Dang I Think I Forgot to Link This Earlier
My apologies to Burke; I promised to post about this and forgot. He's trying to organize a mock trial of the US Government for 9-11. This strikes me as a good idea; have each side lay out the evidence. But you can probably guess the problem; so far he hasn't been able to get any of the 9-11 Deniers to take on the job of prosecution.
posted by Pat @ 10:53 PM
5 comments
5 Comments:
Jones is toast.
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=582631
About damn time.
Thanks for the link, Pat. No need to apologize. Hopefully it shakes out a few deniers willing to justify their accusations. It's interesting how quickly some of them stop making accusations and claim to be just "asking questions" when you want them to actually prove their accusations.
Wow good idea burke. This looks like it will be very ineteresting.
Hope everything pans out as far as making it happen. I'd love to see it.
But you can probably guess the problem; so far he hasn't been able to get any of the 9-11 Deniers to take on the job of prosecution.
Why would they? He selects what evidence can and can't be heard. Not exactly a 'fair' trial mind you. There is already a real scheduled debate anyway. I posted that on an earlier thread.
Thanks for the link, Pat. No need to apologize. Hopefully it shakes out a few deniers willing to justify their accusations. It's interesting how quickly some of them stop making accusations and claim to be just "asking questions" when you want them to actually prove their accusations.
Burke biased? Naww I didn't think so.
All I can do is promise I will decide fairly, based on agreed upon rules, what evidence may be admitted; and how each case may be presented.
Well that maybe true, but you also have a blog that mocks CT's and are very active on this site, so I doubt anyone will particpate. I'm afraid your wasting your time.
I would suggest using Crossing The Rubicon as your hypothetical prosecutor. Spend your time debunking that tome on your 9/11 trial site.
Post a Comment
<< Home