Somebody Needs to Tell Zawahiri
That Al Qaeda did not pull off 9-11.
The deputy to Osama bin Laden wore a grey robe and white turban during the statement. A picture of the World Trade Centre on fire was on the wall behind him along with pictures of two fighters.
posted by Pat @ 9:44 AM
8 comments
8 Comments:
Like, Hey man, I mean, like I can only provide an alibi for one guy with a turban at at time, and I'm busy helping Osama get away with it.
Like, hey man, have you seen Loose Change 2? There's more than one way to get Screw Loose googled!
Don't you know, that wasn't Zawahiri.
It couldn't have been because there IS NO Zawahiri.
It was nothing more than an animatronic robot created by the government with the help of Disney. You know they want your fingerprints at Disneyworld now. All part of the Patriot Act.
And that picture he had in the background was obviously photoshopped.
[man, making up CT's is FUN. You should try it. Its almost cathartic to shut off your brain and type the dimbest garbage you can imagine... and its even funnier when your CT sounds more plausible than the Loosers]
It's actually Bushes Second cousin Marvin (all his relatives are either named Jeb or Marvin). They dress him up every time he gets drunk, in a turbin and sheets...
sorry, but I just had to...
But but but why would Islamic terrorists attack civilian targets in America - the same ones they tried to destryoy in 1993?
Didn't they see Loose Change? Islamists don't do stuff like that! Dylan Avery said so! Sheesh! Box cutters, man. The box cutters.
Thnk about that. Keep buying Bin-laden's "official story."
/9-11 denier off
Jujigatami...
Seriously, it is fun. If you can make it up, its as good as true. Like "Zawahiri's hairstyle is so 1996, nobody in Afghanistan has that hairstyle anymore". Now we're suppose to dig up back issues of GQ Kabul to debunk something someone made up out of thin air.
Its funny, I actually thought one up since I made that last post.
I'm thinking I'd actually love to post it somewhere to see if I could get Dylan or other CT's to believe it, then expose it as nothing more than the product of my warped mind.
Its a good one too.
Hmmm.
Pat, James, any idea how to do this?
Actually if I remember correctly, VC's pulled off suicide bomb attacks well before '81. They just didn't do it very often. And if you want to be technical, Japanese Kamikazi were probably the first known suicide bombers back in the mid 40's.
It is common sense that if you want to kill a man- the best and most morally correct way to do it is by using PEOPLE who are highly trained(e.g. Delta Force, Rangers,etc.) to do it. A person can see civilians and judge the difference between a wedding party and a terrorist meeting- bombs and pilots simply cannot.
Nonsense. "Bombs and pilots" don't make the decision to kill, they're directed from much higher. Whenever possible, airstrikes will be guided in by ground personnel anyway. The rest of the time, missions are based on earlier intelligence, and planned with surveilance photos using either satalites or aircraft. Sure, mistakes are still made, but they are extremely rare. The vast majority of "weddings" that are reported to have been bombed later turn out to be nothing more than enemy propaganda. It's easy for them to make the accusation, and the western media has shown time and again that they're more than happy to print their lies, and always hasitant to publish a retraction. For our enemies it's a win-win situation.
Post a Comment
<< Home