Saturday, June 26, 2010

Is This Man Responsible for Controlled Demolition on 9-11?


Hey, I'm just asking questions. The Troofers are all agog at the latest revelation over at Gage's Gaggle of Geese, by a guy who appears to have been a photographer for CDI, and who claims to have also placed charges in the Kingdome and other controlled demolition sites.

But note the very curious documentation he provides. A Certificate from the FDNY, dated 7/9/01, a full two months BEFORE 9-11. Note the description of his function: POWDER CARRIER. What kind of powder, hmmm? Doesn't sooper-dooper nanothermite come in powder form?

135 Comments:

At 26 June, 2010 10:55, Blogger Billman said...

This guys is obviously an NWO disinfo plant.

 
At 26 June, 2010 11:33, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

So the just takes pictures? WOW? That bust the case wide open. maybe he has some pictures of Nanothermite.

You would think they could find a real controlled demolition expert of some talent and expertise. What ever happened to Danny Jowenko? Wasn't he going to blow the lid off the case? Oh. Wait, he says the towers fell from fire. Never mind.

 
At 26 June, 2010 12:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Oh my Gawd! I was right; the conspiracy theorists were the "masterminds" behind 9/11.

INSIDE JOB!

 
At 26 June, 2010 12:36, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

My favorite part in his interview is when he says, GET THIS!

“Remote wireless detonators have been available for years. Look at any action movie”

WOW! Well that proves it!!!!!!, he saw it in a action movie, And we all know stuff in the movies work in real life.

Being just a photographer and laborer maybe he doesn’t know how sensitive radio detonators are to electrical signals found in a working office building full of cell phones, computers and wireless networks. That is why real controlled demolition experts use non-electrical detcord.

Some controlled demolition expert the truthers have there, he doesn’t understand how controlled demolitions are done, but he did see all the Die Hard movies.

 
At 26 June, 2010 12:42, Anonymous TV said...

I checked the patent they quote.

Here is the part Gaggle et.al. apparently missed. It's right at the beginning of the description.

This invention relates to a new low-energy integral thermite igniter/heat source, e.g., for use in igniting larger charges, e.g., propellant charges. The device of this invention is highly efficient especially in terms of energy output versus the amount of material utilized and also has advantageously low gas output.

 
At 26 June, 2010 13:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Box Boy dissembles, "...Brent Blanchard, the photographer from the controlled demolition company Protec, has said, in criticism of the CD theory, that there would have had to been detonation cords strung all over the place and casings left in the rubble pile from the cutter charges...Sullivan notes that "miles of det cord" are not required with modern detonation devices like this on from HiEx which are set off from remote computer systems."

Photographic Source: ae911truth: Box Boy lying through his teeth again.

Next, Box Boy cites Hi-Ex Technologies, Ltd. as a source of "modern wireless detonation devices"; Sullivan goes on to claim that "[r]emote wireless detonators have been available for years."

Naturally, I immediately smelled a rat, because Box Boy is a habitual liar. Thus, I had a look at HiEx Technologies website for more information.

As it turns out, the only advantages provided by the HiEx wireless detonation system can be reduced to three primary selling points: [i] Eliminates need for safety fuse and its inherent complications; [ii] Blaster not tethered to blast by shooting line or nonel lead-in line that is often too short; and [iii] Increased stand off distances - up to 5 kilometer (not dependent on line of sight).

Source: HiEx Technologies: HiEx Technologies--Products.

Notice that detonation cord is not mentioned; thus, the HiEx Technologies wireless detonation system still requires the demolition team to wire the explosives with det cord.

The HiEx wireless detonation systems main selling point is two-fold: [i] The system allows the blaster to enjoy "Increased stand off distances - up to 5 kilometer"; and [ii] the elimination of "safety fuse and its inherent complications".

Sorry, Box Boy, but even if the HiEx wireless detonation system was used DET CORD IS STILL REQUIRED.

BUSTED LYING AGAIN, BOX BOY.

And remember, Box Boy, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 26 June, 2010 14:49, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Remember in the 50s there was a big deal about blasting caps, kid were finding these things around construction sites and being injured when they explode. The reason is electronic detonators need to be very sensitive to work and static from touching them alone can set them off. As can stray electrical chargers from radio cell phone and network equipment signals. Not workable in the kind of stuff controlled demolition companies need to do. the idea you would set hundreds of these in a working office building like the WTC and not have one go off prematurely is pure fantasy.

So they use detcord because it's safe and reliable. Radio detonation equipment would only be use at the final collection points for the miles of detcord.

Setting off thermite is another thing even more difficult. But, truthers being people with child level thinking ability buy this stuff, because they saw it in a movie.

 
At 26 June, 2010 14:58, Blogger Billman said...

I think it was "The Rock" when I first heard the words "thermite" ever used. I think it was part of a missile that would burn hot enough to incinerate the virus or whatever.

And then there was the laughable scene in "Volcano" where Tommy Lee Jones points at a 30 story condo building and says "can we knock it in down in 30 minutes?" And everyone is like "sure." Cut to: guy in helmet setting off demolition charges.

So it MUST BE TRUE!!!

 
At 26 June, 2010 15:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 26 June, 2010 16:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Dave,

Safety fuse igniters are inherently unstable. In fact, safety fuse igniters are susceptible to RF (Radio Frequency), which could lead to premature ignition (not good).

You'll notice that all safety fuse igniter lead wires are twisted (aka., twisted pair configuration) by the manufacturer to increase resistance to RF.

Thus, a wireless detonation system is a good idea for two reasons: [i] safety; and [ii] the wireless detonation system reduces the amount of work required to set up the demolition, which results in overall cost reduction for the project (No need for safety fuses and safety fuse ignition components).

 
At 26 June, 2010 17:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No gigs on a saturday, Bill?
Who am i kidding.
Of course there are no "gigs", youre a billshitter.
All you dillrods bullshit , cuz thats all you have. Get up in the morning turn the puter on and you can be whoever you want. If i were as talented as you all i wouldnt be caught dead posting on the web. And dont say i`m here for a couple minutes, cuz you been here all day , bitch. You and lil bill. I seriously doubt youre even an american.

 
At 26 June, 2010 19:02, Anonymous Marc said...

I could understand the confusion if there had been other 9/11-style attacks on large buildings in the past, but the fact is that there have not. So there is no point of refference on the building collapse to make the kinds of judgements that troofers make.

The Twin Towers and WTC-7 were each unique free-standing structures, so there are no other buildings that they can be compared to.

I could point out that nobody saw any explosives planted in the building. None of the NYPD Port Authority cops saw anything, none of the hundreds of technical and maintenance people saw anything, the evelator people saw nothing, and the NYFD engine companies that responded to the WTC daily never reported anything.

Why? Because there were no explosives in any of the buildings, that's why?

 
At 26 June, 2010 19:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

As a matter of fact, compulsive liar for 9/11 troof, I have a gig every Friday, Saturday and Monday night.

Go back, and check for yourself, because I never post between 9:00 and midnight on those evenings.

In fact, it's 7:00 PM Pacific time now in California, and we don't start the show until 9:00 PM.

Now, back to subject.

Does it piss you off that I ass raped that liar Box Boy again?

Now, crawl back down into your bomb shelter and practice remedial English, spelling bee champ.

 
At 26 June, 2010 19:14, Blogger Billman said...

Meh, another ad-hom sent my way while I was at work, I see. Fun stuff. Has 9/11 Truth toppled the government yet?

 
At 26 June, 2010 20:03, Anonymous paul w said...

More 'proof' for a truther to throw into the face of a newbie.

This will be part of the non-stop barrage of 'facts' that is a truthers version of 'explaining' and 'debate'.

The following comment will be made just after the 'facts' about the 'unusual' power downs in the Towers beforehand:

"Tom Sullivan is an explosive expert who has confessed to planting the explosives in the building....and he's just one of many...more are coming forward every day...again, the mainstream media will not report this..."

Take a smidgen of truth...that Sullivan said he planted explosives...distort it, and wrap it up in lies.

 
At 26 June, 2010 20:22, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"If i were as talented as you all i wouldnt be caught dead posting on the web."

Why not? When I am not showing the ridiculous nature of you fools I am posting my artwork to the web and getting much attention from it. And as well as getting paid for the prints I create and sell from my site at motorsportsartist.com. A site that also clearly host my debunking efforts at 911realtruth.org. People who hire me to do design and illustration and general web site development know I debunk you fools. But because they’re professional business people they are not part of the truther loon minority and so applaud my efforts. And any truther that may feel they won't hire me is of no consequence because you are so few, and getting fewer and who wants to deal with a kook anyway.

And it may take all the effort YOU posses to come here and jack off about 9/11 truth, but for me it's nothing, I being a skilled professional have by default the extra time to engage fucking with fools, and between having an iPhone and iPad and mobile internet I can punk boobs like you while having lunch or maybe having a beer at the local pub.

It's a catch 22 kind of thing for you Anonymous, You being a lowlife will by your nature buy the conspiracy theorist scams. stupid people do those things, and because you are such a lowlife will always be at the bottom of the social ladder and never have the time education or talent to compete with people like me who treat you like the dirt you are. And I can do that using my real name and I can do it with great pride because who gives a shit about a bunch of screwballs who have nothing but their imagined truth struggle.

Of course you will never address these major failings in your life and never give up the truther thing because without it you have nothing but you worthless talent less existence.

 
At 26 June, 2010 21:12, Anonymous nwoisbunk said...

I'd love to see Gage or someone else in the Truth Movement get hit with a lawsuit for defamation of character or something of that nature for the scurrilous and irresponsible accusations they've thrown at numerous people.

Color me disgusted.

 
At 27 June, 2010 04:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Apparently Sullivan's status as a fraud is old news.

 
At 27 June, 2010 04:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry, here's a better link documenting Sullivan's status as a fraud. Post #139.

 
At 27 June, 2010 04:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey -- would you like to become an expert Powder Carrier licensed by FDNY? Everything you need to know is right here. Be warned, it's ten pages and not very many pictures.

 
At 27 June, 2010 05:12, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Wouldn't "powder monkey" be more apropos?

 
At 27 June, 2010 08:24, Blogger Triterope said...

I liked this part:

we have some new insights to pass along as to how controlled demolition works

So Gage has been pushing DURR CONTROLLED DEMOLITION DURR INSIDE JOB DURRRRRRRRRRRR for years now, but acquires "new insights" from talking to the guy who does the grunt work?

 
At 27 June, 2010 08:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

“Remote wireless detonators have been available for years. Look at any action movie”

Wrong, dipshit, he worked with them. That is how he knows. I'm sure you can ask Bill about guitars afterall he works with them.

"That is why real controlled demolition experts use non-electrical detcord. "
Wrong again, shit tard. Check your facts because your ignorant.

"Guitar Fuck...Brent Blanchard, the photographer from the controlled demolition company Protec,"

Look, Bill! You quoted a CD photograher. According to Dave Kyte, you can't do that because he just takes pictures. Why does the debunking community always contradict themselves??
Yeah, Bill because EVERYBODY cares about your guitar schedule. I'm sure it doesn't help support your lovely family so stick with the computer security stuff. Go home and be a better daddy and computer tech guy and leave the 9/11 issue to experts.

All you despunks have left is your own little online anyonmous community while expert after expert continually speaks out about 9/11. You shitards hate this site don't you...

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

 
At 27 June, 2010 09:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Another 100% fact-free non-response, Anonymous?

In fact, I just blew a hole a mile-wide through Box Boy's latest attempt to discredit Brent Blanchard, which is child's play for a real engineer. Read it and weep, scumbag:

"...Our team, working at ground zero, including myself, never saw indication of explosive use that would have been evident after the event. You just can't clean up all that det cord, shock tube, blasting cap remnants, copper backing from explosive charges, burn marks along clean-cut edges of columns, etc., nor is there any evidence in the thousands of photos taken by the press and dozens of agencies over the following days." -- Brent Blanchard, Demolition Expert; International Society of Explosives Engineers.

The fact is that the HiEx wireless detonation system does NOT eliminate the "det cord, shock tube, blasting cap remnants, copper backing from explosive charges".

The HiEx wireless system provides two advantages: [i] The system allows the blaster to enjoy "Increased stand off distances - up to 5 kilometers"; and [ii] the elimination of "safety fuse and its inherent complications".

And it took me 5 minutes to find the information that TOTALLY DEBUNKS the Box Boy and his latest attempt to deceive his infinity gullible audience.

Now, fucktard, would you care to provide a shred of evidence that proves I'm wrong?

I won't hold my breath.

Now, get to work, dissembler for 9/11 troof, because I just destroyed Box Boy again.

And remember, cretin, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 27 June, 2010 09:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You shitards hate this site don't you...

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/


What's to hate about it? Some of us find delusional fucktards entertaining, and that site contains hundreds of them.

 
At 27 June, 2010 09:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just one question, can anyone post some pics of a controlled demolition site that has det cord laying around in huge quantitites after the destruction of the building it was used on?

Thanks!

 
At 27 June, 2010 09:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Just one question, can anyone post some pics of a controlled demolition site that has det cord laying around in huge quantitites [SIC] after the destruction of a building?"

Why would anyone take pictures of det cord fragments?

Again, this is EXPERT TESTIMONY:

"...Our team, working at ground zero, including myself, never saw indication of explosive use that would have been evident after the event. You just can't clean up all that det cord, shock tube, blasting cap remnants, copper backing from explosive charges, burn marks along clean-cut edges of columns, etc., nor is there any evidence in the thousands of photos taken by the press and dozens of agencies over the following days." -- Brent Blanchard, Demolition Expert; International Society of Explosives Engineers.

Now, the burden of proof is yours, asshole.

Now, get on with it, and prove that Blanchard is lying. And the lack of pictures on the internet ISN'T PROOF OF ANYTHING.

I won't hold my breath.

 
At 27 June, 2010 09:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just one question, can anyone post some pics of a controlled demolition site that has det cord laying around in huge quantitites after the destruction of the building it was used on?

Sure. First, could you post some pics of a building prepped for controlled demolition in a way that could not be detected from the inside? Any size building is fine.

Thanks!

 
At 27 June, 2010 09:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

More expert testimony.

Source: BBC: The Third Tower: Controlled Demolition?

Is Mark Loizeaux a liar? Is Gene Corely a liar?

If they are liars, you've certainly provided NO EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE THAT CLAIM.

Now, get to work, dissembler for 9/11 troof, because questions ARE NOT EVIDENCE.

 
At 27 June, 2010 11:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Look, Bill! You quoted a CD photograher [SIC]. According to Dave Kyte, you can't do that because he just takes pictures. Why does the debunking community always contradict themselves??"

Wrong again, fucktard.

Brent Blanchard is a long-standing member of the International Society of Explosives Engineers (ISEE).

"...Applications for membership should be accompanied by a summary of the applicant’s employment experience and educational background along with the first year's annual dues. To become a member, a person must be endorsed by an ISEE Member or appropriate governmental official, or belong to another professional society with similar membership qualifications."

Source: ISEE: ISEE--Membership

FACT: Brent Blanchard is not just a photographer--your never ending lies to the contrary notwithstanding.

Now, crawl back into your bomb shelter, dissembler for 9/11 troof.

 
At 27 June, 2010 11:57, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Wrong, dipshit, he worked with them. That is how he knows. I'm sure you can ask Bill about guitars afterall he works with them."

But HE is the one who made the remark about it being true because HE saw it in an action movie. HE SAID IT. He used the movie justification because as nothing but a photographer and laborer he has most likely never touched the explosives.

But gullible fools like you will buy it, how sad is that?

 
At 27 June, 2010 12:03, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Hey -- would you like to become an expert Powder Carrier licensed by FDNY? Everything you need to know is right here. Be warned, it's ten pages and not very many pictures.

Wow! After reading that I too can become a controlled demolition expert and join the A+E people. Seen driver license study air more complex than that.

 
At 27 June, 2010 12:29, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"The J.L. Hudson Department Store in Detroit. 33-levels total, making this job 15% the size of the WTC “job.” It took a 12-person crew 24 days to set 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations, and they only put explosives on 9 levels! So, again with unfettered access to a building that has already been completely abandoned, it took a 12-person crew 24 days to set charges on 9 levels of the structure. "

Not to mention all the pre-weakening required to DROP a building this size. Drop is the proper term, not pull.

det cord in place, Yeah, that isn’t noticeable at all. Also note the blast blankets use to concentrate the explosive energy and prevent high speed shrapnel.

I can’t find a single instance of wireless charges being used for a building demolition. In all instances the charges are linked by miles of cables. So we’re asked to believe that not only was this the biggest demolition of a steel framed high rise in history (nearly 6-times bigger than the previous world record) but we’re also asked to believe that it was done using a type of charge never before used.

As I said truther do of the lower glass of thinking people.

/

 
At 27 June, 2010 12:31, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Sorry bad link. This is what a det cord wired building looks like inside
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7199/demolitionssetih0.jpg

 
At 27 June, 2010 12:48, Anonymous Ktesibios said...

"Anonymous said...
Just one question, can anyone post some pics of a controlled demolition site that has det cord laying around in huge quantitites after the destruction of the building it was used on?"

Here's one, shitnozzle:
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g157/kookbreaker/CopperDepositweb.jpg

This was posted by JREF forum member Kookbreaker at the site of the demolition of the Philadelphia Civic Center. The snarl of yellow stuff is the remnants of detcord.

You can read the original thread here:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=76343

 
At 27 June, 2010 12:53, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Check your facts because your ignorant."

Said the fucktard who can't spell.

OH TEH IRONY SHE BURNS SHE BURNS!!!!!!

 
At 27 June, 2010 13:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Dave wrote, "...I can’t find a single instance of wireless charges being used for a building demolition."

Of course you can't find "wireless explosives".

%^)

The idea is ridiculous, not to mention monumentally impractical.

For example, in order to design a "wireless explosive", the explosive would need to conform to IP (internet protocol, RFC-791 and RFC-793); each device would need to conform with wireless network standards IEEE 802.11 (in addition to standards such as 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, etc); a dedicated network interface device would need to be integrated INTO EACH EXPLOSIVE, and would be destroyed by the detonation of each device. This makes the idea PROHIBITIVELY EXPENSIVE, not to mention completely impractical.

FACT: Box Boy is an idiot. His "wireless explosive" theory is ridiculous--and especially so to anyone with expertise in IP (internet protocol) and its applications (that's me, by the way).

 
At 27 June, 2010 13:22, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

GB, here's a prediction:

Anon the Idiot is going to cite RFC1925


With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

 
At 27 June, 2010 13:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LL wrote, "...Anon the Idiot is going to cite RFC1925."

I hope the cretin uses cut-and-paste, because he can't spell to save his life.

Perhaps he'll cite IP over Avian Carriers.

%^)

LOL!

 
At 27 June, 2010 14:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I couldn't resist chasing down the huntergreengroup.com URL on Sullivan's CDI card. It's been long parked. Wayback Machine suggests it used to look something like this -- that is, lame. But the real giggle comes when you have a look at the street address of his alleged business. Not a helluva lot there.

 
At 27 June, 2010 14:13, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"For example, in order to design a "wireless explosive", the explosive would need to conform to IP (internet protocol, RFC-791 and RFC-793); each device would need to conform with wireless network standards IEEE 802.11 "

Bill, I think I got an iPhone app for that. Let me see here..... OPPS, just blew up the Sears Tower!

 
At 27 June, 2010 15:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

CIA's Panetta: No New Leads on Bin Laden
7 hours ago

Gee...I wonder who's been putting out all those fake audio and video tapes since Tora Bora...and why? ............as if that's not too obvious now.

Come on asshole GuitarBill...tell me he is alive now and the tapes aren't a pile of horse shit.

 
At 27 June, 2010 15:54, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No leads on OBL for years and years and years..........but every tape appears to be authentic.

ROFL

And you suckers actually believe that.

-----------------------------

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men
--- George Orwell

 
At 27 June, 2010 15:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Gee...I wonder who's been putting out all those fake audio and video tapes since Tora Bora...and why? ............as if that's not too obvious now."

Another 100% fact-free non-response, jizzmop?

That's right, Anonymous, when your ass has been thoroughly kicked, change the subject.

That said, are you trying to elevate your head-up-your-ass opinion to the realm of fact again, jizzmop?

Go fuck yourself, scat muncher.

 
At 27 June, 2010 15:59, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You a-holes forgetting about the spain bombing? They were detonated remotely. Guitar bill says its impractical to use and expensive. WTF?
Just because you cant find information on exotic explosives on the web doesnt make them impossible.
And to clear one thing up WTC1and 2 didnt look like a controlled demo like you claim truthers have said . It looked like they got blown the fuck up . Period.

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One might think that a "new audio or video tape" from OBL would count as a "new lead"? You would think that they might be interested in tracing those "tapes" back to their source, perhaps to give finding OBL the leader of AQ, who did 9/11 (ROFL, a liitle higher priority that finding Julian Assange of WikiLeaks (LOL).

...but after all we need the boogie man out there....keep the phoney baloney war on terra going...keep the gravey train flowing to all the people who build the ships, the bombs, the bullets, the missiles and the planes.

And you guys suck it up...believe anything they tell you...

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Go fuck yourself, scat muncher.



Guess that means you cannot scrap together a coherant counter-argument shit for brains?????

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...And to clear one thing up WTC1and 2 didnt look like a controlled demo like you claim truthers have said . It looked like they got blown the fuck up . Period."

Oh, I see. The "9/11 truth movement" howled for 9 years about "controlled demolition", and now you're trying to convince us that you never made that assertion?

Now you're changing your tune in an attempt to claim that the World Trade Center Towers "got blown the fuck up"?

You realize that an ever shifting rational is the defining characteristic of a liar, don't you, jizzmop?

And remember, habitual liar for 9/11 troof, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Guess that means you cannot scrap together a coherant [SIC] counter-argument shit for brains?????"

I don't need to offer "a coherant [SIC] counter-argument", spelling bee champ.

After all, you've offered not one shred of evidence to support your head-up-your-ass assertions, shit nozzle.

Given your hectic masturbation schedule, how do find time to type, jizzmop?

And remember, dissembler for 9/11 troof, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another 100% fact-free non-response, jizzmop?

That's right, Anonymous, when your ass has been thoroughly kicked, change the subject.



First off SCHMUCK HEAD, I only logged on a few minutes ago, I've only been talking about Panetta says there has been no leads on OBL since the "early 2000s".

There is more than one anonymous posting and your ASSumption is that I "changed the subject", is just that. So fuck you!

Second, my comments are far from "100% fact-free." It is now a fact that they were making FAKE TAPES!

"But that did not stop a CIA video being shot of a fake Osama bin Laden sitting around a camp fire... The video apparently used some of the CIA's "darker skinned" employees ...playing the terror chief's henchmen."
--- SPYTALK: CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay, By Jeff Stein, The Washington Post, May 25, 2010

So FUCK YOU again!!!

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill

I want you to reconcile two things:

1) Panetta says there has been to New Leads on OBL since the "early 2000's" (when all the tapes began)and...

2) how dozens of audio (and several video) tapes....everyone of which they said "appears to be authentic"...........

Hpw do those tapes not count as a "new lead".

crickets

crickets

crickets

crickets

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Trolling again, jizzmop?

Yeah, you're a different "Anonymous". Right, compulsive liar for 9/11 troof?

Just keep changing the subject, shit nozzle.

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Got to run......be back to make GuitarBill look stupid later.







Asshole!

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have not gone yet.

ANSWER MY QUESTION FUCK HEAD !!!!

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yeah, right.

The only person you've manged to discredit is yourself, shit nozzle.

Now, get back to blowin' that donkey, Mr. Bestiality.

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:38, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You cannot answer the question.

Checkmate!

GuitarBill, you are the most stupidest most obnoxious nasty asshole.

You're a total waste of my time!

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...ANSWER MY QUESTION FUCK HEAD !!!!"

Desperate, shit nozzle?

And the answer is no, troll. Stay on subject, or get the fuck out, dissembler for 9/11 troof.

 
At 27 June, 2010 16:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Checkmate!"

Patting yourself on the back again, Pinocchio?

You're pathetic, shit nozzle.

 
At 27 June, 2010 17:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Second, my comments are far from '100% fact-free.' It is now a fact that they were making FAKE TAPES!"

It's a "fact that they were making FAKE TAPES!"

Really? No kidding?

We'll see, won't we, shit nozzle?

Anonymous continues his bald face lie, "...The Washington Post, May 25, 2010."

No wonder you didn't give us a source. After all, the Washington Post didn't run the "story". In fact, your "source" is a blog post, not the "Washington Post".

Source: blog.washingtonpost.com: CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay.

Check.

The quote you cite, moreover, is a product of quote mining. Here's what you wrote:

"...But that did not stop a CIA video being shot of a fake Osama bin Laden sitting around a camp fire... The video apparently used some of the CIA's "darker skinned" employees ...playing the terror chief's henchmen."

But that's not what the blog post says, does it, jizzmop?

Here's what the blog post really says--sans your quote mining:

"...The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from 'some of us darker-skinned employees,' he said.

"Eventually, 'things ground to a halt,' the other former officer said, because no one could come to agreement on the projects.

"They also faced strong opposition from James Pavitt, then head of the agency’s Operations Division, and his deputy, Hugh Turner, who 'kept throwing darts at it.'

"The ideas were patently ridiculous, said the other former agency officer.

"'They came from people whose careers were spent in Latin America or East Asia' and didn’t understand the cultural nuances of the region...'While I can't confirm these accounts, if these ideas were ever floated by anyone at any time, they clearly didn't go anywhere,' the official said.

"The reality, the former officials said, was that the agency really didn’t have enough money and expertise to carry out the projects."


Thus, your "facts" are nothing more than bald faced lies, based on compulsory troofer quote mining, aren't they, jizzmop?

Check and mate.

Now, go lick your wounds, habitual liar for 9/11 troof.

And remember, jizzmop, I'm only askin' questions...

 
At 27 June, 2010 17:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yo Anonymous jizzmop for 9/11 troof.

Tell us, how does it feel to know that your alleged credibility can be measured in negative engineering units?

And remember, lying shit nozzle for 9/11 troof, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 27 June, 2010 18:38, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hpw do those tapes not count as a "new lead".

Because real life isn't like CSI Miami where they shout "enhance" at the videotape and pick up a reflection of a license plate in the victim's earring which leads the cops to the killer.

Your turn. Explain what's in the most recent tape that qualifies it as an actionable lead.

 
At 27 June, 2010 20:02, Blogger ConsDemo said...

It sounds like Sullivan can't get much work these days and he blames a supposed controlled demolition on 9/11? What an asshole.

I actually made my first trip to ground zero this weekend. For those who follow the twoof movement, its easy to sometimes thing they matter more than they do. I aksed one guy selling a booklet on the attacks if he had ever seen any twoofers and he said they show up now and then but not that often. There was no signs of twooferism anywhere at ground zero.

 
At 27 June, 2010 21:27, Blogger 陳淳 said...

在莫非定律中有項笨蛋定律:「一個組織中的笨蛋,恆大於等於三分之二。」.................................................................                           

 
At 27 June, 2010 21:35, Blogger Billman said...

Good work, GB. I wonder how many troofer lies and subject changing there is per comment thread.
These morons must believe we won't call them out on their transparent and childish bullshit, otherwise they wouldn't come in here nearly everyday trying to pull the same tricks.

 
At 27 June, 2010 23:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LL wrote, "...Wouldn't 'powder monkey' be more apropos?"

Personally, I prefer "blow monkey."

%^)

 
At 27 June, 2010 23:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Billman wrote, "...Good work, GB."

Thanks, Bill.

Always remember, the troofers have no argument. It's all about trivial anomalies; however, you'll notice that there's no effort to assemble them in any coherent way.

Cherry pick, cherry pick, cherry pick, with no concrete conclusion forthcoming. They're like sleazy defense lawyers--don't offer evidence--ever--attack the prosecution with specious arguments at best; shit all over creation like a flock of seagulls and fly back to sea.

Fuck 'em and the horse they rode in on.

 
At 28 June, 2010 00:29, OpenID yngvar said...

You a-holes forgetting about the spain bombing? They were detonated remotely.

No, they weren't.

 
At 28 June, 2010 06:30, Anonymous Rebel said...

OT, but I gotta call your attention to this SLC:

http://bigjournalism.com/dweigel/2010/06/28/hubris-and-humility-david-weigel-comes-clean-on-washington-post-the-d-c-bubble-the-journolist/

 
At 28 June, 2010 06:35, Anonymous Rebel said...

From the above article:

Jones had five years to distance himself from this bullshit. Five years. He didn’t do it. And I can’t believe that a man who spoke at basically every left/liberal event in 2007 and 2008 did not see what the Truthers were up to.
Yes, as [Charles] Johnson points out, they’re liars who try and suck everyone into their orbit. One year ago I was backstage at a Ron Paul event with Kevin Barrett, the lunatic University of Wisconsin professor, who deliriously informed me of all these famous people he’d gotten on board with the Truth movement. He was full of shit–they were people who’d been accosted by Truthers and said nice things to blow them off. Here’s an example of a Truther baiting Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand into indulging his nonsense.
But there was nothing preventing people like Paul, or like Jones, from brushing aside people like Barrett from releasing clear statements that they didn’t believe in these conspiracy theories.

 
At 28 June, 2010 07:20, Anonymous sackclotj and ashes said...

'You a-holes forgetting about the spain bombing? They were detonated remotely.'

A point for the terminally retard - a bomb attack and a controlled demolition are not the same thing.

'I only logged on a few minutes ago, I've only been talking about Panetta says there has been no leads on OBL since the "early 2000s".'

That might have something to do with the fact that he's a fugitive, numbnuts. Are there any more obviously retarded comments you'd like to make here, before you get sent back to your padded room?

 
At 28 June, 2010 08:28, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GB"Now, get on with it, and prove that Blanchard is lying. And the lack of pictures on the internet ISN'T PROOF OF ANYTHING."

I'll request again pictures of a clean up site after a controlled demolition so as to put on display the remanants of such a controlled demolition. Surely you can email Blanchard and have him post some, he is a photographer afterall.
Blanchard is a photographer. And yet you disregard testimony from someone WHO ACTUALLY PLACED CUTTER CHARGES IN A CD PROJECT at the Kingdome. Nice selective use of so called experts.

Dave Kyte"But HE is the one who made the remark about it being true because HE saw it in an action movie. HE SAID IT."
Dave, you were conned by your buddies. They forgot to post the rest of the quote:

Hmmmm. And what does this former CDI employee have to

"Remote wireless detonators have been available for years. Look at any action movie -- and of course the military has them. The reason most contractors don’t use them is that they are too expensive -- but in a project with a huge budget it would be no problem. As for the casings -- everyone in the industry, including Blanchard, would know that RDX explosive cutter charges are completely consumed when they go off -- nothing is left. And in the case of Thermite cutter charges, that may also be the case. Thermite self-consuming cutter charge casings have been around since first patented back in 1984."

Enjoy your lunch, Dave. Now do you believe Guitar Bill when he schooled you on wireless detonation? Funny when debunkers have to fix each others knowledge base so they can get their bullshit straight.

And why in the world would you think after the destuction of 3 steel framed buildings with building parts blown all over kindom come there would be det cord tubes laying around in plain site? What kind of physics do you work with? LOL
Nevermind, your not an engineer your a computer guy.

But look, Bill https://www.isee.org/FPmemberonlineapp.htm
you can be an exploisves engineer too! All you need to do in most states is pass a test. Did you happen to see on the application page the "engineering" requirements your leaning on? Don't worry, LEVEL OF EDUCATION is not on the application list. Nor is it required to pass a blasting test. So frankly that ISEE is a nice endorsement to get a job but doesn't make one an engineer. Strike 1,2, and 3 for you.

Blanchard quotes 1000's of photos. Did he see those? Have you seen those? Seems to me the clean up site was limited to who could or could not take pictures. Besides, its the explosion itself that gets rid off the blasting caps, copper tops, blah blah.

 
At 28 June, 2010 08:34, Anonymous Anonymous said...

99% of the tests are open book too. You don't really have to be a Rocket Surgeon to pass them

 
At 28 June, 2010 08:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What's this fucktard?

Enjoy your plate of crow, scumbag.

 
At 28 June, 2010 08:47, Blogger Triterope said...

And why in the world would you think after the destruction of 3 steel framed buildings with building parts blown all over kingdom come there would be det cord tubes laying around in plain site?

** facepalm **

 
At 28 June, 2010 08:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Nevermind, [SIC] your not an engineer your a computer guy."

Excuse me, spelling bee champ, but how does one become a fully-qualified software engineer?

You'll need an advanced degree in computer science.

And what are the requirements you'll need to get a CISSP?

Can you tell me, jackass.

"...99% of the tests are open book too. You don't really have to be a Rocket Surgeon to pass them."

That's a bald faced lie. I've never had an "open book" test in my life--not once.

Where did you go school, idiot?

Or did you pull your "degree" out of a box of Cracker Jacks?

 
At 28 June, 2010 09:00, Blogger avicenne said...

"Sullivan stated that he knew from the first day that the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was a classic controlled implosion."

These demented bullshitters always say that. If he knew, why did he wait for a decade before coming forward?

"Thermite self-consuming cutter charge casings have been around since first patented back in 1984."

Who fucking cares?

 
At 28 June, 2010 09:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...But look, Bill https://www.isee.org/FPmemberonlineapp.htm
you can be an exploisves
[SIC] engineer too!"

Good job, spelling bee champ.

And your link doesn't work--you thoroughly dishonest fucktard. Misrepresenting your sources again, Pinocchio?

Here's the real ink:

Source: ISEE: ISEE--Membership.

Any more lies for us, illiterate for 9/11 troof?

And remember, quote miner for 9/11 troof, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 28 June, 2010 09:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 28 June, 2010 09:25, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Don't worry, LEVEL OF EDUCATION is not on the application list. Nor is it required to pass a blasting test."

Lying again, fucktard?

Why does the application contain the following?

"...Please indicate the method you will be sending your support information

"Employment/Education Fax Mail Email"


Care to misrepresent your sources again, scumbag?

And remember, quote miner for 9/11 troof, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 28 June, 2010 09:32, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous dissembles, "...Nevermind, [SIC] your [SIC] not an engineer your [SIC] a computer guy."

That's three errors in one sentence, spelling bee champ (not counting punctuation).

You're lucky to have a GED, genius.

And you have the unmitigated gall to think that you're qualified to debate the events of 11 September 2001?

ROTFLMAO!

And remember, illiterate for 9/11 troof, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 28 June, 2010 09:58, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"You a-holes forgetting about the spain bombing? They were detonated remotely."

Well seeing as you are not bright enough to figure this out on your own let me enlighten you.

Setting off a singular bomb or two in a train using a cell phone or other radio devise is a simple task. Done in Iraq all the time. The timing does not have to be that precise. and safety is of no issue. Now setting off hundreds of cutting charges at precise down to the fraction of a second intervals that are necessary for a controlled demolition is near impossible using radios prone to interference or worst premature initiation. Fuuny no one found any remains of radio detonators.

That is why detcord is use. It is cheap, reliable and burns at precise times dependent on length and type. You can hammer on it and run it by high tension electric sources and not have it trip too soon. Thing is it is impossible to hide.

 
At 28 June, 2010 10:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Pat,

Check out Uncle Fetzer's latest bowel movement:

Conspiracies and conspiracism By Uncle Fetzer

 
At 28 June, 2010 10:05, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Sullivan stated that he knew from the first day that the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was a classic controlled implosion."

Maybe because as nothing but a photographer he is hurting for work. With the advent of digital photography anyone can take great picture and do it cheap. Since he is not an explosives expert he won't find a job doing that. What's left? 9/11 truth. The fall back job for the unskilled, untalented and uneducated.

 
At 28 June, 2010 10:16, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Nevermind, your not an engineer your a computer guy."

Yes a guy very much smarter than you will ever be. Sorry but that is a fact, care to prove me wrong?

Yes annon you will always be my bitch because you are who you are, a poor lowlife of limited intelligence and I am who I am. Your superior in every way. that is why I can demean you using my real name because if you checked with anyone who knows me they will tell you I am a fucking smart guy who has a bad habbit of picking on the stupid. I imaging your friends may just call you nice, but dumb.

 
At 28 June, 2010 10:25, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Enjoy your lunch, Dave. Now do you believe Guitar Bill when he schooled you on wireless detonation? Funny when debunkers have to fix each others knowledge base so they can get their bullshit straight."

Funny YOU didn't get the joke, Well stupid people are not to quick on that sort of stuff. Bill was referring to WIFi networks which he obviously understands and that I understand, hence my joke about an iPhone app.

Sorry I went right over your poor uneducated head. We will have to dunb this stuff down for annon in the future.

 
At 29 June, 2010 05:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks, Bill.

"Always remember, the troofers have no argument. It's all about trivial anomalies; however, you'll notice that there's no effort to assemble them in any coherent way.

Cherry pick, cherry pick, cherry pick, with no concrete conclusion forthcoming. They're like sleazy defense lawyers--don't offer evidence--ever--attack the prosecution with specious arguments at best; shit all over creation like a flock of seagulls and fly back to sea.

Fuck 'em and the horse they rode in on."

WOW!!! im serious GB can i use that entire quote?

I have made many an arguement against twoofers on other boards/blogsites. I hammer that home so often i get tired of thier soundbite intellectualisms....now ill use two words..."trivial anomalies" and its shorter to type....love it!!

Why are the twoofers goal posts always moving?

Just askin questions...lol

BIGDOG

 
At 29 June, 2010 06:27, Anonymous Bikerman said...

Completely OT - anybody know whatever happened to the paranoid nut-job who called himself "LUCUS" on youtube from a year or so back? Remember he was advising everyone to get guns and get hidden in the woods because the world was going to end any minute. Whatever happened to that clown?

 
At 29 June, 2010 07:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...WOW!!! im serious GB can i use that entire quote?"

Answer: Yes.

 
At 29 June, 2010 17:33, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

I haven't listened to this yet, but I'm probably gonna be disappointed in O&A:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seN-K66BihQ

 
At 30 June, 2010 01:08, Anonymous the real chief james said...

no post have ever been moved, all i want to know is what is on the 28 blacked out pages in the 9/11 commission report. but let be real, around this place the idea that saddam and iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 has been thoroughly debunked. we all know that the government would never lie to it's beloved citizenry.

 
At 30 June, 2010 02:49, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

"what is on the 28 blacked out pages in the 9/11 commission report."

lizard people.

 
At 30 June, 2010 03:15, Anonymous great ceasers ghost said...

Patrick from Cincinnati said...
"what is on the 28 blacked out pages in the 9/11 commission report."

lizard people.


SLC debunking rational thoughts for how many years now? top shelf logic at it's finest....

 
At 30 June, 2010 03:32, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'what is on the 28 blacked out pages in the 9/11 commission report'

The true story of how 'da gubmint' and 'da Jooos' and all their thousands of minions in the NWO were able to establish a fake terrorist group, plot four bogus hijackings, and carry out a CD on three of the WTC towers with a super-secret explosive, all without anyone noticing. Oh, and also the inside track of how an administration notorious for leaking like a sieve was able to cover it all up.

Keep believing this shit, and keep holding onto the illusion that the '9/11 truth movement' isn't a complete failure.

Oh, BTW - 'ceasar's', not 'ceasers'. Why is it that all the truthers are functionally illiterate?

 
At 30 June, 2010 04:52, Anonymous great ceasers ghost said...

can't you jackasses answer a simple question? what's on the blacked out pages? how can we know the truth when it's blacked out? how can we know the truth when most of what we think we know what gained through torture? because you know, torture is famous for getting people to tell you the truth, not just what you want to hear....

 
At 30 June, 2010 05:07, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'what's on the blacked out pages?'

I don't fucking know, shithead, and more's to the point, neither do you. But if you think that these redacted pages would somehow reveal 'the truth' if they were declassified then you must be smoking too much skunk.

The fact that you are reduced to citing the classified parts of a report which you truthers think is a whitewash indicates your desperation. We're coming up to nine years now, and your movement has still achieved fuck all.

And it's still spelt 'ceasar', not 'ceaser'.

 
At 30 June, 2010 05:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

can't you jackasses answer a simple question? what's on the blacked out pages? how can we know the truth when it's blacked out?

You're insane. Get help.

 
At 30 June, 2010 09:51, Blogger Billman said...

Oh I get it... if it hasn't been mentioned in the current thread the lazy troofers are currently posting their arrogant ad-hom drivel, then it has never been debunked ever.

So from now on, in every thread we're going to have to post links debunking controlled demolition, and "28 pages blacked out from the commission report" and whatever else they imagineer up.

Or we could just mock the insane arrogant retardedness of people who can't spell "you're" or "caesar" right...

 
At 30 June, 2010 10:18, Blogger Billman said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 30 June, 2010 12:53, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Soldier Boy Bilbo's a winner:he's the Debunker Cult's spelling "go to guy"!!

 
At 30 June, 2010 13:05, Anonymous Arhoolie on Hammond B-3 said...

Easy on "SackedCarthage in Ashes" there Bilbo! He's on a heavy drinking schedule and hasn't had his carpets cleaned in ages.

 
At 30 June, 2010 13:39, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Patrick from Cincinnati said...
"what is on the 28 blacked out pages in the 9/11 commission report."

The part about the Illuminati.

And Skull and Bones.

 
At 30 June, 2010 13:41, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Have you noticed that asking questions is a tactic used by conspiracy theorist loons of every ilk. As if the holes in the education and knowledge of the event is evidence of a conspiracy.

The loony does not need to know anything, and given the inferior thinking ability of the conspiracy mavens it's a good thing for them, they are naturals at being uninformed and questioning. If they were actually smart enough and had the ability to dig up information their silly little conspiracies would fall apart. And that is not good, it's all these losers have, the imagined idea they’re on to something.

 
At 30 June, 2010 14:09, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie on Hammond B-3 said...
Easy on "SackedCarthage in Ashes" there Bilbo! He's on a heavy drinking schedule and hasn't had his carpets cleaned in ages."

It remains a mystery why natural causes would thereby be made to contradict in all theoretical sciences, our understanding. Let us suppose that, so far as regards the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions and our a posteriori concepts, natural causes have nothing to do with the Transcendental Deduction, yet the paralogisms of practical reason have lying before them when treated as our ideas, the things in themselves. the Ideal of natural reason may not contradict itself, but it is still possible that it may be in contradiction with our disjunctive judgements.

 
At 30 June, 2010 14:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan wrote, "...Arhoolie,on Hammond B-3..."

ArseHooligan, when will you learn that you can't fuck a Hammond B-3 organ?

Now, stop molesting that poor, innocent percussion instrument. There ought to be a law...

"...Let's get ArseHooligan, he'll fuck anything."

And remember, cretin, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 30 June, 2010 18:25, Anonymous paul w said...

"what is on the 28 blacked out pages in the 9/11 commission report."


The entire breakdown of how and why the controlled demolition took place, plus names, location, time, and other details (amount of explosive used, etc).

Luckily, the document was proofed by NWO operatives before it went public.

Apparently, the members of the Commission didn't think it would cause any problems.

They figured people would be pissed for a couple of days, then get over it.

 
At 01 July, 2010 00:50, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Easy on "SackedCarthage in Ashes" there Bilbo! He's on a heavy drinking schedule and hasn't had his carpets cleaned in ages.'

Got any new stories to tell us about your time in my country, Walt? Or have you finally decided that making up shit about your sad, pathetic excuse for a life only makes you look like even more of a wanker?

 
At 01 July, 2010 04:04, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you really just need to admit you don't what you think you know. once the blacked out pages are released to the public my curiousity will be satisfied, it just seems like blacking out important info really goes against the said reason for the commission, to provide fullest explination possible related to tragic events of 9/11.

 
At 01 July, 2010 06:04, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'you really just need to admit you don't (sic) what you think you know.'

That's a bit ironic. 'We didn't know what we thought we knew' would be the truth movement's epitaph.

'once the blacked out pages are released to the public my curiousity will be satisfied, it just seems like blacking out important info really goes against the said reason for the commission, to provide fullest explination possible related to tragic events of 9/11'.

The redacted sections could refer to anything. It could contain information relevant to current counter-terrorist operations which is sensitive (particularly if it involves NSA work), it could be info which allied governments have requested remains classified, it could even refer to the names of informants whose identities need to be protected.

The one thing it is more or less guaranteed NOT to be is the smoking gun that will prove that 9/11 was an inside jobby-job. After all, if the 9/11 Commission was the massive cover-up you knobbers claim it was, then why include sections which compromise the cover story, only to classify them? Again, the fact that you're placing your hopes of vindication on what you regard as a whitewash suggests how retarded you are.

 
At 01 July, 2010 10:36, Blogger Billman said...

Heh, what amazes me is that 9/11 actually had the largest investigation EVER, and it's still not enough for the troofers.

Yet a piddly independant investigation headed by David Ray Griffon armed with "Subpeona Power! (Gong sound)" is somehow supposed to unlock the secrets to the universe: including Dark Matter, Big Foot, Loch Ness, Who assassinated JFK (probably Bush)....

And the BEST way to get this is by posting arrogant hate filled racist comments on THIS BLOG, supplementing your comments with YouTube videos that are INTENTIONALLY and FRAUDULENTLY edited, and proclaiming a scientifically invalid and politically motivated paper as the greatest thing since the Bible because it was "published" in any way shape or form.

Oh, and shitting on the victims by claiming they couldn't have been there, but doing so "in their name" is a bonus.

 
At 01 July, 2010 13:30, Anonymous Arhoolie on Hammond B-3 said...

The Three Stooges got nuttin' on the insane Yuppie,Sackdoily and Pornboy.Jeepers guys,is that all you got?

 
At 01 July, 2010 14:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ArseHooligan, when will you learn that you can't fuck a Hammond organ?

Keep it up, and I'll report you to the authorities.

 
At 01 July, 2010 16:47, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu Crushing the Git said...

That's the Insane Yuppie Defamed FretBoy over in the next room on Broken Record.Whoops,make that Unfunny and Ridiculous Broken Record! Got your ass,buddy,and I'm gonna keep kickin' your butt up and down Main Street every time,you loudmouth Cult moron.And if you ever get up the nerve I'm gonna pulverize you in person right here in NYC.Plus,I'll treat you to a meal and pints of Guinness at the Oyster Bar,and take you to the Blue Note,down in the Village after a Yankee game.How anyone could pass that up is beyond me.You will though,because you're a spineless wackjob.I'm waiting,you piece of shit.

 
At 01 July, 2010 18:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan hallucinates, "...And if you ever get up the nerve I'm gonna pulverize you in person right here in NYC.Plus,I'll treat you to a meal and pints of Guinness at the Oyster Bar,and take you to the Blue Note,down in the Village after a Yankee game."

Wrong again, cretin.

After all, you won't be out of the hospital before it's time for me to take my return flight to California.

 
At 03 July, 2010 06:52, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Wow, assholio has been reduced to internet tough guy threat sputtering.

Pitiful, just pitiful.

 
At 03 July, 2010 07:28, Anonymous Arhoolie V.,the Brown Bomber said...

Since when are invitations and promises "threats"? It's all real,Sonnyboy,I've been destroying you schvontzes for months now.The "Git" is a special case,you have to admit.No one has crashed a paper plane with the exciting aplomb of this wackjob!!

 
At 03 July, 2010 08:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan dissembles, "...I've been destroying you schvontzes for months now.The "Git" is a special case,you have to admit.No one has crashed a paper plane with the exciting aplomb of this wackjob!!"

ArseHooligan, tell us, why are you studiously avoiding the content of the following post?

Source: SLC: Fly ash is a primary component of lightweight concrete.

You are OWNED, cretin.

Now, bow to your master.

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, ArseHooligan.

 
At 03 July, 2010 18:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heh, what amazes me is that 9/11 actually had the largest investigation EVER, and it's still not enough for the troofers.

Oh yes, of course, by Philip Zelikow, that is when he was not writing books with that cunt Rice

 
At 04 July, 2010 18:01, Blogger Triterope said...

Wow, assholio has been reduced to internet tough guy threat sputtering.

"reduced?"

 
At 05 July, 2010 01:51, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'I'll treat you to a meal and pints of Guinness at the Oyster Bar'

So this is where Arseholie drinks. Why am I not surprised?:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdbt-sx5MDc

 
At 06 July, 2010 07:47, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

As always,the Nutty Professor has pubs and taverns on his mind.The Oyster Bar is one of the finest restaurants in the world and meanwhile you're stuck at the Bumfuck Inn complaining about the lack of buy backs and blacking out yet again as you rattle on about the moral legitimacy of the conquest,rape and occupation of Iraq.

 
At 06 July, 2010 07:47, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

As always,the Nutty Professor has pubs and taverns on his mind.The Oyster Bar is one of the finest restaurants in the world and meanwhile you're stuck at the Bumfuck Inn complaining about the lack of buy backs and blacking out yet again as you rattle on about the moral legitimacy of the conquest,rape and occupation of Iraq.

 
At 06 July, 2010 07:48, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

As always,the Nutty Professor has pubs and taverns on his mind.The Oyster Bar is one of the finest restaurants in the world and meanwhile you're stuck at the Bumfuck Inn complaining about the lack of buy backs and blacking out yet again as you rattle on about the moral legitimacy of the conquest,rape and occupation of Iraq.

 
At 06 July, 2010 07:48, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

As always,the Nutty Professor has pubs and taverns on his mind.The Oyster Bar is one of the finest restaurants in the world and meanwhile you're stuck at the Bumfuck Inn complaining about the lack of buy backs and blacking out yet again as you rattle on about the moral legitimacy of the conquest,rape and occupation of Iraq.

 
At 06 July, 2010 07:49, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

As always,the Nutty Professor has pubs and taverns on his mind.The Oyster Bar is one of the finest restaurants in the world and meanwhile you're stuck at the Bumfuck Inn complaining about the lack of buy backs and blacking out yet again as you rattle on about the moral legitimacy of the conquest,rape and occupation of Iraq.

 
At 06 July, 2010 08:35, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'The Oyster Bar is one of the finest restaurants in the world'

And I suppose you've got a permanent table reserved there for yourself and your harem, Walt.

'and meanwhile you're stuck at the Bumfuck Inn'

Which was presumably your hostelry of choice when you visited the UK in 1995 (or was it 1997? Refresh my memory).

'complaining about the lack of buy backs and blacking out yet again as you rattle on about the moral legitimacy of the conquest,rape and occupation of Iraq.'

Coming from the man who tried to pose as a three-year OIF veteran, that just goes to show how collossally fucked-up you are, Arseholie.

 
At 06 July, 2010 16:54, Anonymous Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...

Sorry about the multiple posted lashings of the Nutty Professor,who's down there under the buffet table screeching about saddam and WMD's.There's a hitch in the system that had me in a tizzy.Poor,poor pitiful Archie Snide sure is a desperately colorful dipsomaniac.How do we just know his Acker Bilk LP collection is scratched and broken? And,happily,he knows more about the lineup of dive bars in shitty London than the roster of world rated restaurants,which NYC offers in bundles! Waking up to a greasy breakfast (again!?) at his latest B'n B is taking quite a toll on the Moldy Fuck!

 
At 06 July, 2010 18:07, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...
Sorry about the multiple posted lashings of the Nutty Professor,who's down there under the buffet table screeching about saddam and WMD's.There's a hitch in the system that had me in a tizzy.Poor,poor pitiful Archie Snide sure is a desperately colorful dipsomaniac.How do we just know his Acker Bilk LP collection is scratched and broken? And,happily,he knows more about the lineup of dive bars in shitty London than the roster of world rated restaurants,which NYC offers in bundles! Waking up to a greasy breakfast (again!?) at his latest B'n B is taking quite a toll on the Moldy Fuck!"

Most people believe that an anomaly living with the minivan takes a peek at the abstraction inside a food stamp, but they need to remember how accurately the avocado pit feels nagging remorse. Indeed, a pickup truck organizes a fairy defined by a pine cone. A mysterious tabloid inexorably is a big fan of a light bulb from a nation. The pickup truck of an inferiority complex, a linguistic warranty, and the gratifying pit viper are what made America great! Furthermore, a pork chop from a garbage can leaves, and a revered apartment building somewhat bestows great honor upon a short order cook for the rattlesnake.

 
At 06 July, 2010 19:26, Blogger Triterope said...

Laz... you're good at that.

 
At 07 July, 2010 00:55, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

I'm still waiting for Walt to share some more stories about his fantastic, successful and fulfilling life. I'm waiting for him to admit that he's a Nobel prize-winner, but he's been too modest to admit it until now.

 
At 07 July, 2010 10:38, Anonymous SackedCloth in Ashes said...

Most people,after having their ass handed to them are obsessed by the pain giver.Case in point,the barfly,the Nutty Professor,who latches onto bizarre and dunder headed conclusions regarding the ass whupper's biography.Poor sap.He's probably waiting at Heathrow with Connolly and AngryyetSubpar,to avenge the destruction of his ego.Sad Sack SoldierBoy inhaled WAY too much depleted uranium,yet still defends the scumbags who spread the stuff round! That's a weird dude,that Archie Snide!

 
At 07 July, 2010 14:25, Blogger Bill said...

my personal fav is calling Sullivan an "explosive-charge placement technician". NYFD requires all people handling explosives to pass a test and recieve a license of fitness for each specific job (blaster, explosive, loader, powder carrier, etc.). and guess what? the one ae911truth claims he did doesn't exist. assholes are padding his resume with bullshit titles.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/c_of_f/cof_study_materials.shtml

also glad to see the truthers are completely dancing around the fact that gage and his goon squad totally fabricated the existence of thermite cutter charges.

 
At 07 July, 2010 22:41, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Most people,after having their ass handed to them are obsessed by the pain giver.'

In your case, Walt, 'pain givers' plural.

Now go on and tell us some more blatant lies about your pathetic excuse for a life, so we can have more laughs at your expense.

 
At 08 July, 2010 16:53, Anonymous Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...

There's broken down hacks and then there's the English Sa-a-a-a-a-ckmuffin in Tatters! How desperate you gotta be to when all you can do is spit out the same wrong bullshit over and over? I guess that's the old British stiff upper lip for you.I think Albert Einstein said ".......",well,you know the rest.The thing that proves this is a dishonest,propaganda cult is that the pathetic,slandering shitheads Paddy and JoggingJamesB know I never posed as a soldier but they don't inform the Insane Nutty Professor.That's the territory here,I guess.That's what I get for kicking debunker butt up and down Broadway.What ever happenend to the Neanderthal Ronald Weak anyway?

 
At 09 July, 2010 00:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan dissembles, "...That's what I get for kicking debunker butt up and down Broadway."

Patting yourself on the back again, with no victories to justify your never ending self congratulation?

I guess some things never change. After all, you're still deranged.

 
At 10 July, 2010 05:50, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

By repeatedly insisting that he didn't post as 'A Real Veteran', Arseholie is also showing us that (1) he's a blatant liar or (2) that he's suffering the problems of short-term memory loss associated with serial substance abusers. Still, anyone who thinks that buildings can be destroyed by magic paint is bound to believe that his sockpuppetry is convincing.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home