Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Pentagon Video at Hot Air

Okay, Allah's got the videotape up at Hot Air.

As our conspiracy theorists have chortled, there is not much to see in this tape. Here's a look just before the plane arrives (the silvery thing appears to be just a light glare):



Here's the shot of the nosecone peeking into the picture (see highlighted area):



Of course, had the picture shown the plane with American Airlines markings, the nutbars would have been claiming that it was a fake. Remember, every piece of evidence just confirms the conspiracy or the coverup to the true believer.

Update: Nutbar Alex Jones posted this "pre-emptive" strike on his website:

This is also a political boon for President Bush. The timing is precise and has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that the Moussaoui trial has ended. Bush's approval ratings are at 29% and his administration is being battered from pillar to post over the NSA spying scandal. What better time to replay the horror of 9/11 and attempt to reinforce fealty to the government's lauded efforts to keep us all safe from terrorists by taking our rights away?

The release of these images comes at a time when the 9/11 truth movement is at its most prominent. This is a targeted assault intended to quash questions about 9/11 and discredit the movement. TV news anchors are already uniform in their talking points in using the video images to attack 9/11 skeptics.

What remains clear is the fact that news networks are steadfast to ask questions about the real issues surrounding 9/11, such as the implosion of Building 7, the NORAD stand down and the fact that all the evidence points towards the hijackers being US government agents.

8 Comments:

At 16 May, 2006 12:50, Blogger nes718 said...

If anything, the second picture you have posted confirms what Avery said on Loose Change. This could be a small military plane.

 
At 16 May, 2006 12:51, Blogger RanDomino said...

Um, that's the same video we already had...

 
At 16 May, 2006 12:55, Blogger nes718 said...

No, the second video includes a green glare. The first one didn't.

 
At 16 May, 2006 13:12, Blogger truthcommission said...

Do you guys really think these video stills "debunk" the "conspiracy theories?" First of all, these are by no means 'new' pictures. The five frames showing the impact have been available on the internet for at least a year now. The only difference is the police car that passes the checkpoint in the beginning -- something obviously inconsequential. Here are some of my outstanding questions that still go unanswered:
1. Where is the Sheraton Hotel video footage? This footage should be able to provide a much clearer picture of the aircraft.
2. Where is the Virginia DOT traffic cam footage? This should be the most conclusive angle.
3. Why didn't the Pentagon missile defense system target Flight 77 once it entered it's airspace?
4. Why would the terrorists strike the west side of the building? The west side was recently renovated and reinforced to withstand such an attack and contained significantlly less people that any other part of the building. Assuming they would want to cause the greatest possible damage, why not target the east side where the top military brass was, including Secretary Rumsfeld? Also, according to the purported flight paths, why would Hanjour, an amateur pilot at best, go out of the way to hit the strongest, least-inhabited part of the building? Obviously this question cannot really be answered but it is nonetheless important to consider.
5. According to Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta's 9/11 Commission testimony, who was the young military officer who periodically came into the situation room to ask VP Cheney if the "orders still stood?" What were those orders and who gave them? Why does the Final Report neglect this?

Instead of going back-and-forth calling eachother 'moonbats' and 'ignorant right-wing coincidentalists', we should instead unite and seek answers. This is obviously something that affects us all, regardless of ideology.

 
At 16 May, 2006 13:20, Blogger nes718 said...

4. Why would the terrorists strike the west side of the building? The west side was recently renovated and reinforced to withstand such an attack and contained significantlly less people that any other part of the building.

Include with that a near impossible 330 degree turn @ 500 + MPH instead of hitting it head.

 
At 16 May, 2006 13:30, Blogger Realist06 said...

Ya that proves it guys!

This "new video" is another government hoax and you guys are eating it up.

Waste of our time.

 
At 16 May, 2006 13:46, Blogger truthcommission said...

Do you guys really think these video stills "debunk" the "conspiracy theories?" First of all, these are by no means 'new' pictures. The five frames showing the impact have been available on the internet for at least a year now. The only difference is the police car that passes the checkpoint in the beginning -- something obviously inconsequential. Here are some of my outstanding questions that still go unanswered:
1. Where is the Sheraton Hotel video footage? This footage should be able to provide a much clearer picture of the aircraft.
2. Where is the Virginia DOT traffic cam footage? This should be the most conclusive angle.
3. Why didn't the Pentagon missile defense system target Flight 77 once it entered it's airspace?
4. Why would the terrorists strike the west side of the building? The west side was recently renovated and reinforced to withstand such an attack and contained significantlly less people that any other part of the building. Assuming they would want to cause the greatest possible damage, why not target the east side where the top military brass was, including Secretary Rumsfeld? Also, according to the purported flight paths, why would Hanjour, an amateur pilot at best, go out of the way to hit the strongest, least-inhabited part of the building? Obviously this question cannot really be answered but it is nonetheless important to consider.
5. According to Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta's 9/11 Commission testimony, who was the young military officer who periodically came into the situation room to ask VP Cheney if the "orders still stood?" What were those orders and who gave them? Why does the Final Report neglect this?

Instead of going back-and-forth calling eachother 'moonbats' and 'ignorant right-wing coincidentalists', we should instead unite and seek answers. This is obviously something that affects us all, regardless of ideology.

 
At 16 May, 2006 23:53, Blogger RanDomino said...

The question remains: Why don't they just release all the footage and data from 9/11? There can't possibly be any information there that al-Qaeda can use.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home