New Debunking Site
Welcome to the Pentacon.info, which is focused on debunking former Loosers Merc and Lyte Trip's fantasy documentary about the 757 flying over the Pentagon on 9-11, not into it. They've also got a forum, where Merc has threatened legal action if the site is not taken down. It is apparent from some of the claims that Merc makes that April Gallop is involved in this particular effort:
April Gallop will be THE spokesperson for the movie, she will be representing the unknown victims of the Pentagon attack.
Here's the trailer for this moronic film by a pair of 'tards who were originally going to have the whole movie released back in January:
Update: 'Tards is harsh, so let me specify that I'm referring to these two individuals and not to the 9-11 Deniers in general, many of whom are sincere if sincerely misguided. I do not believe that to be the case with Merc and Lyte Trip.
posted by Pat @ 7:14 AM
16 comments
16 Comments:
'tards, nutbars, loosers, morons, moonbats, tinfoil hats.
Name calling is the rhetoric of those who find the practice of mature discussion too challenging.
Apparently the 9/11 Denier fascists despise freedom of speech. And they are the ones supposed to protect us from Adolf Bush?
Chf,
Let me see that debunk, please.
So, now we have two groups of morons, er, theorists, in the Troother camp: one says that a missile hit the Pentagon, and another says a plane was headed for the Pentagon but somehow the terrorists on board had a change of heart at the last second (perhaps that "Allahu Akbar" stuff got them scared), and flew OVER the Pentagon.
Question 1: If the plane flew OVER the Pentagon, where did it go? Maybe Cleveland!
Question 2: Where are all these people on board the flight that hit the Pentagon?
Question 3: Why do conspiracy theorists come up with some of the most whacked out, insane crappola in the history of mankind?
This comment has been removed by the author.
CHF said...
DOZENS OF PEOPLE SAW THE FUCKING PLANE AND WRECKAGE WAS FOUND!
How's that?
Now let's see you prove it was a missile/A3/F-16/cargo plane.
I can't prove anything. I can point to details which seem reliable that poke big holes in the official version. Nothing you point toward patches those holes.
Specifically, I don't claim to know what crashed into the Pentagon.
My major point in my latest posts has been about the data release by the NTSB, claimed to be recovered from the Flight 77 data recorder.
Was it Flight 77 that flew into / over the Pentagon? Was the data released taken from the Flight 77 recorder. Was it a recorder from another Aircraft?
The plain fact is that the released data don't support the official story. And, there is nothing that debunks my contention that this is a big problem with the quality of information.
Name calling is the rhetoric of those who find the practice of mature discussion too challenging.
Right, and accusing the United States of killing 3K of its own people on the basis of NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER is just fine and dandy?
I can't prove anything
Ok,
It's possibly I could do a mathematical prove.
i could do a stupid God exists proof.
As far as 9/11, or any historical event, absolute proof is a silly concept. Near proof requires access to evidence, or reliable reporting of evidence. The evidence is in short supply, and I certainly haven't seen chain of custody as being reliable.
I don't accept any video as "real" without expert review. So, of course, I don't think I can prove anyting about 9/11.
What does seem to be indisputable is that the 9/11 Commission was mostly a cover up commission.
Iraq: The Hidden Story
from Crooks and Liars
What does seem to be indisputable is that the 9/11 Commission was mostly a cover up commission.
No, what is indesputable is that morons like you could add up 2 and 2, and end up with 27,564.
As for the video...heh, anyone else see "THE PLANE FLEW OVER THE PENTAGON", and immediately think "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"?
BG, that insult was directed particularly at Merc and Lyte Trip, a loathsome pair that even Russ Pickering, a serious (if seriously wrong) 9-11 researcher has admitted have engaged in unethical behavior.
Which flight data animation is correct? The fraudlent NTSB where the altitude was tampered with or the 9/11 Commission which doesn't match the NTSB at all?
More of the same crap, with no explanations from the Feds which ammounts to a bunch of OS bloggers supporting the same 'no explanations' from the Feds.
Sure, at least JamesB has questions regarding the FAA and NORAAD, kudos James for asking questions.
The plain fact is that the released data don't support the official story. And, there is nothing that debunks my contention that this is a big problem with the quality of information. AMEN!
Not only that BG, but the 9/11 Commission's animation doesn't even match for a second the NTSB's. And deniers wonder why the Truther's have issues with the Pentagon and 9/11.
Right, and accusing the United States of killing 3K of its own people on the basis of NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER is just fine and dandy?
Actually it is a historical reality that apparently many of you ignore.
Lets see...as it stands it is ok to be lied to about the start of Vietnam, lied to about Gulf War I (see the incubator farse on that one),lied to about OKC, lied to about Gulf War Syndrome, lied to about depleted uranium, lied to about prior warnings and terrorists, lied to about WMDs, TOLD THE COMPLETE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11, lied to about SH and 9/11, lied to about the 9/11 Commission, lied to about air quality.
Yeah there is not problem with that whatsoever. Trying being an American citizen for a short time and hold your government accountable for its actions.
To follow up the 9/11 Commission..
A shocking new book by the 9/11 Commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton says Americans still don't know the whole truth about their government's initial response to those terrorist attacks that day. [The book] outlines repeated misstatements by the Pentagon and Federal Aviation Administration. Fog of war...could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations, and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue. Untrue -- the military's original timeline of United Flight 93. Equally untrue, the government's timeline for American Flight 77 and details about fighter jets scrambled to intercept it. DOD did not accurately report to the 9/11 Commission on the response to the September 11, 2001 hijackings.
Lou Dobbs on CNN Asks Why Government is Lying about 9/11
2006-08-09, CNN News
http://transcripts.cnn.com/
TRANSCRIPTS/0608/09/ldt.01.html
Keep on denying boys!
Trying being an American citizen for a short time and hold your government accountable for its actions.
Sorry, reflexively accepting anti-American crackpot conspiracy theories isn't part of any definition of citizenship that I can find.
Lets see...as it stands it is ok to be lied to about the start of Vietnam, lied to about Gulf War I (see the incubator farse on that one),lied to about OKC, lied to about Gulf War Syndrome, lied to about depleted uranium, lied to about prior warnings and terrorists, lied to about WMDs, TOLD THE COMPLETE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11, lied to about SH and 9/11, lied to about the 9/11 Commission, lied to about air quality.
Don't forget pearl harbour, JFK, the moon landing, roswell, area 51, bigfoot, earthquake beams, starwars lasers, the amero, and the assassination of Elvis. If you're gonna be a nut, you may as well go the whole way.
Sorry, reflexively accepting anti-American crackpot conspiracy theories isn't part of any definition of citizenship that I can find.
Don't confuse historical fact with theory.
Accepting a theory and holding your government accountable are two different things. Trying to merge the two is a nice attempt to deny historical reality.
'Tards is harsh...
It's only insulting to people with actual retardation, is all. 9-11 deniers are in fact all tards. OK, not all of them, but all of the ones who are not actively evil are tards. It is literally impossible to continue to believe the things they claim to believe and not be a tard.
Post a Comment
<< Home