I'm All In!
Sheesh, the folks at 9-11 Blogger want us to bet on this:
The much anticipated release of the Doubletree Hotel security video that has been speculated it will show a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon is due to be released by one week from today the latest:
So how much do you want to bet that this Doubletree Hotel security video will be released before this Tuesday (election day) to “shock & awe” the voters in hopes to sway the elections, especially if this video finally shows a plane hitting the Pentagon?
You know what? There is zero chance this is the October (or November) Surprise. And you know why? Because you nuts don't have enough votes. "Oh, we'll just release the Pentagon video from the Doubletree hotel and everybody will vote for us when they see a grainy image move across the screen. Nobody's sitting there waiting for the Pentagon video to be released before they vote! Everybody that's waiting for that video to be released has already voted for the nutbar candidates like Howie Hawkins and Matt Sendmeabuck and Bob "Star Wars" Bowman.
posted by Pat @ 7:32 AM
26 comments
26 Comments:
And don't they realize that FOIA requests done 2+ years ago had the FBI saying "we have 84 related videos......83 of em show nothing but maybe the explosion/fire after the fact"
It's not gonna really give us anything and be clear and it would have zero effect anyway.
How do they get so paranoid that they think the government is witholding evidence which would shoot a hole in their case for a midterm election?
Since when does the FBI have a set republican agenda anyway?
Somebody should make a parody of one of these security camera videos, to reflect what the conspiracy idiots think they ought to contain. Something like this:
- establishing shot of the Pentagon crash site
- cars driving by with various Illuminati, NWO, and Israeli symbols on them
- a flash from the sky
- one frame that says, "replace with Boeing 757"
- a cardboard cutout of a 757, taped onto the shot with visible Scotch tape, not animated at all, and of a totally different picture quality than the rest of the shot. Also, the front end of of a missile is sticking out beyond it, as the 757 cutout does not cover it entirely.
- The missile/757 wiggles in for two or three frames as it approaches the Pentagon. The missile looks real, but the plane is very two-dimensional. The perspective does not change at all, and the plane is wobbling up and down instead of coming straight in.
- The missile/757 disappears. Only a small explosion is seen. We wait for two or three frames. (Remember, this is really slow security-cam video, so this is probably an entire second.)
- A gray reptilian space alien runs into the shot, carrying a Wile E. Coyote-style red plunger for blasting dynamite. He puts the plunger on the ground and pushes it down. The side of the Pentagon explodes out furiously, much larger than the explosion caused by the missile. The alien grabs the plunger, giggles, and runs out of frame.
- A bunch of people in matching janitor uniforms run into the shot (from just out of frame) and start doing things. Most of them are too small and too far away to be observed. Some of them have words stenciled onto the back of their uniform. One of them says "Airplane Hole Expander." He runs up to the side of the bulding, where the missile hit, and sprays something on to it. Another says "Missile Debris Remover."
- A yellow dump truck, with "Boeing Scrap Parts and Miscellaneous Human Remains, Inc." written on the side backs on to the lawn and dumps out its contents in a pile. The janitors manually scatter the contents.
- Finally, once all the commotion has left, a team of white-outfitted golf club pros, plus Carl Spackler from Caddyshack, seed and grass the lawn, which instantly grows into a lush putting green, complete with holes and golf-style marker flags.
You forgot the lightpole fairy.
I knew I'd forget something. Stick the Lightpole Fairy in the beginning of Act III, just before the big musical number.
It is amazing how a missle could have hit all the light poles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&eurl
Speaks to their delusion of how important they think they are. The majority of Americans don't question whether Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon and therefore a release of a video showing it would sway no one.
Of course, should it clearly show a Flying Spaghetti Monster, I may be inclined to vote Woo.
You know, that gets me thinking, if it is so obvious that a cruise missile hit the Pentagon, why don't they do a computer recreation of how it happened? I would love to see them demonstrate how a 20 foot long cruise missile could knock down 5 light poles, hit the generator out front, explode, causing a giant fireball and a 75 foot wide hole, and then continue spreading airplane debris through 3 rings of the Pentagon, another 310 feet. It would be cool to see.
I know you are reading this Dylan. I want to see this in "Loose Change: the final pathetic attempt at the truth". It will win you an Oscar for sure.
I would love to see them demonstrate how a 20 foot long cruise missile could knock down 5 light poles, hit the generator out front, explode, causing a giant fireball and a 75 foot wide hole, and then continue spreading airplane debris through 3 rings of the Pentagon, another 310 feet.
Oh, sure, give them the easy part. I want to see the recreation of how the cruise missile went to the houses of each of the passengers and crew of flight 77 and made them disappear without a trace forever, picking up just enough DNA to carry back to the Pentagon.
OK, that's not true. I want to see the maintainer of 9-11 blogger get stomach cancer.
Once again, proof that these wingnuts think they are way more significant than they really are...pathetic really.
TAM
Once again, proof that these wingnuts think they are way more significant than they really are...pathetic really.
Actually the biggest examples of that would have to be Fetzer's claim that Norman Mineta resigned because he mentioned his name on Hannity & Colmes.
Stevew Thx alot for the link to that video!
Never seen that before, and now i can show those few dutch non believers this video.
And i quote from the comments:
samhain81 (8 hours ago)
If anybody still beleives that it was a missle after watching this video then they are pretty retarted and need to get a job and stop sitting on thier computers all day.
Actually the biggest examples of that would have to be Fetzer's claim that Norman Mineta resigned because he mentioned his name on Hannity & Colmes.
I agree. I still laugh when ever I hear him spue that nonsense.
TAM
Jay
Most welcome. Mike and I are both Solidworks users so I understand quite well how accurate it is.
By superimposing the actual piks over the animation clearly shows the animation to be acurate.
If the tooser's don't believe you, just tell them that Sw, Pro-E and Catia are the primere modeling pgms used around the world because of their accuracy and capabilities but the whaks would know nothing about this. These programs have been used around the world and are well known for their accruacy.
The 787, some of the 777, the A380, the Sea Wolf and Virginia class subs, supertankers, buildings and many other major things that we see in our world of today were designed with these programs. They are the primere tools used today.
There are things called Addins that allow these programs to input the actual flight profile into the animation so that the model will follow it exactly. The non technical people have no clue about these things so all they do is post mindless babble and lies.
Get a Solidworks expert to prove it wrong and some one might believe it is wrong. As a Solidworks user I know they are full of crap. Can they explain in detail how it is wrong? No
Mike is in the process of doing a follow on after it hit the pent that shound be very interesting.
http://www.solidworks.com/
http://www.ptc.com/
http://www.3ds.com/products-solutions/plm-solutions/catia/overview/
Purdue University did a similar simulation which includes the impace. They must be involved in the coverup too!
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/cgvlab/projects/pentagon.htm
Stick the Lightpole Fairy in the beginning of Act III, just before the big musical number.
There are some sentences I am very unlikely to ever see written ever again in the English language. This is one of them.
Like it matters. If it is a low quality video, those imbeciles will claim whatever object they see is a "missile" and if it his high quality, they will claim it was doctored.
Thx SteveW,
I have a copy of the programm myself, and i know a little bit how to use it, so i know its very accurate, but im used to other programms like Tribon and Autocad. Maybe i should have a go at it again :)
And the people who don't believe the official story don't have a clue about any structural stuff, because most of em are in the IT sector.
The truthers over in Holland i mean. They think everything is a plot for NWO. So they like to talk alot about Peak Oil and stuff like that :)
Jay
If you have Solidworks, go for it. Personally I have disliked ACAD since version 3. If you have SW2006 or better it comes with a free ACAD Version called DWGEDITOR so you can use it if you need ACAD. SW will read and save native ACAD files as well but when you get into 3D modeling it will be like a drug LOL. I started modeling 14 years ago and with SW in 99, if nothing elst it will let you bring things in your imagination to life. Here are just a few things you can do.
http://www.colonialfleets.com/stevew/Mydocs/
IT guys like most propellerheads march to a different drummer. I have always been in hardware and have had a friendly war with them for the last 40+ years LOL, Most are good guys but there are some real whaks as well, far more than in hardware/mechanical design.
James
I saw the purdue study, very interesting and was state of the art at the time but the whaks dismissed it even though none could really understand it. I guess to the whaks, ignorance is bliss
Wow, that is some exeptional work Steve.
I can even see the progress u made modeling all those things :)
And yeh i think im gonna install Solid Works again, because i was always impressed of what u could with it in 3D. So thx again :)
Ow and if someone start yammering to u about quotes about 9/11, just direct them to my site where im going through all the transcripts made from the firemen, policemen and EMT personel who were there on 9/11.
Pretty chilling to read all those transcripts though...
oops, forgot the link
http://jay-911.blogspot.com/
oh and im still busy with those, so alot more to come.
Thanks Jay
Just remember SW is a huge pgm and takes time to learn but worth it. This may help learn
http://www.solidworks.com/pages/products/SolidWorks_for_Dummies.html
Jay, I couldn't help but notice that alot of the testimony of the buildings coming down described it as sounding like another plane initially....
Now if the basis for controlled demolition and 90% of that evidence is based off of initial reports saying they heard explosions....
How come the truth movement isn't examining the possibility that planes were inside the buildings all along pointed down and that instead of a progressive collapse, that the planes just got turned on and the jet propulsion pushed through the lower floors?
That could explain the squibs too!
I'm gonna ask the LC forum crowd this tonight
Tym
You mean to say that after the planes entered the towers, they banked 90 degrees and went straight down weakening the center of the towers. WOW some kind of flying
:)
Post a Comment
<< Home