Tuesday, September 12, 2006

The Loosers on CNN

CNN's Paula Zahn does a puff piece interview with the Loosers. Nothing too exciting, Korey Rowe now apparently considers himself an expert on the capabilities of Al Qaeda, based off of his experience in Afghanistan (by his own admission) sitting around on guard duty doing absolutely nothing. They do have an interesting little bit with 9/11 Commission member Bob Kerry though, who has a hell of a lot more medals than Rowe.

The most unintentionally ironic quote of the day was by Dylan Avery:

For them to have been caught completely off guard by September 11 we would have to believe that our government is... the Three Stooges.
















I will let the picture speak for itself.

35 Comments:

At 12 September, 2006 21:16, Blogger Dog Town said...

The Do over quote is Priceless!
As for the "has people thinking" quote that ends the piece!
F-ya it has me thinking, thinking a half to a third of this world is loopy! No surprise, think it's more really. They still sounded like "flat earth" kooks !!

 
At 12 September, 2006 21:38, Blogger shawn said...

"Freedom fighters."

-Korey Rowe on the Taliban

 
At 12 September, 2006 21:54, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

I know this is a little off the topic but during the debate with PM, Bermas says, "again dont believe us, go to see loose change.com and watch for free"

Uuuh did you just tell us not to believe you but then tell us to watch your video?

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:19, Blogger Dog Town said...

Uuuh did you just tell us not to believe you but then tell us to watch your video?

FLMAO! And then some!

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:20, Blogger Dog Town said...

MarkyX add that to "Deniers" Please!

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:28, Blogger nes718 said...

Forget about Loose Change!

Challenge to "Gravy" and SLC:

I think this is a movie Gravy should try and debunk if he really wants to be believed. We all know his "debunk" of Loose Change has the one fatal flaw that it relies on Osama actually being the culprit when we know there is not enough evidence even to post he had connections to it on the FBI website.

The second fatal flaw of the "viewers guide," SLC and all other resulting bullcrap is that they rely heavy on the conclusions put forth by the 911 commission. Well, this film makes a cut and dry case that the 911 commission was a total farce.

Add the fact that Osama isn't the 911 purp with the fact that the 911 commission is lies and what are we left with?

Go ahead guys, forget about Loose Change. This is the documentary to "debunk" from here on.

9/11: Press for Truth

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:31, Blogger nes718 said...

The most unintentionally ironic quote of the day was by Dylan Avery:

Oh yeah, those "stooges" are giving you guys so much grief, look at the lengths you go to "debunk" them, hahahaha..

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:59, Blogger Pat said...

I think Bob Kerrey is still the only man with a SEAL trident and a Medal of Honor.

 
At 12 September, 2006 23:04, Blogger shawn said...

one fatal flaw that it relies on Osama actually being the culprit

I wasn't aware relying on reality was a "fatal flaw".

Oh I forgot, in nessieworld black is white, left is right, and up is down.

 
At 12 September, 2006 23:08, Blogger nes718 said...

I wasn't aware relying on reality was a "fatal flaw".

See here about "reality." Basically the reality spun by the US government is what all of us has suspected all along. The actual patsy operation was funded through ISA (CIA front) and was allowed to take place. Loose Change covers the rest of the caper.

You really need to wake up now.

 
At 12 September, 2006 23:13, Blogger default.xbe said...

Well, this film makes a cut and dry case that the 911 commission was a total farce.

the only farce made clear by loose change is loose change itself, if you actually took the time to read gravys guide youd know the only thing dylco got right was the date

 
At 12 September, 2006 23:20, Blogger nes718 said...

if you actually took the time to read gravys guide

I got through about half of it and all he sources is Wikipedia, 911 commission, PM and his speculation, next..

But like I said, he solely relies on Osama being the culprit. That is the very first part of the guide and once you realize how he is sourcing Osama being the culprit, you can stop right there, the rest of it is garbage. The fact that Osama did the deed is not set in stone by anyone other than Bush and the compliant mainstream media.

If you want to really see a good retort of 911 you should see Hoffman’s accurate and fair critique of it.

 
At 12 September, 2006 23:22, Blogger nes718 said...

Typo:
ISA (CIA front)

That's ISI, Pakistani intel.

 
At 12 September, 2006 23:53, Blogger default.xbe said...

I got through about half of it and all he sources is Wikipedia, 911 commission, PM and his speculation, next..

well hes already got more sources than loose change

But like I said, he solely relies on Osama being the culprit. That is the very first part of the guide and once you realize how he is sourcing Osama being the culprit, you can stop right there, the rest of it is garbage. The fact that Osama did the deed is not set in stone by anyone other than Bush and the compliant mainstream media.

and the entire truth movement is based solely on the notion that the govt is the culprit, how is that any different?

how is it different from any debate? should a DA enter a courtroom to prosecute a case with the notion that the accused might not be guilty?

essentially all your saying here is "i dont agree with gravy, so he must be wrong"

 
At 13 September, 2006 00:51, Blogger nes718 said...

essentially all your saying here is "i dont agree with gravy, so he must be wrong"

No, Gravy IS wrong because we can safely take Osama out of the equation, no doubts about it. It is a verified fact that supposed hijacker Atta got 100,000 dollars from a Pakistani intel officer on orders from Pakistani intel chief. How does Osama fit in here? He doesn't. The "confession" video is a forgery and to this day there has been no money trail that conclusively leads to Osama.

The official story falls completely apart at this point and any of the "debunking" people too because now they are left with the notion that if Osama didn't do it, then who?

There was no possible way for terrorists to have compromised security at building 7 being a headquarter to many government agencies. This glaring clue leads us to point the finger at no other terrorist group other than the OSP, PNAC and Dov Zakheim.

 
At 13 September, 2006 04:40, Blogger CHF said...

Give it up, Nazinyc.

We saw on monday what kind of support you jokers have.

On the biggest protest day yet for da twoofers you managed to get a couple hundred people.

After all your polls showing massive support you failed to get 1/20th of the crowd the Cleveland Indians used to draw on a rainy Monday night in the 1980s.

You're finished. There will be no revolution, no investigation, no trials.

You will die frustrated, miserable and alone.

 
At 13 September, 2006 05:31, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Wait, I don't like CNN, remember?

They made me do fake stuff in Afganyland.

 
At 13 September, 2006 05:57, Blogger Chad said...

Is that Camp Freedom (aka Mommy's Basement) in the background?

And Nessie, I missed you on Monday. Grow a sack and make a trip down on Saturday, 'kay?

 
At 13 September, 2006 06:05, Blogger JoanBasil said...

Bob Kerrey! The man's a war criminal, remember?

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/25/magazine/25KERREY.html?ex=1158292800&en=1bea0d854af6f9ea&ei=5070

If you don't have a NY Times account:
"While witnesses and official records give varying accounts of exactly what happened, one thing is certain: around midnight on Feb. 25, 1969, Kerrey and his men killed at least 13 unarmed women and children."

Talk about undermining the credibility of the 9/11 Commission: Here's a fellow who always has it hanging over his head that a real investigation of his own past could have him prosecuted for murder!

 
At 13 September, 2006 07:03, Blogger CHF said...

chad,

Nazinyc says he's brown-skinned.

I saw one photo (posted on LGF) of some dorky looking brown guy with a "WTC = controlled demo" sign.

I think that may well be our Nazi Boy. Weird how the twoofers were almost all white teenagers or far-lefties.

BTW, I'll be in NYC on Saturday. When/where do the twoofers usually show up?

 
At 13 September, 2006 07:07, Blogger James B. said...

It is a verified fact that supposed hijacker Atta got 100,000 dollars from a Pakistani intel officer on orders from Pakistani intel chief.

One anonymous source in an Indian newspaper (the sworn enemies of the Pakistanis) is a "verified fact"? You have a funny definition of the word.

I can find more than one anonymous source connection Osama to 9/11, somehow I doubt you will call it a "verified fact"

 
At 13 September, 2006 07:32, Blogger Chad said...

CHF, my email info is on my blog. Shoot me an email and I'll give you the info on where we meet, etc....

 
At 13 September, 2006 07:49, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Man Bermas is STILL one freakish looking individual.

 
At 13 September, 2006 08:12, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Verfied crap...the ONLY source for the 100,000 pakistani connection is the "Times of india" even the WSJ article only quotes it for its accusations, no other source.

And we all know an India based paper wouldn't have any agenda against pakistan right...laughable.

 
At 13 September, 2006 10:41, Blogger Alex said...

You're finished. There will be no revolution, no investigation, no trials. You will die frustrated, miserable and alone.

Now there's a cheerful thought :) Thanks, you just made my day!

The man's a war criminal, remember?

Why do you persist in lying? How would you like it if I called YOU a war criminal? It'd be just as accurate.

Talk about undermining the credibility of the 9/11 Commission: Here's a fellow who always has it hanging over his head that a real investigation of his own past could have him prosecuted for murder!

No, it couldn't. For one thing the statue of limitations has expired. For another thing, the deaths occurred under combat conditions meaning charges are unlikely unless it's clear that they were the result of pre-meditated, cold-blooded murder. Which is far from being the case here. And finally, due to the nature of the mission a proper investigation would be impossible, meaning no case could be built even if there WERE some evidence to suggest that it really was murder. So, the short and the long of it is - you are wrong once again. Don't you ever get tired of it?

 
At 13 September, 2006 11:45, Blogger Dog Town said...

I saw one photo (posted on LGF) of some dorky looking brown guy with a "WTC = controlled demo" sign.

I thought the same thing. The dejcted look said it all!

 
At 13 September, 2006 12:51, Blogger Chad said...

Oops. CHF, I meant Blogger profile. You can get my email from there.

The nutters normally show up between noon and 1pm right in front of the PATH station at GZ. I think some of us are going early to see an exhibit they have set up at WTC7.

 
At 13 September, 2006 14:00, Blogger CHF said...

The dejcted look said it all!

Nessie's been a lot more quiet that usual these past few days.

Reality sinking in perhaps?

 
At 13 September, 2006 14:04, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Its hard to type while in a straight jacket!

 
At 13 September, 2006 15:45, Blogger zippychippy said...

James dear, you got it confused. That was Paula Zahn interviewing the kids at "special camp".

 
At 13 September, 2006 17:43, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like hey man I think that Paula chick was hot for me.

 
At 13 September, 2006 22:30, Blogger nes718 said...

Reality sinking in perhaps?

Haha.. I actually have a few things I'm getting done then babysitting here. But not to worry, I'll be back in full force in a few...

 
At 14 September, 2006 08:32, Blogger Alex said...

Reality sinking in perhaps?

Optimism is nice, but c'mon. This is Nazinyc you're talking about. Theres as much chance of him rejoining us in the real world as there is of the Maple Leafs winning the cup this year.

 
At 15 September, 2006 16:21, Blogger beervolcano said...

After all your polls showing massive support you failed to get 1/20th of the crowd the Cleveland Indians used to draw on a rainy Monday night in the 1980s.

Well, I think most people that answered those poll questions are like me. I don't buy the government story. I also don't buy 3/4 of the bs peddled by most conspiracy theorists. I think that it's obvious that there is some sort of cover-up surrounding 9/11 and it should be more deeply investigated by a real independent body. That's what those polls asked. Also, I think I'm like most other people in that I could never bring myself to walk around with a big sign screaming at the top of my lungs for any reason, no matter how strongly I feel about an issue. Protesting is stupid and accomplishes nothing of substance. So it's really a fallacy to judge support for a cause based on how many people are willing to make a fool of themselves for it.

 
At 15 September, 2006 20:08, Blogger shawn said...

I wonder what you folks thought of Churchill's "bodyguard of lies".

It only, y'know, saved the free world.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home