They Really Are After You...
After years of paranoid accusations from Truthers, from Alex Jones offering to hide Pat from my murderous rampages, to Jon Gold wanting to know who really is behind this blog, now the Truthers are posting on 911 Flogger about a supposed military operation to create fictitious personas.
Most people use social media like Facebook and Twitter to share photos of friends and family, chat with friends and strangers about random and amusing diversions, or follow their favorite websites, bands and television shows.
But what does the US military use those same networks for? Well, we can’t tell you: That’s “classified,” a CENTCOM spokesman recently informed Raw Story.
One use that’s confirmed, however, is the manipulation of social media through the use of fake online “personas” managed by the military. Raw Story recently reported that the US Air Force had solicited private sector vendors for something called “persona management software.” Such a technology would allow single individuals to command virtual armies of fake, digital “people” across numerous social media portals.
On a related note, you can now find me on Facebook. I post under the names Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Kevin Barrett and Jon Gold. Be sure to friend me.
posted by James B. @ 9:10 PM
131 comments
131 Comments:
I knew all along that three of those guys were CIA assets.
now the Truthers are posting on 911 Flogger about a supposed military operation to create fictitious personas.
Sounds kind of like they do with their retarded petitions about fictitious architects & engineers that they show in public on their retarded websites.
Do they explain how the government plans to control a network dedicated to cute cat pics and nut-shot videos?
WAQo, your ongoing lies discredit this blog. MGF, controlling and exploiting are two different things.
This comment has been removed by the author.
James wrote, "...Truthers are posting on 911 Flogger about a supposed military operation to create fictitious personas."
James, with your permission, I'll happily expose a member of A&E 9/11 "truth" who maintains a fictitious persona via a vanity website, lies about his alleged career as an "engineer" and, above all, is an identity thief.
Just give me permission and I'll prove all of the aforementioned allegations.
This comment has been removed by the author.
WAQo, your ongoing lies discredit this blog. MGF, controlling and exploiting are two different things.
Squeal squeal squeal!
Brian, the only member of AE911Truth is Richard Gage. You were a member, but you were banned for stalking Carol Brouillet.
Just give me permission and I'll prove all of the aforementioned allegations.
Put it here. You don't need anybody's permission.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I'll tell you the difference, cretin.
Identity theft is a very serious crime. And I have all the information that's necessary to report the SOB to the FBI and have him thrown into a federal penitentiary.
Your lies about Shyam Sunder are just that--lies.
But then again, should we expect less from a sex predator and compulsive liar who wears women's underwear?
Probably not.
Now go play in the freeway, goat fucker.
And stop trying to hijack the thread--you no account homosexual degenerate.
And you can stuff your straw man arguments where the sun doesn't shine.
Now, off to the freeway, Aunt Fancy.
James, why exactly did you call it a 'supposed' military operation? Is it the UK's Guardian you don't trust, or CENTCOM itself? Show us the research you conducted that makes you doubtful of its existence, James.
Or were you simply trying to create false doubt, so you could have another excuse to make fun of others? Is that the kind of 'historian' you are, James? Explain yourself, coward.
The ArseHooligan whines, "...James, why exactly did you call it a 'supposed' military operation?"
Why is it that troofers can't read?
If you could read, you'd know that the article at 9/11 Flogger is based purely on speculation. That's why he called it "a 'supposed' military operation?"
Now, go play in the freeway, ArseHooligan.
The 9/11 Flogger article reads, "...When Raw Story first reported on the contract for this software, it was unclear what the Air Force wanted with it or even if it had been acquired. The potential for misuse, however, was abundantly clear...A fake virtual army of people could be used to help create the impression of consensus opinion in online comment threads, or manipulate social media to the point where valuable stories are suppressed."
That's not "proof," Arsehooligan, that's speculation.
Have you always been an idiot, ArseHooligan?
Recently I have been taking apart truthers at a Facebook site.
It funny because they are the one who like to make up fake names and spam sites.
http://www.facebook.com/groups/2211830485/
I see Brian is still vivid proof of the low life nature of 9/11 truthers.
A truthers came to the FB site claiming to be a debunker but it soon became clear he was a truther out to make some kind of point, as pointless as it was. When I and some others picked him apart he went postal and posted profanities to my FB instance message. (see screen capture) Of course I egged the poor loon on with insults. He responded by bravely closing his fake account. Yep, as I said they all are low of life, but fun to punk.
http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/298164_10150376288419879_773014878_8193893_1558769502_n.jpg
FYI, a whitehouse.gov site for creating petitions HAD a petition to investigate 9/11, again! It got less that 100 votes and was removed with this
“Thanks for your interest in We the People, a new tool on WhiteHouse.gov that allows all Americans to ask the Obama Administration to take action on a range of important issues facing our country.
The petition you are trying to access has expired, because it failed to meet the signature threshold.
While you can’t sign this petition, there may be other petitions on We the People on a similar issue that you’d like to add your name to. Or, you can create your own petition.“
A petition to get an investigation of UFOs got over 11.,000 votes!
Yep, 9/11 truther is on fire.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Still trying to hijack the thread, ass face?
You haven't proven anything, goat fucker.
When will you learn that the 100% fact-free, unsubstantiated opinion of a logical fallacy spewing compulsive liar, sex predator and college dropout who wears women's underwear is less than worthless?
Now stop trying to hijack the thread, dufus.
If you can't stay on topic, go play in the freeway, ass face.
I didn't lie. Dr. Sunder lied. He lied when he told NOVA that the WTC steel was "scattered" because of the need for search-and-rescue operations. He lied when he told the 9/11 widows in controdiction to the NIST report that a "location" in a fire might be a desk or a filing cabinet so that an office cubicle might burn for an hour.
Brian, you're lying about Dr. Sunder right now.
DK, the WH.gov petition was an operation by someone who had no standing to submit a petition and who did a lousy job of promoting it. Nobody signed it because they didn't trust it.
Waaah, the petition didn't get the results I wanted! It's not fair! Squeal squeal squeal!
Polls show that back in 2006 100 million Americans considered it somewhat likely that the gov't knew the attacks were coming and for political reasons did nothing to stop them--or worse.
Polls show that 150 million Americans think the universe was created 6,000 years ago in a period of 6 days.
9/11 truth has seen great increases in acceptance since then, and I have no doubt the percentage is much higher now.
Of course. That's why President McKinney has instructed Attorney General Fetzer to investigate Halliburton's thermite production subsidiaries.
Brian, you really, really need to see a psychiatrist. You're a danger to yourself and others walking around with such a seriously unwell mind.
So Pat and James, when do you plan to live up to your broken promise? You promised us that you would remove any post by the goat fucker that is off-topic or a blatant attempt to hijack a thread.
So far, the goat fucker has tried twice to hijack the thread. To be specific, the comments at time stamps 24 October, 2011 09:49 and 24 October, 2011 11:31.
See what I mean?
Now we can add your post at time stamp 24 October, 2011 11:55 to the list of comments that should be removed.
BAN.
Dr. Sunder lied. I can show where he lied, that he lied, and how he lied.
False.
I knew about the WH.gov petition as soon as it got off the ground, and I didn't sign it because I didn't trust it.
Nobody cares.
Ian, what Americans believe about the creation of the universe doesn't matter. What citizens believe about issues that are the foundation of public policy does.
Translation: when Americans believe something absurd that I don't believe, it doesn't matter. When they believe something absurd that I do believe, it's vital to the interests of democracy.
Well, it's all irrelevant anyway because nobody believes in 9/11 truth.
Poor UtterFail. Did you put those chubby fingers on a diet yet?
Brian, you're libeling Guitar Bill. My cousin Bob is a lawyer. He says to cease and desist. I'm asking you nicely.
WAQo, your ongoing lies discredit this blog.
And who's the wuss that backed down after I challenged him to a debate? Definantly not me.
So Brian, how does it feel to back down from 4 debates with Willie, Kevin, Craig, & me?
Ian, in a democracy, what its citizens believe matters. You don't care about democracy. OK.
WAQo, I don't debate liars.
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ian, in a democracy, what its citizens believe matters. You don't care about democracy. OK.
Squeal squeal squeal!
Yes, Brian, in democracy, it does matter what the citizens believe. It troubles me that half the population are creationists. Fortunately, only a tiny demented fringe (to borrow Christopher Hitchens' term) believes in 9/11 truth, so there is no need for the sane and rational to confront such beliefs.
Instead, I can just mock you for being a liar and lunatic and coward who runs away squealing and crying from debate challenges.
WAQo, I don't debate liars.
See what I mean?
Brian, how do you ever expect to get the widows questions answered if you won't even debate WAQ? What do you think Laurie Van Auken would think of you running away from every debate challenge?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Still trying to hijack the thread, ass face?
You're such an idiot that you couldn't pass a formal examination in elementary civics.
For example, we don't live in a "democracy," we live in a representative Republic.
Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" Franklin replied , "A republic, if you can keep it."
If we lived in a democracy, Al Gore would have been the 43rd president of the United States, not George W. Bush. After all, according to the Federal Election Commission, George Bush received 50,456,002 votes or 47.87% of the electorate and Al Gore received 50,999,897 votes or 48.38%.
See how you are, goat fucker?
You're an idiot who couldn't pass a 6th grade test in elementary civics.
Now stop trying to hijack the thread, cretin.
Dude, we both have jobs. Think we have nothing better to do then sit here monitoring comments all day?
Bet Brian doesn’t even know what the petition said. It was very straight forward. It encouraged a new investigation, same shit you hear from evert truther loon. And I saw it promoted on several truther sites. Fact is a vast majority knows the 9/11 commission got it right and don’t care what a few loonies want. So go and cry to your mommy, who you still live with, right Brian?
I have a small business, too. And I'm incredibly busy. My cleint's range from Cisco to the US government.
But that's neither here nor there.
No one is asking you to delete the comments immediately. That request would be unrealistic and burden to you and Pat. I'm merely asking you to live up to your promise. Is that clear, James?
Yes facts are not a matter of popular vote, Evolution is real and creationism is not. No matter how many believe differently. Facts is the towers were not a controlled demolition, that like creation is a fantasy of a loony fringe. Go into any science class to structural engineering class and if asked what brought the towers down, the correct answer is fire. If you say controlled demolition, you fail because you don’t know the subject.
Bill, let Brian ramble, he is only good for a laugh, and that is all he has in life. Sad but true Brian was born a looser in life, that is why he has never held down a job requiring anything over janitorial skills, why he has to live at home at an advanced age, why even other low life people like truthers will have nothing to do with him, even they can see what a flaccid thinker he is.
He is a fine example of everything one should not be in life.
WAQo, I don't debate liars.
Again, how do you know I'm "lying"?
Debate about 9/11 with me and we'll see who the liar is then.
By the way, James, if you have the time to compose the comment at time stamp 24 October, 2011 13:07, why don't you have time to live up to your promise and delete off-topic comments and blatant attempts to hijack the thread?
Where I come from that doesn't speak well of your character.
Someone might come to the conclusion that you're protecting the self-admitted troofer propagandist.
So which is it, James? Do you make promises that you have no intention of honoring, or are you protecting the troofer swine?
Take your pick, son.
I'm going to debate Brian whether he likes it or not.
According to sources the widows have had 28 questions answered by the 9/11 Commission and they were satisfactory by the widows.
Out of the rest of their questions it involves National Security, which the Government nor the Commission didn't want to answer due to National Security protocals and the endangerment of innocent lives.
Of course Brian doesn't want any type of National Security because he would rather invite terrorism on U.S. soil and invite the murders of thousands if not millions of innocent people.
If it's any consolation, Dave, I agree with you 100%. After all, the goat fucker is scum.
On the other hand, why should a compulsive liar, sex predator and raving lunatic be allowed to defecate on SLC?
In fact, you've categorically listed all the reasons why he should NEVER be allowed to trash the blog.
When did SLC become a therapy outlet for a twisted lunatic?
Inquiring minds want to know.
I'm with Dave. Brian is like the lunatics one occasionally encounters on the subway, ranting about something to nobody. They can be quite funny (I remember one boasting loudly to no one in particular that he was so tough that "the wolf man is afraid of me").
So just treat Brian as the internet equivalent of the lunatic on the subway, as I do. All one has to do is bait him with a comment about widows or Willie Rodriguez, and watch him babble away!
I don't agree, Ian. As I understand it, SLC was never intended to be a blog dedicated to baiting every lunatic with an Internet connection.
SLC, however, could be a place where substantive debate takes place if the "owners" desired that outcome. Unfortunately, the goat fucker is allowed to hijack every thread and turn the blog into Brian Good's personal toilet.
So which is it going to be? A place where sane people are allowed to debate, or Brian Good's personal toilet?
Yeah, Brian is my “Go to guy“, when I need to demonstrate why you should not be a truther, you just show them Brian. Kind of “this is your brain on trutherism, any questions”
Debating Brian:
According to OFFICIAL records, Dr. Sunder was talking about the exterior panels of both Towers when he was taling about eh 9-11 seconds it took for those outter columns to hit the ground.
According to NOVA, their interview with Dr. Sunder wasn't an offical record.
NOVA has been talking about subjects from Bigfoot, Ghost & lake monsters.
I have a simple and quite reasonable request: Can we get back to the subject of James' OP?
Or is that an unreasonable request?
Truthers love to create fictitious personas.
James, with your permission, I'll happily expose a member of A&E 9/11 "truth" who maintains a fictitious persona via a vanity website, lies about his alleged career as an "engineer" and, above all, is an identity thief.
I would love to see this. But beware the consequences, Bill. Pat Cowardly...might...CALL YOU A NAME! :-)
Or were you simply trying to create false doubt, so you could have another excuse to make fun of others? Is that the kind of 'historian' you are, James? Explain yourself, coward.
Apparently, it needs to be said again.
There will never be another investigation. Never, ever, ever, ever, ever!
Remember that on your deathbed.
John wrote, "...I would love to see this."
Thanks, John.
I don't, however, think it would be appropriate for me to do so until I have the written permission of either James or Pat. If they give me the okay, I'll happily publish the data.
Ian, you can't mock me for being a liar and lunatic and coward because I'm not.
DK, even the 9/11 Commissioners say they didn't get everything right. Philip Zelikow was obviously corrupt to accept the assignment in the first place with his conflicts of interest, to write the outline before the investigation started, to run interference for the Saudis and for Condi, and then to accept the payoff of a plum job with the Secretary of State's office afterward.
DK, I invited you to bring the biggest, meanest, hairiest PhD structural engineer you could find to make a fool of Richard Gage in Detroit and you didn't do it. Why not?
WAQo, I know you're lying because what you say is not true and you have no right to believe it is.
UtterFail, James has no intention of keeping any promise to you because you are a girly asshole who lies and lies and whines and whines and whines. You're a pathetic twisted lunatic.
WAQo, Dr. Sunder told NOVA the BUILDINGS fell in 9 seconds and 11 seconds. You make up your facts.
I don't, however, think it would be appropriate for me to do so until I have the written permission of either James or Pat.
Understood.
Still, what can be more discrediting than cardboard boxes? :)
UtterFail, James has no intention of keeping any promise to you because you are a girly asshole who lies and lies and whines and whines and whines. You're a pathetic twisted lunatic.
LMMFAO! - girly asshole??? Really??? I'll get you at recess Brian!
The goat fucker squeals, "...[GuitarBill] James has no intention of keeping any promise to you because you are a girly [SIC] asshole who lies and lies and whines and whines and whines. You're a pathetic twisted lunatic."
Says the twisted, pathetic lunatic and sex predator who wears women's underwear.
And it looks like you're wrong, shit-for-brains, because Pat just removed your attempts to hijack the thread at timestamps 24 October, 2011 09:49 and 24 October, 2011 11:31.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Pwn3d again, goat fucker.
Adios, pendejo!
And guess what, thread hijacker the pathetic? Your latest comment is also off-topic and a blatant attempt to hijack the thread. Thus, Pat should remove it as well.
Why do you have such a hard time staying on-topic, Pinocchio? The subject of the thread is "a supposed military operation to create fictitious personas."
Oh that's right! Your job is TRASH the blog with off-topic nonsense, hijack the threads and generally make the blog unreadable. My bad.
Asshole.
Pat, please remove the goat fucker's comment at time stamp 24 October, 2011 17:02. The comment is off-topic and another pathetic attempt to hijack the thread. Thanks.
Say bye, bye, goat fucker.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Well Brian, unlike you I am not a retarded loser mama’s boy and do have a life. Racing my car at an SCCA divisional was far more fun than picking apart a third rate architect like Gage who would not confirm to debate me. And who is a joke to anyone but a hand full of clowns like you. But if you have any clout with the guy I will take him apart myself if he will agree, I am not an architects but I am his better.
You would not understand that because you as a person Brian have no life or skills beyond your delusional ramblings and mopping floors. That is truly sad and pathetic. we all know it.
Look at DK, such a dweeb he thinks squealing his tires is macho!
Look at the goat fucker. He thinks squealing and lying gives him the "right" to claim that he has a "scientific reputation."
What a joke.
"MGF, controlling and exploiting are two different things."
Neither will work.
Stop and think about this story too, if it is true it underlines just how stupid our intelligence services are. Propaganda has never worked in any significant way in the US, and they already have effective internet monitoring programs that give them a clear picture of various trends, and what the public is thinking.
So if this story is true then we should be thankful that Al Qaeda didn't arrange for marching bands to serenade their attacks, and that they didn't also buy hundreds of billboards along the eastern seaboard advertising their attacks.
MGF. you're only showing your ignorance. Propaganda got us into two wars that are doing to us what the Afghan war did to the Soviet Union. Mission accomplished!
Let's return to the subject post, shall we?
So James B tells us that "The Truthers are posting...."
Now I guess technically this is correct, because even though the post did not make it to the front page, and even though only one person commented on it, we have one truther (with a total of 2 posts under his belt) making the post, and one other truther commenting on ir.
So if I adhered to James's journalistic standards, I could write at my ScrewScrewLoose blog that "debunkers are posting that there are no 9/11 widows" because Ian says so. And in fact that would have more journalistic validity than James's screed because the fact that nobody here is willing to challenge Ian's lies shows that in fact you ALL go along with such nonsense.
If you had any principles liars like WAQo and Ian and MGF and DK would not be tolerated for a minute. But hey, if you banned all the liars then there'd be only me.
Ian, you can't mock me for being a liar and lunatic and coward because I'm not.
False. You are all three. You're a liar for claiming that you're not Petgoat. You're a lunatic for believing that magic spray-on thermite destroyed the WTC. You're a coward for refusing to debate WAQ.
Game, set, match. You lose again, Brian.
UtterFail, James has no intention of keeping any promise to you because you are a girly asshole who lies and lies and whines and whines and whines. You're a pathetic twisted lunatic.
YES! Nothing is funnier than when Brian gets so upset he starts calling people "girls". That's just more evidence of what a hopeless lunatic you are, Brian.
So if I adhered to James's journalistic standards, I could write at my ScrewScrewLoose blog that "debunkers are posting that there are no 9/11 widows" because Ian says so.
Brian, stop lying. I never said there are no 9/11 widows. I said that you believe in invisible widows. Big difference.
If you had any principles liars like WAQo and Ian and MGF and DK would not be tolerated for a minute. But hey, if you banned all the liars then there'd be only me.
Poor Brian. He keeps getting pwn3d by all of us and he's VERY upset about it, so he throws all his devotion to free speech and democracy out the window in order to try to silence those who keep destroying him in arguments.
Hey Brian, has "meatball on a fork" been published in an engineering journal yet? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
Ian, you lie as usual. There's nothing magic about thermite. It's simple chemistry. WAQo is a waste of time, even JREF says so.
I never lied about Petgoat.
I didn't call UtterFail a girl, Ian. I called him a girly asshole. The fact that you don't know the difference tells us quite a lot about you.
You have repeatedly used the term "imaginary widows".
Ian, you lie as usual. There's nothing magic about thermite. It's simple chemistry.
Right, which is why I understand that it's ridiculous to think it destroyed the WTC towers.
I never lied about Petgoat.
So "meatball on a fork" is your model?
I didn't call UtterFail a girl, Ian.
False.
I called him a girly asshole.
See what I mean? You also said I post "girly spam" once. That's was truly hilarious.
The fact that you don't know the difference tells us quite a lot about you.
Squeal squeal squeal!
You have repeatedly used the term "imaginary widows".
False. I've used the term "invisible widows". The fact that you don't know the difference explains why you're so confused about 9/11.
Oh, on planet Ian a reaction must be complex to be powerful, and U --> Ka + Ba is just used for 4th of July sparklers.
You have repeatedly used the phrase "imaginary widows" as anyone who knows how to google can see, liar.
"Propaganda got us into two wars that are doing to us what the Afghan war did to the Soviet Union. Mission accomplished!"
So Libya and Uganda don't count? What about the Balkans? What about our operations in the Philippines, and Somalia?
That's 7 wars, dumbass. Show me the propoganda for Somalia? Show me the propoganda for Uganda?
You are so goddamned stupid.
You don't need propaganda for Somalia and Uganda, numbnuts. Once we're fighting in Afghanistan and Iraqw, nobody blinks an eye about that stuff. Most people never heard of that stuff.
WAQo, I know you're lying because what you say is not true and you have no right to believe it is.
Squealing like a stuffed pig, ain't ya?
WAQo, Dr. Sunder told NOVA the BUILDINGS fell in 9 seconds and 11 seconds. You make up your facts.
Sorry, but those FACTS are NIST Facts. Dr. Sunder admitted as evidence to the 9/11 Commission that it was the EXTERIOR PANELS that fell 9 seconds (WTC1) and 11 seconds (WTC2).
The NOVA interview IS NOT AN OFFICIAL REPORT.
The only person who makes up their facts with NOVA as an excuse is Brian. NOVA this, NOVA that, who fucking cares what NOVA says? I beleive Brian thinks that UFOs, Bigfoot & Lake Monsters exist because they're on NOVA.
And I remain undefeated in this debate with Brian.
He hasn't gone beyond the what NOVA claims and uses that as an excuse for "evidence".
WAQo is a waste of time, even JREF says so.
That's funny, I go to JREF almost on a daily basis and 've never seen a thread about me over there. Wow, talk about a huge lie! That one's a whopper, and I'm not talking about Burger King.
This comment has been removed by the author.
WAQo, you keep on lying. Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He said the buildings came down in 9 seconds and 11 seconds. That's not NOVA's claim, that's Sunder's claim. You don't know the difference between the quoter and the quotee.
You guys are incompetent. GutterBall thinks Richard Gage verifies the identity of software guys, and you think Dr. Sunder wrote the NIST FAQs. Both of yez just make stuff up.
You didn't get banned at JREF for gross stupidity?
Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels.
NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels...
Once again you lied Brian!
NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels...
Once again you lied Brian!
NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels...
Once again you lied Brian!
NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels...
Once again you lied Brian!
NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels...
Once again you lied Brian!
You don't know the difference between the quoter and the quotee.
I know the difference between the words "exterior panels" and "building" over on the NIST website.
Funny that you're calling the exterior panels: "buildings".
WAQo, how many times do I have to tell you: What Sunder told NOVA and what the FAQs say are two differemt things.
Do you eat your shit and flush your food?
You guys get so confused because you get your talking points from propaganda websites and you don't understand what you're saying.
WAQo, how many times do I have to tell you: What Sunder told NOVA and what the FAQs say are two differemt things.
Yeah, and NOVA documents Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, UFOs & Ghosts. And you believe that they exist because they said it on NOVA?
You still haven't told me anything, all I get out of you is: "LALALALALALALALALALALALA"
You guys get so confused because you get your talking points from propaganda websites and you don't understand what you're saying.
You should really get a rainbow wig, some make-up, baggy pants, a red nose, big red shoes & a bicycle horn.
http://www.truthaction.org/forum/
To try to make some sense of all this I went looking for verification of the seismic study the FAQs claim for the panels' fall time. I can't find anything in the report to support any study of the time--either of the panels as the FAQs claim or the towers as Dr. Sunder claims. - truebeleaguer (aka Brian Good)
Even Brian said about the panels and he admitted that he couldn't find evidence for the buildings falling @ 9 & 11 seconds.
Oh Brian, you got some 'splainin to do!
Brian's dirty secret: He lied about the buildings falling@ 9 & 11 seconds.
Read the post above! ^^^
Oh, on planet Ian a reaction must be complex to be powerful, and U --> Ka + Ba is just used for 4th of July sparklers.
So 4th of July sparklers are capable of demolishing skyscrapers? I never knew they were so dangerous! They need warning labels!
You have repeatedly used the phrase "imaginary widows" as anyone who knows how to google can see, liar.
False. I never said you believed in imaginary widows. I said you believed in invisible widows, which you do.
Brian had a retraining order out against him? Read below.
V
V
V
http://s3.invisionfree.com/CIT/ar/t1652.htm
"A. Marquis - February 28, 2011 03:41 AM (GMT)
Thanx Slice, I was just going to post that stuff. He is an infiltrator without a doubt in my mind-not deranged. He also goes by the name "truebeleaguer" and "snugbug". "Truebeleaguer" is self explanatory. "Snugbug" implies he is like a parasite that is deeply attached to it's host, completely infiltrated.
I mean the guy had a restraining order filed against him by a leading LA 9/11 Truth activist. This is what they do, stir shit up, cause infighting and cause doubt and confusion."
I meant "restraining".
More about Brian:
http://s3.invisionfree.com/CIT/ar/t1652.htm
"onesliceshort - February 28, 2011 01:36 PM (GMT)
He also goes by Punxatawney Barney (mainly at Youtube viciously attacking Willie Rodriguez) and chiming in like a big kid at TNLZ911's ad hom, racist videos against April Gallup, CIT and their supporters."
He's a racist too?
Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He said the buildings came down in 9 seconds and 11 seconds.
False.
WAQo, how many times do I have to tell you: What Sunder told NOVA and what the FAQs say are two differemt things.
Yes! You're just so stupid and ignorant and insane to accept which one is valid. I wouldn't expect anything less from a perverted liar like you.
You guys get so confused because you get your talking points from propaganda websites and you don't understand what you're saying.
Isn't it about time you called us "girls" again, Brian? You're obviously really upset that we keep laughing at you because WAQ has pwn3ed you yet again.
LMAO Brian was banned from another Truther forum.
http://s3.invisionfree.com/CIT/ar/t1652.htm
onesliceshort - February 28, 2011 03:25 AM (GMT)
Brian Good made thousands of posts in the 911Oz Pit arguing for the "SOC path". He was banned. Then "another" poster appeared calling himself "Watson" who spammed nearly a thousand posts arguing for the equally unfounded "NOC impact".
This turned out to be Brian Good too."
WAQ has pwn3ed you yet again.
Brian's going to say: "He hasn't pwned me, I pwned him because he's a liar."
Watch!
This comment has been removed by the author.
WAQo, it's not about NOVA, it's about what Dr. Sunder said. You really need to get an education.
Ian, you have repeatedly used the phrase "imaginary widows". You not only lie, you lie about your lies-- as anyone who knows how to google can see.
WAQo, I've never had a restraining order taken out against me. Aldo Marquis lies like Craig, like Barrett, like Ian, and like you.
WAQo, it's not about NOVA, it's about what Dr. Sunder said. You really need to get an education.
Yes, and Dr. Sunder said that the panels hit in 9 and 11 seconds. You should really learn how to read, Brian.
Ian, you have repeatedly used the phrase "imaginary widows". You not only lie, you lie about your lies-- as anyone who knows how to google can see.
False. Brian, I have repeatedly used the phrase "invisible widows" because you believe in them.
And I don't lie. You cannot name a single time that I have lied.
WAQo, I've never had a restraining order taken out against me. Aldo Marquis lies like Craig, like Barrett, like Ian, and like you.
I don't lie, Brian. I only point out truths about the WTC and truths about you, like the fact that you were banned from the truth movement.
Ian, you're lying. Dr. Sunder said nothing about panels.
Anybody can google "imaginary widows" with "Ian" and see that you have many times claimed the widows were imaginary. You lie about your lies.
On 9/11 I participated in all my local truth movement activities. I have not been banned from the 9/11 truth movement.
Ian, you're lying. Dr. Sunder said nothing about panels.
False.
Anybody can google "imaginary widows" with "Ian" and see that you have many times claimed the widows were imaginary. You lie about your lies.
False.
On 9/11 I participated in all my local truth movement activities. I have not been banned from the 9/11 truth movement.
False.
So it appears that all Brian can do is lie and call people "girls". No wonder the widows haven't had their questions answered after all these years!
Ian you lie, and lie and lie.
I have done a lot to educate y'all about 9/11. If you choose not to learn, it's your loss.
Ian you lie, and lie and lie.
False.
I have done a lot to educate y'all about 9/11. If you choose not to learn, it's your loss.
True. I've learned a lot about 9/11 from reputable sources just investigating the things you've babbled about. It's good to be better educated.
I've also learned a lot about mental illness while looking into what could possibly cause you to be such a hopeless trainwreck.
WAQo, it's not about NOVA, it's about what Dr. Sunder said. You really need to get an education.
But then again I'm not the one saying this and then contradicting myself:
I can't find anything in the report to support any study of the time--either of the panels as the FAQs claim or the towers as Dr. Sunder claims. - truebeleaguer (aka Brian Good)
WAQo, I've never had a restraining order taken out against me. Aldo Marquis lies like Craig, like Barrett, like Ian, and like you.
Read above you jackass, you're lying about the buildings and quote mining Dr. Sunders testimony.
wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2838
"No, 9/11 truth belongs to us, NOT the families"
Truebeleaguer (Brian Good yet again states the falsehood that, "We should ask 9/11 activists to acknowledge that 9/11 belongs to the families, not to us"
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=38334#38334
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
Even another Truther tels him he's wrong. LOL!
Meanwhile over @ the:
"Is science being used to reveal the truth about 9/11 or help conceal it?" Thread
@
http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com
"Don’t fret though- my experience with Brian “Watson” Good is that he will say ANYTHING (even self-contradictory things) so long as it is anti-CIT." - Mrboz February 18, 2011 at 1:44 pm
Directed to Brian:
"You’re quite the bundle of debunking energy all of the sudden, aren’t you? Your comment on Ms. Renaud is hardly worth responding to since you basically ignored the point. You subscribe to the idea that if you can’t prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that something in the official story is false, you shouldn’t question it at all. Nice tactic." - Craig McKee March 20, 2011 at 3:22 pm
WAQo, lazy minds (such as yours) tend to seek certainty and thus often see contradictions where there are none.
A Tale of Fake Truthers
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/3292
Describing Brian Good:
Once upon a time, a new poster appeared at a few 9/11 Truth discussion sites. He endeared himself to the regulars at one such board, despite the fact that he admitted to having just dropped out of high school, by toeing the fake truther party line about Muslims and LIHOP and Pentagon jets (oh my). Now he's not a truther at all, anymore -- being allegedly one of that vanishingly rare species, the ex-truther. He comments at the leading 9/11 debunker site.
And Brian lies about how other Truhers don't talk about him being allowed in the Truth Movement anymore because of his erratic behavior due to bipolar disorder.
WAQo, lazy minds (such as yours) tend to seek certainty and thus often see contradictions where there are none.
But then again my names isn't Brian Good, is it?
Go ahead and whine, I'll just bask knowing what I know about you & what other Truthers are going around talking about you.
There's nothing like googling the words "truebeleaguer brian good" and finding alot about you Brian.
Not only do I get to enjoy reading your pathetic attempts to discredit the Truth Movement by calling them a bunch of liars, I do get a kick out of watching you squirm like a worm in the hole you dug for yourself when they gang up on you and you run like the bitch that you truely are.
"Eyes on the Pentagon: new Toronto event independent of 9/11 hearings."
http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com
"No reasonable person can deny that it’s possible and that they might be highly motivated to prank a couple of pesky assholes from California." - Brian Good August 27, 2011 at 6:50 pm
I'm very glad that you called yourself an asshole.
So, you've got nothing to counter me with Brian?
I just humiliated the hell out of you and made you eat your own words. Feels good to be caught lying, doesn't it?
WAQo, it seems you can't distinguish me from Arcterus.
You humiliate yourself and you're too dumb to know it.
WAQo, it seems you can't distinguish me from Arcterus.
Because you are Arcterus, other Truthers mention you are.
You humiliate yourself and you're too dumb to know it.
So says the lying prick who thinks he can get away with saying that Dr. Sunder said about the buildings then coming up with this hell of a gem:
"I can't find anything in the report to support any study of the time--either of the panels as the FAQs claim or the towers as Dr. Sunder claims. - truebeleaguer (aka Brian Good)"
So now you guys are down to posting incoherent nonsense in the hopes that someone reading it will say "I don't know what he's talking about, but it sure sounds bad!"
So now you guys are down to posting incoherent nonsense in the hopes that someone reading it will say "I don't know what he's talking about, but it sure sounds bad!"
Squeal piggy, SQUEAL!
No, I don't like that game. Haven't you got a still to tend?
No, I don't like that game. Haven't you got a still to tend?
Haven't you noticed that you're bouncing back & forth from one thread to another to get way from the truth of what I said?
Truth hurts when your own words are put against you, doesn't it?
Only the truth hurts, and you better learn how to read, Jethro.
Only the truth hurts, and you better learn how to read, Jethro.
The truth certainly hurts. The only thing that gives Brian's empty life meaning is the delusion that magic thermite elves destroyed the WTC on orders from Dick Cheney. That's why he fights tooth and nail against any facts that contradict that fantasy, and that's why he babbles about the day when the truth movement will win and us "girls" will be laughed at like he is now.
Try some facts, Ian.
Try some facts, Ian.
OK.
Fact: after 10 years, "meatball on a fork" still hasn't been published in an engineering journal.
Fact: after 10 years, the "widows" have not had their "questions" answered.
Fact: after 10 years, there still hasn't been a new investigation.
And the reason for all these facts is that there is no factual basis for all the absurd "truther" theories out there, and that only a tiny fringe of hopeless liars and lunatics like yourself still cling to them.
Truth hurts, Brian. Now go and squeal and call us all "girls".
Ian, why would you expect "meatball on a fork" to be published in an engineering journal? It's trivial and axiomatic.
No one is claiming that the widows' questions have been answered. What's with the "scare quotes"? You think they're not widows?
No one is claiming that there has been a new investigation.
These are silly facts and they have nothing to do with your proposition that magic thermite elves did or did not destroy the WTC on orders from Dick Cheney.
You make no sense.
Ian, why would you expect "meatball on a fork" to be published in an engineering journal?
I wouldn't, because it's absurd. You, however, told Democratic Underground to expect drawings like your scribbles to appear in a journal someday. Then the other posters there laughed at you much as we do here.
It's trivial and axiomatic.
Brian, you should learn what words mean. Neither "trivial" nor "axiomatic" are synonyms for "idiotic" or "insane" or "unintentionally hilarious".
No one is claiming that the widows' questions have been answered.
Thanks for proving my point. You've FAILED. HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
What's with the "scare quotes"? You think they're not widows?
Nobody cares if they're widows.
No one is claiming that there has been a new investigation.
Another TOTAL FAILURE. Did you read that, Brian? You've FAILED. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
These are silly facts and they have nothing to do with your proposition that magic thermite elves did or did not destroy the WTC on orders from Dick Cheney.
Brian, I'm not the one who believes in magic thermite elves. You do. Learn to read your own posts.
You make no sense.
There's the squealing that I was waiting for. Thanks Brian!
I never expected scribbles to be published in a journal. Why would I expect such a stupid thing? Where do you get these goofy ideas?
We haven't failed. We're just getting started.
The widows care that they're widows, and the widows are somebody--except to narcissistic sociopaths like you to whom nobody is anybody.
We haven't failed. There will be new investigations--it's just a matter of time. It's already become commonplace in mainstream media to hear claims that the Pakistani ISI is backing Taliban. Truthers knew all about this way back in 2005, but it was regarded as a loony conspiracy theory. As computers get more powerful, modeling the collapses of the three skyscrapers will get to be very popular in engineering schools--and eventually on home computers as well.
Where do you get the idea that I believe in magic elves, Ian? I leave girly stuff like that to girly guys like you.
I never expected scribbles to be published in a journal. Why would I expect such a stupid thing? Where do you get these goofy ideas?
You tell me, Brian. You're the lunatic who comes up with this stuff.
We haven't failed. We're just getting started.
After 10 years? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
The widows care that they're widows, and the widows are somebody--except to narcissistic sociopaths like you to whom nobody is anybody.
Nobody cares about your "widows".
We haven't failed. There will be new investigations--it's just a matter of time.
Yup, just a matter of time. I bet they'll re-open the Lincoln assassination too.
It's already become commonplace in mainstream media to hear claims that the Pakistani ISI is backing Taliban.
Holy shit! Next thing you'll tell me is that the US was backing the Shah of Iran! I'm shocked!
Truthers knew all about this way back in 2005, but it was regarded as a loony conspiracy theory.
Such a loony conspiracy theory that Ahmed Shah Masood knew about it BEFORE 9/11!!! OMFG, INSIDE JOB!!!111
As computers get more powerful, modeling the collapses of the three skyscrapers will get to be very popular in engineering schools--and eventually on home computers as well.
Yup, and I'm guessing the WTC collapse app on my iPhone 7 won't account for magic thermite sprayed on by invisible elevator repairmen.
Where do you get the idea that I believe in magic elves, Ian? I leave girly stuff like that to girly guys like you.
And there it is: calling us "girls". What a finish to this masterpiece of babbling lunacy!
Thank you, Brian. I know you'll always come up with new stuff for me to laugh at.
Hey Brian, have the widows had their questions answered yet?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!
Keep it up, Ian! You do a great job of making debunkers look idiotic.
Keep it up, Ian! You do a great job of making debunkers look idiotic.
Brian, you didn't answer my question. I'm going to tell Laurie Van Auken that you're not answering questions and it's going to make her cry. You should be ashamed of yourself!
I love you, Brian. If you didn't exist, someone would have to invent you. You're just that absurdly entertaining.
I know you do, Ian. That's why you act exactly like an eight-year-old girl who is desperately seeking male attention.
I know you do, Ian. That's why you act exactly like an eight-year-old girl who is desperately seeking male attention.
Calling us "girls" again. Poor Brian, he's so upset that we just use him for our amusement here.
Well, at least we haven't banned you like all the truther sites have.
Once again showing you don't know how to read, girlyguy.
Only the truth hurts, and you better learn how to read, Jethro.
Is Mr. Piggy squealing because he had a mud bath today?
We haven't failed. We're just getting started.
Don't give us that "run before you walk" shit.
Once again showing you don't know how to read, girlyguy.
Ever heard the word "PEDOPHILE"?
Sure, it's someone who has a thing about feet.
Sure, it's someone who has a thing about feet.
When you were a baby, you went into the Crack Baby Olympics, didn't ya?
When you were a baby, you went into the Crack Baby Olympics, didn't ya?
I remember once that Brian was babbling about the evil government conspiracy that is corn syrup and I thought to myself, "It's too bad Brian's parents didn't use corn syrup to sweeten his cereal when he was a kid. It appears they used lead paint chips."
Watch out Ian, those paint chips might be unreacted nano super dooper thermite.
I bet if we ignited Brian, he'll be shitting hot molten iron out his ass, but that ain't the Hersey squirts he's got.
Well at least WAQo doesn't talk like an 8-year-old girl. He talks like an 8-year-old boy instead.
There will be new investigations--it's just a matter of time. It's already become commonplace in mainstream media to hear claims that the Pakistani ISI is backing Taliban. Truthers knew all about this way back in 2005, but it was regarded as a loony conspiracy theory. As computers get more powerful, modeling the collapses of the three skyscrapers will get to be very popular in engineering schools--and eventually on home computers as well.
There will be new investigations--it's just a matter of time. It's already become commonplace in mainstream media to hear claims that the Pakistani ISI is backing Taliban. Truthers knew all about this way back in 2005, but it was regarded as a loony conspiracy theory. As computers get more powerful, modeling the collapses of the three skyscrapers will get to be very popular in engineering schools--and eventually on home computers as well.
Brian, you already posted this dumbspam, and we already mocked you for it. Try posting something else, OK?
Post a Comment
<< Home