What?
Trailer for a new film by the WAC jobs of New Jersey. This one just might set a new record for time to first lie or mistake; at about 21 seconds in they show an aerial view of the Pentagon smoldering, but it must be amateur hour CGI, as they show the wrong freaking side on fire.
posted by Pat @ 9:48 PM
19 comments
19 Comments:
This comment has been removed by the author.
Oh my god, the WTC got demolished by a giant zionist tsunami. There is the proof! I've always knew it.
Wow. Bruno of WAC-LA rots in the slammer, and WAC-NY is spending money on CGI to make Yet Another 9-11 Truth Movie? These guys could coordinate better.
The first two soundbites are from "2010". The tidal wave hitting the Twin Towers is from "Deep Impact." The clip of the Pentagon is apparently recent but I don't recognize it.
But that's all academic. WTF is this clip even supposed to accomplish? They're gonna wake us up to the truth by showing us fiction? They should call themselves We Are Not Change (WANC) if this exemplifies their approach.
Gosh, maybe I spoke too soon. When this film is out it's going to change the world. I know because the guy making it told me so.
WTF is this clip even supposed to accomplish? They're gonna wake us up to the truth by showing us fiction?
I wonder if it's one of those "the global elite leaving clues in Hollywood movies" type things. There is a faction of 9/11 Truth that believes that sort of thing.
Yeah, RGT, you gotta be impressed when a 22-year-old tells you this is one of the most important films he's ever made. ;)
the guy making it told me so.
And look at the related videos. There must be three dozen more of this jackoff just talking to the camera.
This nut probably fantasizes about somebody at Dreamworks seeing his ridiculous trailer and offering him a job.
Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks enraptured as he tells them his film "gets into the very nature of life itself." By life, he means his own life, which consists of posting endless creepy monotone rants on youtube about the NWO, the police state, the Freemasons and, bizarrely, how he predicted the Russian railway bombing.
Where have all the troofers gone?
Who knows, but all it took to get rid of them was a simple log-in requirement. Who knew it was that easy? Granted, this is a place where you might like to see a Truther every once in awhile. But the efficacy of this method is noteworthy.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the truthers all fearsome activists prepared to risk life and liberty to punish the 'real conspirators'?
And these turds can't even summon up the guts to log on with a traceable email address.
Way to go Brian Good, Arseholie, 'Anonymous' and all your sock-puppets. Tomorrow belongs to you.
Garry, the evidence suggests that SLC had only one troofer.
Why, you ask?
The Google mail account login requirement is easy for one person to create and manage. In order to post a comment to SLC, all that's required is one Google mail account and one corresponding password.
Now, imagine that you're an underhanded, scumbag troofer and your goal is to trash SLC via belligerent, misinformation spewing sock puppets. The "anonymous" identity allows one dedicated troofer to accomplish this nefarious goal with ease; however, remove the "anonymous" identity and the difficulty involved in attaining the troofer's goal rises dramatically. For example, the troofer must manage multiple Google mail accounts. This means the troofer must create a Google mail account for each sock puppet; switching between sock puppets requires a login and a logout for each identity. Obviously, playing the sock puppet game is infinitely more difficult, confusing and, above all, time consuming.
And that's precisely why I asked Pat to remove the "anonymous" identity over a month ago. (What took you so long, Pat?)
That said, the "anonymous" identity is rife for abuse; with that in mind, I hope that Pat will continue to require Google or OpenID accounts in order to post a comment to SLC.
Conclusion: The difficulty involved in managing multiple sock puppets explains the sudden disappearance of not merely one troofer, but all of the alleged troofers. For this reason, I believe that all the "troofers"--from "Anonymous" to "The ArseHooligan"--were the work of one maniacal troofer who dedicated himself to trashing SLC.
Garry, the evidence suggests that SLC had only one troofer.
I disagree. I think there were at least three. They had distinct styles, distinct attitudes towards various posters, and distinct interests. These people aren't clever enough to maintain suck poppets for that long.
"...These people aren't clever enough to maintain suck poppets for that long."
We're dealing with a psychopath, Triterope. It's easy to change writing style and attitude toward various individuals. It's all part of a smokescreen.
Do you recall the elaborate legend created by the troofer, Glenn Maxey, which I exposed on SLC a few months ago?
Troofers can, and will, go to great lengths to obfuscate and confuse. It's their MO.
And another point.
If there were three troofers, why don't they simply create individual Google mail accounts and continue to attack SLC with off-topic nonsense? Google, moreover, doesn't require anyone to use their real name, so this isn't a privacy issue.
The troofer's sudden departure doesn't make sense unless he was relying solely on sock puppets.
It's easy to change writing style and attitude toward various individuals.
Yes, it's easy to change them. It's not easy to maintain them. No matter how hard Brian Good tried, he would eventually slip back into his initials-comma-space style of responding to everyone. And don't get me started on Boris Epstein. He couldn't manage three posts without screwing up.
Do you recall the elaborate legend created by the troofer, Glenn Maxey, which I exposed on SLC a few months ago?
Vaguely. But since we're all in agreement that Brian Good is a regular, that makes at least two different Truthers who were posting here.
If there were three troofers, why don't they simply create individual Google mail accounts
Have you met these people? They think they're freedom fighters on the run from an oppressive government out to silence them. Or they're ordinary Internet trolls, for whom even the most minimal level of registration is Kryptonite.
Okay, if you say so.
However, don't you find it strange that all of the nut bars disappeared simultaneously?
don't you find it strange that all of the nut bars disappeared simultaneously?
Not really. A registration requirement can turn off different people for different reasons.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I really think there were at least 3 or 4 different Truthers here.
Post a Comment
<< Home