Monday, April 12, 2010

World's Most Prominent Truther Calls for New Investigation of 9/11

No word yet on whether he is endorsing the NYC CAN people.


TEHRAN — Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has written to UN chief Ban Ki-moon, asking him to launch an investigation into the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, news reports said on Monday.

"The minimum expectation from your excellency is to set up an independent and trusted fact-finding group to comprehensively investigate the real factors behind September 11," Ahmadinejad said in the text of the letter carried by official news agencies.

They did not say when the letter was sent.

296 Comments:

At 12 April, 2010 21:52, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Why doesn't he just come out and say "bankers" or "hooked-nose money lenders"?

And notice how quickly the troofers do NOT run away from this.

 
At 12 April, 2010 22:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yawn--another World-infamous anti-Semite howls for another "investigation" into 9/11.

I'm shocked--shocked--I tell you.

%^)

 
At 12 April, 2010 22:37, Blogger Sam said...

Ask Iran to foot the bill and I am TOTALLY for it.

 
At 13 April, 2010 02:36, Anonymous TV said...

Scratch a twoofer to find an anti-Semite is rapidly being turned upside down.

Scratch an anti-Semite and you find a twoofer is becoming much more close to the truth.

It is funny, though, how Iran howls about it's national sovereignty, but is quite happy to call for violations the US national sovereignty when it suits them.

 
At 13 April, 2010 04:33, Anonymous Anonymous said...

when all you got is a hammer, all you see is nails.

 
At 13 April, 2010 04:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...when all you got is a hammer, all you see is nails."

More 100% fact-free commentary from the neo-fascist liar wing of the "9/11 truth movement".

No doubt, it's hard to get the big picture when you have such a small screen. Right Anonymous?

And why don't you pick a handle and stick with it, fucktard? In your case, "droolin' moron" should prove to be an appropriate handle.

 
At 13 April, 2010 05:25, Anonymous Wayne Young (formerly LUCUS) said...

I've decided to release my real name.

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=170776792&blogId=531949216

 
At 13 April, 2010 05:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

More 100% fact-free commentary from the neo-fascist liar wing of the "9/11 truth movement".

can you define the word fascist? since you're claiming the 9/11 truth movement is, it's likely you have little to no idea what it means.



No doubt, it's hard to get the big picture when you have such a small screen. Right Anonymous?

And why don't you pick a handle and stick with it, fucktard? In your case, "droolin' moron" should prove to be an appropriate handle.


i think you have me confused with pat or jamie oh wait, droolin moron, i get it. you think i'm laz, right?

 
At 13 April, 2010 05:46, Anonymous nutcracker said...

Wayne Young - Lucus says.

I'm sure the government already knows my real name so what's it matter anyway now.

Did the evil govt which pulled off 9/11 just figure out your real name?

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous wrote, "...can you define the word fascist? since you're claiming the 9/11 truth movement is, it's likely you have little to no idea what it means."

Nice straw man argument, Anonymous.

The term I used was neo-fascist, not "fascist".

And you know damned well that I fully understand both versions of the word, don't you?

Moreover, all one need do is look at the leaders of the "9/11 truth movement" to understand the neo-fascist underpinnings of your alleged "truth movement" (Eric Hufschmid, anyone? Eric Hufschmid, the reader should note, was the first AmeriKKKan to publish a book on the events of 911 titled, Painful Questions, which was first published in 2002. Thus, neo-fascist Eric Hufschmid is no less than the Godfather of the American 911 "truth" movement). You're nothing more than a pack of anti-Semites, stealth neo-Nazis, Orwellian liars, con artists and perverts, who masquerade as "concerned citizens". And I need look no further than your support of that raving anti-Semite, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to substantiate my allegation's against your Orwellian "truth movement".

"...i get it. you think i'm laz, right?"

No, I don't think you're LL. In fact, I think you're a semi-literate, über sleazy Al Qeada apologist whose head is rammed so far up his ass that he'd need a World-class team of proctologists to extract his head from his colon.

Got it, Anonymous?

Now pick a handle and stick with it, jackass.

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:16, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know what's funny? Ahmadinejad hasn't started two illegal wars with Iraq and Afghanistan and isn't illegally drone bombing Pakistan. America is a bigger threat to the world than Iran could ever hope to be.

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:32, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

"Ahmadinejad hasn't started two illegal wars with Iraq and Afghanistan ..."

Actually, moron-who-doesn't-read, Iran has likely started a war with Iraq. And not for the enforcement of U.N. sanctions, which makes it a bit illegal.

As to Afghanistan, it seems likely that they're up to something, and hopefully it's on our side.

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:38, Blogger angrysoba said...

Hey! I fell all ignored as I thought you'd mention my post.

I was stunned to see that the Infowars comments box for this story is so full of absolutely insane shit.

Oh, and the word verification is "hogoerea" which sounds somehow relevant.

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...You know what's funny? Ahmadinejad hasn't started two illegal wars with Iraq and Afghanistan and isn't illegally drone bombing Pakistan. America is a bigger threat to the world than Iran could ever hope to be."

More bullshit, Anonymous?

So tell us, Al Qeada apologist, why are Osama bin Laden, Iran, Iraq, Libya, and North Korea, among others, trying to obtain nuclear weapons on the black market, which they intend to detonate somewhere in a major American metropolitan area?

Source: timesonline.co.uk: Hillary Clinton fears al-Qaeda is obtaining nuclear weapons material.

Source: nti.org: The Threat--The Demand for Black Market Fissile Material.

Source: The Carnegie Endowment: The Demand for Black Market Fissile Material.

No threat there, right Anonymous?

And you have the unmitigated gall to refer to America as the biggest "threat to the world"?

The mind boggles.

Now pick a handle and stick to it, fucktard.

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

angrysoba wrote, "...Hey! I fell all ignored as I thought you'd mention my post."

If it's any consolation, I read your post, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Thanks, angrysoba!

 
At 13 April, 2010 06:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So tell us, Al Qeada apologist, why are Osama bin Laden, Iran, Iraq, Libya, and North Korea, among others, trying to obtain nuclear weapons on the black market, which they intend to detonate somewhere in a major American metropolitan area?"

I'm not an Al-Qaeda apologist, but I know that America is responsible for more terror than Osama Bin Laden in his wildest dreams. Ask the Afghans, Iraqis, and Pakistanis. Israel also has nukes. Why shouldn't those countries you mentioned try to level the playing field? Why not make Israel get rid of their nukes? How much American nuclear technology has been sold to those countries on the black market? I stand by my statement that America is the biggest purveyor of terrorism in the world.

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:04, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And when did Iran declare war on Iraq, and how dare they do that after we already did it for no good reason?

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Why shouldn't those countries you mentioned try to level the playing field?"

Right! You're not an Al Qeada apologist, which explains why you wrote that pile of crap.

Moreover, they're not trying to "level the playing field?"--you Orwellian liar. They're trying to "level" a major American metropolitan area.

"...Why not make Israel get rid of their nukes?"

Israel has "nukes"? According to whom, Ari Ben-Menashe, Pravda, WorldNet Daily and Mordechai Vanunu?

ROTFLMAO!

According to Wikipedia, "...In July 2004 Vanunu claimed in the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper that the state of Israel was complicit in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He claimed there were 'near-certain indications' Kennedy was assassinated in response to 'pressure he exerted on Israel’s then head of government, David Ben-Gurion, to shed light on Dimona’s nuclear reactor.'"

Right, Israel assassinated Kennedy. And make no mistake, that statement alone is enough to make me suspect that we have a nutter in the woodpile (Vanunu to be specific).

Moreover, Vanunu's proof is what exactly? His alleged "near-certain indications" (which is weasel word-laden bullshit, as the word "near" indicates) and unsubstantiated allegations against David Ben-Gurion?

Sorry, but quoting a nutter doesn't cut it, Anonymous.

Try again.

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

since you geniuses are all about debunking all things alex jones, any luck debunking the wiki leaks vid? ya know the one that shows u.s. military joyfully killing children? how about you debunk that shit?

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous squirms, "...since you geniuses are all about debunking all things alex jones, any luck debunking the wiki leaks vid? ya know the one that shows u.s. military joyfully killing children? how about you debunk that shit?"

That's right, Anonymous, when you've had your ass handed to you, change the subject.

You're pathetic.

Since you live in Austin, TX, why don't you calm down, drop your silly delusions, and go to Salt Lick Restaurant and have decent lunch.

Get a life, pick a handle and stick to it, fucktard.

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...any luck debunking the wiki leaks vid? ya know the one that shows u.s. military joyfully killing children? how about you debunk that shit?"

Because there is nothing to debunk.

Does the obvious always escape you, punk?

Now pick a handle and stick to it, fucktard.

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:52, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about the Associated Press, among a MULTITUDE of other reputable sources?

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hah_mnNlEdL2F05h25Ib2pRBctegD9EVO6B80

Everyone knows Israel has nukes.

 
At 13 April, 2010 07:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Click Here For Associate Press

 
At 13 April, 2010 08:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You're misrepresenting your source again, Anonymous (What's new? After all, we're dealing with an Al Qeada apologist for "9/11 truth"). AP makes no such claim at all.

Read on, disingenuous one...

AP wrote, "...Israel's official policy of 'nuclear ambiguity' — neither confirming nor denying that it has nuclear weapons — has long been a cornerstone of its military deterrence. But officials and experts from various countries, in addition to one well-known Israeli whistle-blower, have all said the truth is not ambiguous at all: That Israel has dozens, perhaps hundreds, of nuclear bombs."

That's your proof that Israel has "nukes"?

Israel's enemies and a lone nutter (Vanunu) make unsubstantiated allegations and that qualifies as "proof" in your drug-addled mind?

No doubt, Hunter S. Thompson would be proud of you, Anonymous.

Now pick a handle and stick to it, fucktard.

 
At 13 April, 2010 09:33, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
You know what's funny? Ahmadinejad hasn't started two illegal wars with Iraq and Afghanistan and isn't illegally drone bombing Pakistan. America is a bigger threat to the world than Iran could ever hope to be."

Iran has been illegally at war with the United States since 1979, you illiterate fucktard.

 
At 13 April, 2010 09:38, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Right. Pakistan, a third world country has nukes, Israel, as supplier for some of the United States' most advanced weapon systems, loyal ally and fiercely threatened and nearly isolated in the region, doesn't. Right? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Right! That must be why Vanunu was kidnapped and tried in secret in Israel! This kind of denialist bullocks can only be found at SLC, the Corky orchestra.

JFK killed by Israel? An excellent Mossad disinformation effort to defame Vanunu and impeach his credibility. State worshippers just can't understand how it works.

SLC, a pile of maliciously lying camel dung, and GB is the little crinkled American flag on top of it.

 
At 13 April, 2010 09:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...JFK killed by Israel? An excellent Mossad disinformation effort to defame Vanunu and impeach his credibility."

Mossad made that claim?

Wrong, those are Vanunu's words, straight from the horse's mouth.

Next.

"...Right! That must be why Vanunu was kidnapped and tried in secret in Israel!"

No, he was kidnapped in order to silence the lying bastard.

And for all of his unsubstantiated allegations, he's never provided ONE SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE to support his argument.

Next.

"...SLC, a pile of maliciously lying camel dung, and GB is the little crinkled American flag on top of it."

Projecting again, Anonymous?

Next.

"...State worshippers [SIC] just can't understand how it works."

State "worshippers"????

I don't "worshipp" [SIC] the state--far from it.

Now pick a handle and stick to it, fucktard.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oooh! Touchy touchy.

Now link me to an audio recording of the Al-Wassat interview, an interview which was impossible to conduct in the first place.

Link me and I will bow before you. Promise.

You can't link me, you howling moron, because the interview never took place. Al-Wassat was full of shit, and the other newspapers merely parroted this so-called 'interview'.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:10, Anonymous Anonymous said...

*cricket*

I'm waiting for that audio link, GuitarBill.

*cricket*

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:14, Anonymous It's Great To Be An American! said...

"since you geniuses are all about debunking all things alex jones, any luck debunking the wiki leaks vid? ya know the one that shows u.s. military joyfully killing children? how about you debunk that shit?"

The JAWA REPORT took a huge dump on your "story" a fucking week ago dumbass...

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh and by the way, you cantankerous twit, worshipper is the correct spelling. Just so you fully understand how much of an ass you make out of yourself not only via your malicious lies, but also through your embarrassing pedantic antics.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmm, and what did the JAWA report say about the sadistic laughing and remarks in the helicopter? About the shooting of the bus that came to collect the wounded? The talk about the wounded please picking up a weapon so they'd have an excuse to slaughter him?

Who gives a fuck about any "JAWA" report? What does "JAWA" stand for anyway? Jerk-off Association of Warmongering Assholes?

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nah... Israel doesn't have any nukes.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Now link me to an audio recording of the Al-Wassat interview, an interview which was impossible to conduct in the first place."

Lying again, Anonymous.

The interview was never committed to audio, as the following makes perfectly clear:

"...Later, the London-based Al-Wasat printed an interview it claimed it made with Vanunu and quoted him as saying Israel had between 100 to 200 atom and hydrogen bombs."

Source: harvard.edu: A-G orders Vanunu arrested.

Furthermore, you have absolutely NO EVIDENCE that Al Wasat is a Mossad propaganda mill or asset.

"...Al Wasat (Arabic: الوسط‎) is an Arabic language daily newspaper in Bahrain. It was founded by Mansour Al Jamri who is also editor-in-chief as of 2008. It is one of the most popular newspapers in Bahrain and is generally regarded as one of the only dailies that does not take a loyalist stand to the Bahraini government."

Source: Wikipedia: Al Wasat.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:35, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Olmert urged to quit after letting slip what everyone knows: Israel is a nuclear power

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:36, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ya know... I'm going to go with the multiple news sources citing Israel's nuclear program, and I'm going to ignore the "debunker" GuitarBill. Call me crazy.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Nah... Israel doesn't have any nukes."

Misrepresenting your source again--you Orwellian neo-fascist liar?

Telegraph.co.uk wrote, "...Yuval Steinitz, an opposition MP from the Right-wing Likud party, said Mr Olmert should resign. 'His unfortunate statement in Germany harms Israel's 50-year policy of ambiguity,' he said. Yossi Beilin, head of the Left-wing Meretz movement, said: 'The amazing statement regarding nuclear capability indicates a lack of caution bordering on irresponsibility and elicits a great doubt whether this person is fit to serve as prime minister.'"

Source: telegraph.co.uk: Olmert urged to quit after letting slip what everyone knows: Israel is a nuclear power.

In other words, he didn't reveal ANYTHING. In fact, he violated Israel's policy of nuclear ambiguity.

Read it again:

"...Israel's official policy of 'nuclear ambiguity' — neither confirming nor denying that it has nuclear weapons — has long been a cornerstone of its military deterrence."

Source: AP: Canceled Netanyahu trip spotlights Israel nukes.

Any more half-truths and outright lies for us, Anonymous?

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:44, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey GuitarBill, you turd. That's a big FAIL. No link to the audio tape of the interview. BIG, BIG failure. And why the FUCK do you link me to Al-Wasat's Wikipedia page? What the FUCK does that have to do with anything? Am I interested in a generic encyclopedia article about Al-Wasat? No, that's not what I asked for. You're a galactic moron.

How does it feel?

Let's make it worse.

Cretinous buffoons like yourself will *always* make an ass out of themselves. It's a fact of life. Now go stand in the corner, child. You don't have the intellectual capacity yet to join the grownups in discussion.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:46, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like I said, I'm going to ignore the "debunker" GuitarBill, and rely on the multitude of news sources that state otherwise.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:48, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the FUCK? One can't even keep a straight face reading your comments, GuitarBill, the words "Israel nukes" are even in the fucking article you LINK, you tottering twit! You'd deny a bat if it fucking hit you in the face, wouldn't you, state worshipper.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Israel's status as a nuclear power since the 1960s is widely known"

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous lies, "...That's a big FAIL. No link to the audio tape of the interview."

That's because there never was an audio.

Next.

So where's your "proof" that Al Wasat is an Israeli Mossad asset?

I won't hold my breath.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's because there never was an interview, Einstein. LOL.

Where's your proof that Vanunu said what he said? Link me to the audio tape. You have not.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...What the FUCK? One can't even keep a straight face reading your comments, GuitarBill, the words "Israel nukes" are even in the fucking article you LINK, you tottering twit! You'd deny a bat if it fucking hit you in the face, wouldn't you, state worshipper."

And you conveniently misrepresent your source and completely avoid the content of the last paragraph found therein:

Telegraph.co.uk wrote, "...Yuval Steinitz, an opposition MP from the Right-wing Likud party, said Mr Olmert should resign. 'His unfortunate statement in Germany harms Israel's 50-year policy of ambiguity,' he said. Yossi Beilin, head of the Left-wing Meretz movement, said: 'The amazing statement regarding nuclear capability indicates a lack of caution bordering on irresponsibility and elicits a great doubt whether this person is fit to serve as prime minister.'"

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

By the way, it's Al-Wassat, not Al-Wasat, and it's not a fucking person, delirious douche bag.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Federation of American Scientists, Israel possesses around 75–200 weapons.[30] Imagery analysts can identify weapon bunkers, mobile missile launchers, and launch sites in satellite photographs.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...That's because there never was an interview, Einstein. LOL...Where's your proof that Vanunu said what he said? Link me to the audio tape. You have not."

Have you ever heard of a footnote, clown?

Try the bottom of the Wikipedia page, jerkoff.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Israel is widely believed to be the sixth country in the world to have developed nuclear weapons[5]

You're a fucking douche bag and a complete moron. You know what? If you believe 9/11 was not an inside job, that means it absolutely must be. Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:59, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill is an idiot, a spin artist, and a liar.

 
At 13 April, 2010 10:59, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Have you ever heard of a footnote, clown?"

Have you ever heard of a hyperlink, skank? Now run along, boy, and link me to the audio tape of the Vanunu interview. You have not.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...By the way, it's Al-Wassat, not Al-Wasat, and it's not a fucking person, delirious douche bag."

Not according to Google and Wikipedia:

Source: wikipedia: Al Wasat.

Source: Google: Al Wasat.

And I never claimed that Al Wasat is a person--you illiterate ass-clown.

Perhaps if you got your information from a source other than 911blogger, you might learn the truth.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So GuitarBill, do you admit that Israel has nukes?

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Concerning FAS:

Wikipedia writes, "...The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is a non-profit organization formed in 1945 by scientists from the Manhattan Project who felt that scientists, engineers and other innovators had an ethical obligation to bring their knowledge and experience to bear on critical national decisions.[1] Their first projects focused on controlling nuclear weapons and research on civilian nuclear power, issues that remain prominent to FAS today."

Source: Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_American_Scientists.

Misrepresenting your sources again, Anonymous ass-clown?

FAS is not a US government institution, it's a non-profit institution, and any information derived therein is suspect and unofficial.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Israel is widely believed to be the sixth country in the world to have developed nuclear weapons[5]"

Misrepresenting your sources again, Onan?

"...widely believed."?!?!?!?!?

More weasel words. LOL!

That's pure speculation--you weasel.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous whines, "...So GuitarBill, do you admit that Israel has nukes?"

No, because so far you've proven nothing.

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, Onan the weasel.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:19, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill, why would Obama need to agree to keep Israel's nukes a secret, if they don't exist?

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill, you are a sorry liar, and a loser. Israel has nukes, and no matter how much spin you put on it, or how many lies you spew, that will be the truth.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill, you're a pathetic caricature of yourself. You're also a whiny, undereducated, bloviating turd.

While I (we, apparently the other Anonymous agrees with me) have cited many credible sources proving the existence of Israeli nukes, you have only your irrelevant and non-existent Vanunu interview, for which you don't have a link to the audio source. How embarrassing! SLC: The Corky Orchestra.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous cites The Moonie Times, "...GuitarBill, why would Obama need to agree to keep Israel's nukes a secret, if they don't exist?"

Your source is Sun Myung Moon's Washington Times?!?!?!?!?

LOL!

What next? Will you cite the American Free Press?

You're a laugh a minute, Onan the weasel.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now admit Israel has nukes, you piece of cantankerous fascist slime. Bow down before the truth camp, kneel and kiss the ring. You are less then the dirt on the sole of my shoes.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And what was your fucking source again, dingbat? Al-Wassat? Muhammad Saeed Al-Sahhaf has more credibility than you do.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're not allowed to provide any source that contradicts what the lying debunker GuitarBill is trying to lie about. Then he attacks the messenger, and disregards the message (even though he can't prove it's untrue).

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:32, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous whines, "...GuitarBill, you're a pathetic caricature of yourself. You're also a whiny, undereducated, bloviating turd."

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, Onan the weasel.

I'll hold my double masters up to your GED any day of the week, Onan the weasel.

So when will you provide something other than speculation?

"...While I (we, apparently the other Anonymous agrees with me) have cited many credible sources proving the existence of Israeli nukes..."

You've done nothing of the sort. All you provide is pure speculation, garnished with bald-faced misrepresentation of your alleged "source".

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...And what was your fucking source again, dingbat? Al-Wassat? Muhammad Saeed Al-Sahhaf has more credibility than you do."

According to who, a bald faced liar of your ilk?

That's a laugh.

Are there any more sources you care to misrepresent?

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:35, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

Let's see:the cracked out Yuppie guitar collector and musical theory blowhard sleeping on a cot in the garage is claiming that 1) Israel has no nukes and 2) they kidnapped Vanunu on general principles:he's a mean and vicious liar! Can anyone say:Yuppie Wackjob?

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...You're not allowed to provide any source that contradicts what the lying debunker GuitarBill is trying to lie about."

Care to show me where I lied, Onan the weasel?

So far, I've busted you misrepresenting your sources on numerous occasions.

"...Then he attacks the messenger, and disregards the message (even though he can't prove it's untrue)."

I never attacked the messenger, I proved that you're a liar who misrepresents his sources.

Next.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie the cyber scumbag scribbles, "...Let's see:the cracked out Yuppie guitar collector and musical theory blowhard sleeping on a cot in the garage is claiming that 1) Israel has no nukes and 2) they kidnapped Vanunu on general principles:he's a mean and vicious liar! Can anyone say:Yuppie Wackjob?"

Incoming. Retard at 12 o'clock high.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tell us again what your source for the Vanunu story was, turd, and how it compares to the Washington Times.

Then link us to the audio tape of the Vanunu interview. You have not. You're an empty-handed fool, a soap box clochard.

You're a crackpot, a dunce, a weasel, a liar and a piece of cantankerous, obtuse, facscist filth. Lying is your hobby, and therefore, this blog is your hobby. You're a laughing stock and a cretin. You're to be put in the the cucking stool, pointed at, and mocked. It's amazing a creature as retarded as you can ever get a degree. It's also testament to the sad state of the educational system. :(

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the compulsive liar scribbles, "...Now admit Israel has nukes, you piece of cantankerous fascist slime. Bow down before the truth camp, kneel and kiss the ring. You are less then the dirt on the sole of my shoes."

Still patting yourself on the back, retard?

So when will you "prove" that Israel has "nukes"--you slimy neo-Nazi, anti-Semite and bald-faced liar?

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:43, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's been proven over and over. However, you can lead a horse to the water.....

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:45, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You, on the other hand, have not produced a single sliver of evidence that Vanunu ever did an interview for Al-Wassat. Typical hypocritical douche baggerism, there, right? You imbecile?

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:48, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

GuitarBill, if Israel doesn't have nukes, they should get on it right now.

 
At 13 April, 2010 11:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

But they do have nukes, which makes GuitarBill a gigantic bullshitter, like most "debunkers".

 
At 13 April, 2010 12:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...But they do have nukes, which makes GuitarBill a gigantic bullshitter, like most "debunkers"."

No, it's alleged that Israel has nukes--the allegations have NEVER been proven. And there's a big difference between an allegation and confirmation.

Wikipedia writes, "...The treaty came into force on 5 March 1970 and currently there are 189 states party to the treaty, five of which are recognized as nuclear weapon states: the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, and China (also the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council)...Four non-parties to the treaty are known or believed to possess nuclear weapons. India, Pakistan and North Korea have openly tested and declared that they possess nuclear weapons, while Israel has had a policy of opacity regarding its own nuclear weapons program."

Source: Wikipedia: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Apparently, you don't understand the difference between knowledge and belief, Anonymous.

Belief is the stuff you do at Church: "...I believe that God exists."

But that's far from knowledge.

Got it, ass-clown?

Moreover, Israel promised--repeatedly--to never be the first to use nuclear weapons in the middle east (and that promise does NOT prove that they have deployable nuclear weapons).

Do you honestly believe that we can expect the same from Iran?

If you honestly believe that Iran can be trusted with nuclear weapons, you're too naive to be let out alone at night.

 
At 13 April, 2010 12:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonytmous prevaricates, "...Then link us to the audio tape of the Vanunu interview. You have not. You're an empty-handed fool, a soap box clochard."

How can I link to an article that was removed from the London Al Wasat website? Must I wade through Google's cached database?

The fact is that the interview was used against Vanunu, and was proven to be authentic by the authorities--your idiotic Mossad conspiracy theory notwithstanding.

Are you still conflating belief with knowledge, Anonymous.

Well, that crap may work on your retarded buddy's who frequent 911blogger.com, but it won't pass the sniff test where I'm concerned.

 
At 13 April, 2010 12:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lazarus Long said...
" Anonymous said...
You know what's funny? Ahmadinejad hasn't started two illegal wars with Iraq and Afghanistan and isn't illegally drone bombing Pakistan. America is a bigger threat to the world than Iran could ever hope to be."

Iran has been illegally at war with the United States since 1979, you illiterate fucktard.

fucktard, you ever heard mohammad mosaddegh? or are you too fucking stoopid to know history, debunk that you little pissant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh

 
At 13 April, 2010 12:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...But they do have nukes, which makes GuitarBill a gigantic bullshitter, like most 'debunkers'."

Proof, Anonymous! I want proof, not speculation.

Until you can provide real incontrovertible proof, you're just another anti-Semite with his panties in a twist.

 
At 13 April, 2010 12:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...fucktard, you ever heard mohammad mosaddegh [SIC}? or are you too fucking stoopid to know history, debunk that you little pissant"

Ayatollah Khomeini was no friend of Mohammad Mossadegh. So what's your point, Jew hater?

Mohammad Mossadegh--you fucking idiot--was a socialist.

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was a theocracy loving, religiously insane nut-bar, who would just as soon kill a socialist as look him.

What was that about "history", Anonymous? Or is "truther history" all you know?

 
At 13 April, 2010 13:03, Anonymous Marc said...

Hey, guess what? Irael has nukes! Who cares?
Israel has had them since the early 1970s. They got their initial plutonium from the U.S.. How is not clear, it depends on who you ask. Once again, who cares. As my Egyptian friend points out, Israel has not used them on anyone. He also points out that the same woul NOT be true if Syria, Jordan, Iraq, or Egypt has possessed atomic weapons during any of theur wars against Israel.

Then there is the issue of "Illegal" wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Illegal how? Al Qaeda had a pressence in Afghanistan, we asked the Taliban to hand them over and they told us no, and then said that their causes were linked. So they wanted the war, and we gave it to them. Al Qaeda declared war on the United States in the late 1990s.
As far as Iraq, a state of war existed between them and the nations of the Gulf War Allience dating back to 1991. A cease fire was signed at the end of Desert Storm. A cease fire is not the same as articles of surrender or a peace treaty. Technically the United States is still at war with China and North Korea as that war ended not in a peace treaty nor surrender, but a cease-fire agreement.

Every time Iraq fires at coalition aircraft enforcing the No-Fly Zone they were in violation of the cease-fire agreement and we had the option of continuing the war at any point. So technically the war with Iraq was legal.

What I am facinated by is Anonymous' obsession with Isaeli nukes. Why do Jews with nukes bother him so much?

 
At 13 April, 2010 13:05, Blogger Billman said...

Marc, I think the point is GB is trying to get anonymous to post a source that isn't speculation or a mined quote... that's what I'm getting from this.

 
At 13 April, 2010 13:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Marc wrote, "...Hey, guess what? Irael has nukes! Who cares?"

If that's true, Israel has NEVER tested their alleged "nukes".

Personally, I wouldn't trust untested nuclear weapons to function.

Thus, if Israel does have nuclear weapons, they're taking a HUGE gamble on untested ordinance, which is nothing less than insane.

Sorry, but that assertion does not compute given what we know about the reliability and maintainability of real nuclear weapons.

 
At 13 April, 2010 13:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Billman wrote, "...Marc, I think the point is GB is trying to get anonymous to post a source that isn't speculation or a mined quote... that's what I'm getting from this."

Exactly! You nailed it, Bill.

 
At 13 April, 2010 13:16, Blogger Billman said...

If the truthers honestly would rather live under Iran rule because they're mistaken about their intentions on this whole "new investigation" thing, I say let them go...

It seems the truthers have become nothing but apologists and sympathizers for both Iran and Al Qaeda, or really anyone against the U.S.

Try living in the conditions and under the rule of any of those countries as one of thier citizens and then see if you still want to apologize for them.

 
At 13 April, 2010 13:53, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

Soon the Wacky Yuppie on lead guitar will break out his 190 proof bottle of "O.J. was framed for the 1994 murders" while traipsing around claiming it's a can of whoop-ass juice! The guy is lying in a puddle in his own den,and claiming he's the man! Locate your gingko biloba so you can remember where you hid the Viagra so your wife will give you ten minutes upstairs,DogBoy.

 
At 13 April, 2010 14:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie the cyber prevaricator whines, "...Soon the Wacky Yuppie on lead guitar will break out his 190 proof bottle of "O.J. was framed for the 1994 murders" while traipsing around claiming it's a can of whoop-ass juice! The guy is lying in a puddle in his own den,and claiming he's the man! Locate your gingko biloba so you can remember where you hid the Viagra so your wife will give you ten minutes upstairs,DogBoy."

Incoming. Retard at 12 o'clock high.

 
At 13 April, 2010 14:03, Blogger Billman said...

Arhoolie, that's interesting you bring up O.J. I've been following his case recently (unwillingly, since its all over the news in Vegas). But while he was aquitted for murder years ago, he was found guilty of robbing a casino here for some of his sports memorabilia not too long ago. He's currently in jail, and the story I saw on the news last night is he's set to appear for his appeal soon.

Meh, just my opinion and speculation, but I think he killed her all those years ago.

 
At 13 April, 2010 15:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Billman wrote, "...Arhoolie, that's interesting you bring up O.J."

Bill we're judged by the company we keep; thus, it's probably not a good idea to converse with a sub-literate bore, like Arsehoolie the off-topic cyber schmuck.

Just my 2 cents...

 
At 13 April, 2010 16:21, Blogger Billman said...

Oh, I know GB. I just found it ironic that Arhoolie of all people would bring up something I was currently following. I don't seriously expect a response other than "Get a load of Bilbo the Bagged Debunker!" or whatever whimsical shit he'll flame me with this time... I think we're all getting desensitized to Arhoolie.

 
At 13 April, 2010 16:26, Anonymous Marc said...

The one thing that Israel is good at is keeping their mouths shut. So there is just nothing solid to be found that will detail their nuclear weapons program.

Rightly so.

However there is some evidence out there, including at least one possible test in 1979:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/israel/nuke-test.htm

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Safrica/Vela.html

http://www.israelnewsagency.com/israelnuclearweaponsolmertiransyriaterrorism481211.html

Before you click, the bottom line of all three of those reports is "We don't know for sure if it was a test or not", and this is about as good as it well ever get.

The best over all write up on Israel's "Suspected" nuke program is this one:

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm

Once againt, the above report is a glorified educated guess.

The question shouldn't be if Israel has nukes, the question should be "Why is this bad?". Anonymous is an enemy of freedom and an anit-Semite. This is clear in his above posts where he equates the actions US military with those of Islamic terrorists, and then says that we are worse. He/she/it then brings up Israels - possible - nukes as justification for Iran to build their own nukes. Sucking on the teet of evil has rotted his brain, so why bother arguing with him/her/it?

Look at the 1973 war with Egypt. Israel had control of Egyptian skies. They could have destroyed every city, every bridge, their new damn, and killed a huge chunk of the population. Israel did not, they attacked military targets only. Now had the situation been reversed, and Syrian and Egyptian jets roamed free over Israel's skies, how would that have worked out?

The true issue with Anonymous is that he/she/it is siding with the bad guys because they are killing Americans and Jews, it is nothing more than that and you should not waste your time with such people. However, that is up to you.

 
At 13 April, 2010 16:27, Anonymous paul w said...

GuitarBill said...
If that's true, Israel has NEVER tested their alleged "nukes".


Actually, Bill, they probably did, off the coast of South Africa.

It was never proven that it was their bomb, as it would have caused political problem as the time.

They tested it under the pretense of it being another countries bomb...my memory is moudly re the date and the exact details, but from what I can gather, most people believed it was an Israeli bomb.

 
At 13 April, 2010 16:31, Anonymous paul w said...

GuitarBill

If you're interested, I've just finished reaing an excellent book about the nuclear issue: 'In Mortal Hands', by Stephanie Cooke.

 
At 13 April, 2010 16:32, Anonymous paul w said...

Sorry for the typos

 
At 13 April, 2010 17:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"How can I link to an article that was removed from the London Al Wasat website? Must I wade through Google's cached database?"

I rest my case. It's not even on their website. You're in a fantasy world, GuitarBill, and by the way, you're a wanker.

"The fact is that the interview was used against Vanunu, and was proven to be authentic by the authorities--your idiotic Mossad conspiracy theory notwithstanding."

Yet it's not on the website and you can't produce any audio recording of it, bullshit appeal to authority notwithstanding.

"Are you still conflating belief with knowledge, Anonymous."

Right. You believe that Israel is nuke-free, and I (and even your pals here) know that you are drooling, cantankerous, petty, cretinous and self-righteous denialist moron for thinking that.

 
At 13 April, 2010 17:35, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The true issue with Anonymous is that he/she/it is siding with the bad guys because they are killing Americans and Jews"

Sums up the simplistic, fucked up mindset of SLC thugs in a nutshell. Good job, douche.

 
At 13 April, 2010 17:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the anti-Semite scribbles, "...Yet it's not on the website and you can't produce any audio recording of it, bullshit appeal to authority notwithstanding."

There never was an "audio recording"--your lies to the contrary notwithstanding. And at least I'm honest enough to admit that I can't find the article.

But what does that prove? Articles are removed from websites all the time, never to be seen again.

Again, how does that prove that this is a Mossad operation?

"...Yet it's not on the website and you can't produce any audio recording of it, bullshit appeal to authority notwithstanding."

And this does what to prove that the Mossad was behind the article?

Nothing? Less than nothing?

So where's your proof that Mossad was behind the interview, or that the interview was fabricated by the Mossad?

Up your ass, where you get the majority of your alleged "facts"?

"...Right. You believe that Israel is nuke-free, and I (and even your pals here) know that you are drooling, cantankerous, petty, cretinous and self-righteous denialist [SIC]moron for thinking that."

Wrong, all they've given me are "probably" and more speculation. Do you understand the concept of "proof", Onan the anti-Semite?

Of course you don't, because you're an anti-Semite who would lie to his mother if you thought for one minute that you could gain some advantage from the lie.

So where's your proof that Mossad is behind the interview that was used as evidence against Vanunu?

Put up or shut up, asshole.

Where's you "proof" of Mossad wrongdoing?

And links to 911blogger aren't proof, Onan the anti-Semite.

 
At 13 April, 2010 17:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Marc wrote, "...The true issue with Anonymous is that he/she/it is siding with the bad guys because they are killing Americans and Jews, it is nothing more than that and you should not waste your time with such people. However, that is up to you."

Well said.

 
At 13 April, 2010 17:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Iran president urges UN probe on Afghanistan, Iraq conflicts

Patrick Worsnip, Reuters

Published: Monday, April 12, 2010

"Iranian media reports quoted Mr. Ahmadinejad's letter as also calling for an investigation into the Sep. 11 attacks on the United States, saying they had been used as a pretext for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

But the text of the letter distributed to media in New York by Iran's UN mission contained no such call. UN spokesman Farhan Haq said Ban was studying the letter."


SLC pushing a canard again?

 
At 13 April, 2010 17:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This debating stuff isn't really your thing, GB. Not even your pals here agree with you that Israel has no nukes.

Face it GB, you're better off playing guitar in the park for money in the hat.

Passers-by'll pay you generous amounts of cash to stop playing.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the dense prevaricates, "...Iranian media reports quoted Mr. Ahmadinejad's letter as also calling for an investigation into the Sep. 11 attacks on the United States, saying they had been used as a pretext for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq...But the text of the letter distributed to media in New York by Iran's UN mission contained no such call."

So, either the Iranian media is lying, or the Iranian UN mission distributed a version of the letter with the demand for a new investigation redacted from the text of the letter.

So, which is it, Onan the anti-Semite?

LOL!

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:04, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And I'm still waiting for that link to the audio recording of the interview. Hell, even a link to a scan of the article.

Your source dries up upstream, and you don't have a leg to stand on. Your concept of 'source' is the brothers Grimm, and your 'Vanunu interview' is pure fantasy and fairy tale.

You're a bullshitter, a storyteller, a fantasist and a pretender. You're a con artist, a spin doctor, and an excuse-making court jester. Your an Al-Sahhaf, a dweeb, a fool and a vicious lie spreading turd. You're not a man, you're a spineless, gutless, mindless, childish cunt and a weasel. Like all debunkers.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:10, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So, either the Iranian media is lying, or the Iranian UN mission distributed a version of the letter with the demand for a new investigation redacted from the text of the letter."

Good example of GuitarBill, the BillShitter™. No mention of any "redaction" in the source article whatsoever. Just that the letter contains no request for a new investigation into 9/11 whatsoever. What is BillShitter's™ typical state worshipper reaction?

Simply change reality to fit. Wow! Are there even meds to treat such persevering, colossal delusions? I think a lobotomy is best, since BillShitter's™ IQ probably won't change measurably.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...This debating stuff isn't really your thing, GB. Not even your pals here agree with you that Israel has no nukes."

No, that's not what they said. But you're a proven liar who misrepresents his sources, so what else should we expect from you.

Here's what they said, sans your bullshit:

Marc: "...The one thing that Israel is good at is keeping their mouths shut. So there is just nothing solid to be found that will detail their nuclear weapons program."

Paul: "...Actually, Bill, they probably did, off the coast of South Africa...It was never proven that it was their bomb, as it would have caused political problem as the time."

So, all they offer is speculation, and they're not really disagreeing with me, because they acknowledge that they could be wrong.

But that's beside the point.

As usual, you're changing the subject.

Again, where's your proof that the Mossad fabricated the evidence used against Vanunu?

Answer the question, Onan the prevaricator.

I won't hold my breath.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the prevaricator scribbles, "...Good example of GuitarBill, the BillShitter™. No mention of any "redaction" in the source article whatsoever."

Read the National Post article, and this time read it carefully, liar:

The National Post wrote, "...Iranian media reports quoted Mr. Ahmadinejad's letter as also calling for an investigation into the Sep. 11 attacks on the United States, saying they had been used as a pretext for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq...But the text of the letter distributed to media in New York by Iran's UN mission contained no such call."

So which is it, Onan?

Did the original letter contain the request or not?

And I'm still waiting for your proof that Mossad fabricated the evidence against Vanunu.

Put up, or shut, asshole.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the anti-Semite scribbles, "...Your source dries up upstream, and you don't have a leg to stand on. Your concept of 'source' is the brothers Grimm, and your 'Vanunu interview' is pure fantasy and fairy tale."

Well, if that pile of crap is true, you've offered not one iota of evidence in support of your head-up-your-ass speculation.

So, where's your proof, Onan the anti-Semite? And links to 911blogger.com aren't proof--it's a circle jerk.

Again, I won't hold my breath.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, BillShitter™, the letter "contained no such call". Period. It's not that hard to understand really, except for the occasional legendary shit-for-brains.

Still no link to the audio tape of the Vanunu interview. How unsurprising.

This bears repeating:

You're a bullshitter (In fact.. a 'BillShitter'™), a storyteller, a fantasist and a pretender. You're a con artist, a spin doctor, and an excuse-making court jester. Your an Al-Sahhaf, a dweeb, a fool and a vicious lie spreading turd. You're not a man, you're a spineless, gutless, mindless, childish cunt and a weasel. Like all debunkers.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, Anonymous the anti-Semite, just keep changing the subject.

Again, the absence of an interview from a website is not proof that the Mossad fabricated the evidence against Vanunu. The absence of the text of the interview only proves that the interview was removed from the websites database--nothing more; nothing less. (unless, of course, you're an insane anti-Semitic conspiranoid with the intellectual integrity of a Oakland, CA streetwalker.

Again, where's your proof that Mossad fabricated the evidence used against Vanunu?



The 911 "truth" Movement--If We're Ever Arrested, We Sure Hope the Prosecutor Doesn't Use Our Standard's of Evidence.

 
At 13 April, 2010 18:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Link me to an audio tape of the interview, BillShitter™. You haven't because you can't. Like Chamberlain, you try, try, try...

and fail.

The "debunker" cult: where facts slowly adapt to the, warped, twisted, blinded alternative reality of state worship.

 
At 13 April, 2010 19:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Link me to an audio tape of the interview, BillShitter™. You haven't because you can't. Like Chamberlain, you try, try, try..."

Again, the absence of an interview from a website is not proof that the Mossad fabricated the evidence against Vanunu. The absence of the text of the interview only proves that the interview was removed from the websites database--nothing more; nothing less.

Moreover, the interview was used as evidence against Vanunu in a court of law, which PROVES that the interview did in fact exist--your lies to the contrary notwithstanding.

So, where's your "evidence" that proves that the Mossad fabricated the interview?

The fact is that your call for a "new investigation into 9/11" amounts to nothing more than an evil, satanic Kangaroo Court.


The 911 "truth" Movement--If You Can Find a Fact in Our Pamphlets, We'll Eat Them.

The 911 "truth" Movement--Try Out Our New Fact-Free Conspiranoid Theories. All the Flavor of Conspiranoid Theories You're Used to--and None of the Harmful Facts.

ROTFLMAO!

 
At 13 April, 2010 19:25, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Um, GB, Isreal tested a bomb in 1979 in conjunction with the South African regime.

 
At 13 April, 2010 19:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LL wrote, "...Um, GB, Isreal tested a bomb in 1979 in conjunction with the South African regime."

And your proof is what?

More speculation?

 
At 13 April, 2010 19:39, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"More speculation?"

Hell, man, everybody knows for a fact that Isreal has nukes.

(And thank God for that)

So common that Tom Clancey mentioned the nuke test in one of his books.

I read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel

and it seemed to be pretty straightforward.

 
At 13 April, 2010 19:40, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Tinyurl for the link:

http://tinyurl.com/66dkz9

 
At 13 April, 2010 19:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Wikipedia wrote, "...Israel is widely believed to be the sixth country in the world to have developed nuclear weapons..."

More weasel words (see the words in bold face font).

Sorry, but isn't proof.

Moreover, NO COUNTRY can develop nuclear weapons without extensive tests of the weapons.

Israel has NO RECORD of extensive nuclear weapons testing.

So, you're trying to tell me that Israel developed nuclear weapons without testing them either above ground or underground?

Sorry, LL, but that dog doesn't hunt.

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your homies just threw you under the bus, BillShitter™. Just when does reality start to kick in? I agree with Arhoolie, you need a good smack over the head with one of those guitars of yours. At least that sounds better than you playing one.

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:26, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Moreover, NO COUNTRY can develop nuclear weapons without extensive tests of the weapons."

They did.

"So, you're trying to tell me that Israel developed nuclear weapons without testing them either above ground or underground?"

No. No I'm not.

Just curiosity, but why the bug up your ass on this particular topic?

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

By the way.

GuitarBill said: (emphasis mine)
"The 911 "truth" Movement--If We're Ever Arrested, We Sure Hope the Prosecutor Doesn't Use Our Standard's of Evidence."

LOL!

Do you realize, GB, that the sentence above makes about as much sense as a tuning fork slapping a ham sandwich? Are you meaning to say our standards of evidence are real good? Because it can't be interpreted any other way. Thanks for the compliment, although we don't really need "compliments" from people who aid and abet mass murderers and fascists.

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:27, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Your homies just threw you under the bus"

Why don't you do us all a big favor, go take an overdose of your pschycotropic meds, 'mkay?

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Israel has nukes. Period. GuitarBill's inability to admit it demonstrates his inability to be honest. That's the key here.

And if you want to talk medication, ring up Troy Sexton. While he's not in jail, he's on a whole bunch of them.

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the sub-literate scribbles,"...Are you meaning to say our standards of evidence are real good? Because it can't be interpreted any other way."

No, it means just what it says.

That said, if a prosecutor used the "9/11 truth movements" standards of evidence, the court would be nothing more than a Kangaroo Court.

Let me know when you finish elementary school, junior.

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LL writes, "...Just curiosity, but why the bug up your ass on this particular topic?"

Good question, LL.

Think about the game of poker. And then think about a poker player when he bluffs.

That explains Israel's policy of "ambiguity" where nuclear weapons are concerned.

"...They did."

Then why does Israel have no record of nuclear weapons testing?

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Israel has nukes. Period."

If that's true, and it's not, you've offered nothing to substantiate your alleged argument but weasel words.

Again, where's your "proof".

And I'm still waiting for your proof that Israel's Mossad fabricated the evidence against Vanunu.

Again, I won't hold my breath.

When will you learn that your opinion and speculation are NOT evidence, Mr, Kangaroo Court.

 
At 13 April, 2010 20:54, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Your homies just threw you under the bus"

No, it's called debate, junior.

Again, let us know when you finish elementary school, junior.

 
At 13 April, 2010 21:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the cyber pansy whines, "...I agree with Arhoolie, you need a good smack over the head with one of those guitars of yours."

Oh, I'm scared sweetheart.

I have a Benjamin that says you couldn't punch your way out of a wet paper bag, junior.

You feeling lucky, junior?

 
At 13 April, 2010 21:12, Blogger angrysoba said...

GuitarBill,

If it's any consolation, I read your post, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Thanks, angrysoba!


Thanks, GuitarBill!

 
At 13 April, 2010 21:38, Anonymous paul w said...

"Then why does Israel have no record of nuclear weapons testing"

GB, as I said earlier, it would have caused political problems.

This is from memory, and I stand to be corrected, but I think they were getting the materials via a company based in Sweden, or the like, so as not to upset the applecart with the US, which was trying to keep control of countries getting nukes.

The US was also building up its own arsenal, of course, but then, what country is free of double standards?

And the US was at least trying to limit the things to stable, democratic regimes, rather than the lunatic fringe, or those with obvious 'issues', such as India and Paksitan.

Is there any concrete proof that it was an Israeli bomb? No, not that I know of, but it seemed to be the case.

Anonymous, take your meds and go to bed. The adults are trying to talk.

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Sorry, but Israel has no verifiable record of nuclear testing.

So, I'll tell you what, Paul, if you can show me one country with nuclear weapons--the United States, Russia, China, North Korea, the United Kingdom, France, India or Pakistan--that has no record of nuclear testing, then I'll stand corrected.

Deal?

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:05, Blogger angrysoba said...

And the US was at least trying to limit the things to stable, democratic regimes, rather than the lunatic fringe, or those with obvious 'issues', such as India and Paksitan.

Well, Pakistan and India have issues, no doubt. But Israel have a number of issues too and a history of being attacked by those issues.

Usually, it goes like this Countries XYZ make a simulataneous surprise attack on Israel in an attempt to destroy it. Israel recovers quickly from the initial strike to give Countries XYZ a pasting and occupying the land from which the attacks were launched.

Everyone cries foul and says that Israel's defence of itself is inconscionable and completely unfair and that they should give that land back right this minute!

So, it is no surprise that Israel absolutely does have nukes and is quite happy enough for it to be "leaked" that it does as nuclear deterrent can only work if there is credible evidence that nuclear deterrent works.

Further leaks that there exists a "Samson Option" of enormous nuclear retaliation for any overrunning of the country should also make Countries XYZ a little wary of pulling the trigger next time. So said countries must instead resort to non-state "actors" and a sudden love for the people caught in the crossfire. Countries XYZ will do nothing at all to actually help the Palestinians but will pretend that it is only Israel that has anything to do with this situation.

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:08, Blogger angrysoba said...

nuclear deterrent can only work if there is credible evidence that nuclear deterrent works.


Should be...

"can only work if there is credible evidence that such nuclear deterrent exists."

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:43, Blogger ewingsc said...

... does guitar bill (fuckwit) realise that most semites speak arabic ?

... and that the ashkenazi are not themselves semites ?

... because it doesn't look like it ...

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:49, Blogger ewingsc said...

... and I've sure never, ever seen anyone apologise for the extra -SHITTY- foreign policy of Israel

so hard

as you bill

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:52, Anonymous paul w said...

Angrysoba.

Point taken.

GuitarBill

Just because other countries have verifiable testing does not mean Israel does not have nukes.

And, just because one can bluff in poker, does not mean Israel is bluffing now.

I take your point, however. The other tests ARE proof, and so far, it's just speculation about Israel.

As for truthers, the US and nukes, it's amazing how many of them always mention the US was the first to create the things, yet ignoring WHY.

Here's a hint for truthers; Google 'Hitler'.

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:54, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc,

Telling half-truths again, 'tard?

So, what's your point? After all, Semite is defined as Semitic-speaking people, including Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.

So, what were you saying conspiratard?

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:57, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Here's a hint for truthers; Google 'Hitler'."

Here's a hint for the stunted fucks that visit this idiot site:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlqhMjsuuKk

WOW whaddyuh think -that- was ?

Or shall we talk about FUCKING haircuts ?

 
At 13 April, 2010 23:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc scribbles, "...... and I've sure never, ever seen anyone apologise [SIC] for the extra -SHITTY- foreign policy of Israel"

And who do you apologize for, conspiratard?

The bat-shit crazy bastards who killed 3,000 innocent Americans on 11 September 2001, and their fellow foaming-at-the-mouth Wahhabi Muslim lunatics?

Fuck you, and the horse you rode in on.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:03, Blogger ewingsc said...

How 'bout we fuck you instead ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlqhMjsuuKk

Got a comment on this video do you

-fuck- ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:04, Blogger ewingsc said...

... because it sure as gosh-heck looks like a controlled demo to me

What do -you- think asshole bill ?

Here it is again :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlqhMjsuuKk

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:05, Blogger ewingsc said...

controlled demo, or not, Bill ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc,

That video shows WTC 7's windows being blown out as the East Penthouse crashes through the roof, which occurred 9 seconds BEFORE the parapet wall fell. No controlled demolition was necessary.

Here's the truth--your bullshit notwithstanding:

Source: YouTube: WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1.

Source: YouTube: WTC7 Collapse Chandler Debunked pt 2.

Source: NIST/YouTube: NIST SIMULATION FOR WTC 7.

Tell us, conspiratard, how many idiotic YouTube 9/11 conspiracy videos were you required to watch in order to become a full-qualified civil engineer?

One? Two?

Again, fuck you and horse you rode in on.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:18, Blogger ewingsc said...

Thanks for working away so hard on this, -fucker-

A Few Small Fires & Debris From The North Tower would not cause near-instantaneous structural failure at all points of WTC 7’s construction.

[ near-instantaneous structural failure at all points of WTC 7's construction such as this ]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm7aGzubz9A

Fuck you.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:20, Blogger ewingsc said...

How many full-qualified civil engineers and ARCHITECTICS now think,

nay,

now -know-

that you are full of

-shit-

and are just not worth talking to anymore, bill ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Holy irreducible delusions, Batman!

You didn't have time to watch the videos I gave you, ewingsc.

Typical truther: When confronted with the truth, you refuse to look at ANY evidence that contradicts your delusions and bald-faced lies.

Again, fuck you and the horse you rode in on, conspiratard.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:24, Blogger ewingsc said...

bill,

this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm7aGzubz9A

is NOT a building collapsing from fire and getting hit by some WTC debris, bill.

-FUCK- you, bill

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:27, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Typical truther: When confronted with the truth, you refuse to look at ANY evidence that contradicts your delusions and bald-faced lies.
"

You're talking about yourself here

& I've seen your posted evil lame shit dickhead

and I'm just as underwhelmed now.

Lying -FUCK-

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc prevaricates, "...How many full-qualified civil engineers and ARCHITECTICS now think..."

Box boy has 1,100 charlatans and "engineers" for "9/11 truth". Of that 1,100 about 12 are civil engineers. The remainder are specialists in unrelated disciplines.

The American Society of Civil Engineers, on the other hand, which fully endorses the NIST report, is made up of 147,000 FULLY-QUALIFIED civil and structural engineers.

147,000 > 1,100

Got it, math illiterate?

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:32, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That video, only shows a portion of the collapse, you liar.

Why does your "rare" video not include the portion where the east penthouse crashes into the building a full 9 seconds before the parapet wall collapses?

Because you don't want people to know that the collapse of WTC 7 took a full 18 seconds.

Lie to us some more, chump.

A half-truth is still a whole lie, shit-for-brains.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:34, Blogger ewingsc said...

bill,

this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRkQ7Tr9Q3o&NR=1

is NOT a building collapsing from fire and / or getting hit by some WTC debris, either, -bill-

It is collapsing

-bill-

because it is experienceing near-simultaneous structural

-failure-

at all points of its

-construction-

-bill-

you -fuck-

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:38, Blogger ewingsc said...

bill,

this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

is NOT a building collapsing from fire and / or getting hit by some WTC debris, either, -bill-

It is collapsing

-bill-

because it is experienceing near-simultaneous structural

-failure-

at all points of its

-construction-

-bill-


Go fuck yourself you lying soulless shill -prick-

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:38, Blogger ewingsc said...

The only -liar- here is you

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:40, Blogger ewingsc said...

Take that wood-guitar of yours and shove it up your ass.

-prick-

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:42, Blogger ewingsc said...

Is

-this-

a building collapsing from 'fire' and 'debris', bill ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

-liar-

-prick-

-asshole-

-fucknut-

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I've already seen that bullshit video.

Here's the truth, conspiratard:

Source: NIST: NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

WTC 7 didn't fall at free-fall speed, as the 911 deniers claim. The building fell in 18 seconds, as I'll prove below. The collapse ensued when the east penthouse fell in on the building, and the parapet wall did not begin to fall for at least another 8 seconds. This observation is fully supported by the NIST's computer simulations, which confirm their progressive collapse hypothesis.

Source: YouTube: WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1.

Source: YouTube: WTC7 Collapse Chandler Debunked pt 2.

Source: NIST/YouTube: NIST SIMULATION SHOWS DAMAGE TO WTC 7 FROM TOWER CAUSED SLOWER LESS EXTREME COLLAPSE.

The charlatan Richard Gage scribbles, "...NIST were forced to reverse themselves in their Final Report and acknowledged 2.25 seconds of absolute free-fall. Yet they did not reconsider how this was compatible with their analysis. A network of heavy steel girders had to be forcibly removed suddenly across the width of the building for eight floors. However, a free-falling object cannot exert force on anything in its path without slowing its own fall, so the structural support had to be removed by something else—explosives. The free-fall of Building 7 is a smoking gun."

Source: Rense.com->WorldArchitectureNews: Conspiracy theory or hidden truth? The 9/11 enigmas....

Shyam Sunder replies, "...Our analysis shows that even the smallest explosive charge that was capable of bringing down the critical column in the building [column 79 -ed] , had it occurred , we would have seen sound levels of 120 to 130 decibels, about a half mile away. That would have been an incredibly loud sound, and that sound was not picked up by any of the videos or witnesses that we have talked to."

120 to 130 decibels!

That's louder than a Jimi Hendrix concert!

Now, I've watched many videos of the collapse of WTC 7, and I've never heard a sound ("explosion") that approaches that amplitude.

Source: YouTube: Engineering Disasters WTC 7 Collapse Explanation..

So where are the alleged "explosions", conspiratard?

Or were Star Wars Beam Weapons and Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW) responsible for the [expletive deleted] collapse?

Now, make sure that you're careful not to watch the videos--you delusional fucktard.

Any more lies for us, conspiratard.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:44, Blogger ewingsc said...

"That's louder than a Jimi Hendrix concert!"

You're not all that bright, are you.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:47, Blogger ewingsc said...

Is

-this-

a building collapsing from 'fire' and 'debris', bill ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

Cos it sure doesn't FUCKING look like it !

You lying FUCK !

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Source: NIST/YouTube: NIST SIMULATION FOR WTC 7.

Watch the simulation, "truther" jack@$$.

Two collapse scenarios are proposed by NIST and were simulated using a cluster of state-of-the-art Linux computers: (i) no debris impact damage from the towers; and (ii) with debris impact damage to the towers.

Scenario [1]: No debris impact damage from the towers.

The collapse initiates on floors 11, 10, 9, 8, 7 and 6 (in that order), which causes column 80 and then 79 to buckle. As a result, the east penthouse crashes through the building's roof and falls to the ground floor. As the remainder of the upper floor's weight is redistributed to the remaining columns, the building crumples inward. Clearly, steel beams expanded in the heat, and numerous structural connections throughout the building failed. Heat also causes steel to lose strength and stiffness. Thermal expansion occurs at temperatures much lower than those required to reduce steel strength and stiffness. Collapse in this scenario is inevitable, given that the firefighters were unable to fight the fire owing to broken water mains. Remember the building's steel was rated for two hours against fire, but the fires burned for over 7 hours.

Scenario [2]: With debris impact damage from the towers.

On 11 September 2001, WTC 7 suffered extensive damage to the South-side of the building and the fires raged for over 7 hours. An entire 15-story section of the lower-South face of the building was scooped out by debris falling from the North Tower. This caused the building to lean and sway, according to FDNY personnel. In fact, FDNY fire damage experts were convinced by approximately 2:00PM that day the building would collapse.

In the second scenario, the collapse initiates once again on floors 11, 10, 9, 8, 7 and 6 (in that order), which causes column 80 and then 79 to buckle. As a result, the east penthouse crashes through the building's roof and falls to the ground floor. As the remainder of the upper floor's weight is redistributed to the remaining columns and the building's North wall begins to fall, the lower 15-story portion of the South wall, which was damaged by debris from the collapse of the North Tower, buckles and initiates a global collapse, as the NIST simulation clearly demonstrates. It's at this point that the building experiences a brief period of free fall; however, free fall is short lived as the remainder of the building meets resistance from floor 15 to the top of the North parapet wall.

So much for free fall speed and the alleged "implications".

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:48, Blogger ewingsc said...

You're a lying -fuck-, bill

Shame on yew.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:50, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Clearly, steel beams expanded in the heat, and numerous structural connections throughout the building failed"

I am laughing in your fat failed fucking face right now bill

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc scribbles, "...You're not all that bright, are you."

I'll hold my two masters degrees up to your GED any day of the week, conspiratard.

So, you're trying to tell me that 120 Db isn't louder than a Jimi Hendrix concert?

What's your point? Or can't you write in complete sentences?

Your GED is showing again, ewingsc.

'tard!

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:52, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Clearly, steel beams expanded in the heat, and numerous structural connections throughout the building failed"

What a fuckwit you are, bill

'Clearly steel beams expanded ... '

my ass

You bad soulless -fuck-

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc prevaricates, "...I am laughing in your fat failed fucking face right now bill."

That's all you've got, conspiratard?

Where's your evidence?

Up your ass? Because you sure haven't presented any evidence this evening.

Is that all you can do: Parrot the neo-fascist liars for "9/11 truth"?

When will you learn to think for yourself?

Oh, I forgot that thinking is painful for a conspiratard.

Polly want a cracker?

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:54, Blogger ewingsc said...

"What's your point?"

My point is that you are a lying shit.

Fuck you, bill.

 
At 14 April, 2010 00:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc prevaricates, "...My point is that you are a lying shit."

Well, if that's true, you've presented absolutely nothing to substantiate your assertion (heavy emphasis on ass when dealing with ewingsc).

Polly want a cracker?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:01, Anonymous John E. Smoke said...

If Zedong Mao were alive and expressed even a passing interest in the laughable 9/11 Conspiracy, Truthers would forgive him of being the greatest mass murderer in history.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:05, Blogger ewingsc said...

From one of your earlier dickhead posts :

"Is that all you can do: Parrot the neo-fascist liars for "9/11 truth"?"

You sound like that -fuck- hannity

9/11 truth = 'neo-fascist liars' for you ?

How come ?

Isn't -fascism-

the marriage of government and big business ?

Kind of like what's happened now in America ?


You dumb stunted -fuck- ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

America, in your head-up-your-ass opinion, is "fascist"?

Thanks for proving that you're an uneducated, neo-fascist waste of skin, ewingsc.

A demitasse would fit ewingsc's head like a sombrero.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:09, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Well, if that's true, you've presented absolutely nothing to substantiate your assertion "

you -did- notice me posting this, right ? :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlqhMjsuuKk

& you -did- notice me posting this, right ? :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FlJNh8UjO8

multiple times, right ?

You

-lying-

-empty-

-fuckwit-

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:10, Blogger ewingsc said...

Fuck you, bill

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You want to visit a fascist police-state, ewingsc?

Move to Singapore--you gullible useless eater.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:13, Blogger ewingsc said...

"America, in your head-up-your-ass opinion, is "fascist"?"

Sure is headed that way, fuckwit.

You're just too pig-ignorant to see it.nest

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:15, Blogger ewingsc said...

Explain to me how I'm :

'neo-fascist'

you -prick-

-HOW- am I somehow some kind of fusion between government and big business ?

You dumb -hick- fuck

Liar.

Prick.

Asshole.

Traitor.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:18, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The BillShitter™, fucking classic!!
Whats even funnier is Lil Billshitter
aka Billman is more believable!

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc prevaricates, "...& you -did- notice me posting this, right ? :"

I watched those video before you ever laid eyes on them--you bore.

Don't forget that I monitor YouTube, and watch all the latest 9/11 conspiratard videos.

It's a hobby.

After all, Bill's my name and debunking uneducated morons and their idiotic conspiranoid theories is my game.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:18, Blogger ewingsc said...

Why don't -you- move to Singapore, bill ?

They'd like you more there

than I do here

Here - you just come across loud like some kind of lying PR nazi asshole.

Fuck you, Bill

Can you explain this, bill ? :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlqhMjsuuKk

Nazi asshole

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:20, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Bill's my name and debunking uneducated morons and their idiotic conspiranoid theories is my game. "

... well you're not very good at it ...

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous the retard scribbles, "...The BillShitter™, fucking classic!!
Whats even funnier is Lil Billshitter
aka Billman is more believable!"


That's not evidence, retard.

Are ad hominem attacks all you have, shit-for-brains?

Go away, "truther" scumbags, you bore me.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc whines, "... well you're not very good at it ..."

That's rich--and especially so when one considers that you've never had an original thought in your miserable life.

So how do you survive in the US with nothing more than a GED and arrogance?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:23, Blogger ewingsc said...

Does this bore you ? :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlqhMjsuuKk

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:26, Blogger ewingsc said...

Like I said ...

take that wood guitar of yours

& those -*crickets*-

and shove them up your ass

You Despicable Human Failure.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That video is bunk, and you know it, 'tard.

Playing a video in reverse in order to trick people into falling for your "controlled demolition" lies is intellectually dishonest.

Try playing the video in forward mode, you con artist.

Is there no lie that's beneath the "9/11 truth movement"?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc whines, "...You Despicable Human Failure."

Really? No kidding?

I guess that's why I have a real education, and all you have is a GED and video deception.

You're lower than a snake's belly, ewingsc.

A half-wit gave you a piece of his mind, ewingsc, and you held on to it.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Now go to bad children. After all, this website is intended for adults, not recalcitrant, delusional children.

Besides, you bore me.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:36, Blogger ewingsc said...

Thanks for your own -opinion-

and your own naff word-smithery

-dick-

You soulless lame piece of shit

-FUCK- you

-bill-

You DO know that 3,000 Americans died in a false flag incident, right ?

You evil -fuck-

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:37, Blogger ewingsc said...

You DO know that 3,000 Americans died in a false flag incident, right ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:37, Blogger ewingsc said...

Right ..?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:38, Blogger ewingsc said...

Shall we talk about Israel, now ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, ewingsc, when you are caught red-handed playing a video of the WTC 7 collapse in reverse mode, change the the subject.

Are lies and deception all you have, ewingsc?

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc whines, "...You DO know that 3,000 Americans died in a false flag incident, right ?"

I'm not impressed by your bogus righteous indignation.

You don't give a damn about the 3,000 innocent Americans who perished that fateful day--you neo-fascist liar.

I've run into dead bodies that are less offensive than you, "truther" scum.

 
At 14 April, 2010 01:54, Blogger ewingsc said...

whaddyuh make of this ? :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FlJNh8UjO8

Looks like a building collapseing from small isolated fires and WTC debris and NINE years of internet BULLSHIT perpretated by lying cyberspace

-FUCKS-

like you

-bill-

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

There you go again, showing half of the collapse, and editing out the portion that shows the east penthouse collapsing into the building.

After all, in order to trick the gullible, you MUST edit out the east penthouse portion of the collapse. Otherwise it would be apparent to everyone that the building did not fall at "free fall speed" [SIC].

Now, take your deceptive videos and shove then up your ass.

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:11, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Otherwise it would be apparent to everyone that the building did not fall at "free fall speed""

Do yuh think that it fell at

-near- free fall speed ?

You traitor sellout -fuck- ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

No, the buildings fell in 18 seconds, as the following videos prove beyond a doubt.

Now, let's look at the entire video, not just the portions of the video that "substantiate" your lies and deception:

Source: YouTube: WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1.

Source: YouTube: WTC7 Collapse Chandler Debunked pt 2.

Now that you've been thoroughly exposed as a liar and a con artist, take your videos and shove them up your ass--you neo-fascist liar.

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:18, Blogger ewingsc said...

From your bullshit :

"Otherwise it would be apparent to everyone that the building did not fall at "free fall speed"


If you're -not- sure

here it is again :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FlJNh8UjO8

imagine yourself standing on the roof of WTC 7 and you drop a tennis ball at exactly the same time that all the

-nanothermite-

bombs go off beneath your feet.

Which would hit street pizza level first ?

the tennis ball ?

Or your own lying ass ?

The answer is :

The tennis ball

but not by much at all

you lying little -fuck-

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:20, Blogger ewingsc said...

"take your videos and shove them up your ass--you neo-fascist liar"

Why am I a 'neo-fascist' again ?

and

'Shall we talk about Israel now' ?

-bill- ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Now that you've been reduced to the quivering mass of lying, cowardly shit you've always been, change the subject.

I have no desire to play "whack-a-mole" with you ewingsc, because I have work to do.

Now, go to bed, and get a grip on reality.

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:45, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Now, go to bed, and get a grip on reality."

Sure bill

Talk to you more about Israel, soon

 
At 14 April, 2010 02:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ewingsc prevaricates, "...Talk to you more about Israel, soon."

Don't you mean "lie to you more about Israel soon"?

Good luck, anti-Semitic conspiratard, because you're going to need it.

And don't forget to bring that mass of nonperforming goo you mistakenly call a "brain", because you don't stand a chance.

That said, I'm looking forward to kicking your sorry @$$ from one end of this blog to the other.

I hope your life insurance policy is up to date.

LOL!

 
At 14 April, 2010 03:00, Blogger ewingsc said...

"Good luck, anti-Semitic conspiratard, because you're going to need it."

You

-do-

know that most semitic folks speak

-arabic-

right ?

You despicable soulless shitbag -fuck- ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 03:06, Blogger ewingsc said...

You

-do-

know that the

'people'

that largely choose to make their own 'Israeli foreign policy'

are -not-

In.

And.

Of.

Themselves.

Actually.

Fucking.

-SEMITES-

-Right- ?

You Do Know That,

Right ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 03:09, Blogger ewingsc said...

Shall we talk about Israel now ?

 
At 14 April, 2010 03:09, Anonymous paul w said...

Hey, ewingsc, here's a comment from a link at your Blogger User Profile ('The truth will set you free');

"This year, we have been affronted with wide-mouthed Zionist leaders from New York to Tel Aviv, who lie as often as they breathe oxygen, insulting humanity with the same despicable rituals.

And the tacit but clear message remains unchanged, namely that the world has no right to criticize Israel or even prevent her from doing to the Palestinians what Adolph Hitler reportedly did or tried to do to the Jews."

Reportedly?
Tried to do?

Oh dear, must be very frustrating for closet Brown Shirts like you to be reduced to impotent rantings on the internet, eh?

Then again, you deserve nothing less.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home