Tuesday, September 12, 2006

We Get Death Threats

From computer science PhD candidates who are stupid enough not to anonymize their emails:

I think youre a TERRORIST for no tinforming the people the right information, and educating them on whats right. You should be arrested and HUNG for treason. No worries though because in due time ALL secrets will be revealed. When that happens you will be the first to be decapitated, and be judged left to suffer the horrors of the coming of your god! Have a wonderful day. Thank you for your time, MAYA.


Hey, if I get hung or decapitated, this is the guy the police should be looking for:

44 Comments:

At 12 September, 2006 11:15, Blogger Dog Town said...

Can you send that to the FBI ?
What a maroon.

 
At 12 September, 2006 11:16, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

observed and noted. Back it up, and send yourself an email with the photo in it, explaining that if you are found dead, this is the first guy they should question. Title the email - FOR THE POLICE IN THE EVENT OF MY MURDER.

 
At 12 September, 2006 11:44, Blogger Chad said...

The photo already looks like a mugshot.

 
At 12 September, 2006 11:57, Blogger Good Lieutenant said...

Book 'em, Danno.

Cyber threats are as illegal as physical threats.

 
At 12 September, 2006 11:57, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

What a total putx.
Please for the love of god lets hope he has not breeded yet.

Nice pic it really does look like a mugshot!!

 
At 12 September, 2006 11:58, Blogger Manny said...

Decapitated, huh? Just like his terrorist masters do?

 
At 12 September, 2006 12:07, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Yet another Putz that Dylan will have to tell to, "relax".

 
At 12 September, 2006 12:20, Blogger Pepik said...

Does he have to remain anonymous?

 
At 12 September, 2006 12:39, Blogger JoanBasil said...

Creepy. I just had an experience getting threats from an Ebay seller when I complained that the merchandise was sub-par and it made me wary of packages for a while.

 
At 12 September, 2006 13:18, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

Anyone else notice the perp has one green eye and one brown?

Wierd.

Anyway... I'd also have your attorney or executor of your estate hang on to the info. He'll know what to do if anything happens.

 
At 12 September, 2006 13:38, Blogger AbrashTX said...

After giving a talk refuting a bunch of 9-11 claims this Sunday, I got harassed by some member of the local Denier group. He was like the reincarnation of Rasputin and freaking followed me around the room! I filed a complaint with the police.

JoanBasil, please note that we are not talking about creepy eBay sellers. We are talking about creepy members of your own little club who believe the same batshit things you do. If for some reason you ever break ranks with your little pals, they will turn on you.

 
At 12 September, 2006 13:51, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

I think they should hang this kook just for his misspellings.

As usual, a liberal without a brain.

 
At 12 September, 2006 13:53, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12 September, 2006 13:55, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

I heard Dylan wants to start a commune down in South America.....

 
At 12 September, 2006 14:00, Blogger CHF said...

He sounds and looks Russian.

 
At 12 September, 2006 14:04, Blogger AbrashTX said...

As usual, a liberal without a brain.

Excuse me!? This fool making death threats is no liberal. I am a liberal, and I have a brain, thank you very much.

 
At 12 September, 2006 14:19, Blogger michael said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12 September, 2006 14:20, Blogger Pat said...

Let me say that I have no evidence he's a liberal, and indeed, I have some reason to suspect he may be somewhat conservative, without getting further into it. Yes, I did notice the different color eyes; it's fairly uncommon but not unheard of.

 
At 12 September, 2006 14:20, Blogger michael said...

I think they should hang this kook just for his misspellings.

As usual, a liberal without a brain.



actually, virtually 100% of the time when I come across some poorly written semi-literate comment on someone's blog, rife with misspellings, it's written by a right-wing Bush cultist.

not all conservatives are stupid; however, it is true that stupid people are usually conservative.-John Stuart Mill

 
At 12 September, 2006 15:12, Blogger shawn said...

I think the fact he threatened you for the free flow of information is completely against liberalism.

 
At 12 September, 2006 15:13, Blogger shawn said...

John Stuart Mill

Although I'm a big fan about his quote on war, he was a socialist, so not himself the brightest bulb in the circuit.

 
At 12 September, 2006 15:40, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I would rather mispellings than flowers, frills, granola, and smilies...any day.

TAM

 
At 12 September, 2006 15:57, Blogger Robert said...

Heh, I've got a little Computer Science lingo to tell that guy, "PWNED!"

 
At 12 September, 2006 16:17, Blogger danny said...

Anyone else notice the perp has one green eye and one brown?

I suspect his brown eye is the favorite amongst his cohorts.

 
At 12 September, 2006 16:27, Blogger Alex said...

not all conservatives are stupid; however, it is true that stupid people are usually conservative.-John Stuart Mill

1 billion failed commies say otherwise :)

Stupidity know no political boundaries. I know plenty of morons whose idea of a deep thought is "like, we shud hang Bush y0!". On the other hand, Nazynic and his ilk definitely fall on the right hand side of the spectrum. In general, from my experience, liberals tend to be more "educated" while conservatives have more life experience. As far as intelligence goes, I don't know any truly intelligent people would classify themselves as (or fall into the category of) either conservative or liberal.

 
At 12 September, 2006 16:55, Blogger shawn said...

liberals tend to be more "educated"

Let's be honest, most "liberals" today are not liberal (for instance, classlical liberalism gives a thumbs up to free-markets, nowadays most "liberals" are for more socialism, at least at my age).

And Bush and the big-government Republicans aren't really conservatives, either.

 
At 12 September, 2006 17:05, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Jason Bermas is rather freakish looking.
I would advise never looking him directly in the eye.

 
At 12 September, 2006 20:18, Blogger Unknown said...

Things are hung, people are hanged:

"The well-hung man was hanged for murder"

 
At 12 September, 2006 20:47, Blogger blind avocado said...

Let's be honest, most "liberals" today are not liberal (for instance, classlical liberalism gives a thumbs up to free-markets, nowadays most "liberals" are for more socialism, at least at my age).

This is true. FDR and JFK were Liberals. Today’s Liberals are actually leftist or "progressive" and they all consider themselves highly educated. They are also the main believers of 911 CT. Almost nobody on the right believes in such nonsense. And contrary to popular belief, there are many very highly educated conservatives. They are the clear thinkers of today's society.

 
At 12 September, 2006 21:08, Blogger Richard said...

And contrary to popular belief, there are many very highly educated conservatives. They are the clear thinkers of today's society.

I would argue that the moderate Republicans and Democrats are the highly intelligent free thinkers. I really can't stand this left/right stuff. It's not like 99% of Dems in congress believe 9/11 was an inside job. The number of crazy far left Dems that ruin it for the rest of the Democratic party is about the same as the number of racist pricks within the Republican Party.

EVERONE'S s%!T stinks up on Capital Hill. Your best bet is to wade through the crap and find the moderate individual who agree's with what you think and back them up. The only reason that our government is so polarized right now is because in a way people want it. If we stopped flipping out about these hot button issues polititians would stop "marketing" that part of their platform and stick with the moderate stuff that actually matters. In a group of individuals concerned about tax reform or global warming your not going to find anyone that votes for someone because their platform is "Them gays are tryin to get married!"

 
At 12 September, 2006 21:41, Blogger shawn said...

"Them gays are tryin to get married!"

Hey, we let them get married here in Massachusetts.

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:14, Blogger blind avocado said...

I am much more concerned with having unelected judges redefining marriage then with the non-issue of global warming. That said, I agree that politicians are mostly worthless. Once you get outside of politics though you have quite a few clear thinkers on the right. For example you have Thomas Sowell. Who does the left have? Howard Zin? Please!

 
At 12 September, 2006 22:29, Blogger shawn said...

Yeah it is pretty sad that Howard Zinn's "history" of America is forced on loads of college students. Holocaust deniers almost have a better grasp of objective history than Zinn, and that's scary.

 
At 13 September, 2006 01:41, Blogger nes718 said...

This fool making death threats

I didn't see any death threats there only "the wrath of YOUR god and the people" type of line. That is simply wishful thinking..

A death threat looks like this..

"I will hunt you down and pump a few slugs through your brain"..

See the difference? This guy looks like some kind of bible thumper/patriot that seems to have taken the truther cause and you stepped on his toes. Nothing here, move on..

 
At 13 September, 2006 01:42, Blogger nes718 said...

Cyber threats are as illegal as physical threats.

Yep! There's federal laws on the book for physical threats and I believe the FBI cyber crimes unit take it up.

 
At 13 September, 2006 07:34, Blogger ELC said...

I think youre a TERRORIST for no tinforming the people. I think that guy just accidentally coined a new word: "tinforming". (I know, I know: he meant to type "not informing".)

Anyway, we could define "to tinform" as "to confuse, mislead, or deceive by tendentious selection and distortion of evidence" and "tinformation" as such evidence selected and distored. As in "Bush Derangement Syndrome is the root cause of a lot of the tinforming going on nowadays" and "Loose Change is a prime example of tinformation about 9/11".

We could connect "tinforming", etymologically, with the tinfoil-hat crowd. Indeed, another definition of "tinformation" could be "the process of becoming a member of the tinfoil-hat crowd".

 
At 13 September, 2006 10:48, Blogger Alex said...

You know, I thought pretty much the same thing when I first saw that word in his post, but then 5 seconds later thought "naw..." and moved on. Now, seing it put down in such a clear and concise manner, I think you may be on to something. I for one will deffinitely be using those words in the future :)

 
At 13 September, 2006 14:55, Blogger ELC said...

Thanks, Alex. I blogged about it today: No Tinformation, Please.

 
At 15 September, 2006 00:03, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

Congratulations on coining that excellent new word. It seems Debunking Conspiracies can become almost a cultural movement. At least I hope.

Question for my Free-Market loving friends here though. If Communism is simply a "failed ideology", why did the Western countries have to spend trillions of dollars combatting and undermining the Communist Bloc, even when opportunist elements were already reversing the ideology post-Stalin? Why did Western capitalist nations need to enact all sorts of socialist programs such as SS, legal trade unions, welfare, etc.? All that money and effort spent combatting and ideology that supposedly "just doesn't work"? And let's not forget the "free" service done by Adolf Hitler against the USSR.

The point is, that if you must struggle against something with such massive effort, only to see it finally collapse when traitors deliberatly dimantle it from within- clearly it is not primarily a matter of inherent flaws.

 
At 15 September, 2006 07:23, Blogger mbats said...

elc, I added "tinformation" to Urban Dictionary - I pretty much quoted your definition. I hope that's OK.

 
At 15 September, 2006 16:24, Blogger beervolcano said...

Wow, I'll bet you feel important now.

 
At 15 September, 2006 20:21, Blogger shawn said...

Why did Western capitalist nations need to enact all sorts of socialist programs such as SS, legal trade unions, welfare, etc.? All that money and effort spent combatting and ideology that supposedly "just doesn't work"?

Welfare and social security don't work. Might want to use better examples.

Our taxes don't increase enough for social security to last forever, especially because of our retirement age and how long we live now. Back when it was created it worked because people didn't live much longer than 65 (if they lived that long at all). I'll probably never get money out of social security.

Welfare doesn't work because it makes people dependant. It's quite possibly the most broken institution in the United States.

clearly it is not primarily a matter of inherent flaws.

Even when Stalin was around Communism didn't work. He had to go to the world market to get grain because they weren't making enough (and his fail planned caused famines).

Look at China, they're pretty much capitalist, just retaining the autocracy of Communism.

North Korea's probably the best example though. One of the most backward countries on the planet - but nearly completely in the mold of Communism.

 
At 17 September, 2006 15:59, Blogger Alex said...

If Communism is simply a "failed ideology", why did the Western countries have to spend trillions of dollars combatting and undermining the Communist Bloc, even when opportunist elements were already reversing the ideology post-Stalin?

Because it wasn't communism we were battling, but the militant spread of the USSR's idea of communism. The fear was always that too many nations would come under their control, at which point we might not be able to stand up to them either economically or militarily. See, for most people the failure of Communism was a given. The only unknown quantity was whether or not it would take the rest of us down first.

Why did Western capitalist nations need to enact all sorts of socialist programs such as SS, legal trade unions, welfare, etc.?

That's a red herring. They didn't NEED to do any of that. They did it because they were democratic nations, and people voted for the individuals who promised to do something for the people. That's the way it always works - the masses will generally be favorable to anyone who promises to "look after the workers". That's why communism was possible, and that's why it took so long to fall - because the common people genuinely believed that they'd be better off under a communist government, and once the government took control they could excuse ANY measure by saying it was being done "for the good of the workers". Look at Castro if you want an excellent example of that at work. The guy was quite popular when he took power because he promised to make things better for the poor. Once he got in power he declared that he didn't need elections any more because "the people had spoken". He became a tyrant, and destroyed Cuba. Yet there are STILL people (especially in the west) who will claim that he's doing good things for Cuba, and ensuring equality amongst it's people.

The point is, that if you must struggle against something with such massive effort, only to see it finally collapse when traitors deliberatly dimantle it from within- clearly it is not primarily a matter of inherent flaws.

Bullshit. Gangs are inherently flawed in that they invariably end up killing off their own members, and harming the societies in which they operate. Yet we must expend enormous amounts of money and effort in order to combat them.

Or think about the Cane Toad population in Australia. It's inherently flawed in that, since they don't have any predators, the cane toads will eventually over breed and destroy their own food supply, thereby wiping themselves out. But the Australian people don't really give a shit that it's a self correcting problem - they need to spend inordinate amounts of money combating it anyway because otherwise the toads will destroy the human food supply too.

Just because a system is flawed, and will eventually self destruct, doesn't mean we don't need to fight it. What's important is how much damage it will do to us BEFORE it self-destructs.

 
At 22 November, 2006 17:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know the ignorance inside your head will tell you that that is a death threat. The truth is that is actually just a statement true to to the vengence of God for such monstrosities as creating and spreading this act of "Another Pearl Harbor." At least I would hope any God of mine would do the same.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home