Saturday, April 03, 2010

Moron Misprision



I just love these efforts by the Troofers. Nothing is going to get officials on your side quicker than accusing them of a crime.

Labels:

45 Comments:

At 03 April, 2010 17:34, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

I just can't watch these videos anymore. They've gone past cringe-inducing; now it's douche chills all the way through.

 
At 03 April, 2010 18:28, Blogger Sam said...

"Hurrr, if you don't take my nutty ass conspiracy theories seriously you're guilty of misprision of treason."

"Do you even know what that is? Where in the code does it say that I have jurisdiction over New York?"

"...MISPRISION OF TREASON!!"

Reminds me of when the tax protesters try to exercise their GED in law skills in a court room by parroting some bullshit they heard on the internet. Had the big wordy-words, must be legitimate.

 
At 03 April, 2010 20:23, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

If anything, the AG here is shown to be clueless of the issues at hand.

As for the WAC's objective - it is not necessarily to get the officials on their side, as I understand it but rather to demonstrate to the general public what those officials are about.

 
At 03 April, 2010 21:03, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris,

I know that you were rejected from We Are Change (two people have given me evidence of this), and my understanding was that it was a permanent denial of membership, so you coming here to lick their asses won't get you anywhere.

 
At 03 April, 2010 22:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know what this country needs? This country needs the Buzz Aldrin defense officially codified for the rest of us. That's what this country needs.

"Are you aware of the concept of misprision of treason?"

"Are you aware of the concept of getting punched in the mouth?" BAM!

 
At 04 April, 2010 00:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Make my day. We all want it.

 
At 04 April, 2010 03:56, Blogger angrysoba said...

As for the WAC's objective - it is not necessarily to get the officials on their side, as I understand it but rather to demonstrate to the general public what those officials are about.

They really need a better strategy than appearing more ignorant than the person they're trying to expose.

"Do you know the title of Steven Jones 'peer-reviewed' paper?" is on a par with "Do you know the name of the planet the Scientologists come from?"

However, "Can you explain the legal codes you are quoting to me?" is something the Truther couldn't do. So he fails.

 
At 04 April, 2010 04:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can you?

 
At 04 April, 2010 04:31, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris,

I know that you were rejected from We Are Change (two people have given me evidence of this), and my understanding was that it was a permanent denial of membership, so you coming here to lick their asses won't get you anywhere.


And the names of those people would be?..

Patrick - or whatever your real name is, you can sit there all day long inventing fiction but that fiction ain't turning into reality just 'cause you want it to. I have never been a member of any of the WAC chapters, I have never sought membership, and it is mighty difficult to be rejected from a group you've never joined.

 
At 04 April, 2010 06:25, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris, you know who I'm talking about, you psycho-stalker.

 
At 04 April, 2010 06:28, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Patrick, that was convincing.

 
At 04 April, 2010 06:46, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris, you know who I'm talking about, you psycho-stalker.

No, Patrick, I absolutely don't as this is yet another complete fabrication of yours. You are a pathological liar, it seems, hence this is not surprising in the least.

 
At 04 April, 2010 07:28, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

Anonymous said...
"Can you?"
"Make my day. We all want it."
"Well Patrick, that was convincing."

Sure hope the movement isn't counting on you for leadership...

P.S. - Pick a name Fucktard!

 
At 04 April, 2010 11:59, Blogger Triterope said...

I know that you were rejected from We Are Change (two people have given me evidence of this)

Really? Wow. Usually WAC doesn't cancel your membership until after you kill someone.

 
At 04 April, 2010 14:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does this mean the entire Bush administration is disqualified with prejudice?

 
At 04 April, 2010 15:00, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

Anonymous said...
"Does this mean the entire Bush administration is disqualified with prejudice?"

No, it means you're still a fucktard, fucktard.

 
At 04 April, 2010 15:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Since you are the fucktard patrol, have you recently tried to bust yourself? Can you be expected to remain objective in your hunt for fucktards?

 
At 04 April, 2010 16:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Does this mean the entire Bush administration is disqualified with prejudice?"

No, this is just another example of the "9/11 truth movement" making unsubstantiated assertions (heavy emphasis on ass) without the benefit of evidence.

 
At 04 April, 2010 23:18, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol (Ape House Division) said...

"Since you are the fucktard patrol, have you recently tried to bust yourself? Can you be expected to remain objective in your hunt for fucktards?"

I'm not hunting you fucktard - just pointing you out. Sort of like a guide at the Zoo.

 
At 04 April, 2010 23:25, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol (Anencephaly Spotter) said...

And over on this link is the rarest of the phylum fucktardious...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__OKAAxlni-8/S4VtikGzv3I/AAAAAAAAAIQ/xfh64cho25s/s1600-R/s640x480

Don't stare - it will burn your corneas.

 
At 05 April, 2010 01:01, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a tautology, GB. Just wanted to be helpful and point that out. Like "Bush" and "Killer" is a pleonasm.

 
At 05 April, 2010 10:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous wrote, "...That's a tautology, GB. Just wanted to be helpful and point that out. Like 'Bush' and 'Killer' is a pleonasm."

I see. Essentially, you've employed a rhetorical device in order to make a bad joke.

Why is the joke bad, in my opinion?

Because the joke implies that George W. Bush is a mass murderer, which in my opinion is not humorous at all. After all, there's no evidence to support the claim that George W. Bush is a mass murderer.

Thus, your joke is an example of extremely poor taste.

 
At 05 April, 2010 15:35, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

Hey GitFiddler,what don't you understand about 4 million refugees,1,000,000 deaths and environmental disaster in a country of 25,000,000? What IS your major malfunction,numbnuts?!?

 
At 05 April, 2010 17:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie the terrorist apologist scribbles, "...Hey GitFiddler,what don't you understand about 4 million refugees,1,000,000 deaths and environmental disaster in a country of 25,000,000? What IS your major malfunction,numbnuts?!?"

Well, let's see, I happen to remember that little thing called "9/11". And I also remember that George Herbert Walker Bush invaded Iraq, and that Bill Clinton continued the embargo for the entirety of his presidency.

In addition, I have a bit of a problem with the idea of accusing the Commander and Chief of the US Armed Forces of murder, when the term clearly does not apply in this situation.

 
At 05 April, 2010 17:17, Anonymous Troofers R Us said...

Arhoolie the Self-Loathing Jew said...
"Hey GitFiddler,what don't you understand about 4 million refugees,1,000,000 deaths and environmental disaster in a country of 25,000,000? What IS your major malfunction,numbnuts?!?"

I understand your circle jerk must be totally lame without Saddam, Uday and Qusay. Maybe Ralph could fill in while you look for a new team.

 
At 06 April, 2010 10:28, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

GitCobbler accuses people of being terrorist defenders while he tumbles face first onto the pavement regarding a President who forged documents and lied relentlessly to forge a conquest occupation and slaughter of a sovereign nation which was no threat to anybody.The buck stops where? Terrorists indeed!

 
At 06 April, 2010 10:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie belches, "...GitCobbler accuses people of being terrorist defenders while he tumbles face first onto the pavement regarding a President who forged documents and lied relentlessly to forge a conquest occupation and slaughter of a sovereign nation which was no threat to anybody.The buck stops where? Terrorists indeed!"

Stop changing the subject, moron.

So Arsehoolie, you coward, when will reply to the ass kicking I gave to you here? After all, almost 24 hours have elapsed, and you refuse to respond--you pussy.

Come on, "truther" coward, I dare you.

 
At 06 April, 2010 17:17, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

"The plane is 100 miles out...the plane is 50 miles out....the plane is shot down"!!!!!!!! Thanks for clearing up the mystery over #93,Dirtweed Blowhard.As if it wasn't obvious that plane was shot down.Do you sniff a lot of snow and then jackoff while still at the computer Bozo? Because traipsing around celebrating the fact that #93 was shot down under Bush's orders is a wacky way to represent the Debunker Cult.Rap on Brother,rap on!! P.S. How far apart are D.C and Shanksville,Doctor of Music Yuppie?

 
At 06 April, 2010 17:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie lies, "...The plane is 100 miles out...the plane is 50 miles out....the plane is shot down"!!!!!!!! Thanks for clearing up the mystery over #93,Dirtweed Blowhard.As if it wasn't obvious that plane was shot down."

You fucking illiterate moron. I never said Flight 93 was shot down--you illiterate jackass. I said Bush gave the order to shoot the planes down, that doesn't mean the aircraft was shot down.

Got it, illiterate?

"...Do you sniff a lot of snow and then jackoff while still at the computer Bozo? Because traipsing around celebrating the fact that #93 was shot down under Bush's orders is a wacky way to represent the Debunker Cult."

Projecting again, Onan?

Obviously, you sniff glue. So how's that working out for you, retard?

Now get your hand's off your pecker and learn to read--you illiterate moron.

 
At 07 April, 2010 09:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think when you took on Laz, you sounded a lot more intelligent. I think your truther hatred impairs your performance.

 
At 07 April, 2010 10:23, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

Who said you admitted that #93 was shot down? Not me.If you admitted that,you'd be a stand up guy and we know you're merely a pretentious and condescending blowhard Yuppie.You said that the aide and Cheney were tracking #93,which WAS shot down.Since the plane Cheney and his aide (#93?) were talking about was subject to a shoot down (as per Bush's order), when did it get shot down,or are you saying it's a coincidence that all the evidence at Shanksville indicates a shoot down? How far is Shanksville from D.C.? Yea,you really tore me a new one there,Punky Meadows! Now get back to correcting your website and then on to the mosh pit with PornBoy,jackoff.

 
At 08 April, 2010 15:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie the cyber liar wrote, "...You said that the aide and Cheney were tracking #93,which WAS shot down.Since the plane Cheney and his aide (#93?) were talking about was subject to a shoot down (as per Bush's order), when did it get shot down,or are you saying it's a coincidence that all the evidence at Shanksville indicates a shoot down? "

I never said that, so you're just flailing another straw man, Arsehoolie.

That's right, genius, completely ignore the portion of my argument that proves that Mineta's time line was off by 30 minutes to one hour.

So tell us, Arsehoolie, how does one survive in the US with a mind composed primarily of mush?

 
At 08 April, 2010 16:38, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

You never said that #93 was the plane being talked about by Cheney and the aide? Of course you did.How far is Shanksville from D.C.? Seems your running away from the point you yourself made.Your glib "oh,that plane had already crashed" (referring to #93) gets you nowhere.It's well nigh obvious that #93 was shot down,and you have provided information that it indeed was,on Bush's orders.It's only logical,right? Congratulations California YupStar,you've further crushed the official story and now you are well on the path to understanding the scam and bailing out of the Coincidence School of Denial.And quit bringing Ray Bolger into this.It's really kind of whiny and chickenshit.Stand on your own shaky pins,you pretentious twit.

 
At 08 April, 2010 18:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Are straw man arguments all you have, Arsehoolie the cyber pud huffer?

Still avoiding Mineta's fatally flawed time line?

Come on, scumbag, discuss the substance of my argument, not the words you stuff down my throat and attack--you intellectually dishonest penis inhaling unit.

 
At 09 April, 2010 12:57, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-hero said...

After an exhausting "Battle of the Witless Debunkers" with the moron PornBoy,GuitarShrill whines yet again as he flops face first into the pachysandra! You kicked your own ass and now you want brownie points for half of your argument.Again,I ask you:how far is Shanksville from the bunker? Are you seriously saying that #93 WASN'T shot down? You haven't responded,Dr.Name Dropper,what is it? It was a coincidence that the plane being tracked by Cheney,and subject to a shoot down order,was taken down by Mark Bingham,et al. and disappeared into a mine shaft?!? "The substance of my argument"?!? Say what? You can't even explain your own argument when it comes to #93.Start over again,Wedding Entertainer.

 
At 09 April, 2010 13:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie the severely retarded scribbles, "...Again,I ask you:how far is Shanksville from the bunker? Are you seriously saying that #93 WASN'T shot down? "

Again, the answer, Arsehoolie is NO, flight 93 was NOT shot. How many times must I repeat myself?

Got it, shit-for-brains?

That said, doesn't the "9/11 truth movement" love to cite Payne Stewart's Learjet interception as proof that NORAD stood down?

Let's consult David Ray Grifter, shall we, Arsehoolie?

"...Flight 11 would have been intercepted by fighter jets within 10 minutes of any sign that it may have been hijacked." -- David Ray Grifter, lying his @$$ off in "The New Pearl Harbor".

In fact, Payne Stewart’s Learjet 35, registration N47BA, flew across several states before crashing on October 25, 1999. According to the NTSB communication with the aircraft was lost at 9:33 EDT. A test pilot from the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, reached the Learjet at 9:54 CDT--a full 81 minutes after initial communication was lost.

[1] Flight A11 was hijacked at 8:13 EDT and crashed at 8:46 EDT, which is a duration of 33 minutes.

[2] Flight UA175 was hijacked at 8:47 EDT and crashed at 9:03 EDT, which is a duration of 16 minutes.

[3] Flight AA77 was hijacked at 8:56 EDT and crashed at 9:37 EDT, which is a duration of 41 minutes.

[4] Flight UA 93 was hijacked at 9:28 EDT and crashed at 10:03 EDT, which is a duration of 35 minutes.

The fact is that the intercept of Stewart’s Learjet took twice as long as the longest hijack duration on 911.

So much for your NORAD failed bullshit.

You're a waste of skin, Arsehoolie.

 
At 09 April, 2010 13:22, Anonymous Arhoolie the GuitarBill Crusher said...

Hoist on his own petard and grumbling all night to his overwhelmed wife!! "The Art of Abandoning Your Own Argument and Declaring Victory Nonetheless" by the whining dog from California! Just so you don't have a nervous breakdown in front of your daughters' friends,I'll say that your point about the scrambling protocols,etc. is well taken.However,you've folded your shaky tent on #93 and how far away Shanksville is from D.C.,so I'm giving you an Incomplete and encouraging you to think this one through and come back for a re-test next week.Gee,and you seemed so smart at one time.Oh well.

 
At 09 April, 2010 13:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...However,you've folded your shaky tent on #93 and how far away Shanksville is from D.C.,so I'm giving you an Incomplete and encouraging you to think this one through and come back for a re-test next week.Gee,and you seemed so smart at one time.Oh well."

Who gives a shit how far Shankville is from DC? Do I come equipped with a GPS system, numb nuts?

It's irrelevant--you fool.

And while we're on the subject of "protocol", perhaps you can explain how VP Cheney gave the order to "shoot the aircraft down", when he didn't have that authority?

Protocol dictates that VP Cheney couldn't give that order as long as president Bush was alive.

Any more lies and obfuscation for us, shit-for-brains?

 
At 09 April, 2010 13:48, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

Hapless,desperate and truly witless,the shrill and whiny GitFiddler is now trying to claim I said that Cheney gave the shoot down order.You've lost it shithead.Y ou're the one who said that Cheney and the aide were tracking #93.According to the testimony,that plane came within 40 miles from the White House.Go dog your nanny.

 
At 09 April, 2010 13:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Hapless,desperate and truly witless,the shrill and whiny GitFiddler is now trying to claim I said that Cheney gave the shoot down order.You've lost it shithead.Y ou're the one who said that Cheney and the aide were tracking #93."

Oh fuck you!

The "9/11 truth movement" has been telling the "Cheney gave the orders to shoot the aircraft down" bald-faced lie for over 6 God damned years.

Do you kiss your mother with that lying mouth (that is, assuming you have a mother. I'm becoming convinced that you're really a botched slime mold experiment)?

Any more lies and obfuscation for us, shit-for-brains?

 
At 10 April, 2010 04:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gawd, you bunkturds are boring and repetitive needle skippers.

 
At 10 April, 2010 10:42, Anonymous Arhoolie the GuitarSmasher said...

See that?!!! The guy is incurable.His cement head has left him hapless,guileless and deeply ruined.The issue is whether the plane was shot down,not who ordered the 'shoot down'.You said it was Bush.Let's grant that this is true.Are you still insisting that,coincidentally,just as that plane was going to be shot down,the passengers took it down? After all,you're the schnook who says that the plane Mineta was talking about was #93.Yet,Mineta said the plane was 10 miles from D.C.Again,my weird and obfuscating and chickenshit West Coast Whackjob,how far is Shanksville from the bunker? Talk about whining dicks!

 
At 10 April, 2010 16:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Are you still insisting that,coincidentally,just as that plane was going to be shot down,the passengers took it down?"

You just can't stop with the straw man arguments can you, jackass?

The aircraft was in the air for 35 minutes, and the transponder was OFF.

The interceptors simply didn't have enough time to find the aircraft (Remember Flight 93's transponder was turned OFF by the hijackers. And don't forget, dildo, that Payne Stewart's Learjet's transponder was ON, which made the Learjet EASY to track and intercept. Yet, it took a full 81 minutes to intercept the Learjet.)

Don't you think you should remove the sand from your vagina, because it's driven you bat-shit crazy.

 
At 12 April, 2010 15:05, Anonymous Arhoolie the Cyber-Hero said...

The bindlestiff STILL cannot manage a pipsqueak on the question.I'm tired of batting you around like a horsefly,OK YuppieBoy?! You got no balls GuitarShrill.You're worse than the Lager Lout from Blimey.Not as bad as the idiot PornBoy,though.

 
At 12 April, 2010 19:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, Arsehoolie the cyber prevaricator.

So when will YOU address Mineta's fatally flawed time line?

(GuitarBill's conservative estimate: When Hell freezes over.)

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home