Friday, February 23, 2007

The PentaCon Video

Is here after long anticipation. They manage to find a few witnesses who claim AA77 flew north of the Citgo station, and from this they manage to "deduce" that the plane actually flew over the Pentagon. Unfortunately for their "deduction" they did not manage to find any witnesses who saw the plane fly over the Pentagon.

Update: What a trainwreck of a movie! They try fruitlessly to get people to say that they saw the plane fly over the Pentagon, which causes no end of consternation from the witnesses. The witnesses contradict each other on the color of the plane, the markings, etc, but they want us to believe they're absolutely right when it comes to where exactly the plane was. It amazes me that they claim this took them months to put together; that either tells me that film editing is not as easy as it looks, or that they're extraordinarily slow.

Labels: , ,

22 Comments:

At 23 February, 2007 09:14, Blogger Richard said...

Wow, 4 witnesses. That really represents the majority right there. Interesting how witnesses are only credible when they agree with the truthers version of events. Yeah, that's it ignore hundreds of other accounts just so you get your point across. I'd find it more credible if they had just one witness who actually saw the plane as it passed over the pentagon and flew off into the distance.

 
At 23 February, 2007 09:25, Blogger Alex said...

Also ignore the fact that all 4 witnesses disagree about the colour, one can't remember any markings at all while another describes them in detail, and two of them describe the plane hitting. Those things aren't important at all!

The only thing they've managed to show is just how unreliable eyewitness testimony really is. This is exactly why we base as much of the investigation as possible on verifiable facts.

 
At 23 February, 2007 10:04, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

But they, the 4, all agree that the plane's flight path doesn't match the official story which supports the pilotsfor911truth.org assessment of the NTSB data and the critique of the 9/11 Commission as well.

 
At 23 February, 2007 10:06, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

Yeah, that's it ignore hundreds of other accounts just so you get your point across.

Can you link to the hundreds of other accounts that you mention?

 
At 23 February, 2007 11:24, Blogger ewing2001 said...

Fly-Over Plane Witness

http://tinyurl.com/33c9zr (BBC)
I drove around the car park area to find the exit back onto the freeway. As we drove back onto the freeway a passenger aircraft went past at high speed and at too steep an angle for landing, but at that moment, what I had witnessed did not make any sense, I then turned off the freeway for Pentagon City. Off the freeway we approached an intersection with stop lights, some guy was running up the middle of the road waving his arms, shouting and pointing behind us. My first reaction was that I must be on the wrong side of the road or that we were travelling the wrong way in a one way system, then, across the stop lights came the fire truck from the Pentagon City fire house, at this moment it all began to make some kind of sense. I turned to my and wife and can remember saying to her that the aircraft I had just seen must have come down. We decided that we should move out of the area as being strangers we would probably get in the way of the emergency services. We now turned to go back up to the freeway to head into central Washington, only to be confronted with a view of the Pentagon with the tell-tale column of thick black acrid smoke rising up...

 
At 23 February, 2007 11:36, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

Thanks Ewing. I was hoping the Pentacon Video would elaborate on those types of witnesses.

 
At 23 February, 2007 11:47, Blogger Stevew said...

After 5+ years the toofers manage to put together some foney vid and claim this and that. It is just another crock that the toofers lap up like warm milk

 
At 23 February, 2007 12:11, Blogger Jujigatami said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 23 February, 2007 12:15, Blogger Jujigatami said...

Can you link to the hundreds of other accounts that you mention?

here you go

 
At 23 February, 2007 12:35, Blogger ScottSl said...

I still don't see a witness who claims the plane flew over. In fact if you read the witnesses account that Ewing pointed out, it seems he agrees that the plane impacted there.

 
At 23 February, 2007 12:42, Blogger Alex said...

Anyway, this video doesn't deny that the airplane was actually there, and it doesn't talk about a missile, so I figure they've got maybe a week before someone accuses them of being CIA "disinfo" agents.

 
At 23 February, 2007 15:20, Blogger Smilodon said...

After reading Jujigatami's post, I popped this into Google:

"Pentagon witness" 9/11

The site he links to came up as third.

 
At 23 February, 2007 16:26, Blogger Jay said...

I dont understand the video anyway. The meaning of the movie is to show that no plane hit the pentagon, then why do they get witnesses that say that a plane hit the Pentagon... Im confused.

 
At 23 February, 2007 16:51, Blogger Stevew said...

Jay
This is the real deal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&eurl

 
At 23 February, 2007 18:56, Blogger Col. Jenny Sparks said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 23 February, 2007 19:54, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

The witnesses contradict each other on the color of the plane, the markings, etc, but they want us to believe they're absolutely right when it comes to where exactly the plane was.

Pat, what the plane looks like and where it is are two different things.
How much detail can you make out watching something a couple of hundred feet off the ground traveling 100's of miles per hour?

Now could you place the location of that plane relative to where you were at when you saw it?

Your pathetic attempt to try to discredit the video based upon your logic is truly sad and a wonderful example of how desperate you and those like you are in trying to prop up the OS.
The eyewitnesses totally contradict the 9/11 Commission and totally support each other's description of where the plane was.

 
At 24 February, 2007 01:33, Blogger Jay said...

Thx for that vid Steve, but i already saw that a few months ago i think, but thx again :) Exelent video btw.

 
At 24 February, 2007 05:46, Blogger Jay said...

The funny thing is, that the first witness actually contradicts the flight path they said the plane took. Because its on the right side of Fort Myer, which they even show a top view picture from Paiks house and Fort Myer. And he said he saw the plane fly over his head. So they actually have 3 witnesses that coroberrate their story... Excelent investigators they are :)

 
At 24 February, 2007 09:50, Blogger shawn said...

Your pathetic attempt to try to discredit the video based upon your logic is truly sad and a wonderful example of how desperate you and those like you are in trying to prop up the OS.

Swing, could you cut it with the irony? It's really getting old coming from you children.

 
At 24 February, 2007 16:22, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

can you link to my #$%*&....

sorry, but the internet is not the link to all information from all sources from all places for all time, like you think it is.

Stand up, turn around, see that window over there...beyond that window is the real world where witness testimonies are on WRITTEN PAPER, locked away in STEEL FILING CABINETS.

lol...I am sorry, but sometime it has to be said.

TAM

 
At 26 February, 2007 00:56, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

The maker of the film Craig Ranke is a complete nutjob in real life as he is on the boards.

 
At 05 March, 2007 17:37, Blogger Caustic Logic said...

I was hoping you guys hadn't done anythin on this video yet. I just finished my own review.
http://frustratingfraud.blogspot.com/2007/03/video-review-pentacon.html

I'm even trying to be fair.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home