Monday, February 12, 2007

The 9-11 Truth Pyramid

Nico's been busy. I'm a little disappointed we didn't make the "Flagwaver/Shill Associates" group.

27 Comments:

At 12 February, 2007 08:37, Blogger Der Bruno Stroszek said...

Alex Jones is in the same category as Fox News?! Yeah, I'd always viewed those two as completely ideologically compatible. Can we expect him to get his own show on that network any time soon? You could call it The O'Fruitcake Factor.

 
At 12 February, 2007 09:04, Anonymous Anonymous said...

...hey that was honest;

Screwloose has less shills than ConspSmash, basically not much ; )

I'm a big 'fan' of ScrewLoose and check it out daily as well.

Why do you think my 'imposter' from Oregon was *here* ? :)

http://www.911bloglines.com/aggregator/sources/1

 
At 12 February, 2007 12:07, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

Oi, Nico, nice to meet you. I just came over from Albanese's blog to check on coordination. Not too surprised the Ricky stuff isn't here yet--but with that link you just gave us, I am surprised you have Albie's Ricky blog already listed.

On a mission are we? We know how close you are to Pat and James--get a room. First Pat says you're nicer than other truthers(LOL!), now you're saying the blog whose raison d'etre is to attack LC doesn't have many shills(smirk). I suppose you both share an affinity for pictures of feces and swastikas. Well, full grown, consenting adults, and all that...

So, tracked your imposter down to Oregon? I wonder how an independent operator who IS NOT a paid gov. shill has the resources to do that?

He's taking the piss, you know. Hoping the other "Nico" will come by to deny it. Otherwise sounds like a "conspiracy theory". ;-)

But then you lot think his info is reliable "news". Whatever-- consenting adults...

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:05, Blogger Manny said...

"now you're saying the blog whose raison d'etre is to attack LC doesn't have many shills(smirk)

It's a relatively minor offense, I must admit, in the face of your and other troofers' continued support for foreign terrorists, but pretty much all of you guys are mangling the meaning of the word "shill." Please look up the word and adjust your usage accordingly.

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:14, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

I think they should lock Nico and whatever imbecile did that chart in an asylum and throw the key away.

Maybe I seem a tad naive, but can someone enlighten me as to where all of these fruitcakes came from? Did some institution close and they released all of their nutters, all of whom are now "Troothers"?

Where else could so many insane people just pop up at one time?

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:19, Blogger Pat said...

Jenny, I read Siegel's post, but I don't see a hook--something that I can riff off to create a post. It's kind of inside baseball; interesting to me, but probably not to my readers.

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:20, Blogger b. j. edwards said...

Thanks for including me way at the bottom, Nico, but I thought I paid for a larger spot. Please clarify.

Thanks,

Skyking

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nico,

Thanks for the mention - I'm sure my government/NWO/Bildeberger/Masons/illuminatti/Bigfoot superiors will add a little more to my pay packet this week. Thanks so much!

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:36, Blogger Unknown said...

Col. Jenny Sparks said...

Ms. Sparks

It's a free Country (sort of) and this is a free comment section.

However, I think your tact with the Nico (the real or the imposer) is slightly off base.

I believe that there are shills, infiltrators, operatives, etc. However, I think the idea that Nico is in tight with US Govt intelligence gathering / cointelPro is barking up the wrong tree. I'm not defender of either Nico. However,t I'd humbly suggest that the disinfo and the agents of disinfo come from a panoply of sources more diverse that most people imagine.

If I'm wrong, I hope you can show me how Nico can be exposed.

It was very odd, some time ago, when Nico was in the Yahoo no-planer group and a German "friend" of his posted. The guy was posting Lihop stuff that didn't fly with me at all. Nico defended him and said this guy was the person who introduced him to 9/11 Truth.

NY911TRUTH AND 911TRUTH have been led by people who have performed in dubious ways, who can't stand up to scrutiny (Hence, Jamison, Sander Hicks, Nicholas Levis, ...)

I don't put it past Nico being a fake enemy of these people (and part of the overall disinfo crowd). However, if he is truly trying to expose the 911 truth leaders for who they have been, I have to respect that.

 
At 12 February, 2007 13:47, Blogger Unknown said...

For those of you who care, (and Jenny, you should), the variety of manipulation and disinfo goes back further than the SLC Blog guys discuss or seem to know much about.

Take a look at this to see discussion of the 1st 911 Truth Conf. (in San Francisco), which is the only one I've attended.

 
At 12 February, 2007 14:22, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I love it. I hope what Nico has done catches on. Soon all the idiots/truthers will be suspecting each other....ahhhh, the beginning of the end.

TAM

 
At 12 February, 2007 14:54, Blogger Alex said...

It's like a bunch of monkeys throwing feces. As long as you stay out of the way, it's great entertainment.

 
At 12 February, 2007 15:48, Blogger Triterope said...

All these "league" names would be great for fantasy football. Dibs on "Orwellian Brainwash Cyberleague."

 
At 12 February, 2007 16:20, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

bg--cheers for your thoughtful post, but my point wasn't that I necessarily THOUGHT he's a shill--though he makes it hard not to think that and I consider it a strong possibility.

I was just wondering what type of resources he had that he was so sure he'd tracked down his imposter. Being a paid shill would be one way. But it is more likely he's taking the piss--and trying to see what he can flush out.

You think his imposter is a sock-puppet of his?

 
At 12 February, 2007 18:31, Blogger Mark Roberts said...

Nico, are there any 9/11 truthseekers whose work you respect? If there are, I assume they must be no-planers.

Killtown?
Rick Siegel?
Von Kliest?

Or are you the only one who's not an agent of some nefarious power?

 
At 12 February, 2007 18:56, Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 February, 2007 18:57, Blogger Unknown said...

Jenny,

How do we know we should trust you?

 
At 12 February, 2007 19:10, Blogger Triterope said...

Jenny, How do we know we should trust you?

TAM called it.

I thought it would take longer than four and a half hours, though.

 
At 12 February, 2007 22:00, Blogger Pat said...

Jenny, the idea of a sock puppet is that they back up what you say. Nico's doppelganger has been undercutting him.

 
At 12 February, 2007 22:44, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

Jenny,

How do we know we should trust you?


Well, bg, how do I know I should trust you? We could play that game all day long.

Congratulations! You've won the "apropos-of-nothing paranoia post of the day" award!

But seriously--is this something you ask everyone? Or are you a cat with an angle?

 
At 13 February, 2007 04:05, Blogger ConsDemo said...

I wonder how an independent operator who IS NOT a paid gov. shill has the resources to do that?

What makes you fruitcakes think the government has to waste money debating you? You clowns greatly exaggerate your own importance.

 
At 13 February, 2007 05:36, Blogger Unknown said...

Col. Jenny Sparks said...

Jenny,


Perhaps my question would have been better posed privately, and with a clearer sense of joshing.

The outcome which I was looking for was for you to post more about yourself, and your unique viewpoint of 9/11 matters.

From my viewpoint, you are a Jenny-come-lately, as a Truther, and on this Blog. Help me with my understanding of who Jenny is.

 
At 13 February, 2007 05:55, Blogger Manny said...

Jenny Sparks is, of course, a Protector... of the Universe!

 
At 13 February, 2007 07:58, Blogger Unknown said...

But, Manny,

What I really want to know is:

Is she an easy lay?

 
At 13 February, 2007 12:00, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

Is she an easy lay?

Bg--I wouldn't say that, sweet-heart; I'm more of a girl-stud...wear the pants in my relationships, and all, ...especially if you're a pretty boy.;-) ARE you a pretty boy?

You didn't think I was going to actually be bothered by that crack, did you? You haven't the comments at 911Blogger!!!

Love those pretty boys...

Seriously, though, you can just read my blogs at 911Blogger, or my other one here:
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/

And, like when my "papa bear" was at 911Blogger, I'm mostly here for research.

Cheers.

 
At 13 February, 2007 12:38, Blogger ewing2001 said...

jenny, it is also nice to meet you. but that is not me. imposter jason who will not stop. he does not have 'resources'. he just knows where i was on vacation.

 
At 13 February, 2007 13:40, Blogger Unknown said...

You didn't think I was going to actually be bothered by that crack, did you?

Jenny,

I certainly didn't expect you to be bothered, nor respond.

It was a little like when Mel Gibson called one of the police women (the night he was arrested for DUI), SUGAR TITS.

It's all an act.

I don't know what I really think if your posting yet, but I like you cheery conversational tone.

I'm not a pretty boy. I imagine I'm too old for you, anyway.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home