This Looks Like a Case for the Hardly Boys

A poster at 9-11 Blogger comes up with a list of suggested avenues for investigation:

As I monitor the flood of information popping up on 911 I frequently find myself wondering about some things that could add more weight to the discussion. These are things that ought to be ascertainable with a bit of legwork. I'm not in a position to do much hard investigation myself so I thought I'd put these thoughts out there in case someone wants to pick them up and put some time into them.

1. It appears that certain tenants of the 2 towers were warned not to come to work on 911. This implies a selection process.

Question: Is there a connection between people who didn't show for work that day?

This strikes me as a potentially profitable line of investigation. And we do in fact know quite a few people who did not show up for work at the World Trade Center, including: Alex Jones, Dylan Avery, Jim Fetzer, Korey Rowe, Jason Bermas and David Ray Griffin. What's that? They didn't work at the World Trade Center? Ah, that's what they want you to believe! Richard Andrew Grove did work at the World Trade Center, but was late to a meeting that day and so he survived.

What do all these people have in common? That's right, they're all "Truthers". What better cover could there be? While publicly proclaiming that they want a new investigation, they do everything possible to discredit anyone who joins the movement with their kooky theories. Alex Jones predicted the attacks; when the BBC "predicted" the collapse of WTC-7, everybody thought it meant that they had been given a script; how come nobody thinks Alex got a script?

Oh, how they must laugh at us when we point out that so vast a conspiracy would inevitably have leaks! I'm sure they're just dying to say, "You think a couple thousand people couldn't pull something like this off and keep it quiet? Well, we did!"

9-11 was a Truther Job!