Saturday, August 28, 2010

When Troofers Attack Their Own

All I can say is, I hope they all brought rusty knives. Donna Marsh O'Connor, who's been hanging out with the Troofer dolts for years, appeared on Keith Olbermann's show the other day in support of the Ground Zero mosque. But she had the temerity to mention the hijackers, and the "Truthers" went batcrap crazy:

The foundation for her entire argument can be heard at minute mark 4:34, where Ms. Connor says:

"...and I have to acknowledge that the pain I am feeling essentially comes from 19 individual criminals who murdered 3,000 people on our soil, and it has left us horrifically scared." [emphasis mine]

But, there is no proof that the FBI's list of ALLEGED hijackers were indeed guilty of the crimes and murders on 9/11/01. Or, indeed if they were even aboard the airplanes that day.


Don't you just love that "alleged" bit? The Troofers are happy to toss charges around willy-nilly, but when it comes time to talk about the actual criminals who were indeed responsible for 9-11 they act like Mohamed Atta is going to sue them for sullying his good name.

As usual, the really fruity stuff comes out in the comments:

She still perpetuates the myth that the 19 Muslim guys with box cutters are the perps. That is not a good thing.


I was pretty surprised when I heard that statement as I watched this piece live. I could've sworn she was supportive of 9/11 truth and was aware of all the evidence against the OCT. I was disappointed. I was hoping she'd appeal to Kieth to look for the truth, not just perpetuate the myth.


NOONE has the right to be ignorant and agnostic as to the crimes committed on 9-11. I read her remarks as a rather clear endorsment of the official story. And that´s a grave betrayal of those slaughtered on 9-11-2001.


While it's polite to be sympathetic to those who lost family members, there's no excuse for Donna's non-factual public opinion - an opinion that hurts the whole movement.

Labels: ,

12 Comments:

At 28 August, 2010 18:36, Blogger Billman said...

Yeah, because being a movement full of anonymous self-important angry retard YouTube commenters wasn't hurting your movement before...

 
At 29 August, 2010 03:39, Blogger Jay said...

Will their new slogan be "9/11 was am Alleged inside job"?

 
At 29 August, 2010 09:37, Blogger Triterope said...

This goes to show how useless the 9-11 Truth movement is.

They can't even get involved with peripheral issues, like the Ground Zero Mosque, because they have no consensus on the most basic facts of the day.

The mosque controversy assumes that Muslims carried out the 9/11 attack. If they didn't, then the presence of a Muslim religious center near the attack site is a non-issue. Clearly, it is an issue.

There isn't even a group supporting the religious center on grounds that Muslims were wrongly implicated in 9-11. Which, again, the Truthers could be doing, if they weren't completely useless.

All of this implies that most Americans don't view the hijackers as "alleged."

And shame on Keith Olbermann for bringing this fruitbat on the air, and not throwing her off the set the second she said "alleged hijackers." I thought he knew better than that.

 
At 29 August, 2010 09:44, Blogger Unknown said...

" While it's polite to be sympathetic to those who lost family members, there's no excuse for Donna's non-factual public opinion..."

What kind of universe do these assholes live in?

I suppose we better be be polite to the victims' families, for appearances sake, while we pursue our insane agenda of trying to prove on the internet that George W Bush lost his mind and decided to slaughter thousands of Americans.

Of course anyone who lost a loved one on 9/11 and endorses our obscene bullshit theories we will be more than polite to. We'll exploit them by sticking them in ridiculous videos trying to drum up support for our ludicrous conspiracy theories.

We'll also crack jokes about boxcutters, because we are despicable fucks.

 
At 29 August, 2010 12:35, Blogger Billman said...

Nail on the head, avicenne.

Although, now a troofer will come in here and call that "immature."

 
At 29 August, 2010 17:27, Blogger ConsDemo said...

There isn't even a group supporting the religious center on grounds that Muslims were wrongly implicated in 9-11...

Actually deranged nutcase Kevin Barrett has made such a proposal, for what it's worth (obviously not much).

 
At 29 August, 2010 18:43, Blogger snug.bug said...

"a movement full of anonymous self-important angry retard YouTube commenters"

Said the anonymous self-important angry retard YouTube commenter Billman.

 
At 29 August, 2010 20:17, Blogger Michael Lewis said...

I'd never heard of O'Connor before this post. I'm listening to some of her statements and I'm not hearing any MIHOP. She sounds LIHOP at best. She does consistently demand a "new investigation" though, and that's apparently enough for garden-variety Truther idiots. They're so obsessed with keywords, they can't pay attention to what she's actually saying.

 
At 29 August, 2010 20:59, Blogger Billman said...

"Said the anonymous self-important angry retard YouTube commenter Billman."

Yes, well. There's no "debunker movement," so what's your point? It's kind of invalid to parody my comment, because in the same context, it makes no sense.

And I'm hardly Anonymous. That's my face next to my name ---->

And my real name is Bill Warren, and I live in Las Vegas, NV. And I'm not angry. Just fascinated by your movement's violent response to the slightest bit of criticism ever.

I could be retarded, though. You may have me there. And I'm so incredibly sorry you got severely butt-hurt by my comment.

You can file this:
http://spubba.com/extras/butthurt.pdf

with Pat or James.

 
At 29 August, 2010 21:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Said the anonymous self-important angry retard YouTube commenter Billman."

It looks like aunt fancy finally created a Google mail account--and the entire process took him two weeks to complete.

Good job, retard.

 
At 30 August, 2010 04:30, Blogger Triterope said...

Although, now a troofer will come in here and call that "immature."

Or come in here and get their noses out of joint over some minor comment, and ignore valid criticisms of the Truth movement.

Not that they're just a bunch of feckless internet commenters. Nope. Not them.

 
At 30 August, 2010 04:36, Blogger Triterope said...

deranged nutcase Kevin Barrett has made such a proposal, for what it's worth (obviously not much).

Oh, I'm sure someone's floated the idea. But it hasn't made it to the point of a group (by which I mean "at least three people") doing any actual work (by which I mean "IRL") to advance the agenda.

If there were any doubts among normal Americans about who perpetrated the attacks, the mosque controversy would be a perfect opportunity to rally those doubts. But once again, a legitimate 9/11-related news event has come and gone without the Truthers making an appearanace... but lots of internal infighting on message boards, like the Judean People's Fronts they are.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home