Chemtrail Kooks Are Not Kooks
So says a poster over at Democratic Underground.
So yesterday one side of the skies is being manipulated by just a few planes. They were doing the criss cross grids, they were all over the area in which the sun was located. So they started about 12-1:00 pm and within a few hours less than half the sky was that ugly white/gray fake cloud cover. These planes were not on commercial routes. They were not ascending the skies to reach some type of flight altitude. They were systematically creating fake cloud cover in order to block out the sun. Now I am not sure whether this is being done to make the areas hotter or cooler. I am not sure whether this is done to block harmful uv-b rays from hitting us. I am not so so sure about the reasons, but I am sure this is being done in order to control the weather without coming up with new energy systems that are viable for the planet and its inhabitants. This is all about the Frankensteinian science of atmospheric manipulation. This is not about mind control, population reduction, or aliens. In a nutshell, this is about radiative forcing, yet the specifics are unknown because of the secretive nature of the program{s}.
Labels: Chemtrails
posted by Pat @ 9:10 AM
19 comments
19 Comments:
Polical Fear Campaigns
Imaging that people talking about 911!!!!!
bg...exactly what does that video have to do with this crazy chemtrail thing you guy like to believe in.
But it has given me a great idea. A video of truther types spouting some of there loony catch word would be hilarious. Hell you guys are a hoot even without slick editing.
You and Swing should watch the sky. I saw obvious government generated clouds the other day, one looked just like Dick Chaney.
The Chemtrail stuff is so far from reality it makes the 9/11 truthers look like scientists.
TAM:)
Just to go off topic.
I was really impressed by the new google search engine u put on your blog, that i decided to put one up myself.
http://jay-911.blogspot.com/
Just check it out at the right. You can easily go through all the transcripts now looking for explosions, elevators and whatnot. Much easier this way to look for quotes from firemen.
PS, if u press on cashed when u find links with the search engine, u get the page and everything resembliing the word you are looking for is marked yellow. So if you are looking for explosions, every "explosions" word is colored yellow in the text.
Chemtrails are just Windshield Pitting Hysterics with more government conspiracy stacked on top.
"they were all over the area in which the sun was located"
Oh that part of the sky.
Swing is strangely silent on the subject.
I thought he would want to enlighten on the dangers of chemtrails with the same Ahh.. "Fool-proof logic and reasoning" he show with his 911 comments.
Come on Swing... we need a few laughs.
Ok, Truthi, I'll bite:
The question isn't do "chemtrails" exist, it is what they are used for. It isn't even a conspiracy, unless there are health concerns for folks on the ground. It is simply another tool of war. I would argue the phenomenon people are seeing in the sky is part of the research phase. And yes, I've video taped the grid patterns, observed a clear sky turn hazy with no front patterns to account for the haze. I've talked to pilots. Some of the trails of course are simply water vapor, some could be fuel dumps, but others can't be explained except through the following:
I thought you would be well versed on this anyway?
http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/
usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm
Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025>
Research Paper
Presented To
Air Force 2025
by
Col Tamzy J. House
Lt Col James B. Near, Jr.
LTC William B. Shields (USA)
Maj Ronald J. Celentano
Maj David M. Husband
Maj Ann E. Mercer
Maj James E. Pugh
August 1996
The whole paper is relevant, but for this instance I would recommend
What Do We Mean by "Weather-modification"?
The term weather-modification may have negative connotations for many people, civilians and military members alike. It is thus important to define the scope to be considered in this paper so that potential critics or proponents of further research have a common basis for discussion.
"In the broadest sense, weather-modification can be divided into two major categories: suppression and intensification of weather patterns. In extreme cases, it might involve the creation of completely new weather patterns, attenuation or control of severe storms, or even alteration of global climate on a far-reaching and/or long-lasting scale. In the mildest and least controversial cases it may consist of inducing or suppressing precipitation, clouds, or fog for short times over a small-scale region. Other low-intensity applications might include the alteration and/or use of near space as a medium to enhance communications, disrupt active or passive sensing, or other purposes."
Next relevant section:Until recently, success in achieving this goal has been minimal; however, a new window of opportunity may exist resulting from development of new technologies and an increasing world interest in relieving water shortages through precipitation enhancement. Consequently, we advocate that the DOD explore the many opportunities (and also the ramifications) resulting from development of a capability to influence precipitation or conducting "selective precipitation modification." Although the capability to influence precipitation over the long term (i.e., for more than several days) is still not fully understood. By 2025 we will certainly be capable of increasing or decreasing precipitation over the short term in a localized area.
http://video.google.com/
videoplay?docid=8262483364410309502
Discovery Channel Video on owning the weather...
Sorry, no moonbat here, just primary source material.
lol. oh my. he really is certifiable.
The Discovery Channel put the chemtrail whaks to bed. Cloud seeding has been going on for decades. I have been watching jets and vapor trails since the jet age began and chemtrail's whaks are just full of BS. The old B29's, B50's and the Peacemaker flew over where I lived and produced their own type of vapor trails as well, I have known no one who has gotten sick from them, it is just a crock
The old B29's, B50's and the Peacemaker flew over where I lived and produced their own type of vapor trails as well, I have known no one who has gotten sick from them, it is just a crock
Did they turn the clear sky hazy or as water vapor did they evaporate?
NBC investigative report on "Toxic Skies"
http://www.nbc4.tv/news/
9155725/detail.html?taf=la
There are a lot of kooks in that video for sure!
Everyone was different depending on wind currents and altitude. Props did not last nearly as long as the jets. Jet vaportrails could last for hrs and each had a different dispersal pattern. Wind currents can vary every hundred feet or so and vary from day to day. The missle trails from Vandenberg are something to behold. There are a myrad of reasons for patterns and no 2 are the same, chemtrails simply are a sham
I'll bet when Swinger first heard the theory that Cosmic Rays create clouds, his reaction was "OMGZORS, DA ALIENZ R CAUZING DA CLAUDZ!1!!!!11".
Thats probably when he got his first tinfoil hat
Steve, I'm not talking about the patterns I'm talking about turning a clear sky hazy say after about an hour after the fly overs?
Because to the best of my knowledge water vapor evaporates, not haze the sky over.
Did they do that in your experience?
So using weather as a weapon of war is a sham? Perhaps you should read more about it before calling it a sham.
Any thoughts on the video I linked to?
The patterns historically have lasted for hrs. The trails are not all water vapor, jets do have exhaust that mixes with the water vapor. Some last a long time and some dissipate quickly depending on the air currents and altitude. The upper atmosphere is very turbulant and no body can predict how things will react. I said Chemtrails were a sham and said nothing about weather as a weapon of war. I know far more about it than you do and have watched these things all my life. I have read things over the years about it but don't give it much creedence, too many variables. If it were realy viable. it would have been perfected by now.
Post a Comment
<< Home