercial jets?

Or...

If you wanted to bring down the twin towers, and you have gone to the trouble of hijacking commercial jets to fly into each building, why would you risk discovery of your evil plan by lacing the building with a rare agent like nanothermite? Thermite leaves a trace, every demolitions expert will recognize it's trace on the steel beams. Also, anyone at Freshkills who had served in the US Army or USMC would als be able to spot the work of thermite from a mile away. Why risk your perfect plan with such a bonehead play?

I mean if it were me, I would have just flown a 767 into each tower because that would be enough to bring them down...wait a second...

 
At 25 January, 2010 19:15, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Marc
Like the utter implausibility of their wild theories ever stopped the Truthers.

 
At 25 January, 2010 20:30, Anonymous New Yorker said...

KLU, the mechanism of structural failure has NOT been explained. The handwaving argument implicitly invokes Bazant's piledriver theory, but won't actually go so far as to assert it. NIST stops their analysis at the moment of collapse initiation, and thus fails to address the biggest mysteries: the faiklures' symmetry, totality, and speed.

Brian, just because you're too stupid/ignorant to understand the NIST report doesn't mean it doesn't explain everything it was supposed to explain.

Now I don't ever want to see you neocon lickspittles ask for "proof" or a "source proving" that nano-thermite exists ever again.

"Neocon lickspittles" isn't as amusing as "kookloon ultra-nationalists". Also, thermite, nano or otherwise, isn't used to demolish buildings.

Your faux-psychoanalysis is all you have left, shanty town.

"Shanty town"? You know, you might be able to resolve some of your anger issues if you just lit up a joint and listened to some Desmond Dekker ("dem a loot, dem a shoot, dem a wail, in shanty town"). You might even get laid too.

"I came here for three reasons:

* To vent my anger at arrogant stupidity.
* To call SLC frequenters names in various enjoyable ways.
* To set the record straight about nano-thermite. It exists."


I have come here to kick ass and chew bubblegum....and I'm all out of bubblegum.

Maybe watching some John Carpenter movies (after smoking a joint) would help your anger issues too?

Does anyone know who the Truther with 'roid-rage was?

Maybe a CITer? They always appear in CIT-related posts and those posts only.

 
At 25 January, 2010 22:43, Blogger Billman said...

I have come here to kick ass and chew bubblegum....and I'm all out of bubblegum.

Where as I have come here to kick ass and chew bubblegum...and I'm all out of ass. (Thank you, Mystery Science Theater, for that one).

 
At 26 January, 2010 08:59, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Brian, just because you're too stupid/ignorant to understand the NIST report doesn't mean it doesn't explain everything it was supposed to explain."

Not knowing is a huge advantage for your average truther. If they knew exactly how controlled demolition are done, why they use shaped charges and detonation cord, why pre-cutting of the structure is done, and knew the physics involved it would throw too much doubt into their little fantasy. It's a religion in that way. Don't show me the fact or I may kill my faith.

You will never see a truther try and explain exactly how the use of any of their unconventional controlled demolition techniques would work. They default to the logical fallacy that because event "A" was not explained, ergo event "B" is true. Never mind the fact no one has even demonstrated "B" is feasible.

 
At 26 January, 2010 09:08, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

The military has also tested laser weapons with limited success. So are we to believe because they exist in the lab and work on a small scale that the idea the WTC were melted with a laser is valid?

To be even considered you would have to show laser capable of cutting a reasonably large steel beam. Same with this Nano thermite, prove it can work.

 
At 26 January, 2010 09:54, Anonymous The Putnam Abuser (troyfromwv) said...

Time for a new story.

 
At 26 January, 2010 10:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Originally Posted by adam syed
neither dawn vignola nor erik larsen has been able to cite where cit misrepresented her account. Cit has never uploaded any audio of their discussions with dawn at all. They have never even quoted her from their discussions. Now you have to agree, it is pretty hard to twist the words of someone that you have not even quoted.

The entirety of their report from their experience with dawn vignola is in an article detailing their 2007 research trip here:

http://z3.invisionfree.com/cit/index.php?showtopic=26

you can clearly see that they did not say anything different about her account than what erik just reported. She has no basis to attack them at all.

She states:

"the last time i trusted someone in this sort of matter, in particular craig and aldo, i found my words being distorted, taken out of context, and/or insinuations that i meant something other than what i said.".

Yet she refused to give them an interview. This means she obviously she did not trust them nor did they "distort" any of her words. This is why neither she nor larson can cite a single example. Their experience with dawn was a full year after they obtained the interviews with lagasse and brooks and the pentacon had already been public for about 10 months.

In fact i was talking with craig, and he told me that dawn and her husband had told them over the phone that they watched the pentacon before letting cit into their home. So they knew full well what cit had uncovered and had already decided that she was not going to go on camera.

But it can not be disputed, as now confirmed by larsen, that they clearly would not have been able to see that critical final moment in the flight path where the plane flew north of the citgo. So whether vignola and timmerman were distracted by the fireball and missed the flyover, or whether there is something else going on here, we will never know. We do, however, know that they 100% can not refute the north side approach due to their pov. There is nothing cited in this long article demonstrating deception or misrepresentation on the part of cit.

They will eventually publish a formal response to this but in the mean time if erik wants to refute the north side approach evidence i suggest he focuses on witnesses who could actually see the citgo.

Over and out

http://www.911blogger.com/node/22442#comment-226143

 
At 26 January, 2010 10:49, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"But it can not be disputed, as now confirmed by larsen, that they clearly would not have been able to see that critical final moment in the flight path where the plane flew north of the citgo."

That's because it didn't.

 
At 26 January, 2010 18:28, Blogger Billman said...

Hey guys, just so you know.. Nanothermites exist. That means 9/11 was an inside job.

 
At 27 January, 2010 06:39, Blogger Billman said...

They will eventually publish a formal response to this but in the mean time if erik wants to refute the north side approach evidence i suggest he focuses on witnesses who could actually see the citgo.

So let me get this straight... the fact hat they saw a plane... then it crashed.. into the pentagon.. and they DID NOT see the plane continue flying away or anything..

isn't credible enough for the troofers (or at least some of the troofers) because they didn't see the stupid Citgo?

THAT'S NOT HOW AN INVESTIGATION WORKS!

Everyone won't and can't have the full picture. You collect evidence from various veiwpoints and then fill in the full picture based on what you collected...

Quote Sherleck Holmes here... if you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the troof.

In this case, Flight 77 hit the pentagon. I KNOW IT'S IMPROBABLE, but it fits the facts.

 
At 27 January, 2010 07:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The plane hit the Pentagon. It's not "improbable" at all, you dunce. You must study harder. Why do you need a 'twoofer' to tell you that?

Here's another quote:

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect."
— Mark Twain

I especially suggest you reflect a bit longer on those words of sir Arthur Conan Doyle, you know, about truth and eliminating impossibilities. The essence seems to have escaped you.

 
At 27 January, 2010 10:28, Anonymous Roman Craig said...

Don't know who the newest "Anonymous" fucktard is but he sure is funny. Sort of makes the thumbless monkey obsolete.

Hey new Anonymous - keep posting. You have no idea how refreshing your brand of stupidity is!

walt - you're dismissed.

 
At 27 January, 2010 13:28, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

So NOW the bag of Bilbones says nanothermite DOES exist.Hmmm......And talk about a drawer full of socks!! There's no stopping the Debunker Cult! And thanks again,Bilbo,for informing us:"THAT"S NOT HOW AN INVESTIGATION WORKS!" Coming from the vanguard of the 9/11 Commission Report defenders,that's truly rich! The firefighting magazine that howled loudly over how the Ground Zero materials were quickly removed without investigation would most assuredly agree.Right?

 
At 27 January, 2010 14:15, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"the Debunker Cult"

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

 
At 27 January, 2010 14:34, Anonymous KrazeesFormerFan said...

I think Krazee is jealous of 'Roid-rage (the new truther, that's his name).

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:00, Blogger dgdgdf said...

Christian

Louboutin Tuba Tall Boot
Fifre Suede Ankle Boot black lace ankle boots Black Lace-Up Boots

black fold-over

boots
black leather knee-high boots peep-toe bootie Christian Louboutin Astraqueen shoe boots

platform lace-up

bootie
Christian Louboutin Suede Black Ankle boots supra fifre

120 thigh-high boots
Christian Louboutin Alta Ariella Talon Leopard

Boots
Christian Louboutin OTK PlatformAfrica grey suede Boot Christian Louboutin Alta Ariella Talon Leopard Ankle Boots Christian Louboutin black leather ankle boots Christian Louboutin dark red leather ankle boots Manolo Blahnik Something Blue Satin Pump

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:01, Blogger dgdgdf said...

http://www.bootboots.com
http://www.salelouboutin.com
http://www.buylouboutin.com
http://www.bestlouisvuitton.com
http://www.sale-mbt.com
http://www.discount-

christianlouboutin.com

Velours Scrunch

Boots
Miss

Clichy 140 boots
Robot 120 ankle boots Black Suede/ Leather Lace Up Ankle boots Tina Suede

Black Platform Boots
Circus Cutout Suede Ankle Boots Deva 120 suede

fringed Boots
Sigourney Metallc Ankle Boots Miss Dark Brown Miss Suede Black Arielle A Talon ankle Boots

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:01, Blogger dgdgdf said...

Ariella

Clou Silver Studded Boots
Alta Arielle A Talon Python Short Boots Robot 120 ankle

boots Gold
babel

shoe boots Brown
Trottinette 140 ankle boots Brown Trottinette 140 ankle boots Mouse suede Forever Tina boots Purple fringed suede C'est Moi boots

Black
C'est Moi

boots Pink
Charme 100 suede ankle boots Leopard suede boots Christian

Louboutin Tuba Tall Boot
Fifre Suede Ankle Boot black lace ankle boots Black Lace-Up Boots

black fold-over

boots
black leather knee-high boots

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:01, Blogger dgdgdf said...

peep-toe bootie Christian Louboutin Astraqueen shoe boots

platform lace-up

bootie
Christian Louboutin Suede Black Ankle boots supra fifre

120 thigh-high boots
Christian Louboutin Alta Ariella Talon Leopard

Boots
Christian Louboutin OTK PlatformAfrica grey suede Boot Christian Louboutin Alta Ariella Talon Leopard Ankle Boots Christian Louboutin black leather ankle boots Christian Louboutin dark red leather ankle boots Manolo Blahnik Something Blue Satin Pump Manolo Blahnik Something Black Satin Pump

 
At 27 January, 2010 19:43, Blogger Billman said...

The plane hit the Pentagon.

No argument with you at all about that.

It's not "improbable" at all, you dunce.

I'm referring to those who say it had to have flown over the pentagon after it shot a missile because it "Flew north of the citgo."

If you're saying it flew north of the citgo and still crashed.. well, To Be Continued...

You must study harder. Why do you need a 'twoofer' to tell you that?

Study your mom.

Here's another quote:

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect."
— Mark Twain


Here's one of my favorites:

"If all the world's a stage, I want to be the one who operates the trap door..."
-Steve Martin

I especially suggest you reflect a bit longer on those words of sir Arthur Conan Doyle, you know, about truth and eliminating impossibilities. The essence seems to have escaped you.

Because I don't support troofer thinking? Ok... whatever you say...

 
At 27 January, 2010 19:48, Blogger Billman said...

So NOW the bag of Bilbones says nanothermite DOES exist.

When did I ever say Nanothermites did not exist, Arhoolie (aka Spacebar Boy). You and I have gone on for threads and threads now about how Nanothermites exist in Fireworks and primers for Ammunition.

It's NANOSTRUCTURED SUPER THERMITE specifically that DOES NOT EXIST. Nor do any nanostructured thermic materials currently in existance or proposed have the qualities that Jones requires for his theory.

You know all this. You're a retard if you think I'm gonna fall for your word changing.

Hmmm......And talk about a drawer full of socks!! There's no stopping the Debunker Cult! And thanks again,Bilbo,for informing us:"THAT"S NOT HOW AN INVESTIGATION WORKS!" Coming from the vanguard of the 9/11 Commission Report defenders,that's truly rich!

I have a private detective's license, so if you wanna argue with me how a real investigation actually works, feel free.

The firefighting magazine that howled loudly over how the Ground Zero materials were quickly removed without investigation would most assuredly agree.Right?

No. Fresh Kills landfill had plenty of the Ground Zero derbis (if not all of it) where it was investigated by FEMA, etc... so pull another lie out of your ass...

 
At 27 January, 2010 20:29, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

Yeah, wow. a mind boggling 146 pieces of steel were selected there.

 
At 27 January, 2010 20:43, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

By the way, 250 tons of WTC steel were allegedly "stolen by the mafia" from Ground Zero.

and:

"In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the deployment of the BPAT team, a significant amount of steel debris—including most of the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S. Some of the critical pieces of steel—including the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and the internal support columns—were gone before the first BPAT team member ever reached the site. Fortunately, an NSF-funded independent researcher, recognizing that valuable evidence was being destroyed, attempted to intervene with the City of New York to save the valuable artifacts, but the city was unwilling to suspend the recycling contract. Ultimately, the researcher appealed directly to the recycling plant, which agreed to provide the researcher, and ultimately the ASCE team and the SEAoNY volunteers, access to the remaining steel and a storage area where they could temporarily store important artifacts for additional analysis. Despite this agreement, however, many pieces of steel still managed to escape inspection."

U.S. Congress - 3/6/2002

 
At 27 January, 2010 22:12, Blogger Billman said...

Yeah, wow. a mind boggling 146 pieces of steel were selected there.

I'm glad you guys are starting to admit that steel was sent there. It certian cancels your arguments that no steel was ever inspected.

I wasn't aware of the Mafia story. That's pretty amusing. There is also a wharehouse full of steel that the government (or some private organization, I forget which) is giving away for free if you build a 9/11 memorial with it.

The point is, steel was availible for inspection (for explosives, thermite, unicorn death rays, etc...) and is STILL availible for inspeciton if you wish.

The only reason anyone talks about the steel here, Roid, is because troofers continue to chant "NO STEEL WAS EVER INSPECTED AND IT WAS ALL SHIPPED AWAY!"

You agree that's bullshit, though. Kudos.

 
At 28 January, 2010 13:30, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Roid Rage said...
Yeah, wow. a mind boggling 146 pieces of steel were selected there."

Speaking of pulling shit out of you ass......

 
At 28 January, 2010 16:10, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

And then poor,poor pitiful PornBoy said:blah blah woof woof.Hey PornBoy,that Ronald Weak sure is a piece of shit,eh?

 
At 28 January, 2010 16:37, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Arhoolie said...
And then poor,poor pitiful PornBoy said:blah blah woof woof.Hey PornBoy,that Ronald Weak sure is a piece of shit,eh?"

Isn't that cute?

assholio is talking to the voices in his head again!

Have you started taking the meds that your shink prescribed for you, nutbag?

Really, they'll help you with those 'voices'.

 
At 28 January, 2010 21:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Speaking of pulling shit out of you (sic) ass......"

My source is the FEMA report, you incompetent muppet. Do you read? No you don't. You think Al Qaeda sent the anthrax letters, you mentally disturbed kookloon heap of dung.

You've gone funny in the head. Seriously. You're desperately in need of help. I don't say this nonchalantly, or because I 'hate' you. There is nothing to hate. You've gone completely off your fucking rocker and you need therapy. Again, good luck.

:(

 
At 28 January, 2010 21:58, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

Let's be real fucking precise here. Emphasis and exclamation points mine.

Note: As of May 2002, of the 156 steel pieces listed in the spreadsheet, 41 are at the National Institute of Standards, 19 were discarded after
coupons were taken
, 45 are at the salvage yards, and the rest either were discarded after they were documented or were accidentally processed in the salvage operation before (!!!) or after being documented.

Yep. Appendix D of the FEMA report. 156 minus the above. Especially those "processed" "before being documented"

FEMA. Wanted for treason.

 
At 29 January, 2010 08:13, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

And then PornBoy the Weak said:blah blah woof woof.And then the typing dick,Bilbo,said:blah blah woof woof.The Debunker Cult:now they're saying the cleanup of the site was done "by the books"! Ah,there's no stopping this gang of circle jerking whackjobs.

 
At 29 January, 2010 10:23, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Note: As of May 2002, of the 156 steel pieces listed in the spreadsheet"

So what?

 
At 29 January, 2010 11:02, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"So what?"

Yeah. Facts. Truth. Who cares. Right Oedipus?

 
At 29 January, 2010 12:00, Anonymous Chet Ripley said...

"Yeah. Facts. Truth."

Yea...let us know when you got either of these concepts figured out.

 
At 29 January, 2010 14:00, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"Yea...let us know when you got either of these concepts figured out."

Oh. I see. So sourcing appendix D of the FEMA report won't do? Why don't you source me otherwise peanut brain? You know: Q-U-O-T-E S-O-U-R-C-E

Muppet. Go march off a cliff with the rest of the inbred redneck brigade.

 
At 30 January, 2010 12:55, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

PornBoy,dead in the water and still managing a torrent of spittle.How does the maniac do it?!?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home