Should We Apologize to Lauro Chavez?
I mean, man, I'm just thinkin' that maybe this dude is tellin' the truth, man, because he sounds so authentic military, man:
And I worked right for General Franks, I don’t know if you’re familiar with who Tommy Franks was? He was - I was the only individual allowed to work on his personal communications at his home and in his plane and I’d ask, General Franks, a few times, ya know, when I was over his house, and um, like, ya know: "Sir, what a ya think about all this"? And he’s well, he’s like, ya know, "Just" ... He’s like, ya know, "There are some things that need... that just happen and they need to happen and we don’t know why they happen but..." He gave this really, like, ominous answer and I’m like, Whoa man! Ya know, I wasn’t expecting that.
Totally, dude!
posted by Pat @ 11:52 PM
11 comments
11 Comments:
This guy is so full of it. I can't make it any more simple. He seems like some dirtbag tech guy who has beef with the government. Every unit has that one guy....
HE ACTUALLY SAID THAT?!?!
Ok... I'm calling this one. Lauro is obviously a sane person having one over on the troofers.
We need to invite him over here for the heros welcome he deserves.
Or... (covering my ass just a little) he might be just an exceptionally mentally deficient attemntion whore.
Uhh Joan, is there anyone in the "truth" movement we are allowed to talk about? If we talk about Dylan Avery, you say we are just focusing on him, Steven Jones, ditto, Lauro Chavez, yup him too. Apparently there is some mythical truther out there who really has the answers.
You damage your credibility doing a lot of posts on one person that you think is a fraud, even farcically a fraud.
Well, here's the thing. Literally every single claim of the 9-11 denier movement, without exception, has already thoroughly been debunked. There's only so many times one can mock the "speed of gravity" lie.
The reason Sgt. Chavez is getting it is because he's new, and because he's getting a lot of attention in denier land. Jones, etc. are dragging this guy out and saying, "Aha! Here's an insider to support our previously debunked claims." Except that he's clearly not, any more than Morgan Reynolds was, or Jesse McGrath was for the anti-war movement.
Don't worry. Next week the deniers will come across another mentally ill lying sack of dog doo, and he or she will be exposed in turn.
LOL I posted a debunking over at 911 Blogger (sorry, I just couldn't watch this train wreck anymore) and now they have referred to me as a "true truther" and "anonymous god like person" and are accusing Alex Jones of being a government shill.
These guys are too much.
Why were the Bukharis targeted as suspects in 9/11? One of them was already dead on 9/11 and the other is still alive but they were fingered as having rented one of those cars in Boston and there were news reports that they were on the passenger lists.
This is exactly why we're "doing a lot of posts on one person we think is a fraud". Because we have nothing else to work with any more! Idiots like you keep asking the same question over and over again (see above) no matter how many times we answer it. At least if you were half-way sane and intelligent enough to come up with new material, we might have something to work with.
Chavez is not interesting. The Truthers willingness to believe and defend him is interesting.
How are we to know who are the real conspiracy theorists and who are the clowns? You debunk one, and the other says "you should be debunking me" and vice versa.
And by the way, are you the "i can dream up obscure questions about anomolies in random things about 9.11, and therefore it was a conspiracy" movement or the "i can prove it was a conspiracy" movement?
Joan;
since when are you worried about what we waste our time on. In a sense, as a "truther" it should please you to know end that all of us are spending so much time on him...it means we aren't busy debunking the other crap the Troofers are spueing.
No, I think you are concerned, because like alot of your truthmates, you think this guy is the "Biggie" the living smoking gun, and if we prove him a fraud, it is a big hit.
Look at all the time and effort all the other Troofers have spent on him
Alex Jones has interviewed him 2 times in 2 days for god sake.
TAM
James, you god-like, true truther.
Teehee!
None of this matters. Lauro Chavez is just another distractor the 9/11 Deniers can puke up whenever they're losing a debate.
Since the Deniers can't tackle any topic directly, they've developed a large rotation of items they can change the subject to. The idea is to compile enough items that no one will notice that previously answered questions are being re-raised as new.
Joanie Basil has been kind enough to provide an example of this tactic in this very thread. Here we are discussing Lauro Chavez, a current event in the 9/11 conspiracy world, and all of a sudden she demands answers regarding the tremendously important issue of the Bukharis. Who?
Of course, if this thread were originally about the Bukharis, she'd be insisting that they're not important, and demanding we explain away William Rodriguez. And if it were about Rodriguez... well, you get the idea.
The only question -- and I think it's an interesting one -- is how long do the Deniers have to wait before Lauro Chavez becomes yet another unanswered question of 9/11? How long before they can say, "what about Lauro Chavez" and send debunkers scurrying? How long before the Internet collectively forgets that Chavez's alleged military record was full of discrepancies, forcing the point to be conceded or researched anew?
I give it three months. I bet by the end of the year, Lauro Chavez will have turned up in some "46,279 unanswered questions about 9/11" document.
Post a Comment
<< Home