But Whether It's LIHOP, or Whether It's MIHOP...
Some of you may remember the zither guy singing that wacky song in the Abby Scott video. What amazes me, though, is how many of the Truthers don't realize that LIHOP and MIHOP are mutually contradictory. That is, if one of them is true, then the other isn't. For example, suppose we accept LIHOP. That means that there were 19 hijackers on the planes, Hani Hanjour did fly AA77 into the Pentagon, and there was no controlled demolition at the WTC. I doubt many MIHOP proponents would accept those three facts.
We see this all the time from the Truthers, though. Hell, Dylan sometimes makes the case even weaker, stating something along the lines of "the government was, at a minimum, criminally negligent." That's not even LIHOP. That's IHBON (It Happened Because of Negligence).
Why do they do this? The answer is pretty obvious. Even the Truthers recognize that their case for MIHOP is a bunch of BS, and so they're setting up a series of fallback positions. Yes, they require a dramatically different account of the events of 9-11, but the one thing that doesn't change is the Bush Administration is, in one way or another, guilty as charged.
Hence, a new "Truther" movie from the rebunkers.
It's not going to work. This movie is just as bad as Loose Change; it's a mixture of the usual BS from the Troofers: Quote mining ("Set up to fail"), selective presentation of facts, and bizarre interpretations (Norm Mineta's testimony about a shoot-down order becoming a stand-down order, for example). Note as well that his hope that if LIHOP were discovered to be true, that the Patriot Act would be repealed and the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq would end, has no basis in reality. If you accept LIHOP, then that still means there are dangerous terrorists in the world, right?