Nazi-Boy Rick Rajter and Morgan Reynolds' No Planer Paper

You may recall that several months ago, Morgan Reynolds and Steven Jones had a pretty good dustup. Jones made a pledge to put a No-Planer paper and a Planer paper in his Journal of Nine-Eleven Studies. Well, to nobody's great surprise, that promise turned to be as good as the electrons it was printed on, as Jones' reviewers refused the paper. (See, James? They do have standards!)

So Reynolds and Rick Rajter (a Holocaust Denier as we discussed here), have self-published their essay. Here it is, the best that the no-planers can offer as of today.

In a word, it's appallingly bad. Their evidence for Flight 93 consists of one real photo, one gag photo, and the following text:

The killers-for-hire did such an embarrassing job in Pennsylvania and the story is so weak that few researchers defend it. It is easy to disprove that a smoking hole about 20'x20'x10' could not swallow half the parts of Flight 93's 757, much less the whole thing. While we are taught to believe Big Boeings flew into (through?) steel/concrete towers and were invincible enough to cut out "realistic" plane shapes, a 757 could not accomplish the same feat at the Pentagon or in soft ground at a covered quarry in Pennsylvania! Conveniently, the government-designated hole is at the deep end of the covered mine, one of many signals it was a set up. For more, see this article.

Was an airliner in the area? Probably because the witness reports make a good case for it, given their high credibility and relative uniformity in testimony. Most likely, it was an airliner fly-by. And it may even have involved stealth technology to "disappear" the plane over the crash site, as explained below.

Figure 2: Smoking hole near Shanksville, PA unmarred by plane debris, bodies, luggage, etc. A local resident observed, "It's the only place it could have gone down and be sure no one would be hurt." Translation: it was the only place where there could be no witnesses. According to media reports, witnesses reported a low-flying airliner heading east/southeast but no local resident claimed to see a plane crash.

Figure 3: Because of possible enforcement court proceedings, national security and privacy reasons, the government has not yet released this evidence of the Shanksville plane crash :).

Now that's what I call thorough research.