As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Friday, August 25, 2006
CNN Website to Air Full 9-11 Coverage As It Happened
We know the 911 deniers (the Osama belivers) will be there. But you should also mention the 911 movement for truth will be there in full effect as well!
Yup. It will be the day where the public learns of them, and learns to despise them for their juvenile, disprespectful behaviour. Once they see this, all else they have to say will be lost anyway...
I'm rather tempted to go, but with people like Nessie around I know I'll probably end up in jail with an assault charge to my name. Which I'd rather avoid.
On the other hand, NYC cops would probably be quite sympathetic to my situation, and might be willing to turn a blind eye....
Hey, Nessie, where exactly are you planning on being for 9/11?
I'll be at ground zero NOT asking questions but telling it like it is :)
But anyway, the cops will probably set up "free speech" zones were to keep us silent and in our place, let's hope not though ;)
If I were you I would have ended that last sentence with "let's hope so", for your own protection if nothing else. Considering you're planning to show up at a memorial commemorating 3,000 civilian deaths and you plan to act like the usual bunch of assholes at any political rally, you should be more worried about a gang of New Yorkers ripping you to shreds. Hell, if I thought I could get it across the border, I'd probably bring my own CS gas - just in case the cops run out :)
you should be more worried about a gang of New Yorkers ripping you to shreds. Hell, if I thought I could get it across the border, I'd probably bring my own CS gas - just in case the cops run out :)
Don't worry, all angles are covered. Two can play at provocateur-ing. Make sure you get extra close to the "action" wouldn't want you to miss any of it :D
The problem we have with a new investigation is it'd be an enormous waste of money.
Exactly! We've been there and done that. It didn't work the first time. Let's just convict and hang the bastards. That will be way cheaper and 1000x more effective.
As the Zionist monstrosities have stated "The rules have changed."
God, you're an idiot.
Deaths don't nullify other deaths. Hundreds of thousands of Japanese died in World War II, that doesn't change all the atrocities the Japanese committed or that they started the war.
Deaths don't nullify other deaths. Hundreds of thousands of Japanese died in World War II, that doesn't change all the atrocities the Japanese committed or that they started the war.
The minute the Zionist inspired war touched Iraq and the minute the Zionists bombed Lebanon to kingdom come, the 9/11 victims became irrelevant. Two wrongs don't make a right and the supposed criminals are still at large. How's that for justice? It is moronic and idiotic to think that the Zionist inspired wars will make right by the 9/11 victims when in fact, they make a mockery of them.
9/11 as a case for US victim-hood ceased to exist the minute the US/Zionazis embarked on their wars of conquest and destruction.
And it's moronic and idiotic to think the wars were Zionist inspired. Funny how that works.
The "war on terror" is based on "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," and this is a Zionist creation. Read it someday and you'll see how the events have unfolded according to Zionist design.
Why the fuck am I wasting my time with someone who sets his display picture to that despicable little anti-semitic rat. Non-sync, I've never truly wanted to kill anyone. In the performace of my duties I've been ready to kill those who are a threat to me, others, or my mission, but I've never wanted to kill them, and I despised the neccesity of it. You on the other hand? It'd be euthanasia.
As of right now it's 1,287 verified. There are still those who are mortally wounded and those burried underneath the rubble. Pretty much about 3k in total.
Why weren't American leaders during WWII brought up for war crimes?
All the Japanese civilian deaths were our fault, and were of a much higher percentage of the populace (because of your bias I know you don't know that a majority of the civilian deaths in Iraq are thanks to non-Coalition forces).
Why weren't American leaders during WWII brought up for war crimes?
Because they controlled the courts. Had the winners of the War been the Axis powers, you’d be seeing US GI’s getting tried. Just in Dresden more than 200,000 people were incinerated. That was a seer terrorist attack.
Why the fuck am I wasting my time with someone who sets his display picture to that despicable little anti-semitic rat. Non-sync, I've never truly wanted to kill anyone. In the performace of my duties I've been ready to kill those who are a threat to me, others, or my mission, but I've never wanted to kill them, and I despised the neccesity of it. You on the other hand? It'd be euthanasia.
By August 1945, 58 Japanese cities had been firebombed and the bomber commander, General Curtis LeMay, had to curtail his raids because he had run out of incendiary bombs. After the war, Le May remarked “I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal.” Instead he was promoted, eventually heading the Strategic Air Command, where he advocated a pre-emptive nuclear “first strike” against the Soviets. During the Vietnam War, Le May notoriously called to “bomb them [the North Vietnamese] back into the Stone Age.
In "Israel's" Lebanon case, they didn't go after the militants; they specifically went after the civilians like the terrorists that they are!
Yeah, and the holocaust never happened, and there is no Al Qaeda.
Seriously, do you REALLY think anyone beleives a single sylable that comes out of your cock-holster? I'm just surprised that people still bother to parse your verbal diherrea before dismissing it, instead of just ignoring the entire diatribe. Why don't you quit wasting our oxygen and go suicide-bomb a Starbucks or something. Put your money where your mouth is for a change.
Seriously, do you REALLY think anyone beleives a single sylable that comes out of your cock-holster? I'm just surprised that people still bother to parse your verbal diherrea before dismissing it, instead of just ignoring the entire diatribe. Why don't you quit wasting our oxygen and go suicide-bomb a Starbucks or something. Put your money where your mouth is for a change.
Hey, that's something YOU would do to make me look bad (the starbucks bomb). Anyway, I'll be giving it to you and anyone else that wants to believe in official fables. You need to be exposed and desensitized to other explanations of history for your own good. If head enough, eventually everything will click at the right time. You can thank me later.
Well ofcourse he does, only anti-semites know the REAL trouth. Everyone else has been brainwashed by the illuminati. So, like, it makes sense to seek out the advice of anti-semites on everything from the proper way to tie your shoes (everyone knows that when you trip on a shoelace, it's because a jew made it come undone) to the right way to build an oven (I won't go into details with that one...).
How many were killed? The figure of 225,000 was widely circulated; Crossman estimates upwards of 150,000. Fascist “historians” like David Irving have long pointed to the Dresden massacre in order to relativize the Nazi Holocaust of the Jewish people and to absolve the Nazi regime of its horrendous crimes. Yet the Dresden massacre was one of the most horrific war crimes in history, and one carried out by the “democratic” imperialists. For his services rendered to the British Empire, “Bomber” Harris later received a Knights Grand Cross from the Queen (as well as a Legion of Merit from the U.S.).
“The fire storm transformed thousands of individual blazes into a sea of flames, ripping off the roofs, tossing trees, cars and lorries into the air, and simultaneously sucking the oxygen out of the air-raid shelters.
”Most of those who remained below ground were to die painlessly, their bodies first brilliantly tinted bright orange and blue, and then, as the heat grew intense, either totally incinerated or melted into a thick liquid sometimes three or four feet deep.”
–R.H.S. Crossman, “Apocalypse at Dresden,” Esquire, November 1963
In February of 1945, with the Russian army threatening the heart of Saxony, I was called upon to attack Dresden; this was considered a target of the first importance for the offensive on the Eastern front. Dresden had by this time become the main centre of communications for the defence of Germany on the southern half of the Eastern front and it was considered that a heavy air attack would disorganise these communications and also make Dresden useless as a controlling centre for the defence. It was also by far the largest city in Germany - the pre-war population was 630,000 - which had been left intact; it had never before been bombed. As a large centre of war industry it was also of the highest importance.
Whether your puny mind is capable of grasping the difference or not, Dresden was a military objective, being attacked at a time when precision bombing was non-existant. Using todays standards to judge a battle which occured more than 60 years ago is pretty damn retarded, even for you. While such an attack would be inexcusable in the modern world, during WW2 it was status-quo. Calling Harris a war criminal is no more accurate than saying that all men in the 14th century were pedophiles because they mostly married girls who were 16 or younger. You can't judge previous societies by current standards.
Yet the Dresden massacre was one of the most horrific war crimes in history, and one carried out by the “democratic” imperialists.
Horrific war crimes? Again, nesnyc, the number is 25,000-35,000 dead. The bombing of Tokyo was worse. The atomic destructions Hiroshima and Nagasaki were worse.
By the way, it might be a good idea not to trust sites which call democracies "democratic" (like that is soooo not a democracy) or calls anti-imperialist forces imperialist.
How did it confuse me? The imperialist forces were the Nazis and the...wait for it...Imperial Japanese forces. By fighting against imperial forces you are "anti-imperial".
By fighting against imperial forces you are "anti-imperial".
We all know the British were the real Imperialists here and the US was their agent. Who set up bases in those two countries and rules them to this very day? This truth is self-evident.
We all know the British were the real Imperialists here and the US was their agent. Who set up bases in those two countries and rules them to this very day? This truth is self-evident.
Totalitarian Communism was/is part of the Zionist inspired system of Government as is US/Neoconism. Different heads of the same coin.
Incorrect. Communism and Nazism were different heads of the same coin. (No totalitarianism here, idiot.) Then again, you're under the idiotic impression that the Jews are responsible for the NSDAP.
But there are legitimately socialist organizations that abhor totalitarianism in any form.
They say they abhor it, yet feel bad about the collapse of the Soviet Union.
We all know the British were the real Imperialists here and the US was their agent. Who set up bases in those two countries and rules them to this very day? This truth is self-evident.
54 Comments:
Let the quote mining begin! :p
We know the 911 deniers (the Osama belivers) will be there. But you should also mention the 911 movement for truth will be there in full effect as well!
We know the 911 deniers (the Osama belivers) will be there.
Uh the 9/11 deniers are you folks, Mahmoud.
nesnyc-
you are my density.
Yup. It will be the day where the public learns of them, and learns to despise them for their juvenile, disprespectful behaviour. Once they see this, all else they have to say will be lost anyway...
Uh the 9/11 deniers are you folks, Mahmoud.
Bwa, ha ha ha ..
I'm rather tempted to go, but with people like Nessie around I know I'll probably end up in jail with an assault charge to my name. Which I'd rather avoid.
On the other hand, NYC cops would probably be quite sympathetic to my situation, and might be willing to turn a blind eye....
Hey, Nessie, where exactly are you planning on being for 9/11?
Nessie will likely be dancing the TANGO with the guy you see as his avatar...:)
On the other hand, NYC cops would probably be quite sympathetic to my situation, and might be willing to turn a blind eye....
Hey, Nessie, where exactly are you planning on being for 9/11?
I'll be at ground zero NOT asking questions but telling it like it is :)
But anyway, the cops will probably set up "free speech" zones were to keep us silent and in our place, let's hope not though ;)
I'll be at ground zero NOT asking questions but telling it like it is :)
But anyway, the cops will probably set up "free speech" zones were to keep us silent and in our place, let's hope not though ;)
If I were you I would have ended that last sentence with "let's hope so", for your own protection if nothing else. Considering you're planning to show up at a memorial commemorating 3,000 civilian deaths and you plan to act like the usual bunch of assholes at any political rally, you should be more worried about a gang of New Yorkers ripping you to shreds. Hell, if I thought I could get it across the border, I'd probably bring my own CS gas - just in case the cops run out :)
the cops will probably set up "free speech" zones were to keep us silent and in our place, let's hope not though ;)
Like alex said, you better hope they have protective zones for you clowns.
you should be more worried about a gang of New Yorkers ripping you to shreds. Hell, if I thought I could get it across the border, I'd probably bring my own CS gas - just in case the cops run out :)
Don't worry, all angles are covered. Two can play at provocateur-ing. Make sure you get extra close to the "action" wouldn't want you to miss any of it :D
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Considering you're planning to show up at a memorial commemorating 3,000 civilian deaths
The resulting "wars" in the Middle East have nullified these "losses." They are currently meaningless. You reap what you sow.
The resulting "wars" in the Middle East have nullified these "losses." They are currently meaningless. You reap what you sow.
Not how it works.
I mean hey whats a new investigation if everyone is so innocent
The problem we have with a new investigation is it'd be an enormous waste of money.
Hail furor!
Hey kid, it's heil Fuhrer.
Not how it works.
As the Zionist monstrosities have stated "The rules have changed."
The problem we have with a new investigation is it'd be an enormous waste of money.
Exactly! We've been there and done that. It didn't work the first time. Let's just convict and hang the bastards. That will be way cheaper and 1000x more effective.
Let's just convict and hang the bastards. That will be way cheaper and 1000x more effective.
That's disturbingly suitable coming from someone who thinks the holocaust never happened....
As the Zionist monstrosities have stated "The rules have changed."
God, you're an idiot.
Deaths don't nullify other deaths. Hundreds of thousands of Japanese died in World War II, that doesn't change all the atrocities the Japanese committed or that they started the war.
It's called intent, moron.
Deaths don't nullify other deaths. Hundreds of thousands of Japanese died in World War II, that doesn't change all the atrocities the Japanese committed or that they started the war.
The minute the Zionist inspired war touched Iraq and the minute the Zionists bombed Lebanon to kingdom come, the 9/11 victims became irrelevant. Two wrongs don't make a right and the supposed criminals are still at large. How's that for justice? It is moronic and idiotic to think that the Zionist inspired wars will make right by the 9/11 victims when in fact, they make a mockery of them.
9/11 as a case for US victim-hood ceased to exist the minute the US/Zionazis embarked on their wars of conquest and destruction.
That's disturbingly suitable coming from someone who thinks the holocaust never happened....
Hey, they didn't waste anytime in Nuremburg, why should we? Take dumbya to the Haig and hang his and Olmert’s ass for war crimes against humanity.
It is moronic and idiotic to think that the Zionist inspired wars will make right by the 9/11 victims when in fact, they make a mockery of them.
And it's moronic and idiotic to think the wars were Zionist inspired. Funny how that works.
Zionazis
hahahahhahahah further proof you're as dumb as a brick.
Take dumbya to the Haig and hang his and Olmert’s ass for war crimes against humanity
Neither committed war crimes. It isn't the "Haig" by the way. I hope by the time you graduate high school you learn to spell.
And it's moronic and idiotic to think the wars were Zionist inspired. Funny how that works.
The "war on terror" is based on "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," and this is a Zionist creation. Read it someday and you'll see how the events have unfolded according to Zionist design.
Why the fuck am I wasting my time with someone who sets his display picture to that despicable little anti-semitic rat. Non-sync, I've never truly wanted to kill anyone. In the performace of my duties I've been ready to kill those who are a threat to me, others, or my mission, but I've never wanted to kill them, and I despised the neccesity of it. You on the other hand? It'd be euthanasia.
Neither committed war crimes. It isn't the "Haig" by the way. I hope by the time you graduate high school you learn to spell.
Bush = 40K Iraqi civilians
Olmert = 3k Lebanese civilians
Any questions?
Casualties in Iraq
Olmert = 3k Lebanese civilians
Err it's less than a thousand.
Err it's less than a thousand.
As of right now it's 1,287 verified. There are still those who are mortally wounded and those burried underneath the rubble. Pretty much about 3k in total.
Olmert/Israel is responsible of WAR CRIMES!
I'm talking about civilians, jackass. The numbers they're sending out now include civilians and "militants".
Somehow you just up 2k from people still buried (unlikely) and "mortally wounded".
My goodness! Civilians dying in a war? Why that's never happened in human history!
Why weren't American leaders during WWII brought up for war crimes?
All the Japanese civilian deaths were our fault, and were of a much higher percentage of the populace (because of your bias I know you don't know that a majority of the civilian deaths in Iraq are thanks to non-Coalition forces).
Why weren't American leaders during WWII brought up for war crimes?
Because they controlled the courts. Had the winners of the War been the Axis powers, you’d be seeing US GI’s getting tried. Just in Dresden more than 200,000 people were incinerated. That was a seer terrorist attack.
My goodness! Civilians dying in a war? Why that's never happened in human history!
In "Israel's" Lebanon case, they didn't go after the militants; they specifically went after the civilians like the terrorists that they are!
Why the fuck am I wasting my time with someone who sets his display picture to that despicable little anti-semitic rat. Non-sync, I've never truly wanted to kill anyone. In the performace of my duties I've been ready to kill those who are a threat to me, others, or my mission, but I've never wanted to kill them, and I despised the neccesity of it. You on the other hand? It'd be euthanasia.
Easy slugger. You're liable to get a stroke. :)
A war criminal speaks:
By August 1945, 58 Japanese cities had been firebombed and the bomber commander, General Curtis LeMay, had to curtail his raids because he had run out of incendiary bombs. After the war, Le May remarked “I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal.” Instead he was promoted, eventually heading the Strategic Air Command, where he advocated a pre-emptive nuclear “first strike” against the Soviets. During the Vietnam War, Le May notoriously called to “bomb them [the North Vietnamese] back into the Stone Age.
In "Israel's" Lebanon case, they didn't go after the militants; they specifically went after the civilians like the terrorists that they are!
Yeah, and the holocaust never happened, and there is no Al Qaeda.
Seriously, do you REALLY think anyone beleives a single sylable that comes out of your cock-holster? I'm just surprised that people still bother to parse your verbal diherrea before dismissing it, instead of just ignoring the entire diatribe. Why don't you quit wasting our oxygen and go suicide-bomb a Starbucks or something. Put your money where your mouth is for a change.
Just in Dresden more than 200,000 people were incinerated.
35,000 try again.
Weird, he says the Holocaust numbers are a myth, but then uses disproved figures to support America being evil.
It's almost like he lets his bias get in the way of facts.
I love the scare quotes around Israel to.
NEsnyc: "Israel is, like, soooo not a country, man."
Seriously, do you REALLY think anyone beleives a single sylable that comes out of your cock-holster? I'm just surprised that people still bother to parse your verbal diherrea before dismissing it, instead of just ignoring the entire diatribe. Why don't you quit wasting our oxygen and go suicide-bomb a Starbucks or something. Put your money where your mouth is for a change.
Hey, that's something YOU would do to make me look bad (the starbucks bomb). Anyway, I'll be giving it to you and anyone else that wants to believe in official fables. You need to be exposed and desensitized to other explanations of history for your own good. If head enough, eventually everything will click at the right time. You can thank me later.
It's almost like he lets his bias get in the way of facts.
That's exactly what I'm accusing the government and media of. Too bad you fall in that trap and are not sharp enough to get out.
Typo:
"If head enough" should be "heard"
:)
Well ofcourse he does, only anti-semites know the REAL trouth. Everyone else has been brainwashed by the illuminati. So, like, it makes sense to seek out the advice of anti-semites on everything from the proper way to tie your shoes (everyone knows that when you trip on a shoelace, it's because a jew made it come undone) to the right way to build an oven (I won't go into details with that one...).
35,000 try again.
More "allied" propaganda...
How many were killed? The figure of 225,000 was widely circulated; Crossman estimates upwards of 150,000. Fascist “historians” like David Irving have long pointed to the Dresden massacre in order to relativize the Nazi Holocaust of the Jewish people and to absolve the Nazi regime of its horrendous crimes. Yet the Dresden massacre was one of the most horrific war crimes in history, and one carried out by the “democratic” imperialists. For his services rendered to the British Empire, “Bomber” Harris later received a Knights Grand Cross from the Queen (as well as a Legion of Merit from the U.S.).
Allied attrocities.
“The fire storm transformed thousands of individual blazes into a sea of flames, ripping off the roofs, tossing trees, cars and lorries into the air, and simultaneously sucking the oxygen out of the air-raid shelters.
”Most of those who remained below ground were to die painlessly, their bodies first brilliantly tinted bright orange and blue, and then, as the heat grew intense, either totally incinerated or melted into a thick liquid sometimes three or four feet deep.”
–R.H.S. Crossman, “Apocalypse at Dresden,” Esquire, November 1963
In Harris' own words:
In February of 1945, with the Russian army threatening the heart of Saxony, I was called upon to attack Dresden; this was considered a target of the first importance for the offensive on the Eastern front. Dresden had by this time become the main centre of communications for the defence of Germany on the southern half of the Eastern front and it was considered that a heavy air attack would disorganise these communications and also make Dresden useless as a controlling centre for the defence. It was also by far the largest city in Germany - the pre-war population was 630,000 - which had been left intact; it had never before been bombed. As a large centre of war industry it was also of the highest importance.
Whether your puny mind is capable of grasping the difference or not, Dresden was a military objective, being attacked at a time when precision bombing was non-existant. Using todays standards to judge a battle which occured more than 60 years ago is pretty damn retarded, even for you. While such an attack would be inexcusable in the modern world, during WW2 it was status-quo. Calling Harris a war criminal is no more accurate than saying that all men in the 14th century were pedophiles because they mostly married girls who were 16 or younger. You can't judge previous societies by current standards.
Yet the Dresden massacre was one of the most horrific war crimes in history, and one carried out by the “democratic” imperialists.
Horrific war crimes? Again, nesnyc, the number is 25,000-35,000 dead. The bombing of Tokyo was worse. The atomic destructions Hiroshima and Nagasaki were worse.
By the way, it might be a good idea not to trust sites which call democracies "democratic" (like that is soooo not a democracy) or calls anti-imperialist forces imperialist.
calls anti-imperialist forces imperialist.
I figured that would confuse you.
Again, nesnyc, the number is 25,000-35,000 dead.
Again, that's allied propaganda. Get over it.
I figured that would confuse you.
How did it confuse me? The imperialist forces were the Nazis and the...wait for it...Imperial Japanese forces. By fighting against imperial forces you are "anti-imperial".
Seems you are the one who's confused.
Again, that's allied propaganda. Get over it.
It isn't propaganda. Get over it.
C'mon, nesnyc, you quoted a Marxist website. Talk about people who believe in fairy tales.
Oh didn't you know? Marxism is a Zionist conspiracy, too. Maybe you haven't read those IHR publications enough.
By fighting against imperial forces you are "anti-imperial".
We all know the British were the real Imperialists here and the US was their agent. Who set up bases in those two countries and rules them to this very day? This truth is self-evident.
Marxism is a Zionist conspiracy, too. Maybe you haven't read those IHR publications enough.
Totalitarian Communism was/is part of the Zionist inspired system of Government as is US/Neoconism. Different heads of the same coin.
But there are legitimately socialist organizations that abhor totalitarianism in any form.
We all know the British were the real Imperialists here and the US was their agent. Who set up bases in those two countries and rules them to this very day? This truth is self-evident.
hahaahahahahahahahahahahaaahahahahaahahaaahahahahha
Totalitarian Communism was/is part of the Zionist inspired system of Government as is US/Neoconism. Different heads of the same coin.
Incorrect. Communism and Nazism were different heads of the same coin. (No totalitarianism here, idiot.) Then again, you're under the idiotic impression that the Jews are responsible for the NSDAP.
But there are legitimately socialist organizations that abhor totalitarianism in any form.
They say they abhor it, yet feel bad about the collapse of the Soviet Union.
We all know the British were the real Imperialists here and the US was their agent. Who set up bases in those two countries and rules them to this very day? This truth is self-evident.
hahaahahahahahahahahahahaaahahahahaahahaaahahahahha
He really is priceless isn't he? It's like watching a monkey try to figure out an electric can opener.
Post a Comment
<< Home