Wednesday, December 29, 2010

What Are the Odds?

Glenn Zarmanov would have a field day with this one. The other day I flew back home. You know how at the beginning of the security checkpoint somebody looks at your boarding pass and driver's license, and makes a notation on the former?

Well the notation on mine was 1-911. No kidding.

120 Comments:

At 30 December, 2010 00:11, Blogger snug.bug said...

Wow! That means there's going to be a false-flag bird flu chemtrail event on January 9, 2011! Probably involving HAARP and free energy and modified attack baboons! Not to mention the Mossad! Kevin Barrett's corps of Army Intel experts says so, so it must be true. Jesse Ventura, save us! Run and tell the king!

 
At 30 December, 2010 04:49, Blogger TroyFromWV said...

Seriously, I find Zarmanov's videos the most entertaining on Youtube.

I suggest all debunkers subscribe to it. I promise you won't be disappointed.

 
At 30 December, 2010 07:36, Blogger Ian G. said...

Wow! That means there's going to be a false-flag bird flu chemtrail event on January 9, 2011! Probably involving HAARP and free energy and modified attack baboons! Not to mention the Mossad! Kevin Barrett's corps of Army Intel experts says so, so it must be true. Jesse Ventura, save us! Run and tell the king!

Hey, Brian, this is actually a pretty good post. Have you finally figured out that 9/11 truth is a bunch of nonsense?

 
At 30 December, 2010 09:54, Blogger snug.bug said...

No Ian, I've figured out that Barrett and Willie and Jesse and Deagle and pods and flyover and TV fakery and predicting imminent false flaps is a bunch of nonsense--I figured that out years ago.

9/11 Truth is the widows' 273 unanswered questions and the need for a credible explanation of the destruction of three skyscrapers at Ground Zero.

 
At 30 December, 2010 10:04, Blogger Ian G. said...

No Ian, I've figured out that Barrett and Willie and Jesse and Deagle and pods and flyover and TV fakery and predicting imminent false flaps is a bunch of nonsense--I figured that out years ago.

Me too. I've just gone one step further and rejected all truth "theories". You can do it too, Brian.

9/11 Truth is the widows' 273 unanswered questions and the need for a credible explanation of the destruction of three skyscrapers at Ground Zero.

The questions are irrelevant and we've had an explanation of the destruction of those three skyscrapers.

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:01, Blogger snug.bug said...

Any idiot can reject anything. You reject reason, truth, science, and even facts to live in a world of Dada solipsism.

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:16, Blogger Ian G. said...

Any idiot can reject anything. You reject reason, truth, science, and even facts to live in a world of Dada solipsism.

Poor Brian, he's upset that I don't take his babblings about the WTC seriously.

Sorry Brian, but you've had 9 years to gather evidence of an inside job, and all you can do is speculate about spray-on thermite. That there says a lot about how solid the evidence against CD is.

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:22, Blogger Ian G. said...

Sam Harris once said that all people are atheists with respect to other religions. The most devout Christian doesn't take seriously the claims of Muslims or Hindus or Mormons. He says that he just goes one step further and rejects the Christian's claims.

That's like you and me, Brian. You reject all the other stupid claims made by truthers, but you hold onto your own like a religious fanatic. I just go one step further and reject them all.

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:26, Blogger snug.bug said...

You don't really believe anything Ian. You don't believe in truth or reason or even facts. It must really suck to be such a cynic and so hopeless.

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:33, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

"It must really suck to be such a cynic and so hopeless."

You know Brian, you're talking about yourself there kiddo!

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:33, Blogger Ian G. said...

You don't really believe anything Ian.

Right. Beliefs are rigid. I think about things and change my mind if the facts change. For example, I used to think it was good to have a military presence in Afghanistan. Then Karzai stole an election and now I believe we should get out of there.

You don't believe in truth or reason or even facts.

Brian, facts and reason don't require "belief". They either exist or they don't. You are free to reject them all you want, but that puts you into delusional territory.

It must really suck to be such a cynic and so hopeless.

Brian, I'm perfectly content to continue living grounded in reality, and part of that requires laughing at the insane claims made by people like you. I'm sorry it upsets you that I don't take you seriously, but you're not a serious person.

 
At 30 December, 2010 11:49, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you are confusing "believing in" something with "beliefs".

Those are two different things.

Also opinions and beliefs are different things too.

Also, some people's beliefs are rigid, and others are not. Some people's beliefs are rational, some are not.

You seem to doubt that facts and reason exist.

Ian, I have no wish that you take me seriously. Frankly, I wish you would stop wasting my time with your sophomoric mind games.

 
At 30 December, 2010 12:01, Blogger Ian G. said...

You seem to doubt that facts and reason exist.

False.

Ian, I have no wish that you take me seriously. Frankly, I wish you would stop wasting my time with your sophomoric mind games.

I'm wasting your time? Brian, what do you expect to accomplish by posting at this blog? You've been posting the same gibberish over and over and over again for damn near two years here. Have you accomplished what you've set out to do?

 
At 30 December, 2010 13:02, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

I have 273 unanswered questions too. Maybe I'll post them on my blog sometime. They're not about 9/11 because I don't ask questions about the painfully obvious. They're like this:

#164 - Why does one branch of the Baboon family have a red butt?

#171 - Why does my Brian Goode computer chess game checkmate itself?

 
At 30 December, 2010 13:16, Blogger Garry said...

'No Ian, I've figured out that Barrett and Willie and Jesse and Deagle and pods and flyover and TV fakery and predicting imminent false flaps is a bunch of nonsense--I figured that out years ago'.

Yeah, and the Judean Peoples' Front are a bunch of splitters as well.

BTW, the word verification for this post was 'expals'. That's what you get when you become a troofer, alongside 'exfamily', 'exgirlfriend' and 'exlife'.

 
At 30 December, 2010 13:26, Blogger Triterope said...

Any idiot can reject anything.

Brian, those words should be on your tombstone.

 
At 30 December, 2010 13:34, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"Any idiot can reject anything."

Not an oncoming train.

 
At 30 December, 2010 13:50, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

"Any idiot can reject anything."

Brian,

Look in the miror & repeat that hundreds of times.

 
At 30 December, 2010 15:21, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

1-911?

They found your 1911 .45? And they let your through? Iside jobby job!

 
At 31 December, 2010 07:07, Blogger Bill said...

Sadly Brian proves yet again truthers just throw around words they hear other people use.

In this case we have
"solipsism", when it should be nihilism.

 
At 31 December, 2010 10:14, Blogger snug.bug said...

Solipsism and nihilism are hardly mutually exclusive, Bill.

 
At 31 December, 2010 10:57, Blogger Ian G. said...

Solipsism and nihilism are hardly mutually exclusive, Bill.

And you understand the meaning of neither.

I'll save you the effort: "I knew the meaning of nihilism when I was 8 years old!"

 
At 31 December, 2010 11:06, Blogger snug.bug said...

No, Ian, I didn't find nihilism until I was 10, when I undertook an extensive study of Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

 
At 31 December, 2010 15:24, Blogger Triterope said...

Yeah, Brian, it's called a "book report." We all did them at that age.

 
At 31 December, 2010 15:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Smug.mug prevaricates, "...No, Ian, I didn't find nihilism until I was 10, when I undertook an extensive study of Germany in the 1930s and 40s."

Translation from TrooferSpeak:

Brian didn't find nihilism until he stole a copy of Mein Kampf and began his study of the Big Lie propaganda technique like a good little troofer neo-Nazi.

 
At 31 December, 2010 19:56, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

LMAO, so Bwian admits that he has a 10 year old child's grasp of pre-war Germany.

Impressive...

Do you know that to understand the rize of the Third Reich that you have to go backwards almost 200 years?

I mean you need to know why the Germans were so pissed off at the world enough to elect Adolph, right?

 
At 31 December, 2010 19:57, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

I spelled it "Rize" to look more Dr. Evil-ish

 
At 01 January, 2011 10:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

Dr. Fawwis, I suppose some scholars would place the origins of the Drittes Reich in the Erstes Reich under Karl der Gro├če.

But since the issue under discussion is Ian's nihilism, a pissing contest on Deutsche Geschichte seems somewhat out of order.

 
At 01 January, 2011 12:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat molester scribbles, "...But since the issue under discussion is Ian's nihilism...[blah][blah][blah]."

Wrong again, goat molester.

The subject is Glenn Zarmanov--or at least it was before you hijacked the thread with off-topic bullshit.

 
At 01 January, 2011 15:58, Blogger Ian G. said...

Isn't it hilarious how Brian spends so much of his time trying convince a bunch of "girls" how smart and well-read he is?

He's hopelessly desperate to feel superior to a world that has rejected him. How sad.

 
At 02 January, 2011 01:36, Blogger snug.bug said...

I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm just helping you look stupid.

 
At 02 January, 2011 09:30, Blogger Ian G. said...

I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm just helping you look stupid.

Aww, the failed janitor is playing make-believe. He thinks his mindless babbling makes other people look stupid. Isn't that cute?

 
At 02 January, 2011 11:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

See what I mean?

 
At 03 January, 2011 04:31, Blogger Triterope said...

Not really.

 
At 03 January, 2011 11:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

Who asked you?

 
At 03 January, 2011 14:29, Blogger paulthew said...

Brian has finally reached his Nirvana; people are talking with him.

 
At 03 January, 2011 15:51, Blogger Triterope said...

Who asked you?

Uh... you did, in the post right above where I answered.

 
At 03 January, 2011 16:41, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Seeing Brian having a mental meltdown just brings tears o my eyes. The tears of laughter!

 
At 03 January, 2011 17:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

I wasn't talking to you.

 
At 03 January, 2011 17:59, Blogger Triterope said...

So were you not talking to me, or WAQ?

 
At 03 January, 2011 18:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

I wasn't talking to either one of you. I was talking to the hypothetical "intelligent reader" and neither one of you fit the bill.

 
At 03 January, 2011 18:46, Blogger Triterope said...

You mean, the hypothetical person who doesn't think you're a goddamn loony? Yeah, that's hypothetical all right...

 
At 03 January, 2011 18:55, Blogger snug.bug said...

Sorry the concept of the intelligent reader eludes you, TR, but it's not my fault.

You guys really make me appreciate my schooling. When I was 25 I thought it was all crap.

 
At 03 January, 2011 19:04, Blogger Triterope said...

Brian, you need to be institutionalized.

 
At 03 January, 2011 19:19, Blogger Ian G. said...

Sorry the concept of the intelligent reader eludes you, TR, but it's not my fault.

You guys really make me appreciate my schooling. When I was 25 I thought it was all crap.


Brian is babbling to his imaginary friends again.

Also, Brian, your schooling was crap, not because of anything your teachers did, but because you sat there sniffing glue and stalking the cheerleaders, got nothing out of it, and became a bad janitor. I'm sure you had classmates who actually accomplished things with their lives.

 
At 03 January, 2011 22:04, Blogger snug.bug said...

Yeah Ian, one of my schoolmates spent $6 million of her own money proving she's just as much a loser as a politician as she was as a CEO.

None of my schoolmates has achieved anything noteworthy that I know of. It's just your basic Doctor, Lawyer, College Professor riff.

 
At 03 January, 2011 22:35, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that Brian and Jar Jar Binks have never been seen in the same room together.

 
At 03 January, 2011 23:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Smug.mug whines, "...None of my schoolmates has achieved anything noteworthy that I know of. It's just your basic Doctor, Lawyer, College Professor riff."

That rich coming from an unemployed janitor, sex stalker and compulsive liar.

Have you no shame, goat molester?

 
At 03 January, 2011 23:45, Blogger snug.bug said...

GutterBall, where did you get the idea that I'm an unemployed janitor? I certainly hope you have it from some source for which you agree with its conclusions, because anything else would be intellectually dishonest, as all those educated in the true way and the light know.

 
At 04 January, 2011 03:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat molester whines, "...GutterBall, where did you get the idea that I'm an unemployed janitor?"

If you say so, Doc.

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

Screwloosechange publishes Snugbug's address & phone number, various & psundry pseudonyms, prominent activist's plea for him to stop harassing her, and more.

"What a maroon." -- Bugs Bunny

 
At 04 January, 2011 04:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

And, by the way, goat molester, don't try to claim that the source is Kevin Barrett, because that simply isn't true. The source is ScrewLooseChange--and, of course, I agree wholeheartedly with SLC's conclusions.

And remember, goat molester, never enter a battle of wits unarmed.

 
At 04 January, 2011 04:37, Blogger Triterope said...

Not to mention these details are corroborated elsewhere.

 
At 04 January, 2011 08:29, Blogger Ian G. said...

None of my schoolmates has achieved anything noteworthy that I know of. It's just your basic Doctor, Lawyer, College Professor riff.

Which is orders of magnitude better than "failed janitor babbling in his parents basement".

Christ, if Brian is to be believed, he attended the best schools California (and the US) have to offer, and he's still a heartbeat away from homelessness. Imagine what it would have been like if, say, he had attended Detroit public schools or something....

 
At 04 January, 2011 10:49, Blogger snug.bug said...

GutterBall, the source is the bigoted, wifebeating, lying, 9/11 kook Kevin Barrett. If you check his link, there's nothing there at SLC.

You're almost as shitty a scholar as Barrett is. I'm not surprised that neither one of you can get jobs teaching college.

 
At 04 January, 2011 10:51, Blogger snug.bug said...

TR, "It's corroborated"? Corroborated by whom? You guys are as dumb as a whole room for of no-planers pretend to be.

 
At 04 January, 2011 10:54, Blogger Ian G. said...

GutterBall, the source is the bigoted, wifebeating, lying, 9/11 kook Kevin Barrett. If you check his link, there's nothing there at SLC.

Note that he doesn't refute what Barrett says, he just throws ad hominems at Barrett.

I think Brian hates Barrett because Barrett was the one who made it clear to everyone that Brian is a failed janitor and sex stalker who lives at home with his parents.

 
At 04 January, 2011 14:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat molester prevaricates, "...GutterBall, the source is the bigoted, wifebeating, lying, 9/11 kook Kevin Barrett. If you check his link, there's nothing there at SLC."

Lying again, goat molester?

The comments were deleted when Pat and James changed comment management software (as I recall, the proprietary software SLC used for a year or so went commercial, and Pat and James switched back to blogger.com's built-in comment manager). As I recall, a large portion (if not all) of the comments from 2009 were lost as a result of the comment manager switchover.

In fact, I remember following the debate and read the thread back in 2009. As a result, I can verify that Kevin Barrett is telling the truth.

You're not a very good liar, are you goat molester?

Perhaps you can get lessons in advanced prevarication from Richard Gage, Steven Jones and David Ray Grifter, et al? Or better yet, eat shit and die, Pinocchio.

 
At 04 January, 2011 15:16, Blogger snug.bug said...

Thanks for showing your scholarly acumen, nitwit.

 
At 04 January, 2011 15:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What's the matter shit-for-brains?

Does the truth hurt?

In fact, everything I've written about the comment management software changeover, and the subsequent loss of data, is true. But don't take my word for it, ask Pat or James. I'm certain, moreover, that longtime SLC regulars can confirm everything I've written on this subject.

The fact remains Kevin Barrett is not the source of the information that exposes your continued cyber stalking, sexual harassment, poison pen (ie., misinformation) campaigns and downright criminal degeneracy.

In fact, you're a common criminal, goat molester. That's right, a common cyber criminal. Make no mistake, it's well known that you've repeatedly violated laws that prohibit cyber stalking, sexual harassment, etc. And as an information security expert, I'm obligated to report your activity to the authorities. So far, I've overlooked the criminality that informs every move you make on the 'net, however, my patients are wearing thin.

That said, I have a good mind to report you to the authorities. And remember, goat molester, I know where you live, not to mention your IP address. So if I were you, goat molester, I'd cool my jets, because you're skating on VERY thin ice, mister.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What's the matter shit-for-brains?

Does the truth hurt?

In fact, everything I've written about the comment management software changeover, and the subsequent loss of data, is true. But don't take my word for it, ask Pat or James. I'm certain, moreover, that longtime SLC regulars can confirm everything I've written on this subject.

The fact remains Kevin Barrett is not the source of the information that exposes your continued cyber stalking, sexual harassment, poison pen (ie., misinformation) campaigns and downright criminal degeneracy.

Continued...

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

In fact, you're a common criminal, goat molester. That's right, a common cyber criminal. Make no mistake, it's well known that you've repeatedly violated laws that prohibit cyber stalking, sexual harassment, etc. And as an information security expert, I'm obligated to report your activity to the authorities. So far, I've overlooked the criminality that informs every move you make on the 'net, however, my patients are wearing thin.

That said, I have a good mind to report you to the authorities. And remember, goat molester, I know where you live, not to mention your IP address. So if I were you, goat molester, I'd cool my jets, because you're skating on VERY thin ice, mister.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

In fact, you're a common criminal, goat molester. That's right, a common cyber criminal. Make no mistake, it's well known that you've repeatedly violated laws that prohibit cyber stalking, sexual harassment, etc. And as an information security expert, I'm obligated to report your activity to the authorities. So far, I've overlooked the criminality that informs every move you make on the 'net, however, my patients are wearing thin.

That said, I have a good mind to report you to the authorities. And remember, goat molester, I know where you live, not to mention your IP address. So if I were you, goat molester, I'd cool my jets, because you're skating on VERY thin ice, mister.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

In fact, you're a common criminal, goat molester. That's right, a common cyber criminal. Make no mistake, it's well known that you've repeatedly violated laws that prohibit cyber stalking, sexual harassment, etc. And as an information security expert, I'm obligated to report your activity to the authorities. So far, I've overlooked the criminality that informs every move you make on the 'net, however, my patients are wearing thin.

Continued...

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:32, Blogger Triterope said...

TR, "It's corroborated"? Corroborated by whom?

If you type "Brian Good" "Carol Brouillet" into Google, all kinds of things turn up.

Funny, that's the sort of thing you're usually telling us to do.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:46, Blogger Triterope said...

I think Brian hates Barrett because Barrett was the one who made it clear to everyone that Brian is a failed janitor and sex stalker who lives at home with his parents.

Oh, definitely. In fact, pretty much everyone who ever brought up the issue of Brian's misbehavior towards Carol Brouillet has been judged by Brian to be an intellectual fraud who's hurting the movement with false theories.

CIT, for example. Seriously, read this exchange between Brian and Craig Ranke, plus a few comments from the peanut gallery. Pages and pages of laughs.

Again, there's even more hilarious stuff on the Internet.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

In fact, you're a common criminal, goat molester. That's right, a common cyber criminal. Make no mistake, it's well known that you've repeatedly violated laws that prohibit cyber stalking, sexual harassment, etc. And as an information security expert, I'm obligated to report your activity to the authorities. So far, I've overlooked the criminality that informs every move you make on the 'net, however, my patients are wearing thin.

Continued...

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh I see. "Corroborated by the internet." Thanks for clearing that up.

 
At 04 January, 2011 16:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

That said, I have a good mind to report you to the authorities. And remember, goat molester, I know where you live, not to mention your IP address. So if I were you, goat molester, I'd cool my jets, because you're skating on VERY thin ice, mister.

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

GutterBall's patients are wearing thin. What's that got to go with me?

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You're a common criminal, goat molester. That's right, a common cyber criminal. Make no mistake, it's well known that you've repeatedly violated laws that prohibit cyber stalking, sexual harassment, etc.

And as an information security expert, I'm obligated to report your activity to the authorities. So far, I've overlooked the criminality that informs every move you make on the 'net, however, my patients are wearing thin.

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

God damn it, Pat.

What the Hell is wrong with this damned blog? It constantly deletes my posts.

Either you have a configuration error, or some ridiculous rule or limitation. If you're going to make configuration changes or post limitations, have the common decency to inform us so we don't waste our time and energy.

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:13, Blogger snug.bug said...

Also, GutterBall, if Dr. Barrett is not the source, then in any case the source is some anonymous clown named CBSF, not Screw Loose Change. SLC is not the source, but only the conduit.

You guys really don't have a clue about sources and stuff, do you. It's why you're afraid of anything outside of the official channels--because you rightly mistrust your own judgment in evaluating sources.

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:29, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Lying again, Pinocchio.

A simple Google search on the keywords "Brian Good" and "Carol Brouillet" brings the lie to your claims, goat molester.

For example, Carol Brouillet wrote: "...Brian Good almost became treasurer, until our working relationship ended."

Carol Brouillet's complaints against you are found on numerous websites and discussion forums, including, but not limited to, CIT Research Forum and Pilots for 9/11 Troof.

The truth is, goat molester, you're a widely hated cyber stalker/criminal. And your infamy is more than deserved.

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Lying again, Pinocchio.

A simple Google search on the keywords "Brian Good" and "Carol Brouillet" brings the lie to your claims, goat molester.

For example, Carol Brouillet wrote: "...Brian Good almost became treasurer, until our working relationship ended."

Continued...

 
At 04 January, 2011 17:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Carol Brouillet's complaints against you are found on numerous websites and discussion forums, including, but not limited to, CIT Research Forum and Pilots for 9/11 Troof.

The truth is, goat molester, you're a widely hated cyber stalker/criminal. And your infamy is more than deserved.

 
At 04 January, 2011 18:24, Blogger Triterope said...

Oh I see. "Corroborated by the internet." Thanks for clearing that up.

I try to avoid making "irony meter" jokes but... wow.

 
At 04 January, 2011 18:30, Blogger Triterope said...

You guys really don't have a clue about sources and stuff, do you.

I have a college degree in journalism.

 
At 04 January, 2011 18:46, Blogger Triterope said...

Also, GutterBall, if Dr. Barrett is not the source, then in any case the source is some anonymous clown named CBSF

Sure, Brian. If anybody is saying bad things about you, it all traces back to some anonymous clown named CBSF.

Or Kevin Barrett.

Or Willie Rodriguez.

Or Craig Ranke.

Or ScrewLooseChange blog.

Or Carol Brouillet herself, on her own website.

Brian, do you have any other false prophets we should know about?

 
At 04 January, 2011 20:09, Blogger Ian G. said...

Poor Brian, it's one thing to be smeared by one's enemies, but it's quite another to have the cult you're so dedicated to (9/11 truth) have its members expose you as a liar and sex stalker.

Carol Brouillet says you're a sex stalker, Brian. Why would she lie about that? And why would so many other truthers take her side, while not one has taken yours?

 
At 04 January, 2011 22:20, Blogger snug.bug said...

See what I mean?

 
At 04 January, 2011 22:21, Blogger snug.bug said...

TR, if you have an AA degree in journalism you know that the claims of an anonymous internet poster about credentials are just as hinky as the pronouncements of Ian's Uncle Steve.

 
At 05 January, 2011 06:11, Blogger Ian G. said...

TR, if you have an AA degree in journalism you know that the claims of an anonymous internet poster about credentials are just as hinky as the pronouncements of Ian's Uncle Steve.

Carol Brouillet is not an anonymous internet poster, Brian. She's someone who welcomed you into her group until you made it obvious that you're a deranged sex stalker, at which point she threw you out.

But if you'd like, we can all take your claims with a grain of salt from now on. Every time you babble about "free-fall speed" or "molten iron" or the jet fuel burning off, we can ignore it as the meaningless claims of an anonymous internet poster.

 
At 05 January, 2011 06:51, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

".... as all those educated in the true way and the light know."

Brian thinks he's a fucking Jedi knight.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!!

 
At 05 January, 2011 11:08, Blogger Triterope said...

Carol Brouillet is not an anonymous internet poster, Brian. She's someone who welcomed you into her group until you made it obvious that you're a deranged sex stalker, at which point she threw you out.

She's also what we call a "primary source," Brian.

 
At 05 January, 2011 11:53, Blogger snug.bug said...

TR, where did Carol Brouillet did say I was a sex stalker?

 
At 05 January, 2011 12:09, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

TR, where did Carol Brouillet did say I was a sex stalker?

Brian,

Carol said in the e-mail she sent me:

Sadly, Brian used to be a friend. I ended the friendship when it was apparent to me that he would have liked to harmed my marriage.

When you tried to get between her & her husband. Explain that to everyone dopey!

 
At 05 January, 2011 12:16, Blogger Triterope said...

TR, where did Carol Brouillet did say I was a sex stalker?

Are you fucking kidding me?

 
At 05 January, 2011 12:34, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

I'm having a field day! I love jumping from SLC to JREF to read what Truthers have to say. It's just the usual repeats of theories that have been long debunked.

Brian, shut up before you think that you have evidence, which you don't.

 
At 05 January, 2011 12:51, Blogger snug.bug said...

WAQo, that doesn't say I was a sex stalker.

 
At 05 January, 2011 13:14, Blogger Ian G. said...

WAQo, that doesn't say I was a sex stalker.

Poor Brian, this is what he's reduced to: telling pathetic lies about why he was thrown out of the truth movement to people who laugh at him all day.

 
At 05 January, 2011 13:26, Blogger Triterope said...

WAQo, that doesn't say I was a sex stalker.

Yes it does, Brian.

 
At 05 January, 2011 15:26, Blogger snug.bug said...

No it doesn't. In fact, I suspect that her erroneous belief that I wanted to harm her marriage was based on the belief that I made phone calls to her family that I never made. Maybe somebody made them, but not me.

 
At 05 January, 2011 16:24, Blogger Triterope said...

OK Brian, let me get this straight... someone else called Carol Brouillet's family and pretended to be you?

 
At 05 January, 2011 17:52, Blogger Ian G. said...

No it doesn't. In fact, I suspect that her erroneous belief that I wanted to harm her marriage was based on the belief that I made phone calls to her family that I never made. Maybe somebody made them, but not me.

Sure, Brian. I'm sure it was someone else sex stalking her and she only thought it was you. Was it a beta unit Brian sent down from Rylos?

I think your lies about this are even more hilarious than your lies about being petgoat.

 
At 07 January, 2011 00:54, Blogger snug.bug said...

I guess it never occurred to you geniuses that both Barrett and Rodriguez had a great deal of motivation to stir up trouble for me--because I was stirring up trouble for them.

 
At 07 January, 2011 06:42, Blogger Ian G. said...

I guess it never occurred to you geniuses that both Barrett and Rodriguez had a great deal of motivation to stir up trouble for me--because I was stirring up trouble for them.

Nobody cares about a pissing match between different liars and lunatics. We laugh at all of you.

Anyway, you can babble all you want about Rodriguez and Barrett, but you still have the problem that Carol said you were stalking her on her own website. One doesn't need Barrett to tell us this.

 
At 07 January, 2011 10:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you lie. She did not say that.

 
At 07 January, 2011 11:19, Blogger Ian G. said...

Ian, you lie. She did not say that.

False. Learn to google. Also, after that, learn to read.

 
At 07 January, 2011 12:34, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

WAQo, that doesn't say I was a sex stalker.

Brian, please read this sentence:

I ended the friendship when it was apparent to me that he would have liked to harmed my marriage.

You tried to harm her marriage because you felt it nessesary to have sexual advances towards her despite her saying "NO!" to you.

You still haven't explained why you tried to get between her & her husband.

 
At 07 January, 2011 12:45, Blogger snug.bug said...

As I explained, I did not try to come between Carol and her husband, and my best guess is that someone made prank phone calls which were believed to have come from me. As I pointed out, Kevin Barrett and Willie Rodriguez were highly motivated to do such a thing. As were thousands of people in the USA such as Ian and you who find offensive the idea that people should question the official story of 9/11.

 
At 07 January, 2011 12:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

Also note "would have liked to harmed my marriage" is complaining of her belief that she has perceived an attitude, not complaining of any action (such as stalking).

 
At 07 January, 2011 14:55, Blogger Triterope said...

Kevin Barrett and Willie Rodriguez were highly motivated to do such a thing. As were thousands of people in the USA such as Ian and you who find offensive the idea that people should question the official story of 9/11.

Brian, just when I think you can't possibly be any more of a greasy piece of shit, you find a way.

 
At 07 January, 2011 15:04, Blogger snug.bug said...

Just making the point that there were thousands of people with the motive, means, and opportunity to make prank phone calls. What's greasy about that?

I had no motive to harm Carol's marriage. I wanted her to have a stable and supportive home situation to facilitate her credibility and conserve her energies as an activist and candidate.

 
At 07 January, 2011 15:51, Blogger Triterope said...

What's greasy about that?

That you are now dragging regular posters on this blog into your sick "I didn't stalk Carol Brouillet, someone did and pretended to be me because they're afraid of 9-11 truth and I'm such an important member of it" fantasy.

 
At 07 January, 2011 16:10, Blogger snug.bug said...

I didn't drag anyone in. Ian and WAQo's persistent lies about what Carol's blog says dragged me in.

How do prank calls make me important? Carol gets a lot of prank calls. She got them from Troy, even. They make Carol important, not me.

Your problem, TR, is that your lack of intelligence does not stop you from being very opinionated.

 
At 07 January, 2011 16:24, Blogger Triterope said...

You know, I said it already: "Brian, you need to be institutionalized."

Seriously.

 
At 07 January, 2011 16:50, Blogger snug.bug said...

See what I mean?

 
At 07 January, 2011 17:39, Blogger Triterope said...

See what I mean?

 
At 07 January, 2011 19:23, Blogger Ian G. said...

Just making the point that there were thousands of people with the motive, means, and opportunity to make prank phone calls. What's greasy about that?

Carol didn't say someone prank called her. She said YOU tried to wreck her marriage.

You can lie all you want Brian, but you're not about to convince anyone that you're not a creepy sex stalker.

I had no motive to harm Carol's marriage. I wanted her to have a stable and supportive home situation to facilitate her credibility and conserve her energies as an activist and candidate.

False. You have the motive: you're an obsessed lunatic with no normal relationships. You desperately wanted to be with her.

You're a liar, a lunatic, and a sex stalker, Brian.

 
At 08 January, 2011 09:37, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Ian and WAQo's persistent lies about what Carol's blog says dragged me in.

Brian,

Carol said it, not Ian or me:

he (Brian Good) would have liked to harmed my marriage.

So you calling Carol a liar? Boy, you are a douchebag!

 
At 08 January, 2011 11:58, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you lie. She did not say I tried to wreck her marriage.

WAQo, no I am not calling Carol a liar. She expressed an opinion about what she believed to be my attitude. She did not complain that I did anything to wreck her marriage, and in fact I did quite the opposite. I was interested in protecting her credibility as an activist and her image as a candidate, and her status as a happily-married supermom-activist was part of that.

 
At 08 January, 2011 11:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, here's a hint for you: leftist politics is a great place to meet women.

 
At 08 January, 2011 12:03, Blogger snug.bug said...

Kind of like church without all the nonsense.

 
At 08 January, 2011 13:18, Blogger Triterope said...

Jesus H. Christ, Brian, GET HELP. Please.

 
At 08 January, 2011 13:39, Blogger Ian G. said...

Ian, you lie. She did not say I tried to wreck her marriage.

False. She said you tried to wreck her marriage. You deny this because you are a deranged glue-sniffing liar.

Ian, here's a hint for you: leftist politics is a great place to meet women.

Um....ok? Thanks for the tip.

Kind of like church without all the nonsense.

Uh, you realize that this only cofirms what I've been saying about the truth movement being a religious cult, right?

 
At 08 January, 2011 14:26, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, she didn't say I tried to wreck her marriage. She said she thought I wanted to wreck her marriage.

You're not too good at fine distinctions, are you?

 
At 08 January, 2011 15:13, Blogger Ian G. said...

Ian, she didn't say I tried to wreck her marriage. She said she thought I wanted to wreck her marriage.

Right, because you're an obsessed sex stalker.

You're not too good at fine distinctions, are you?

Squeal squeal squeal!

Brian, you're a hilariously bad liar.

 
At 08 January, 2011 17:41, Blogger snug.bug said...

I know you are, but what am I?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home