Thursday, May 18, 2006

Avery: Flight 77 Passengers Are Dead

Dylan Avery was interviewed on Canadian TV last night. Obviously much of the focus was on the video released by the Defense Department, but later the host quizzes young master Avery:

Host: "There are 59 families who are missing loved ones. What do you suggest happened to them?"

Avery: I mean, hey man I can't sit here and lie and say that the family members, you know, either that the passengers were in on it or that their family members are government agents. I mean, I'm not saying that. I mean, these people who lost their loved ones, their loved ones are obviously dead. They're obviously gone. I mean, I'm not saying that they're on a payroll somewhere, I mean, I'm just trying to ask questions, I'm not trying to accuse anyone of trying to cover something up, well, I'm obviously accusing the government of covering something up, but I'm not trying to implicate the passengers because they're just as innocent as anybody else, man.

16 Comments:

At 18 May, 2006 17:34, Blogger Alex said...

You know...they call 'em fingers, but I've never seen them fing.

....oh, wait, there they go.....

 
At 18 May, 2006 19:35, Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 18 May, 2006 19:36, Blogger Unknown said...

Is there anybody out there that will take this challenge... someone who puts of comments like this making fun, thinking it funny.

Will you spend two hours of your own time, and emailing with me over the next week. Look at a few web sites, discussions, etc. and give me a change to let you see with your eyes and understand with your mind why the facts simply blow the official story out of the water?

Obviously I don't have a huge amount of time for this, but I am convinced anyone with average intelligence who looks at this with fresh eyes will be astounded by how much there is that blows away the official story from being possible.

 
At 18 May, 2006 19:40, Blogger Unknown said...

Here's a start on my suggested project.

STILL No Arabs On Flight 77

 
At 18 May, 2006 19:53, Blogger Unknown said...

Here's another url related to Flight 77:

Part Two of the Above

 
At 18 May, 2006 20:00, Blogger Unknown said...

3rd:

We are Not saying, that was was NO plane, Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon. We are saying, Where IS Flight 77, at the CRASH SITE?

 
At 18 May, 2006 20:11, Blogger Unknown said...

4th:

"The FBI was here within minutes and took the film."

Three Months On, Tension Lingers Near the Pentagon

Hortum rushed to the church school, filled with kids. "We're under attack, under attack," he whispered to Christine Yeannakis, the school director.

"I figured he was telling me the vestry was upset about something. We had no idea," Yeannakis recalled.

Then a supersonic boom from somewhere in the sky hushed the playground and Yeannakis hauled the kids into the basement.

Over the next few hours, parents

 
At 18 May, 2006 22:26, Blogger Unknown said...

Link #5

 
At 19 May, 2006 08:55, Blogger Unknown said...

undense,

We simply disagree on what constitutes "wreckage" from the plane crash:

Hunt the Boeing

 
At 19 May, 2006 10:42, Blogger Unknown said...

Another Link

 
At 19 May, 2006 10:48, Blogger Unknown said...

Undense,

The bunk of my beliefs about what really happened on 9/11 are contained in the book by Webster Tarpley called: 9/11 Synthtic Terror: Made in the USA.

For anyone who hasn't read it, I have no time for writing long posts explaining my viewpoints on details. Read the book, case closed (meaning that a real inquiry is needed to determine what really happened).

I take seriously your comments about me. I don't think they are warranted.

My goal here is not to be the "smarting guy in the room". My goal is to call out lies and untruths as I see them, and engage with those of you who seem to be worthwhile.

So far, you haven't impressed me.

 
At 19 May, 2006 11:59, Blogger Curt Cameron said...

bg wrote:
My goal here is not to be the "smarting guy in the room".

With the spanking you've been taking here, I think you are the "smarting" guy in the room. ;-)

 
At 19 May, 2006 14:49, Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 19 May, 2006 14:52, Blogger Unknown said...

Another Link

 
At 20 May, 2006 06:31, Blogger Unknown said...

Could it be that some stuff was Staged at the Pentagon?

 
At 20 May, 2006 09:20, Blogger Unknown said...

A Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon
- by George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.) - LINK - In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home