Jesse Ventura Embraces the Space Beam Nuttiness
Jesse Ventura, on the Alex Jones show, goes from mostly nutty to completely nutty. Admittedly it wasn't a very long trip.
Labels: Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura
posted by James B. @ 9:08 PM
54 comments
54 Comments:
Controlled demolition, superthermite, mini-nukes, space beams, aliens, there were no towers, etc...
Jesse, like Barrett, grabs on to the goofiest theories he can find.
The challenge is on Brian Good.
Dear Pat & James,
Please check your gmail accounts for a registered message from me from
5/5/2011 with the subject "Important: Defamation Notice".
Let me know if I should send it again.
Sincerely,
Kevin E. Houchin, Esq.
Caper on JREF raised a good point about Jesse Ventura:
How will he think through this in his head? On one hand he'll want to say this is another part of the conspiracy, but on the other hand, in every interview I heard him, he always defended the SEALS, so now in order to believe the conspiracy he will have to implicate the SEALS.
He seems to have chosen the most popular option among Twoofers since bin Laden's death, which is "Press on with the accusations and don't acknowledge the contradiction at all."
Dear Pat & James,
Please check your gmail accounts for a registered message from me from
5/5/2011 with the subject "Important: Defamation Notice".
Let me know if I should send it again.
Sincerely,
Kevin E. Houchin, Esq.
Uh Oh... not a threatening email from a lawyer/graphic designer... This looks SERIOUS!
Please check your gmail accounts for a registered message from me from
5/5/2011 with the subject "Important: Defamation Notice".
Kevin, please share who you're representing and what specific complaints they have. That will be the quickest resolution for your client, rather than this heavy-handed lawyer approach.
Dear Kevin:
Please check your gmail accounts for a registered message from me from
5/5/2011 with the subject "Best Lawyer Jokes Ever".
Let me know if I should send it again.
Sincerely,
Maxwell J. Power
Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel
Call (303) 866-6410 or 1(877) 888-1370 to have your complaints against a Colorado lawyer considered and investigated.
Dear Kevin Houchin,
This is a quick notice to inform you that you are a giant sloppy leaky chlamydia-infested douche bag.
Your registered message was received then promptly deleted. It, like your life, it completely empty and devoid of meaning.
If you would like to pursue this issue further, please eat a bag of dicks and file your defamation lawsuit in accordance with Rule 14 of the Internet. Upon filiong of your lawsuit, please paste all details here so we can have a good laugh at your sorry, pitiful, and sad expense.
Die in a fire,
John Smith
Legal Counsel for This Blog.
http://www.facebook.com/kevinhouchin
"Studied Creativity at University of Iowa College of Law"
HHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAA
i think i just shit myself
Remind me not to hire this guy to anything that involved the ACTUAL law.. yo know- the stuff with judges and whatnot...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Tij4Biu7P0&feature=player_embedded#at=86
Remind me not to hire this guy to anything that involved the ACTUAL law.. yo know- the stuff with judges and whatnot...
He's apparently not even licensed to practice law. His Iowa license is inactive (according to him), and the Colorado State Bar doesn't list him at all.
Question: Isn't there a law against impersonating a member of the BAR?
And remember, I'm just askin' questions...
So Kevin Houchin is a lawyer in the same way that Richard Gage is an architect, Steven Jones is a physicist, and Brian Good is a janitor.
And Karl Schwarz is a nanotechnology entrepreneur.
Relax Guys,
The letter is important, but not heavy-handed. It's addressed to the administrators, not the community. The administrators are welcome to post the letter if they want. That's their decision.
Yes, my background before law school was in graphic design. I work with a lot of creative start-up businesses.
My license is inactive in Iowa, true. My license IS active in Colorado... Testicles didn't look in the right place. The Colorado Bar is separate from the CO Supreme Court. The CO Supreme Court licenses attorneys, not the Bar Association.
James, please take a look at the letter and I believe you'll agree that I'm not making heavy-handed demands.
-Kevin Houchin
Dear Mr. Houchin,
This is in reference to your above post dated May 12 2011. Please reference my earlier reply dated May 11, 2011.
I believe I may have not been clear enough in my earlier statement. This is your final warning to cease and desist your amateur asshatery immediately or face legal consequences for impersonating an attorney, which is illegal in the state in which this blog is run from (and is, in fact, a felony).
If you wish to continue harassing my client with your cheap, empty threats, you will be dealt with harshly to the fullest extent of the law, and then some.
Please go back to chasing ambulances or please, as I have requested in my previous message to you, die in a fire (and take your kids with you; we don't need your fowl genes polluting our gene pool any further.)
John Smith, Esq.
Legal Counsel for This Blog
Kevin, thank you for your response. I assumed Colorado handled licensing the same way my state does.
Pat / James, please consider sharing the contents of Kevin's request if he doesn't share it. This blog isn't particularly polite to stupid people, but I find it hard to believe that any comment here rises to the level of actionable defamation.
In the USA, public figures are pretty much fair game--if you ran for office, or traveled around the world lying about your heroism, people are pretty much entitled to express their opinions whether they're correct or not.
Libeling of people who are not public figures is something else entirely.
Hey Brian, how come Jesse Ventura has his own TV show while you're limited to posting dumbspam all over the internet?
Maybe it's because Ventura is a truther in good standing with the movement, while you've been expelled?
Ian, there has been much dissatisfaction with Jesse as a truther ever since his first 9/11 Truth TV show, which was (with the exception of Donna Marsh Oc'Connor) almost wall-to-wall disinfo.
His second 9/11 Truth TV show was even worse, putting forth the silly Pentagon flyover theory.
And recently, I understand, he came out in favor of Dr. Wood's "microwave" theory for the twin towers, making even more people unhappy.
Dr. Wood has a point: the pulverization of the concrete is not explained by FEMA, by NIST, by the thermite theory or even, IMHO, by the WTC-controlled-demolition theory. We definitely need an investigation of the pulverized concrete. I won't be advocating any speculative theories myself, though.
(UtterFail seems to think a NRDC report that claims all 424,000 tons of WTC concrete was pulverized is credible. This claimn is laughable for reasons of which UtterFail seems to be ignorant.)
I find it hard to believe that any comment here rises to the level of actionable defamation.
I thought the same thing.
Truth is seldom embraced as comfort is the reality preferred by humanity.
The goat fucker prevaricates, "...UtterFail seems to think a NRDC report that claims all 424,000 tons of WTC concrete was pulverized is credible. This claimn is laughable for reasons of which UtterFail seems to be ignorant."
That's right, psychopath, repeat the same lies ad nauseum.
Never mind that you refuse to substantiate your argument with anything more than your worthless, unqualified and unprofessional opinion---which isn't worth the ASCII characters you waste to post it.
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
UtterFail, I've no need to substantiate the argument. Anybody who knows the first thing about the construction of the World Trade Center can see instantly why it's true.
I'm still waiting to see if even one of you know-it-all clowns can explain the obvious, and none of you knows enough to be able to state the obvious.
Mr. Houchin complained that one of the people here defamed his client by confusing him with someone else in the comments. This may be true, but the point is the comments are unmonitored. Given that the topic of this blog is conspiracy theories, there are a lot of bizarre things discussed, if we had to go through and research each and every one of them for truth and accuracy it would be a full-time job.
Regardless, under the CDA hosts are specifically exempted from liability for material posted by a third party, so we are not going to dance for this crank just because he has a friend who has a lawyer. If he, or anyone else, has a problem with something said in the comments, they are perfectly welcome to post a rebuttal in the comments, without any interference from us. A privilege you will not get on any blogs or forums hosted by the conspiracy theorists, I might add.
The goat fucker prevaricates, "...I'm still waiting to see if even one of you know-it-all clowns can explain the obvious, and none of you knows enough to be able to state the obvious."
Fuck you, goat fucker. Put your theory out there like a man, and I'll tear you to shreds.
Are you "man" enough to subject your theory to scrutiny, goat fucker?
Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply, folks.
UtterFail, why don't you learn something about how the WTC was constructed instead of issuing stupid challenges?
I've forgotten more about how the WTC towers were constructed than you'll ever know, goat fucker, as I've proven over-and-over again.
So let's hear your specious argument, coward.
I won't hold my breath waiting for your reply.
You haven't a clue as to why NRDC's claims are ludicrous, have you?
Do your homework.
There you go again--you twisted homosexual psychopath--asking me to prove a negative.
You couldn't pass an examination in elementary logic to save your life.
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
I'm not asking you to prove a negative. I'm pointing out that you don't know what you're talking about.
Do your homework.
Yes, you are asking me prove a negative--your inability to pass a formal examination in elementary logic notwithstanding.
As I've pointed out over-and-over again, put your theory out there where I can examine it--you twisted homosexual psychopath--and I'll rip you and your idea's to shreds.
I can't address your batshit crazy idea's if you won't expose them to scrutiny--you lying felcher.
You're nuttier than a bag of squirrel shit.
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
I asked you to prove that you know enough about the construction of the WTC to know why NRDC's claims about the pulverized concrete are ludicrous.
That's proving a positive. You can't do it, because you don't know what you're talking about.
"...I asked you to prove that you know enough about the construction of the WTC to know why NRDC's claims about the pulverized concrete are ludicrous."
It's not incumbent upon me to substantiate your lies and distortions, goat fucker.
Get it through your thick skull, jackass. I'm telling you that assertion is false, and any "evidence" you can spit up in support of that bald faced lie can be proven false in a microsecond.
Got it, felcher? Or must I explain the glaringly obvious to the failed janitor, sex stalker and compulsive liar again?
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
The assertion that you don't know what you're talking about is false? No, it's true, and you're proving it true every time you show that you haven't a clue as to why the NRDC's claim is ludicrous.
Is this another example of the 7 year old girl logic that informs every post you make to this forum, goat fucker? Why yes, it is! Is twisting my words and lying about what I just wrote all you have, felcher? Why yes, it it!
On the contrary, goat fucker, the assertion that YOU know what you're talking about is false.
Get it straight, stupid.
You're so stupid and dishonest that you just proved my point: If I say x and you turn around and falsely accuse me of saying y, that doesn't make me a liar--your inability to pass a formal examination in elementary logic notwithstanding.
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2011/05/screw-loose-change-to-host-debate.html#c563192054648937733
Again, the only thing you've managed to prove is that you're a lying idiot who couldn't hold a job mopping floors.
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
You're not making any sense.
Once again, I've reduced you to a whimper with rock solid logic.
I make perfect sense, and your inability to back your specious nonsense with logic that supports your 100% fact-free nonsense is all the proof people need to see that you're a con artist and a liar.
You think like a 7 year old girl.
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
Every time you show that you haven't a clue as to why the NRDC's claim is ludicrous you're showing that you don't know what you're talking about.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
The goat fucker is busted lying again. And here's the proof:
The plot thickens!
The noose is around the goat fucker's neck.
The noose is tightened!
Hoist with his own petard!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Once again, you stand exposed as a liar and a con artist.
Now bury your latest pack of lies in an avalanche of gay squeal spam--you pathetic liar.
Once again, you FAIL
Grade: F-
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
Squirm, goat fucker, squirm--you lying weasel.
Every time you show that you haven't a clue as to why the NRDC's claim is ludicrous you're showing that you don't know what you're talking about.
Squeal, squeal, squeal.
I don't see any evidence, goat fucker.
Once again, you FAIL
Grade: F-
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
Squirm, goat fucker, squirm--you lying weasel.
No, and you're not going to see any evidence until you go and look for it. Anybody who knows the first thing about the construction of the WTC knows that the NRDC is full of shit.
But you don't and you don't.
You don't know the difference between an unsubstantiated assertion and a fact.
Again, you are making the unsubstantiated accusation. Thus, the burden of proof falls on our shoulder's and your shoulder's alone--you illogical fool.
Just because you make an assertion doesn't make it true--you idiot.
Once again, you FAIL
Grade: F-
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
Squirm, goat fucker, squirm--you lying weasel.
And here we have another example of the goat fucker lying through his terracotta teeth.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Once again, you FAIL
Grade: F-
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
Squirm, goat fucker, squirm--you lying weasel.
You just make it worse, UtterFail. I said an email header CAN be copied. I didn't say this one was copied.
It's pretty obvious why you don't have a job. You're incompetent.
Projecting and lying through your terracotta teeth again, goat fucker? Do you honestly believe that people won't read the content of the link I formatted into my last comment and see that you're an insane liar who constantly talks out of both side of your mouth?
Pathetic.
It must gall you to know that I have a career and family, while you're a complete failure in life, who couldn't make it as a janitor.
Pathetic.
Once again, you FAIL.
Grade: F-
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm
Squirm, goat fucker, squirm--you lying weasel.
UtterFail, I said an email header CAN be copied. I didn't say this one was copied.
Your silly bluffs to try to cover over your incompetence are pathetic.
That's right, goat fucker, repeat yourself ad nauseum. But everyone who follows my link can see for themselves that you're a liar.
Furthermore, you can't cite one instance of "incompetence" on my part.
You remind of Oliver North during the Iran-Contra hearings. You constantly hold your head high and proclaim your high and mighty motives, while you lie like a rug, but everyone knows you're nothing but a degenerate sex stalker, pervert and a liar.
Go fuck yourself, bug fuck.
Your inability to distinguish between saying an email header CAN be copied and saying it WAS copied is the instant case.
Don't swallow your teeth.
Lying again, goat fucker?
Who do you think you're fooling, while you talk out of both sides of your mealy mouth?
Oliver North, in his wildest dreams, could only wish to be half the shameless liar you are, goat fucker.
So tell us, goat fucker, how's psychopathy treating you--you degenerate?
No, GutterBall, unlike you, I don't lie.
Yeah, you don't lie, which explains why I caught you lying on several occasions yesterday.
You've never caught me lying, UtterFail. Your empty accusations are getting quite tiresome.
Post a Comment
<< Home