Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Denier Quotes of the Year--All Nutty Edition

Okay, this took a little longer to compile than I thought, and there were some nutty/funny quotes and some very offensive quotes, so I decided to break it into two. Here are the funny ones:

Sofia (creator of 9-11 Mysteries), on Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad radio show (12/9/06 show, second hour, 10:15 in):

Quote:
Regardless, I tell people, these buildings fell in 10 seconds, they’re 110 stories. Now let’s just use our mouth to demonstrate this. If a pancake collapse can be described as “clunkity clunk” How many times can you say that in 10 seconds? And if one floor is “clunkity clunk clunkity clunk” you cannot say that 110 times in 10 seconds. So let’s even give it the benefit of the doubt, let’s just take off the “clunk”. Let’s just say “clunkity”. You can’t say that in 10 seconds, 110 times.
Uncle Fetzer, on Alan Colmes radio show (about Airfone calls):

Quote:
You think those hijackers were just going to let passengers make cell phones, or those.... those.... plane phones? You need a credit card to do that!
Jason Bermas, on Democracy Now with the Popular Mechanics guys:

Quote:
I'm not calling anybody a liar, I'm calling you a liar!
Judy Wood, on Uncle Fetzer's show:

Quote:
And recently I gave a talk at an engineering conference where I showed some diagrams of the buildings being built and I showed, “If this were a tree and the Keebler elves cut out this big chunk out of the side here, for their little house, where their dwelling is. Would that affect the towers?” And everyone in the room could see, that no, the way the structure is designed, it can’t bring it down.
The Zither Guy, at Ground Zero:

Quote:
But whether it's LIHOP,
Or whether it's MIHOP,
We need to know the truth,
And make this war stop.
Ace Baker from the song, Judy Would:

Quote:
Can we get our mind around disintegrating walls... with billiard balls?
28th Kingdom, from the JREF forums:

Quote:
At the sake of sounding like a genius...you could hammer an asteroid from outer space straight down on one of the (undamaged) twin towers...and it would not cause a chain reaction of floor failures from top to bottom. If anything, it would drill the vertical columns into the ground like a nail.
Spooked 9-11's quotes. For example, about the Pentagon:

Quote:
A small version of Judy Wood's Star Wars beam weapon was used to knock down the lamp poles and fry the generator and create the hole in the building. Pre-planted explosives did the rest of the damage to the building. Plane parts were pre-planted and also sprinkled from an over-flying plane a la Operation Northwoods.
Or this on his attempts to crash a wooden plane into a wooden World Trade Center:

Quote:
I set up an experiment testing how a plane might break up upon impacting arrayed steel columns like the WTC wall. The plane and the columns were both constructed of similar pieces of wood (which here favors the plane, since in real life, aluminum is weaker than steel). The dimensions of the models were not perfect, but they were a rough match for the WTC and a 767. I did not put floors into the model, so this also favors the plane.

I pushed the plane forcefully into the "wall", and while the fuselage penetrated the wall after reasonably strong force was applied, the wings broke off at the root where the wings met the plane. The wings actually bent backwards and slid into the hole alongside the fuselage. The wood of the wings actually broke. A few "columns" broke where the fuselage went in, and a couple broke on either side of the fuselage hole, where the wings broke off-- but basically the array of columns were much stronger than the long wings.
From Rick Siegel of 9-11 Eyewitness, on why he knows nukes were used at the WTC, quoted at the old Looser Forum,:

Quote:
16. No survivors found, except some firefighters in one corner pocket in the rubble who looked up to see blue sky above them instead of being crushed by collapsing debris. Upward fusion flashlight beam of destruction missed this pocket but removed debris above firemen.

Our old buddy (and apparently reformed Denier) PDoherty, with a quote that straddles the line between offensive and nutty:

Quote:
"We dont want too many chicks in the [9/11 conspiracy theory] movement. They are alright to look at and play with but they dont have the necessary intelligence. They are also more open to the disinfo."


Richard Andrew Grove, talking with Webster Tarpley in Chicago last June (about 13:22)

Quote:
"You can learn everything you need to know about 9-11 from watching Hollywood movies."


Korey Rowe, talking with Smith Magazine:

Quote:
"We know there are errors in the documentary, and we’ve actually left them in there so that people discredit us and do the research for themselves."
JREF 9-11 Denier Geggy:

Quote:
"I'm just trying to suggest that the Commission report and the FEMA/NIST reports is a total fabrication without being labelled a conspiracy theorist."
Morgan Reynolds discussing the "single plane theory":

Quote:
"Here is more food for thought: the same chameleon plane could have appeared at all three events: 9:03a at WTC 2, 9:32-9:37a at the Pentagon, and 10:06a at Shanksville, PA. In truth, the perps only needed the disappearing plane trick at WTC 2 but it is a promising possibility for Shanksville too. The Pentagon event did not really need an airliner but the single plane theory proposed this month as a parody of the JFK single-bullet theory actually might make sense! The same disappearing act by the same secret plane could have been used at all three locations! We shall see if future work bears any of this out."
Pet Goat, a poster at the Democratic Underground has an illustrative metaphor for the collapse of the Twin Towers:

Quote:
" What is proposed is that the giant core structure of the WTC, built to carry 10X the weight of the entire tower above, should have captured the disorganized wreckage of the WTC wreckage that was disintegrated core above it, rather than collapsing under this
relatively small amount of wreckage.

Meatball on a fork is a metaphor."

6 Comments:

At 02 January, 2007 08:33, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Take it easy PD; at the time, you were a rabid CTer, and this quote was pretty radical to say the least. Whether it jest or not...lighten up. The comments on you now are few and far between.

Happy Holidays

TAM

 
At 02 January, 2007 09:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

- "We dont want too many chicks in the [9/11 conspiracy theory] movement. They are alright to look at and play with but they dont have the necessary intelligence. They are also more open to the disinfo."

- "You think those hijackers were just going to let passengers make cell phones, or those.... those.... plane phones? You need a credit card to do that!"

LOL, those ones were hilarious.

But....

"But whether it's LIHOP,
Or whether it's MIHOP,
We need to know the truth,
And make this war stop."


^^I don't see anything wrong with this one.

 
At 02 January, 2007 11:14, Blogger Alex said...

That 28th Kingdom quote just slayed me. It is truly the dumbest statement made by anyone, anywhere, EVER.

 
At 02 January, 2007 12:34, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beautiful!

 
At 02 January, 2007 21:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alex, I think this statement may take the prize for that:

"My see-saw analogy renders any need for "calculations" moot." - Lyte Trip

(Taken from Gumboot's signature over at JREF, I believe the original quote is somewhere in the 50+ page Taxicab driver harrassment thread)

 
At 04 January, 2007 14:01, Blogger Alex said...

Hehe. Yeah, I remember seeing that one before, and reading the thread where it first came up. Lyte Trip's statement is definitely amongst the top 5 dumbest/funniest things ever stated, but I think the 28th Kingdom quote beats it. Especially with the "at the sake of sounding like a genius" bit right at the begging.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home