Friday, July 06, 2012

More Truther Related Bomb Threats?

This time in Vancouver BC.  I will let this speak for itself.


51 Comments:

At 06 July, 2012 20:56, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

The sign reminds me of "Puppet Show & Spinal Tap"

 
At 07 July, 2012 08:41, Blogger snug.bug said...

James, you already reported on the bomb threats at least two weeks ago, and I don't see that this offers anything new.

Can't you find anything else to report about? How about an analysis of the debate between Richard Gage and Dave Thomas on WBNF radio?

 
At 07 July, 2012 09:32, Blogger James B. said...

You are aware that Seattle and Vancouver are two entirely different cities, right? In two different countries even.

With savvy intellects like you, it is amazing that the 9/11 truth movement hasn't blown this conspiracy wide open already...

 
At 07 July, 2012 13:08, Blogger SnowCrash said...

I have a better idea. Why don't you write about Pat Curley's Atta-Hussein conspiracy theory?

You are against conspiracy theories are you not?

 
At 07 July, 2012 16:04, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

I have a better idea. Why don't you write about Pat Curley's Atta-Hussein conspiracy theory?

Nobody here has ever made such an assertion, to my knowledge. Feel free to prove me wrong. (By "prove me wrong" I mean "show me where somebody makes the assertion", not the jimd3100 procedure of pasting several dozen links and expecting the reader to connect the same dots you do.)

 
At 08 July, 2012 03:19, Blogger Goat Fucker's Advocate said...

James, there is no depth to my shallowness!

Can't you find anything else to retort about? How about an analysis of the widow's 23,987,420 questions?

For example, (i) if there is no sound in a vacuum, why are vacuum cleaners so loud?

(ii) What is a sperm bank?

(iii) Why do men like the Three Stooges, while women do not?

(iv) What is liquid paper made out of?

(v) If curiosity killed the cat, what about college students?

(vi) How does a three-way light bulb work?

Unlike my short career in "maintenance engineering," the widow's 23,987,420 questions will not go away.

Your erroneous belief that I'm anything other than an insane sex predator with boundary issues exposes your crippled epistemology.

Silly gurl.


Internet--the final frontier. The gobbledegook you're about to read are the lies and obsessions of The Goat Fucker's Advocate. My ten-year mission: to explore new methods of deception; to seek out and formulate new logical fallacies; to boldly go where no Internet troll has gone before.

 
At 08 July, 2012 09:02, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 08 July, 2012 09:03, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 08 July, 2012 09:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

James, since I didn't actually read the "Seattle" article, I didn't notice that the was literally about Seattle. I thought you were referring loosely to Vancouver. It appears that nobody in the truth movement is paying attention and you're pretty much the only one to care. Does anybody know how many attendees there were in Vancouver? The lack of youtube videos suggests that the organizers would like to just forget the whole thing ever happened.

 
At 08 July, 2012 14:39, Blogger Ian said...

You are aware that Seattle and Vancouver are two entirely different cities, right? In two different countries even.

Kevin Barrett is traveling to Washington State right now to investigate the rumors that there is a city called Vancouver right there in your home state, James. It's probably a disinfo campaign by the NWO that is responsible for people believing Vancouver is in Canada.

 
At 08 July, 2012 14:42, Blogger Ian said...

James, since I didn't actually read the "Seattle" article, I didn't notice that the was literally about Seattle. I thought you were referring loosely to Vancouver. It appears that nobody in the truth movement is paying attention and you're pretty much the only one to care. Does anybody know how many attendees there were in Vancouver? The lack of youtube videos suggests that the organizers would like to just forget the whole thing ever happened.

Brian, the truth movement is dead, which is why nobody attends anything related to 9/11 truth, in Vancouver or not.

Anyway, let's talk about more important things, like how you're a mentally ill unemployed janitor who ran away squealing and crying when Willie Rodriguez challenged you to a debate.

 
At 08 July, 2012 14:46, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you employ the Bushbot's (and Barrett's) technique of lies you can claim are failed attempts at humor.

Poor Barrett was forced to explain to US Marshals that his threats against a federal judge were an unfunny attempt to satirize himself.

 
At 08 July, 2012 14:58, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you employ the Bushbot's (and Barrett's) technique of lies you can claim are failed attempts at humor.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Poor Barrett was forced to explain to US Marshals that his threats against a federal judge were an unfunny attempt to satirize himself.

Nobody cares about Barrett except you, and that's because you're a pathetic lunatic who believes in invisible widows with "questions".

 
At 08 July, 2012 16:26, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, your asinine and insane claims that the widows are invisible and have no questions are very damaging to the integrity of the owners of this blog.

 
At 08 July, 2012 17:45, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, your asinine and insane claims that the widows are invisible and have no questions are very damaging to the integrity of the owners of this blog.

Note that Brian just posts squealspam here, and doesn't actually present any evidence that a) the widows are visible, or b) that they have questions.

That's what I expected from a failed janitor who lives with his parents.

 
At 08 July, 2012 19:33, Blogger Len said...

Both the letter were obvious "inside jobs".

1) Neither event was cancelled thus endangering all involved.

2) Cui Bomo

As for truthers facing risks Jim Hoffman said he was more threatened by rival truthers than proponets of the "OCT". Also the death rate in the US and other industrialized countries is about 1%/year thus about 10% of those who were truthers in 2002 and 5% of those who were truthers in 2007 should be dead, but I've only heard of a few of them dying off, they seem to have a LOWER mortality rate than the general population.

 
At 08 July, 2012 20:56, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

The bigger conspiracy is how much Vancouver is like Seattle. It's almost as if the Canadians have a plan to either absorb Seattle, or somehow replace the entire city.

I mean it's almost exactly like America only with healthcare, and colored money.

 
At 08 July, 2012 21:13, Blogger Billman said...

People who have no integrity (i.e. troofers, and Brian) do not get to make any judgements about the integrity of others.

 
At 09 July, 2012 08:19, Blogger snug.bug said...

People who opine on the integrity of others have the obligation to state specifics. I do.

Call me old fashioned, but I think it is the height of hypocrisy for the owners of a blog that claims to be out to expose lies about 9/11 tolerate a poster (e.g., Ian) who spams the comments with obvious lies about 9/11 (i.e. the widows are invisible, the widows have no questions).

Billman, I won't ask you to back up your claim that I have no integrity, because I don't think you have the analytical or verbal skill to write a reply worth reading.

 
At 09 July, 2012 09:28, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

Obvious inside job. Investigate Kevin Blakenly!

 
At 09 July, 2012 11:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

You're jumping to conclusions.
How do you know it wasn't a false flag op designed to look like an inside job?

 
At 09 July, 2012 11:44, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

How do you know it wasn't a false flag op designed to look like an inside job, which was designed to look like another false flag?

THE POSSIBILITIES ARE LIMITLESS!

 
At 09 July, 2012 11:54, Blogger Billman said...

People who opine on the integrity of others have the obligation to state specifics.

Says you, but makes sense. If someone calls you out on something, you should be able to ask them for specifics. Agreed.

Call me old fashioned, but I think it is the height of hypocrisy for the owners of a blog that claims to be out to expose lies about 9/11 tolerate a poster (e.g., Ian) who spams the comments with obvious lies about 9/11 (i.e. the widows are invisible, the widows have no questions).

However, they tolerate you, and Arhoolie/Pat Cowardly/Scootle, and Jon Gold, most of whom only come in here to troll, and ignore anything else that does not comform to thier view of what happened on 9/11. I don't know of any other place where "freedom" to comment is allowed in a 9/11 discussion. Unfortunately, that means trolls are a side effect. You borderline on full-on troll in nearly every thread simply to derail the topic at hand, and you enjoy it.

Billman, I won't ask you to back up your claim that I have no integrity, because I don't think you have the analytical or verbal skill to write a reply worth reading.

Says you. So what's the worst case scenario I'm supposed to draw from this comment? "Oh no.. Brian Good wants me to back up my claim when I say his intregrity is lacking, or he's gonna not feel my comments are worth reading. How terrible." Plenty of people here in the comments bring up your less than stellar (and well documented by the internet) past, daily, in EVERY thread. So my work proving you have no integrity has been done, repeatedly, in this thread already. One merely has to type "Brian Good" into Google.

 
At 09 July, 2012 13:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

Billman, what makes you think people lying about me places doubt on my integrity?

Thanks for proving my prediction that your faulty powers of analysis would make your response not worth reading.

 
At 09 July, 2012 16:20, Blogger Ian said...

Call me old fashioned, but I think it is the height of hypocrisy for the owners of a blog that claims to be out to expose lies about 9/11 tolerate a poster (e.g., Ian) who spams the comments with obvious lies about 9/11 (i.e. the widows are invisible, the widows have no questions).

Typical bushbot tactic. Brian wants my free speech rights taken away because he can't handle what I'm saying.

Why are you so afraid of the truth, Brian?

Billman, I won't ask you to back up your claim that I have no integrity, because I don't think you have the analytical or verbal skill to write a reply worth reading.

Poor Brian. He's been humiliated again so he just starts squealing.

Thanks for proving my prediction that your faulty powers of analysis would make your response not worth reading.

Brian, you have no point. You're a failed janitor who believes in magic thermite elves. You were expelled from the truth movement for being a lunatic sex stalker who tried to wreck Carol Brouillet's marriage. Also, you're a pathetic liar who squeals and cries every time someone calls you "petgoat".

 
At 09 July, 2012 16:39, Blogger anonymous said...

It appears that nobody in the truth movement is paying attention and you're pretty much the only one to care.

Not true. The FBI and police care very much. Google this line of text:
Detective Kerry Hays of the Seattle Police Department is currently investigating the case.

This image is pure lulz.

Cant' wait til they nail the bitch.

 
At 09 July, 2012 18:24, Blogger ComradeAgopian said...

20 dollars says the dork on the vid , wrote the letter .

 
At 09 July, 2012 21:15, Blogger anonymous said...

I'll double that.

 
At 10 July, 2012 01:46, Blogger snug.bug said...

Wow, anonymous! Is Kerry Hays in the truth movement?

 
At 10 July, 2012 02:11, Blogger Dylan Unsavery said...

Scumbag Barrett writes on the Press TV website:

This time, the threat named me and Press TV Canadian correspondent Joshua Blakeney as well as Dr. Fetzer. Fortunately, the theater owner was too busy hosting the event to read his email, so he did not become aware of the threat until the Hearings were over.

Two points: Firstly, scumbags and brave troofseekers Barrett and Blakeney have no problem working for the English language propaganda broadcasting arm of one of the most oppressive regimes in the world. Secondly, they need to get their story straight. It was a handwritten note, not an email, Barrett.

 
At 10 July, 2012 02:13, Blogger snug.bug said...

How do you know it wasn't a handwritten note AND an email?

 
At 10 July, 2012 02:44, Blogger Dylan Unsavery said...

Beacause if there was an email, scumbag Blakeney would be waving it around on YouTube.

 
At 10 July, 2012 04:35, Blogger Ian said...

How do you know it wasn't a handwritten note AND an email?

Yeah, just like the WTC was destroyed by invisible magic thermite AND invisible, silent explosives!

 
At 10 July, 2012 09:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

DU, how do you know what somebody would do? Maybe the theater owner deleted it. Maybe the FBI demanded that they keep it quiet, because making the exact wording of the threat public would inhibit their investigation. You guys have a habit of thinking you know things you don't.

 
At 10 July, 2012 14:42, Blogger anonymous said...

Wow, anonymous! Is Kerry Hays in the truth movement?

Not likely. I don't understand the point of your question.


Blakeney have no problem working for the English language propaganda broadcasting arm of one of the most oppressive regimes in the world. Secondly, they need to get their story straight. It was a handwritten note, not an email, Barrett.

Exactly. Pure hilarity.

DU, how do you know what somebody would do? Maybe the theater owner deleted it.

Or maybe it's a clue that Barrett was in on the scam, the original plan involved an email and he forgot to update his story.

Maybe the FBI demanded that they keep it quiet, because making the exact wording of the threat public would inhibit their investigation.

If so, they've fucked that up by making everything else so public everyone is weighing in.

This forum points out how moving the event down the street and telling everyone online didn't make it any safer.

This blog shows the threats at both events are written the same way, therefore probably by the same person:

1st threat: Kill Jim Fetzer and the 9/11 truth movement. Kill Jim Fetzer (repeated 6 times). Kill University Heights Community Center (repeated twice)

2nd threat: The attack can be a Bomb or Fire Bomb
at a later date to pay you back for
supporting the 9/11 truth movement.
Kill Jim Fetzer and the 9/11 truthers!
Kill Kevin Barrett and every muslim!

Kill Jim Fetzer Kill Kevin Barrett
Kill Jim Fetzer Kill Kevin Barrett
Kill Denman Theatre


If we can figure out it's the same loser, the cops will.

 
At 10 July, 2012 18:04, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Kill Denman Theatre

Interesting that the writer uses the British spelling of "theater". Where's Blakeney from again?

 
At 10 July, 2012 18:28, Blogger anonymous said...

You might have something:

Where's Blakeney from again?

Thought it was Canada; but it's the UK. From his website:

Joshua Blakeney is a journalist and activist originally from Surrey, UK living in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Was also pointed out elsewhere it looks like feminine handwriting.Does Blakenley have a girlfriend? How many UK truther chicks went to both Fetzer's speech AND the hearings?

Actually anyone who went to the Fetzer event AND the hearings should be considered suspect.

 
At 11 July, 2012 03:17, Blogger Dylan Unsavery said...

DU, how do you know what somebody would do?

Brian, I know everything. Correction:there are a couple of things I don't know.

1)Were you banned by Troofaction?

2)Who put the ram in the ramalamdingdong?


If you could help me with those, I'd be obliged.

 
At 11 July, 2012 09:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

So you know what Blakeney would do because you know everything. Thanks for demonstrating your crippled epistemology.

 
At 11 July, 2012 11:17, Blogger Dylan Unsavery said...

I wasn't angling for a 'crippled epistemology' from you Brian, but now I have one I'm well pleased. I'll return it to Cass Sunstein when I'm finished with it.

And I've thought of something else I don't know. Whatever happened to Boris Epstein?

 
At 11 July, 2012 19:38, Blogger Ian said...

So you know what Blakeney would do because you know everything. Thanks for demonstrating your crippled epistemology.

It's kind of the opposite of you, Brian, as you know absolutely nothing. That's why you're dumb enough to think that the "widows" have "questions".

 
At 11 July, 2012 23:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I know some things. I'm also smart enough to be able to recognize what I do not know.

The widows gave 300 questions to the 9/11 Commission. That's a fact. They claim they only got 27 answers. That's another fact.

 
At 12 July, 2012 04:43, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I know some things. I'm also smart enough to be able to recognize what I do not know.

False. You're obviously too stupid and insane to know how stupid, insane, and ignorant you are. That's why you babble hilariously about Newton's laws of physics even though what you think you "know" about them would get you an "F" in high school physics.

The widows gave 300 questions to the 9/11 Commission. That's a fact. They claim they only got 27 answers. That's another fact.

Nobody cares.

 
At 12 July, 2012 07:57, Blogger snug.bug said...

The wiodows care. And unlike you, they're somebody.

 
At 12 July, 2012 08:08, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 July, 2012 15:49, Blogger Ian said...

The wiodows care. And unlike you, they're somebody.

False.

Anyway, enough talk about your "widows". Has you "meatball on a fork" model been published in a journal of engineering yet?

 
At 12 July, 2012 19:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

You lie about the widows.

 
At 12 July, 2012 21:37, Blogger Ian said...

You lie about the widows.

False.

Anyway, Brian, I asked you a question about your "meatball on a fork" model, and you did not answer. What do you think Laurie Van Auken would say if she knew you weren't answering questions?

 
At 12 July, 2012 21:50, Blogger snug.bug said...

You lie about the widows, and you lie about lying about the widows.

Nobody cares about the meatball model because that's what should have happened, and the videos show that's not what happened.

 
At 13 July, 2012 06:48, Blogger Ian said...

You lie about the widows, and you lie about lying about the widows.

Nobody cares about your "widows".

Nobody cares about the meatball model because that's what should have happened, and the videos show that's not what happened.

If that's what "should have happened", then how come no scientists or engineers have submitted it to a journal? How come the only person who thinks that's what should have happened is a mentally ill unemployed janitor?

The answer, of course, is "meatball on a fork" is not what should have happened, as anyone who passed high school physics could tell you. Obviously, you were sniffing glue during high school physics, which probably contributed to you failing out of San Jose State, and your current existence of calling people "girls" on the internet all day.

 
At 13 July, 2012 10:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, 17,000 people have signed a petition of solidarity with the widows. How many have signed your "I don't care about the widows" petition?

Obviously you care about the widows. You have devoted many hours over several years to claiming you don't care about them. That sounds like an obsession to me.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home