Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Assorted Nuts

The Feathered Bastard lays one on the chin of an East Valley Tribune reporter who wrote the piece AP picked up a couple days ago on the 9-11 Accountability Conference in Chandler while somehow missing the whole story about Eric D. Williams.

But even if Markham was unaware of Williams’ Holocaust-denying book The Puzzle of Auschwitz, and did not know that several scheduled speakers have flaked on the kook convention since the Williams debacle broke, why pen a story that treats 9/11 conspiracy buffs as if they’re no more controversial than Civil War reenactors? Doesn’t the guy have Google on his ‘puter? Check this typical passage:

There are plenty of differing theories on what happened on Sept. 11. One is that government-planted bombs, not terrorist-hijacked jetliners, brought down the Twin Towers. And another is that an air-to-air missile shot down United Flight 93 in Pennsylvania.

At no point is someone quoted dismissing or criticizing such crackpot views, even though conference spokesperson Pete Creelman admits (after the jump) that “he doesn’t have proof of the government’s complicity.” Huh? Then why interview this guy without asking him any tough questions, like “Why do you believe in something you have no proof for?” Seems like a logical line of inquiry to me.

In fairness, the mainstream media may just think this stuff is self-evidently crackpottery.

Labels: ,


At 20 February, 2007 17:56, Blogger Pat & James B. said...

This is an excallent addition to the archive. A great proof that, contrary to what the "truth" movement claims, the MSM will treat them with kid gloves.

At 20 February, 2007 18:36, Blogger 911DD said...

Here's another nut:

9/11 Truth Movement Oxy-Moron of the day:

"You're like a slightly dull child with learning difficulties and a poor command of the English language. I personally saw all four plane crashes, and you can quote me on that. No planes crashed."



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home