Monday, October 23, 2006

911,453 Page Views at 9:11 AM

Obviously proving this blog is somehow connected to the events of 9/11. Unfortunately I am not sure what the 453 stands for. Maybe Killtown can help?

To top it off, I got passed by a Porsche 911 driving home last night. Weird....

12 Comments:

At 23 October, 2006 09:46, Blogger remdem said...

Let's see:

4 plus 5 equals 9
3 is the number of planes that hit buildings on 9/11

Add 4+5+3 and you get 12, subtract one for the error of the phase relative to the daylight saving time and you get 11

Then, add the 9 from the first result to the second result and you get 20, divide that by 10 and add 1 (10+1 = 11) and you get 11 again!

4 times 5 times 3 makes 60, divide by 20, divide by 10 and add 1 and you get 11, again!

Also! 3 times 5 is 15, subtract 4 and you get 11, again!!

YOU SEE, IT'S ALL CONNECTED!

That was fun. We should do this again sometime.

 
At 23 October, 2006 09:51, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Weird but I was going to type the exact same thing.

 
At 23 October, 2006 10:02, Blogger tym said...

There were 246 people on the "planes" that "hit" the "buildings" - 19 of em were "hijackers."

246-19 = 227

227 * 2 = 454

Which is what the number of page views was one hit after this tally was taken.

Kudos on the clever but futile chance to throw us off the truth by not waiting 30 seconds.

 
At 23 October, 2006 11:19, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

"911,453 Page Views at 9:11 AM"

Which in turn has caused James to spend numerous hours posting stuff on his blog and to be recognized in a total of 3 publications! Its the classic "Look at me conspiracy!"

 
At 23 October, 2006 12:37, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

If you take todays date 10232006 and you minus 911 you get 10,231,095.

 
At 23 October, 2006 14:09, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

What I really get a kick out of, are the CTers who think that people like James and Pat do this to some how gain fame.

ummm....this pathetic excuse you guys call the 9/11 "truth" movement is pretty insignificant in terms of fame...for most adults that is.

Ya, I guess if you are a "going nowhere" twenty-something, being the king cheese of a small internet movement that can gather 800 people at GZ on the 5th Anni of 9/11, is a big deal. James and Pat are grown ups. They have real lives, real responsibilities.

They do this so that the dweebs with nothing better to do but lie, speculate, and spue baseless garbage, are held accountable, and shown to be the lying morons they are. It has nothing to do with getting "published" or on TV, for fame purposes, but if doing so gets the REAL TRUTH out there to the fence sitters, than I say get as much publicity as possible.

TAM

 
At 23 October, 2006 14:28, Blogger James B. said...

I do it for the women, you wouldn't believe all the debunker groupies....

 
At 23 October, 2006 16:39, Blogger Bubbers said...

That's one of the huge problems with the Ctists Tam. They use the argument that because LC gets more publicity than the sites that disprove everything in it, that they must be right and we must be wrong. Once again they have no real evidence to back up anything they say, so they use anything they can to make themselves feel like they're right. I guess that desperate people really will resort to anything.

 
At 23 October, 2006 17:28, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I think it has to do with where most of them are in the real world. To most of these guys, their future is uncertain, so they see this as a possible "future" of some kind...at least the Dylans and Jasons seem to see it that way.

It is different for most of us grown ups. I have a wife and kids, a good job, a home, assets. I have lots of friends. Personally, I do not need fame, nor do I really want it. My life is settled, and going just fine.

I do this, so that the world gets a fair chance to see all the evidence, and so that they are made aware of the lies and speculation in alot of what the "truth" movement claims to be the "truth".

 
At 23 October, 2006 17:34, Blogger Stuart said...

I've added to your hit stats - but that's because I get a kick out of seeing the rants of 'un-conventional' individuals who live their lives vicariously in blogspace. I've not seen any arguments which have made me change my opinion on 911 either - I am still looking for them, following the scientific method (true scientific theories are testable and accessible to disproof - Karl Popper). I've not found them yet - and certainly not on this site. Why don't you start some some posts that discuss solid evidence supporting your views. You could try debunking Kevin Ryan's google video presentation too - that would help a lot. I don't want to believe that the US administration could do such an evil act - but the balance of evidence points to it IMO. Perhaps you can relieve me of this burden rather that continuing your bickering, self-congratulation, and idle insults.

 
At 24 October, 2006 05:43, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

I do it for the women, you wouldn't believe all the debunker groupies....

ROFL! Now that is a guy I can respect!
Do they ever look like the pics they send you??

Mac- You take things a little too seriously bro. It is different for most of us grown ups. I have a wife and kids, a good job, a home, assets. I have lots of friends. Personally, I do not need fame, nor do I really want it. My life is settled, and going just fine. Yeah same here, I'm not a doc or anything, but I'm doing well.
Hey Mac do you ever do it (blog) to point out the lies that the government spits forth? Maybe as a citizen of the U.S. you should, I mean that is our responsibility in a democratic republic, correct? Well it used to be the role of the press, but I think we can all agree they have failed which has led to the rise of 'net news and the alternative news outlets.

 
At 24 October, 2006 09:23, Blogger Alex said...

e. I've not seen any arguments which have made me change my opinion on 911 either - I am still looking for them, following the scientific method (true scientific theories are testable and accessible to disproof - Karl Popper).

I don't suppose you'd actually want to apply the same standards to your "opinion", eh? There's certainly nothing scientific or testable about the 9/11 denial movement.

I've not found them yet - and certainly not on this site.

Try clicking some of the links in the "permanent top post". If you still don't find anything to change your opinion, then you have only your own ignorance to blame. Only someone who's truly retarded could read through the debunking there and still believe that 9/11 was carried out by someone other than pissed off Muslims.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home