Coins Explains It All
posted by Pat @ 6:47 AM
20 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Previous Posts
- How Dumb Can You Get?
- Bentham Comedy Continues
- CPT's Coverage of Loose Change
- Ambitious, I Will Give Them That
- NIST Did Test Explosive Theory
- Assessment of 9-11 Troof in Canada
- The Conspiracy Theory Detector
- David Griscom's Latest Hypothesis
- Moron Bruno Bruhwiler
- Ready for a Laugh?
View My Stats
Allies:
20 Comments:
What, no modified attack baboons?
What, no modified attack baboons?
Hey Brian, the other thread has a deranged anti-semite posting in it. I stuck up for you and how you denounce Kevin Barrett's anti-semitism. Go over there and smack the guy down, will ya?
Ian G. wrote, "...the other thread has a deranged anti-semite posting in it...Go over there and smack the guy down, will ya?"
I won't hold my breath.
"What, no modified attack baboons?"
Is that your "theory"?
Is that your "theory"?
No, that's actually something believed by Bill Deagle, a guy who is far more prominent in the truth movement than Brian.
Brian believes in magic thermite elves.
Silly me, I thought the modified attack baboons were your invention. I gave you way too much credit--remind me not to give you any in the future.
Do you know any way other than modified attack baboons to deal with the problem of the cheese-eating surrender monkeys?
(Wish I cold take credit for that, but it comes from S.M. Elliott, who I've been cyber-stalking for a while.)
Silly me, I thought the modified attack baboons were your invention. I gave you way too much credit--remind me not to give you any in the future.
Nope, they're another truther talking point, one with as much evidence behind it as thermite.
Do you know any way other than modified attack baboons to deal with the problem of the cheese-eating surrender monkeys?
Your attempts at humor are as poor as your attempts at logic, petgoat. In the future, you should leave both to people with some grasp of reality.
Ian, I don't think Dr. Deagel has ever appeared at a 9/11 Truth conference, or published anything at a respectable 9/11 Truth website, so I don't think you can call him a truther. I have never heard of modified attack baboons--ever-- except from a congental liar at a debunking website. I don't think Deagel even claims they were used on 9/11.
Not funny? It's easy to see why you've never been married, Ian.
Ian, I don't think Dr. Deagel has ever appeared at a 9/11 Truth conference, or published anything at a respectable 9/11 Truth website, so I don't think you can call him a truther.
False. Brian, have you ever appeared on Jim Fetzer's radio show? No? Well, Bill Deagle has.
Face it, Brian: Bill Deagle is a truther held in high repute by other truthers, while you've been kicked out of the movement. That's how much of a loser you are.
I have never heard of modified attack baboons--ever-- except from a congental liar at a debunking website.
That might be because you've been thrown out of the truth movement and thus are not kept up-to-date on the activities of the more highly regarded truthers. Anyway, maybe you could learn to google and figure this stuff out.
I don't think Deagel even claims they were used on 9/11.
Nobody cares.
Not funny? It's easy to see why you've never been married, Ian.
Boy, it's hilarious to read commentary on my marital status from someone old enough to be my father who is a) also unmarried b) unemployed and lives with his parents, and c) well know for sex stalking men and women.
Ian, nobody who appears on Fetzer's radio show is held in high repute by other truthers.
Ian, nobody who appears on Fetzer's radio show is held in high repute by other truthers.
Brian, you can babble all you want about other truthers, but the fact of the matter is that I have yet to find one who would consider you part of the group. Now, I know a staple of religious lunacy is different groups excommunicating each other (and it's no different with the religious cult that is 9/11 truth), but you appear to be a church of one here.
Ian, there's no need for me to do groups. I can work just fine alone.
Which has nothing to do with Fetzer, by the way. You changed the subject.
Ian, there's no need for me to do groups. I can work just fine alone.
Yes, most sex stalkers work alone. I'm just glad to see you admit that every truther organization out there has kicked you out of the group.
Which has nothing to do with Fetzer, by the way. You changed the subject.
Fetzer is an esteemed truther who founded the Scholars for 911 Truth group. If he believes Bill Deagle is a reputable truther, I'll take his word for it over that of a obsessed liar, sex stalker, and failed janitor who has been thrown out of the truth movement.
Dr. Fetzer is not an esteemed truther. You live in a fantasy world.
Dr. Fetzer is not an esteemed truther. You live in a fantasy world.
Poor Brian. It can't be easy dealing with the fact that he was thrown out of the truth movement while people like Bill Deagle, Kevin Barrett, and Willie Rodriguez continue to be held in high esteem by the group.
Anyway, Brian, while you're babbling here and getting laughed at by literally tens of people, Bill Deagle continues to promote his views all across the world. How does that make you feel?
Ian you make up your facts. I was never thrown out of the 9/11 truth movement, and the people you cite are held in high esteem only by a small fringe group of conspiracy theorists--not by the mainstream truth movement.
Ian you make up your facts.
False. Jim Fetzer is a distinguished academic with a long career. You're a failed janitor who lives with his parents.
I was never thrown out of the 9/11 truth movement, and the people you cite are held in high esteem only by a small fringe group of conspiracy theorists--not by the mainstream truth movement.
Ah, the "no true Scotsman" fallacy comes up again. You're all part of a small fringe group of conspiracy theorists. The difference between you and Fetzer is that you can't name a single truther who considers you in good standing with the group. You've been banned, petgoat. Deal with it.
Ian, I have not been banned from the truth movement. If I named any names to you you would harass them and invent sexual fantasies about them. I wouldn't drop any names anyway.
Ian, I have not been banned from the truth movement.
False. You've been thrown out of the truth movement for being a sex stalker and deranged liar.
If I named any names to you you would harass them and invent sexual fantasies about them.
Brian, your pathetic attempt at throwing your own problems at other people is funny.
I wouldn't drop any names anyway.
That's because you have none. The truth movement has banned you, petgoat. Face facts.
Post a Comment
<< Home