Willie Nelson, Engineer
posted by Pat @ 11:03 AM
45 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Previous Posts
- Just What the World Needs...
- Two Hilarious Poems
- Fan Mail
- Australian Podcast Pans 9-11 Conspiracy Theory
- World's Most Prominent Truther Calls for New Inves...
- Dylan, the King John Look Is Never In
- Troofers Take Up Cause of Lynn Stewart
- How's That Paperwork Coming Along, Dylan?
- Oh, By The Way
- Spam Scam
View My Stats
Allies:
45 Comments:
it's funny how nobody believes the government about anything.
but when it comes to 9/11 the thought of those in power not being completely honest to god angels goes right out the window.
One can and should doubt the government's preparation for a 9/11 type attack, and the government's coverup and bureaucratic finger pointing for their failure to protect us. Governments are incompetent and those in power are not completely honest.
That is a different issue than claiming thousands of governmental and non governmental Americans committed mass murder and treason.
And if they did, it was the most efficient governmental operation in human history, and the best kept secret.
LIHOPers are less insane than MIHOPers. Willie Nelson is a MIHOPer. He is making a gargantuan claim and the only supporting evidence he provides is that he doesn't understand how a building collapse can look similar to a building demolition and yet not be.
This is the critical divide between science and superstition. Reaching beyond your base perceptions into reduction and measurement.
Not much of a debunker? Larry claims the towers were hit by 747s! That's sounds like debunkery to me!
Willie expresses skepticism about the official accounts, as any intelligent and honest layman should. NIST's report dodged ALL the mysteries in the event by cutting off its report at the moment of collapse initiation.
Hey, let's have an all-Anonymous thread!
Glenn the cyber quote miner prevaricates, "...Willie expresses skepticism about the official accounts, as any intelligent and honest layman should. NIST's report dodged ALL the mysteries in the event by cutting off its report at the moment of collapse initiation."
That paragraph is an example of conditional delusion.
Ryan Mackey wrote, "...This class is common because the Truth Movement often focuses on the absence of evidence it arbitrarily decides is important, rather than addressing actual evidence."
Source: JREF: Irreducible Delusion.
When will you learn, Glenn the cyber quote miner, that questions are not evidence?
That said, you should sue Colorado State University, your alleged alma mater, for malpractice.
Willie expresses skepticism about the official accounts, as any intelligent and honest layman should.
Than, why aren’t there any smart truthers? I is clear there are in the group of mentally challenged Americans who have an inborn gullibility to conspiracy theorist bullshit.
Hell they can't even grasp the concept of free fall, so to them it's a big mystery.
LMAO! now the twoofers are using a 70+ year old has been who has been stoned for the last 55 years!
god damn twoofers are stupid!
larry: has any building been hit by a 747?
willie wanka: im sure it has.
obviously willie doesn't know what he is talking about, its the twoofer way!
Willie Nelson said, "...I've seen buildings implode before..."
That statement alone proves that Nelson knows nothing. The buildings didn't "implode", they collapsed.
"...I just saw the Texas stadium implode, just a couple of days ago. And these two buildings imploded."
Logical fallacy: Argument from false equivalence. In other words, Nelson equates the controlled demolition of Texas Stadium with the fire induced collapse of World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7, without taking into account the underlying differences which may make the comparison patently invalid.
"...And the one next to it, nothing hit it."
False. WTC 7 suffered extensive damage as the result of falling debris from the North Tower, WTC 1. Tell us, Willie, how do you explain the fires that burned inside WTC 7 for 8 hours?
"...So naturally I have questions about it."
This is another example of conditional delusion. In other words, questions are magically elevated to the status of evidence.
Typical "9/11 truther": One logical fallacy piled on top of another elevated to the status of valid argument.
LMAO! now the twoofers are using a 70+ year old has been who has been stoned for the last 55 years!
Next they'll be wheeling out a senile 90+ year old author turned conspiracy crank. Oh wait! Gore Vidal's already been outed as a Truther.
I haven't watch the video, but it's important to note that Larry King has also allowed his program to be a springboard for crazy ass alternative medicine nutjobs like Suzanne Somers.
I am so high right now.
WTC7 Demolition Analysis - Bright White Flashes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0vq-r0NM4g
Has this video has been 'played backwards' ?
'cos it sure doesn't look like it ...
WTC7 Demolition Analysis - Bright White Flashes
What the Hell are you even looking at?
Put the bong down!
"What the Hell are you even looking at?
Put the bong down!"
That's the cause of the "Bright White Flashes".
Pathetic, really.
Ok, I gave in an watched the youtube.
WHAT BRIGHT FLASHES ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
The bright white flashes are the super-mega-nano thermite-triggered nuclear bombs which were set off by the dancing Jews. Everyone knows that.
George Bush is still President. he declared Martial Law. Nelson was right.
So, what did ewingsc's video "prove"?
"Controlled demolition"? NOT.
The video proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that "9/11 truthers" have incredibly bad taste in music.
%^)
Neither are you Pat. Jon Gold exposed that truth.
Someone's mother has a moldy basement that's causing hallucinations and undermining impulse control mechanisms.
Glenn Maxey the cyber quote miner scribbles, "...Neither are you Pat. Jon Gold exposed that truth."
Tell us, Glenn, when will apologize to us for quote mining NIST's Final Report on WTC 7 (See post number 180 for details)?
Come on, scumbag, prove to us that you have a shred of decency.
(Don't hold your breath).
Real music (as opposed to the shit you'll hear in troofer™ videos):
David Grisman performs E.M.D.
I hear music in my head, drones Willie. How'd you come up with "Crazy", probes Larry. The answer is all too clear now.
If Willie Nelson, Ed Asner & Charlie Sheen be for us, who can be against us?
The second paragraph should read:
"...Tell us, Glenn, when will YOU apologize to us for quote mining NIST's Final Report on WTC 7 (See post number 180 for details)?"
My bad.
who is this "glenn"? and does he actually post here?
"Jon Gold exposed that truth."
Is that what he calls it?
chakka the sub-literate scribbles, "...who is this 'glenn'? and does he actually post here?"
Didn't I explain this to you a couple of days ago, junior?
Answer: Your incredibly ugly shit-for-brains sister.
Arsehoolie the cyber incontinent squeals, "...Someone's mother has a moldy basement that's causing hallucinations and undermining impulse control mechanisms."
I couldn't agree more, Arsehoolie.
And your statement breaks new ground in the scientific community's long-standing effort to explain the shit stains on your underwear.
Parenthetically, when Arsehoolie's physician asks the intrepid Arsehoolie for a urine, stool and sperm culture, Arsehoolie hands him his underwear.
%^)
"Parenthetically, when Arsehoolie's physician asks the intrepid Arsehoolie for a urine, stool and sperm culture, Arsehoolie hands him his underwear."
Darn it, GB, stop stealing my jokes!
"...Darn it, GB, stop stealing my jokes!"
It's a dangerous job, LL, but somebody has to do it.
%^)
Hey,when the ShrillGit's doctor asked him for a sperm sample,a urine specimen and a stool sample he told him,"here,why don't you just take my underwear".
"Arhoolie said... "
Duhhh, I just proved I'm a fucking moron.
Thanks, Mom and Dad!
Wow Arsehoolie, you're almost as funny as a fart in a spacesuit.
it's important to note that Larry King has also allowed his program to be a springboard for crazy ass alternative medicine nutjobs like Suzanne Somers.
I don't know if he's gone woo, but the quality of his guests has certainly declined. Every time I flip by CNN he's got Marie Osmond on the show. Who the hell cares what Marie Osmond is doing? This isn't Utah or 1978.
Which is too bad, because Larry King used to be the best interview show, with the best guests. It's gone from Who's Who to Who's That.
Which is too bad, because Larry King used to be the best interview show, with the best guests.
Must have been before my time.
That said, he had Ahmadinejad on a couple of years ago and grilled him with his trademark interrogation-style questions:
"Would you meet John McCain if he wins the presidency?"
"My government will meet anyone who becomes president! Marg Bar Amrika!"
"Oh, I see. And what if Obama gets elected?"
"My government will meet anyone who becomes president! Marg Bar Amrika!"
"Really, that's fascinating. And you know Sarah Palin? She was a mayor of a town in Alaska. And you were a mayor of Tehran. That means both of you were mayors. Would you meet her if she became president?"
"My government will meet anyone who becomes president! Marg Bar Amrika!"
"It's been great! Next week we talk to Marie Osmond who was famous in Utah in 1978 or something. Are you a fan of Marie Osmond, Mr Armourdinnerjad? No? You don't know? Okay, please come back on the show anytime."
Yes, he really used to be a good interviewer. But you're right, in addition to the decline in quality of guests, his questioning style has also regressed into slow-pitch softball.
I've just realized I messed up my own joke. It should have gone like this:
"It's been great! Next week we talk to Marie Osmond who was famous in Utah in 1978 or something. Are you a fan of Marie Osmond, Mr Armourdinnerjad?"
"My government will meet anyone who becomes president! Marg Bar Amrika!"
That's my joke,you carpet bagging dunces!!
Interesting that the insane guitar plunker is now posting videos of master musicians in an attempt to salvage his ruined reputation here at the World Headquarters of the Debunker Cult.Too late DogBoy,you've already made so many ludicrous statements (not to mention the incessant whining) to ever come back to any semblance of respect."....eight,nine,ten,OUT".
Arsehoolie whimpers, "...eight,nine,ten,OUT."
No, that would be a conservative estimate of your IQ, shit-for-brains.
That said, I've seen people like you, Arsehoolie, but I had to pay admission.
Could you please refrain from calling me "shit for brains"? It's really hurting my feelings.Thanks.
Arsehoolie the ignorant scribbles, "...Could you please refrain from calling me "shit for brains"? It's really hurting my feelings.Thanks."
Just a statement of fact, shit-for-brains.
But we know that 9/11 troofers never let facts get in the way of their insanity. Witness your 100% fact-free arguments, Arsehoolie.
I rest my case.
LOL!
Aw,c'mon DogBoy,"shit for brains" is way over the top,cruel and quite an ad hominem.I will be contacting Paddy and his dim bulb jogging assistant for redress.This will not stand!!You're so mean you should be banned.Quit it,alright? I'm serious,can we please raise the level of insults here at the circle jerk?
willie may not be an engineer(but then noome here is)...but these folks are:
http://cms.ae911truth.org/
guess what...they agree with Willie..
Post a Comment
<< Home