David L. Griscom Wins A Debate--Against Himself!
Hosted by Holocaust Denier Kevin Barrett, and with a prize donated by... wait for that one.
Okay, so Barrett and Griscom, two of the slimiest toads in Trooferdom set up a debate challenge.
Griscom, known mostly to us as the guy who posits that all or most of the passengers on the four doomed flights are living it up in Tahiti with handsome Swiss bank accounts, offered to debate anybody who had an a$$hole index of at least 50.
Since Griscom is the only person who has pinned the meter on that particular index, it turns out that nobody else qualified.
But it gets better, much better. Griscom appeared on Barrett's radio program to accept his major award, during which he gave his physics evidence:
He's a typical drooling senile troofer; I particularly like that his strongest "evidence" wrt WTC-7 includes the fact that it came down into its own footprint (absurd I know) while his strongest evidence on the Twin Towers includes that "beams" (really columns) were ejected hundreds of feet outside their footprints.
Perhaps even better is that the debate offered a $1000 prize (to be donated to the charity of the winner's choice) . Given that the judges were those buffoons who actually listen to Kevin Barrett's radio show, I have little hope that even if they had waived the a$$hole index requirement, that any debunker could win.
But better still is who put up the money. It turns out to be ANETA, which stands for Association for 9-11 Truth Awareness, run by Rick Shaddock, Looks like it's a serious lobbying firm, on K Street in DC no less, the address for major national lobbying firms. But of course it's just some frigging drop box for letters.
Shaddock came to our attention about four years back; he was one of those experimenters who have provided us with much amusement. His experiment was to drop a concrete block on another concrete block from five stories up to "prove" that the concrete could not have been pulverized on 9-11.
Shaddock appears to be a big-time phony himself, as pointed out by Muc at JREF.
There is the Rick Shaddock we (barely) know who, according to his Linkedin profile, did a Master in Education at the "Maharishi University of Management" (with a thesis on "Critical Thinking, Open-Mindedness, and EEG Coherence in Meditating Students"), a BS in Computer Science at Colgate University and an "online course for developing and managing real estate" at Trump University.
Then there is (or better: was) a Dr. Rick Shaddock with a similar looking resume who, in 1984, also did a Ph.D. in Computer Science at the obscure "Central International University" in Los Angeles (dissertation: Relational database management training methodologies - not available anywhere). Actually the university is so obscure that you can only find it in a number of business listings, most of which point to a "Ste 530" (a PO Box, I guess) in an office building at Wilshire Blvd. It also has another address at 1000 University Manor, Fairfield, Iowa which - and now it's getting entertaining - is also the address of a PO Box of Rick Shaddock's CI Corp. What are the odds? I bet the telephone number of the university - if it still exists - leads to an answering service. At one point they even had a rather crappy and fake looking web site, which linked to an apparently never realized alumni site whose domain was coincidentally registered over Shaddock's "Cosmic Internet Registration".
Need a Ph.D.? Just make up your own university.
There's a third Dr. Shaddock who finished his Ph.D. in the same year as the above (1984) at the equally obscure California Technical University. Actually I can only find a high school by that name, and it appears to be defunct.
There also is another Shaddock who did his Ph.D. at "C.I.T.", which I guess is supposed to create the impression that the university was Caltech.
And there's the lab coat wearing computer scientist (Frede-)Rick Shaddock who did his Ph.D. at Westmar University in Iowa, also in 1984.
There's the 1997 version of Rick Shaddock who was a "PhD candidate in Computer Science" at an unnamed institution. The 1998 Shaddock who had finished his Ph.D. in Computer Science. The year 2001 Shaddock who was currently working on his "PhD dissertation in Computer Science" (title: Database management methodologies, and EEG brain wave correlates - not available anywhere). The 2002 Shaddock who finally had earned back his Ph.D. - institution still unknown. And the 2014 Shaddock who is currently working on a Ph.D ... again (see above quote).
6 Comments:
Kevin Barrett, WTC 7, and pulverized concrete in one post. Batten down the hatches, men. We're about to get hit by a hurricane of stoopid spam from Brian Good. Few things get him babbling and raving more than Barrett, WTC 7, or concrete.
I guess it will be like the old days when Brian's heart was still in 9/11 truth and he's post hundreds of pages of spam about his 9/11 delusions. Now he barely posts anything out of fear of being mocked over and over again for it. It's a shame.
Shaddock is a self-confessed ex-Marine and military contractor. That would be grounds for revoking his Troofer card, if Troofers played by consistent rules.
I post here very little, Ian, because the site is obviously very thinly trafficked, and because youse guys don't give me much to work with.
Y'all very carefully avoid raising any actual issues and concentrate on gossip instead. And fashion tips.
Of course this site is thinly trafficked. 9/11 truth is dead and has been dead for years. You just can't accept it because you have nothing else going for you. You have no job, no friends, no family, no normal interests. All you do all day is post hysterical spam all over the internet about your obsession with magic thermite elves, invisible widows, and Willie Rodriguez. Hell, you're so pathetic and homosexually obsessed with Rodriguez that you have two Youtube IDs that you use to post spam: "punxsutawneybarney" and "truetruther".
Also, why would we give you anything to work with. You're the one who believes that the Bush administration blew up the WTC with invisible silent explosives and magic spray-on thermite. The rest of us are, uh, skeptical of such claims and want evidence. Your evidence is.....widows with "questions". Nothing significant has changed on this front for over 5 years. There's nothing to debunk, so we choose mockery instead.
Also, I apologize for being busy with my normal life this weekend, which left me unable to humiliate you. I was busy doing wedding prep stuff. You wouldn't know anything about that, since you haven't gotten laid in about 4 decades, and your attempt to get Carol Brouillet to leave her husband for you went about as well as your attempt to get "meatball on a fork" published in a journal (or about as well as your last attempt to get a decent haircut).
Post a Comment
<< Home