David Ray Griffin
I think in order to be a 9/11 denier, you must have to have a certain degree of mental disease such as bipolar disorder, being able to hold completely contrary thoughts in your head. They seem to believe that conspirators are so cunning that they go out of their way to make their plots as complicated as possible, and that they are vicious murderers, who yet go out of their way to avoid hurting people at the oddest times. I was watching this David Ray Griffin speech, and I just about put my hand through my monitor at this example, at the 43:30 mark:
It is very important the buildings come straight down. Think if those... the easiest way to bring down a building in controlled demolition, just make it fall over. You just have to do something to the base, and the whole building falls over. But a 110 story building in lower Manhattan, would have destroyed so much of lower Manhattan. People would have been really upset and maybe have demanded a real investigation (laughter) why those buildings came down. So they had to come straight down and not make anybody very angry. Umm, in terms of people who have money (laughter), as opposed to the families of the victims.
I honestly do not know what to say to that.
Update: I made a few typos transcribing this bit. It has since been corrected.
11 Comments:
This idiot actually claims later on that we invaded Afghanistan because of all the oil there. Geez, he is Jim Fetzer stupid.
The retard seems to be trying to make a class warfare argument. According to him, only poor people died in the WTC. He apparently never bothered to check to worked there.
Yeah. I remember watching the news that day thinking, "Ah, no big deal. The towers collapsed, yeah. Thousands of people are dead, sure. But at least I can still shop at Century 21."
So now the easiest way to do a controlled demolition is to damage the base and have it topple over sideways?
I swear, you could hit some of these people in the head with a brick and they'd probably end up smarter.
So now the easiest way to do a controlled demolition is to damage the base and have it topple over sideways?
I swear, you could hit some of these people in the head with a brick and they'd probably end up smarter.
Well, thank you for your opinion. And you know exactly where you can shove it. Until you manage to come up with some verifiable facts, we really don't need to hear what you "think".
half of New York
If this means "half of the New York City metropolitan area", that would be over 9 million people.
So why the fuck didn't they march with Alex Jones on 9/11/06? Do explain...
Don't you remember the videos? The deniers were clearly welcomed with open arms by the grieving families whose memorial they tried to disrupt with inane slogans.
wait a minute, that's MORE than a quarter of the adult population.
You need psychiatric help.
The level of physics understanding here is appalling.
So which way is a building supposed to fall, if not straight down? Why would it fall sideways?
Anything but a straight-down fall violates conservation of momentum. I mean, where is the momentum coming from to push the building to the side?
Sheesh. You'd have to have Saturn-V-sized rocket engines firing away to push the building away from a straight-down fall. Don't recall seeing any in the videos. Not even the ones the Troothers like to show.
The man and his fellow idiots are truly sick and even more so because what it is to them is making money.
Fools, sick fools.
No matter what they deny the truth. If they had a front row seat they would deny it. True paranoid delusional clap trap.
Post a Comment
<< Home