SEC Releases Report on the 9/11 Put Options
As I have mentioned before, I have always had a special academic side interest on the subject of the 9/11 put options, so it was especially interesting to read more on the SEC and FBI investigation into this, which was recently released. Despite the troofer claims that nothing connected to 9/11 was ever investigated, this part of the investigation was actually more extensive than previously believed.
In addition to the sex industry groups identified above, we also reviewed trading in certain financial products, including exchange traded funds and broad and narrow indices (e.g. Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq 100, and the American Stock Exchange Airline Index).Together with the market surveillance groups at several self regulatory organizations (SROs), including the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the American Stock Exchange (Amex), the Philadelphia Stock Exchange (PHLX), and the NASDR, we obtained the identity of numerous accounts that traded in a total of 103 individual securities and 32 indices or exchange traded funds. We reviewed and analyzed trading records for those accounts to determine whether trades made during the period prior to September 11 were consistent with earlier trading. When possible, we interviewed the individuals for the investment decisions and/or the traders who placed the trades.
Labels: Put Options
posted by James B. @ 5:03 PM
27 comments
27 Comments:
What? No snarky comment from Anonymous for this thread? It's been 5 minutes! A new record!
Fuck You Bill!
Hows that, lol;]
Side note: my verification word for this comment is "comedi"
There is no need for a snarky comment. This is old news, and has been debunked.
This is what the 9/11 commission based their ridiculous circular argument on, which was subsequently sliced and diced by the truth movement and at least one academic paper that I know of.
The fact remains: those who attempted to profit from 9/11 have not been arrested, cross examined and tried.
The fact, is, both AOL and SLC present this as if it is new. It's not. This is eight years old.
No, I have posted both academic papers addressing the subject, neither prove there was any insider trading.
I'm taken aback by your sloppiness James.
This is what the 9/11 commission based their ridiculous circular argument on, which was subsequently sliced and diced by the truth movement and at least one academic paper that I know of.
Sliced and diced by the Truth movement? Bullshit. If the Truth movement had sliced and diced anything you clowns would've accomplished something other than giving David Ray Griffin an alternate career path.
Well we also gave Pat his "career path".
A thank you would be in order. LOL.
as with the 9/11 commission, this report starts with a preconcived idea about who; what; and why and then distorts history to make it conform to the views of the author. it helps if you acutally read the PDF in it entirety.
Anonymous prevaricates, "...as with the 9/11 commission, this report starts with a preconcived idea about who; what; and why and then distorts history to make it conform to the views of the author."
You're absolutely correct, Anonymous, provided that you define "history" as Troofer™ Revisionist History©.
Care to tell us more about the deceptive videos produced by the lily white an pure "9/11 truth movement"?
Or maybe you'd like to impress us with another contextomy on the NIST Report?
Go for it, Mister "Truth".
%^)
That was not me, Billy Boy, nevertheless, I fully agree with Anonymous.
And don't worry about our WTC 7 discussion. I personally think it's foolish of you to repeatedly engage in defeat. Has your therapist ever told you that you have self-destructive tendencies?
"I'm taken aback by your sloppiness James."
No, sloppy was when he left the house in that plaid button down shirt and the lime green flip-flops.
WHAT WAS HE THINKING?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous prevaricates, "...That was not me, Billy Boy, nevertheless, I fully agree with Anonymous."
And why should anyone believe you, Anonymous? After all, you're a proven habitual liar, who quote mines source material for political gain.
Anonymous prevaricates, "...And don't worry about our WTC 7 discussion. I personally think it's foolish of you to repeatedly engage in defeat. Has your therapist ever told you that you have self-destructive tendencies?"
Really? No kidding?
Personally, I think it's foolish to constantly pat yourself on the back, like a caged monkey, and declare "victory" with absolutely nothing to justify the claim. How do you manage to fit through doors with that larger than life ego, Anonymous?
So, where did you slither in from, Mister Sociopath?
And remember, I'm just asking questions...
any idea how many oath keepers are truthers? think the ratio is 1 to 1? any thoughts on what the nubmers might be? i wonder if all oath keepers are truthers?
I see that you've discovered the virtue of removing comments, Billshitter™.
Do us all a favor and just keep deleting your own.
Your "questions" are the level of kids in the backseat asking if we're there yet.
Again, one must wonder where this fatalist, suicidal charging originates from. Accompanied with such an abysmal, sleep inducing writing style, Bill, I assume you get hired to play elevator music.
Anonymous slithers, "...Your 'questions' are the level of kids in the backseat asking if we're there yet."
Another 100% fact-free non-response, Anonymous?
And what "level" of "kids in the backseat" do your compulsory non-responses to my questions represent, coward?
Remember, I'm just askin' questions...
Remember, I'm just doing your wife a favor by keeping you out of bed.
" chakka said...
any idea how many oath keepers are truthers?"
What's an "oath keeper" and who the fuck cares?
Onan wrote, "...Remember, I'm just doing your wife a favor by keeping you out of bed."
Those are big words coming from a "man" who's been dating his right palm for the last 40 years.
Wasn't this the same government agency that didn't investigate the major banks and their lending practices which has led to the current financial fuck up and subsequent bail out?
Yet James thinks they found nothing suspicious regarding trading on 9/11?
LOL! I bet they didn't find anything regarding Goldman Sachs and others right? LOL@U
Tell us James, why should we believe the SEC now when in the past it has failed miserably?
Lazarus I'm surprised you don't know what an "oath keeper" is. They are kooks who serve in the military or police. They take an "oath" to not do anything against the constitution or against the American People or whatever.
They're basically wacked out fruitcakes who believe they'll be ordered to round up people and send them to the FEMA camps on cattletrains any minute now.
One hundred percent coo-coo.
I'd venture a guess that a full 100% of them believe in the Twoofity-twoof.
"Bikerman said...
Lazarus I'm surprised you don't know what an "oath keeper" is. They are kooks who serve in the military or police. They take an "oath" to not do anything against the constitution or against the American People or whatever."
Ohhhh....
Someone who believes that "defend the Constitution against enemies both foreign and domestic" actually means something.
Wow.
Some kind of fruitcakes.
Yeah.. like.. defending the Constitution against Bush or Obama, whenever they sign laws that effectively nullify important parts of it.
Right Laz?
The "Oath Keepers" have already violated their "oath".
"Anonymous chakka said...
any idea how many oath keepers are truthers? think the ratio is 1 to 1? any thoughts on what the nubmers might be? i wonder if all oath keepers are truthers?"
You're confused. Oathkeepers are Christian Right nuts...more like Teabaggers, right-wing nuts. Which means they're more likely to be debunkers..like the Rethuglicans who run this blog.
The guy who founded the dumb oathkeepers organization is a Paultard.
Paultard, Rethuglican. potato, potahto.
Somewhere in prison Bernie Madoff is busting a gut over JoggingJamesB's alarming naivete when it comes to the SEC.Poor JJ the Boob,he's got that runners tunnel vision thing goin' on! It's OK,JJB,we get a kick out of watching you illustrate how ridiculous the Debunker Cult is.
Post a Comment
<< Home