Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Jeremy Rothe-Kushel Does the Captain May Routine



I just love this crap. Note in particular that the March 11, 2004 bombing in Madrid was not precisely 911 days after 9-11; it was 912. Kudos to JREF forum member Knife Fight Colubus, who did the videotaping.

Labels:

27 Comments:

At 28 April, 2010 03:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just love this crap. Note in particular that the March 11, 2004 bombing in Madrid was not precisely 911 days after 9-11; it was 912.
wouldn't that depend on what time zone you're in? are we using greenwich mean time? has the 24 hour clock been debunked?

 
At 28 April, 2010 04:10, Anonymous chakka said...

what do you think the ratio of truthers to oath keepers is? 1 to 1, 1 to 2, any thoughts?

i was wondering which theory is most popular with debunkers; either the miliarty industrial complex is too stupid to execute false flag terror attacks on the US, or the military industrial complex is too nice to execute false flag terror attacks on the US?
thoughts on either of these?

 
At 28 April, 2010 04:46, Anonymous troyfromwv said...

You let the kooks talk long enough and the batshit nuttiness of their demented minds will eventually come out.

 
At 28 April, 2010 06:07, Blogger Billman said...

Anonymous, no. 912 days is 912 days no matter where you are on Earth. Time zones don't matter.

There's no temporal anomaly I know of where the passage of 912 days only amounts to 911 days on any calendar.

There, debunked for you? Or do you fail a logic and common sense?

 
At 28 April, 2010 09:17, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

7/11! And who work at 7/11s Arabs!

Don't you just love pseudo intellectuals thinking they figured out something?

 
At 28 April, 2010 09:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

chakka blathered on...

what do you think the ratio of truthers to oath keepers is? 1 to 1, 1 to 2, any thoughts?

i was wondering which theory is most popular with debunkers; either the miliarty industrial complex is too stupid to execute false flag terror attacks on the US, or the military industrial complex is too nice to execute false flag terror attacks on the US?
thoughts on either of these?


I think most sane and rational people would choose neither. Rather, they would say that a false flag terror attack that did get executed would be quickly exposed by internal whistleblowers (who were not hired after the fact) and by people who are not verifiable crackpots.

 
At 28 April, 2010 09:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Jeremy Rothe-hyphenated-Kushel said, "...No, because they run the Court systems. From the top down. Yeah [that's the ticket--ed]. So it's not, it's not...I mean...this is...in the...in the...in the Court of the People, a lot of this has been put forth. Well, it's not that everybody in the Court system is corrupt...We should put the evidence in the hands of every single Judge in...in...in...in the land, in response to either Misprision of treason or Misprision of murder [SIC]."

[GuitarBill shakes his head in amazement].

That settles it, Jeremy Rothe-hyphenated-Kushel is a nut-hyphenated-bar.

[Activate troofer™ emulation mode]

Tweek...sizzle...Zap!

And what is wrong with people who have two last names?

Are they paranoids who hoard surnames in anticipation of an identity crises?

Are they victims of a domineering mother?

Let's take a closer look, shall we? For example,

Jada Pinkett-Smith

Hillary Rodham-Clinton

and her long lost cousin,

Dennis Rodman-Clinton**

Daniel Day-Lewis

Catherine Zeta-Jones

David Lee Roth**

The list of nut-hyphenated-bars is virtually limitless.

All of this leads to one inescapable conclusion...

INSIDE JOB!

I rest my case.

[end troofer™ emulation mode].

%^)



[**] (okay, not really, but they make my data points fit the anticipated result...Hey, we're dealin' with troofers™, okay?)

 
At 28 April, 2010 10:39, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

It's official:the "Git" has just headed over the cliff.He left a wife and three lovely daughters,plus an expensive guitar collection and an Archie Comics collection that stacks to the ceiling of his bedroom.His family will be giving ALL of his stuff away as they don't want a thing he owned anywhere near their house."It'll take a long time to get over the shame and humiliation that came with living under the same roof as that freak",said the wife.The funeral will be held in Troy's Mom's basement.The Sexton freebase contraption will be broken out in honor of the wacky Yuppie.

 
At 28 April, 2010 10:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie wrote, "...It's official:the 'Git' has just headed over the cliff.He left a wife and three lovely daughters,plus an expensive guitar collection and an Archie Comics collection that stacks to the ceiling of his bedroom.His family will be giving ALL of his stuff away as they don't want a thing he owned anywhere near their house.'It'll take a long time to get over the shame and humiliation that came with living under the same roof as that freak',said the wife.The funeral will be held in Troy's Mom's basement.The Sexton freebase contraption will be broken out in honor of the wacky Yuppie."

100% fact-free non-response? Check

Okay, thanks for another sample of your compulsory nonsense. On the other hand, would you consider a return to the bastion of brevity thing?

Remember, I'm just asking questions.

The real question, however, remains: Did you like my jokes?

%^)

 
At 28 April, 2010 11:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Arsehoolie wrote, "...It's official:the 'Git' has just headed over the cliff."

[GuitarBill shakes his head in amazement].

[Activate troofer™ emulation mode©]

Snap...sizzle...tweak...zap!

Okay Arsehoolie, if you're so proper, sididdy and full of truthiness™ answer this question**:

If sound doesn't travel in a vacuum, why are vacuum cleaners so noisy?

And remember, I'm only asking questions.

[End troofer™ emulation mode©]

%^)



[**] (The careful reader will note that the aforementioned question appeared originally in The Official TrooferEncyclopedia of pseudo-Science©, Hardcore, Faced & Whackjob, 2005)

 
At 28 April, 2010 13:24, Blogger angrysoba said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 28 April, 2010 13:25, Blogger angrysoba said...

Arhooooolie!

 
At 28 April, 2010 13:35, Anonymous mr tibbs said...

9/11 truth in all its glory, - a bearded beatnik waffling insanely about a secret evil organization utilizing numerological philosophy to rain death & destruction upon the world.

Back in the day, that kind of talk would have landed you in a padded cell.

 
At 28 April, 2010 13:36, Blogger angrysoba said...

what do you think the ratio of truthers to oath keepers is?

No idea what an "oath keeper" is.

But we find with Twoofy Twoofers that whenever they spew their garbage others within their ranks will accuse sane people of focusing on them.

"Hey! We're not all no-planers!"

"Hey! We don't all believe in numerology!"

"Hey! We're not all Holocaust deniers!"

"Hey! We don't all believe in Space Beams!"

"Hey! We don't all murder our wives/fathers/security guards at Holcaust museums!"

No, we don't think all of you fit into those categories but most of us believe you are rag-bag of completely contemptible nuts.

 
At 28 April, 2010 14:36, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

What happens when assholio takes Viagra?

He gets about 6 inches taller.

 
At 28 April, 2010 16:08, Anonymous Dylan Unsavery said...

These lunatics can't get a single fact right. The first major terrorist event after 9/11 was the Bali bombing of October 12th, 2002.

 
At 28 April, 2010 18:21, Blogger Triterope said...

The first major terrorist event after 9/11 was the Bali bombing of October 12th, 2002.

Exactly one year, one month, and one day after September 11th, 2001! DURR I QWESTION TEH TIMING.

 
At 28 April, 2010 22:56, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

Anonymous said...
I think most sane and rational people would choose neither. Rather, they would say that a false flag terror attack that did get executed would be quickly exposed by internal whistleblowers (who were not hired after the fact) and by people who are not verifiable crackpots.


PICK A NAME YOU MARMOSET FUCKTARD!!!!

 
At 29 April, 2010 00:46, Anonymous chakka said...

Anonymous said...

I think most sane and rational people would choose neither. Rather, they would say that a false flag terror attack that did get executed would be quickly exposed by internal whistleblowers (who were not hired after the fact) and by people who are not verifiable crackpots.


From what I've seen on the net, a lot of folks hang their collective hats on that one, that is, 'there's no way such an operation, such a plot, could remain a secret; a leak or a witness would have blown the lid off the whole thing.' I contend that that is a shallow argument made by people that haven't thought it through.

the ol 'whistleblower-slash-leaked-memo-to-the-rescue' theory. Tell me how that goes. Seriously. Who is this whistleblower, and what does he/she say that'll just blow the lid off this thing? Or, what's on the memo that would do the same?

I'm guessing it would be someone who knew about the plan, and could testify that there had in fact been a conspiracy to make it, or allow it, to happen.

Now, I'm under the impression that, assuming there was a conspiracy at all, the actual planners would be a fairly small group.

But here's an idea that I think would be good to introduce here. It's the concept, perhaps you've heard of it, of compartmentalization.

I'd say it's reasonable to argue that, for the most top secret operations, not that many people know all the details. In fact, I'd argue that not only would there be many players who didn't know all the details, but that there would be a large number of participants – in many of the actions that comprised the operation – who wouldn't even know that they were part of an operation. Put another way, I'd think that a lot of people in a big operation would just be doing what they normally do on a regular basis: follow orders from their superiors.

Now, let's keep in mind that the goal of the particular operation we're talking about, our presumed 9/11 conspiracy, was nothing less than the spectacular murder of 3,000 or so innocent American civilians. I dare say this goes way beyond 'top secret'. It's more in the realm of, 'highest high crime in US history'; and as such, I think it's also fair to say that efforts to keep it as secret as possible would be equally unprecedented. If compartmentalization is business-as-usual for intelligence operations, then that practice would be taken to the most extreme form possible for this operation. We're not talking here about some sleazy kick-back scheme, or bribery, or a sex scandal. 'Hey, everybody does it' is probably a reasonable, if despicable, thing to think if your involved in one of those. And if you're involved in one of those, you're still going to take precautions not to get caught. But you're probably not going to be truly extreme about it – the precautions, the security – because you know that even if you get caught, 'hey, everybody does it', and while you might lose your seat in congress or wherever, you're not looking at the possibility of being found guilty of mass murder and high treason. If I and everybody else who suspects a conspiracy around 9/11 are right, the guys we're talking about knew very well that what they were planning was absolutely unprecedented, absolutely brutal (but 'ultimately for a good cause', of course), and if they were found out, they would go down in history as the worst criminals the United States had every seen. Not to mention being turned from the most powerful men on the planet into powerless prisoners, despised by the entire world. In short, they knew the stakes were as high as stakes can get. The idea that they'd leave anything to chance – like documenting on paper anything that would specifically acknowledge a conspiracy – is ludicrous.

 
At 29 April, 2010 01:17, Blogger angrysoba said...

If I and everybody else who suspects a conspiracy around 9/11 are right, the guys we're talking about knew very well that what they were planning was absolutely unprecedented, absolutely brutal (but 'ultimately for a good cause', of course), and if they were found out, they would go down in history as the worst criminals the United States had every seen. Not to mention being turned from the most powerful men on the planet into powerless prisoners, despised by the entire world. In short, they knew the stakes were as high as stakes can get. The idea that they'd leave anything to chance – like documenting on paper anything that would specifically acknowledge a conspiracy – is ludicrous.

No. What you have written is ludicrous.

You are saying that regular criminals don't cover up their crimes very well because their crimes are really regular.

But 9/11 must have been an uber-plot so the Bush Administration (or the international bankers, or the Bilderbergers, or Bohemian Grovers, or the Jews, or the Illuminati, or whatever combination) decided to work much harder than regular criminals to cover up their crimes.

In other words more absurd ad hoc rationalizations of an already absurd theory complete with ZERO EVIDENCE.

In fact you are even asserting that ZERO evidence for your theory is evidence for your theory as you can say, "Do you see, that proves how good the cover-up was!"

 
At 29 April, 2010 05:22, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"From what I've seen on the net, a lot of folks hang their collective hats on that one, that is, 'there's no way such an operation, such a plot, could remain a secret; a leak or a witness would have blown the lid off the whole thing.' I contend that that is a shallow argument made by people that haven't thought it through."

I contend that your an insane conspiracy monger who has only a passing aquaintence with reality.

 
At 29 April, 2010 07:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tell us again about that climate change conspiracy you believe in, Laz.

Do you know why you believe that conspiracy theory? Because it's in sync with your extreme right wing views.

How many people would have been involved in that conspiracy? How many scientists? All of Wikipedia?

Unbelievable. I mean... such a complex, convoluted, overarching conspiracy that would have involved hundreds of thousands of people? Somebody would have talked!

 
At 29 April, 2010 08:28, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Me and some other truthers would like to go on a bear hunting trip soon, and we would like Troy Sexton to play the bear.

Dick Cheney is coming along as well. He has decided that Troy Sexton is such a disgusting piece of 9/11 family member harassing filth that not even he, the Sith Lord himself, can stand it any longer.

Hat tip to Dick 'Blofeld' Cheney for that one!

 
At 29 April, 2010 09:17, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Gotta admit,the vacuum joke raised a chuckle.Not bad,whackjob!

 
At 29 April, 2010 10:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

regardless of whatever numerological coincidences between the attacks there may be.... how does that prove ANYTHING? does he think the gvmt is intentionally giving us these signs or something? in fact, i would think that if anything, it would be the TERRORISTS who intentionally use this supposed "numerology"

 
At 29 April, 2010 11:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I suggest you double click on the Youtube video, Anonymous, and see that this is just one section of a long conversation about many aspects of 9/11.

You see, Pat the 50% orphan likes to "embedmine".

 
At 03 May, 2010 14:45, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Anonymous chakka said...

what do you think the ratio of truthers to oath keepers is? 1 to 1, 1 to 2, any thoughts?"

Oathkeepers=Teabaggers=right-wing loons, so probably not. Most truthers are liberal or libertarian. Most debunkers are Rethuglicans...like the ones who run this blog.

But nice try.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home