Different Inputs Same Output
As Pat just mentioned the new videos don't tell us much. Unfortunately security cameras are not made to capture jetliners cruising by at 500MPH. I guess for now we will have to rely on the testimony of hundreds of witnesses who saw a large commercial jetliner, its wreckage, body parts of the passengers etc. versus the one guy who says he saw a small passenger plane, and the exactly zero people who claim to have seen a cruise missile.
And regardless this is the perfect example of the way conspiracy theorist logic works. No matter what input you use, you reach the same conclusion.
Input: The Pentagon didn't release the crash video
Conclusion: This proves that they are hiding something and part of the coverup of the conspiracy.
Input: The Pentagon is going to release the crash video.
Conclusion: The video must be faked, therefore they are covering up the conspiracy.
Input: The video released by the Pentagon is inconclusive.
Conclusion: See, we told you that an airplane didn't hit the Pentagon, there must be a conspiracy!