Moron the No-757 Hit the Pentagon Nonsense

It just never ends:

From the beginning, the official 9/11 Pentagon story caused cognitive dissonance, since the visual evidence suggests that nothing as big as a 757 could have hit the outside wall of the Pentagon and disappeared even more completely than the planes that hit the World Trade Center, where they burned until the WTC collapsed around them. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

The alternative stories posit a missile or specially rigged small plane hitting the Pentagon. There is no known physical evidence to support such stories. According to Snopes.com (as of April 2008), these stories are false. Much of the evidence collected by government investigators remains secret. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Even a determined debunker of 9/11 skeptics, while laying out a coherent argument that the official 9/11 Pentagon story is true (and conflating physical evidence with photography), ends up concluding:

"In this essay I asked what conclusions about the Pentagon attack were supported by physical evidence – primarily post-crash photographs of the site. I found that, in every aspect I considered, this evidence comports with the crash of a Boeing 757. At the same time, the evidence does not conclusively prove that the aircraft was a 757, much less that it was Flight 77. However, that lack of conclusiveness should not be surprising given the systematic suppression of evidence by authorities."

As you can probably guess, that "determined debunker of 9/11 skeptics" is anything but.  It's Jim Hoffman, whom we last heard from proposing that the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center was accomplished with explosive ceiling tiles.

As usual, the comments are even more ridiculous; it's like being in a time warp back to 2006:

The videos of those three buildings coming down make it 'obviously obvious,' even to a brain damaged individual, such as myself that it was a controlled demolition; carefully planned and executed by high level individuals. Their only mistake, as far as I can see, was to make the fall so clean and perfect; or maybe they wanted to intimidate and terrorize and cow us into submission and passive acquiescence by shoving the facts in our faces.
On the other hand, maybe they were more interested in avoiding "collateral damage" as they didn't want to damage their buddies' buildings.

Yeah, it's amazing

how little

collateral damage

there was.

Note as well the comments that are voted up and down; not too hard to guess that William Boardman's theories on the Pentagon are popular with the readers there, despite the fact that the supposedly responsible Troofers have all disavowed the no-757 at the Pentagon theories.