Tuesday, July 11, 2006

It All Makes Sense



When you read this page.

55 Comments:

At 11 July, 2006 11:36, Blogger Cassiopeia said...

Well, it's bloody convincing stuff. Case closed I'd say.

 
At 11 July, 2006 12:01, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like, hey man I mean , like that's an awful lot of reading to do.

I just want to know where the pods went.

 
At 11 July, 2006 12:02, Blogger James B. said...

Wow, I didn't know Laura Bush made sex toy commercials. I always suspected those libarians had a wild side though.

 
At 11 July, 2006 12:59, Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 11 July, 2006 13:00, Blogger Unknown said...

Scott Adams is in on the conspiracy to... by denying it....

Here

 
At 11 July, 2006 13:21, Blogger default.xbe said...

well of course its not a secret society running the world, Dogbert runs it all on his own :)

 
At 11 July, 2006 16:44, Blogger CHF said...

On a seperate note....

anyone care to guess how long it takes the CTers to blame today's Bombai carnage on the CIA or the Jews?

I mean we all know that Muslim suicide bombers are Jews and that 9/11 was pulled off by the Jews, and that terrorism is just something drempt up by Bush to scare us, so....

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:01, Blogger shawn said...

The Shield of David + Swastika is the most disgusting symbol ever.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:12, Blogger roger_sq said...

On a seperate note....

anyone care to guess how long it takes the CTers to blame today's Bombai carnage on the CIA or the Jews?


Not nearly as fast as the muppets implicated Al Qaeda. It's amazing how they have absolutely no fucking idea what is going on, until 3 hours after something happens, then they know exactly who was behind it. It;s like magic... or bullshit?

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:14, Blogger roger_sq said...

The Shield of David + Swastika is the most disgusting symbol ever.

That's the next crop circle I am going to make.

From my SPACESHIP.

You gullible nitwit you.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:14, Blogger shawn said...

Not nearly as fast as the muppets implicated Al Qaeda. It's amazing how they have absolutely no fucking idea what is going on, until 3 hours after something happens, then they know exactly who was behind it. It;s like magic... or bullshit?


Never heard of an MO, dumbass?

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:14, Blogger shawn said...

You gullible nitwit you.

Irony alert.

Back and to the left, roger.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:20, Blogger shawn said...

The funniest part is al-Qaeda hasn't been blamed, Lashkar-e-Toiba was.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:45, Blogger roger_sq said...

really!

Type "lashkar al qaeda" into google news and then say that again please.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:46, Blogger CHF said...

Who's blamed Al Qaeda, roger? Do tell.

I've heard people suggest Kashmir-based Islamic militants (a pretty solid guess), but not Al Qaeda.

Just voices in your head again, dude.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:59, Blogger shawn said...

really!

Type "lashkar al qaeda" into google news and then say that again please.


Do you have any working brain cells?

They're connected. Islamic terror groups tend to be.

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:08, Blogger roger_sq said...

Ah, the mind of the bootlicking suberviant class hard at work.

"Nobody is blaming Al Qaeda!"

Um.

"Of course Al Qaeda is involved!They all talk on the phone! It's a conspiracy!"

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:11, Blogger shawn said...

Ah, the mind of the bootlicking suberviant class hard at work.

"Nobody is blaming Al Qaeda!"

Um.

"Of course Al Qaeda is involved!They all talk on the phone! It's a conspiracy!"


God, you idiots with your "omg u sheep/zombies/mindless mass" argument. It just makes you look worse.

So this Muslim supremicist group gets the blame and it's everyone blaming al-Qaeda?

And why do you continue to ignore your own stupid ideas and brush them off with some insult of someone else? (Next time don't mention defected KGB agents before saying if you agree with them or not.)

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:12, Blogger shawn said...

Back and to the left, rog. C'mon, man. Back and to the left! It makes perfect sense!

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:12, Blogger shawn said...

Oh, when are you gonna show us everyone blaming al-Qaeda, by the way?

 
At 11 July, 2006 22:01, Blogger jackhanyes said...

You OS'ers block heads act like childern.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/04let.htm

 
At 11 July, 2006 23:31, Blogger roger_sq said...

And why do you continue to ignore your own stupid ideas and brush them off with some insult of someone else? (Next time don't mention defected KGB agents before saying if you agree with them or not.)

It's not important whether I believe him, I'm the one who knows where JFK's brain is. You're the one without the answers. I'm just pointing you down the path. The question is, do YOU believe him?

(actually that's not the question either but it's a start)

 
At 12 July, 2006 00:52, Blogger default.xbe said...

oh yeah well i know where hitlers brain is!

 
At 12 July, 2006 04:00, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

My last flatmate was from India and he has witnessed a lot of the violence there. It actually goes both ways. Muslims riot, Hindu paramilitaries arrive, kill a lot of people and rape women. He said one para attack occured because someone THOUGHT that a Muslim had thrown a rock at someone or something. It's a mess there.

 
At 12 July, 2006 05:36, Blogger furrod said...

It's becoming harder and harder to differentiate between parody and the rantings of a sincere nutter. Which is this?

 
At 12 July, 2006 09:09, Blogger shawn said...

It's becoming harder and harder to differentiate between parody and the rantings of a sincere nutter. Which is this?

I think roger sincerely believes this nonsense, just he's not as serious about talking about it as the others.

 
At 12 July, 2006 09:10, Blogger shawn said...

You OS'ers block heads act like childern.

And you link to a story that doesn't disprove anything we said.

Are you retarded? Have they tested you.

You really shouldn't be saying anyone acts like a child jack. Children believe in fairy tales without any evidence...y'know, like the 9/11 "alternate theories".

 
At 12 July, 2006 10:35, Blogger Alex said...

I'm the one who knows where JFK's brain is

Now if you could only find your own...

Cue the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz singing "If I oooonly...had a braaain..."

 
At 12 July, 2006 17:26, Blogger jackhanyes said...

You really shouldn't be saying anyone acts like a child jack. Children believe in fairy tales without any evidence...y'know, like the 9/11 "alternate theories".

You're a mindless cunt and a fucking college student. Get into the real world and maybe your eyes will open slightly.

Your idea of "evidence" is limited by your personal bias towards anything that may upset your prefect little mainstream world. How about you get off your high horse and address the "evidence" all around you that we are being lead into the NWO.

Fuck no you say, we're in Iraq for their freedom. Bush is limited our freedoms for our own good. BS, Bush isn't doing nothing to limit our freedom.

Funny, after I called you on your childish "logical fallacy" this and "logical fallacy" that and got you hot under the collar you have NOT USED IT ONCE since. That really shows that you were using as a personal attack.

You're a fucking joke you cunt.

 
At 12 July, 2006 18:33, Blogger shawn said...

You're a mindless cunt and a fucking college student. Get into the real world and maybe your eyes will open slightly.

Mindless? You called me anti-god, and I'm mindless? I'm gonna let you in on a little secret: God isn't logical.

And I took a break from school at one point and went out into the world, working, living on my own. I guess your stupid point doesn't matter. Age doesn't bring intelligence, I'm smarter than most college grads I know.

Your idea of "evidence" is limited by your personal bias towards anything that may upset your prefect little mainstream world.

Do you people understand irony? It has nothing to do with bias. If so, I wouldn't have gone from a devout Catholic to an atheist.

Fuck no you say, we're in Iraq for their freedom. Bush is limited our freedoms for our own good. BS, Bush isn't doing nothing to limit our freedom.


I know you probably didn't mean to say it, but yes, he's done nothing to curtail our freedoms. I'm more afraid of university speech codes hurting my freedoms than Bush.

Funny, after I called you on your childish "logical fallacy" this and "logical fallacy" that and got you hot under the collar you have NOT USED IT ONCE since. That really shows that you were using as a personal attack.


I never denied using ad hominem. The difference is (as I've said countless time) I won't just go out and insult anyone until they show themselves to be fools. And I used it like one thread ago, do you read anything?

You're a fucking joke you cunt.

Enough with the irony people! We get the idea.

 
At 12 July, 2006 18:33, Blogger shawn said...

You're a mindless cunt and a fucking college student. Get into the real world and maybe your eyes will open slightly.

Mindless? You called me anti-god, and I'm mindless? I'm gonna let you in on a little secret: God isn't logical.

And I took a break from school at one point and went out into the world, working, living on my own. I guess your stupid point doesn't matter. Age doesn't bring intelligence, I'm smarter than most college grads I know.

Your idea of "evidence" is limited by your personal bias towards anything that may upset your prefect little mainstream world.

Do you people understand irony? It has nothing to do with bias. If so, I wouldn't have gone from a devout Catholic to an atheist.

Fuck no you say, we're in Iraq for their freedom. Bush is limited our freedoms for our own good. BS, Bush isn't doing nothing to limit our freedom.


I know you probably didn't mean to say it, but yes, he's done nothing to curtail our freedoms. I'm more afraid of university speech codes hurting my freedoms than Bush.

Funny, after I called you on your childish "logical fallacy" this and "logical fallacy" that and got you hot under the collar you have NOT USED IT ONCE since. That really shows that you were using as a personal attack.


I never denied using ad hominem. The difference is (as I've said countless time) I won't just go out and insult anyone until they show themselves to be fools. And I used it like one thread ago, do you read anything?

You're a fucking joke you cunt.

Enough with the irony people! We get the idea.

 
At 12 July, 2006 18:34, Blogger shawn said...

Oh, I get it, you think it's childish to point out your (and by this I mean "you idiot conspiracy theorists") logical fallacies? Sorry you've never encountered them till they got to this blog.

Roger tried your moronic trick before, it didn't fly.

 
At 12 July, 2006 20:50, Blogger jackhanyes said...

Wow triple post! From a cunt.

You called me anti-god.... God isn't logical.

I don't believe I ever once called you "anti-god". I have mentioned that you wage a daily internal war against him, as you strangle with him show through in your writing (opps, duidn't think anyone noticed huh?), but never once have I called you anti-god. Maybe the guilt of being "anti-god" is catching up to you? Let me tell you. It's hard for an ass to fight against the whip.

If you have ever seen beyold this world, to the other side, and experinced the things I have you would realize how truely foolish you are.

Here's a bit of information becuase I'm a dick and I like cunts. Have you heard of the God partical? Basicly it's the partical that is believed to provides the strong force, gives mass, and hold everything together. The Bible says this "...in him all things are held together." Odd that someone would write that almost 2000 years ago.

Anyways, go talk to an advance physicist some time about God, like say Stephen Hawking. See what he has to say. He will blow your little mind away about God.

Here's some links:

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=god+particle
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0385312113/104-0383728-6973531?v=glance&n=283155
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

...I'm smarter than most college grads I know...

The one in the pride of his countenance will not seek, inquire for, and yearn for God; all his thoughts are that there is no God.

Lose the pride kid.

 
At 12 July, 2006 21:05, Blogger jackhanyes said...

Oh, I get it, you think it's childish to point out your (and by this I mean "you idiot conspiracy theorists") logical fallacies? Sorry you've never encountered them till they got to this blog.


No, I rather enjoyed getting shown up when I'm wrong. I like to test what I know, unlike you who will kept to a bias tooth and nails even when he is wrong. Yet, you don't even know where you are wrong. Yoiu can't know were you are wrong until you consider that you may be wrong.

Anyways, my time on this blog has increased, not decreased my belief that 9/11 was an inside job. Funny, I go to pro-government blog to get information about 9/11 being an inside job.

My original comment was making the point that it is childish to mock, toss insults, and make foolish statement over and over again like "back and to the left" to people you don't adgree with or do not understand their points. Are you saying that your behavior is becoming of man? Little do you know it's a self defence method used by the weak minded to fight against what they know to be the turth.

 
At 12 July, 2006 21:05, Blogger shawn said...

I have mentioned that you wage a daily internal war against him, as you strangle with him show through in your writing (opps, duidn't think anyone noticed huh?), but never once have I called you anti-god. Maybe the guilt of being "anti-god" is catching up to you? Let me tell you. It's hard for an ass to fight against the whip.


Wow, you are dumber than nesnyc. I wage a daily war with Him? Wanna know the only place I've mentioned Him in months? Here and other 9/11 conspiracy forums. The 9/11 conspiracy nuts and religious zealots are quite similar, and I use the comparison.

I think about other fictional characters far more often than the Lord God Himself.

Weren't you the one talking about Catholicism being a cult? If so, you called me anti-god. I may have you confused with one of the other whackos.

Anyways, go talk to an advance physicist some time about God, like say Stephen Hawking. See what he has to say. He will blow your little mind away about God.

Uh Stephen Hawking is an atheist, pal.

Lose the pride kid.

...it's the God's honest (hehe). I can't "lose" the truth. I know people smarter than me, too! Woulda look at that? Doesn't change the fact I'm one of the more well-read people I know.

 
At 12 July, 2006 21:06, Blogger shawn said...

Oh, didn't think I'd notice how personal you take my "little crusade" against the Lord? You become ever angrier as I bring up the irrationality of the belief.

 
At 12 July, 2006 21:50, Blogger jackhanyes said...

Uh Stephen Hawking is an atheist, pal.

He's actually Agnostic, meaning he can't prove that God exist while at the same time he can't prove he doesn't exist. Of course, if you understand the man's work, you know why he has this stance.

However, he has this to say:

"It is difficult to discuss the beginning of the universe without mentioning the concept of God. My work on the origin of the universe is on the borderline between science and religion, but I try to stay on the scientific side of the border. It is quite possible that God acts in ways that cannot be described by scientific laws, but in that case, one would just have to go by personal belief."

God not only plays dice. He sometimes throws the dice where they cannot be seen.

Oh, didn't think I'd notice how personal you take my "little crusade" against the Lord? You become ever angrier as I bring up the irrationality of the belief.

You attacked me on my belief, do you expect me to sit back and take it?

 
At 12 July, 2006 22:11, Blogger Richard said...

No, I rather enjoyed getting shown up when I'm wrong.

Then you must be a very very happy man.

Funny, I go to pro-government blog to get information about 9/11 being an inside job.

Who the fuck said this was a pro-government blog? Unless you mean that literally, then yes this is a pro-government blog because I'm positive that the blog contributors as well as the bulk of us love America. But I'm guessing your mean pro-Bush or pro-administration. I don't support the President and I have serious issues with the current administration that have gone back further than 9/11. Unlike you though I actually go about solving these issues in a manner respectful of our founding fathers. Why don't you find some real issues to care about instead of crying "NWO, NWO!!"

 
At 12 July, 2006 22:14, Blogger Richard said...

Also I wouldn't bother throwing around Stephen Hawkings name. If you had one-billionth the intelligence he had you wouldn't buy into this CT crap.

 
At 13 July, 2006 03:24, Blogger shawn said...

He's actually Agnostic, meaning he can't prove that God exist while at the same time he can't prove he doesn't exist.

You do know the word agnostic was invented because a guy got tired of the term "atheist"?

 
At 13 July, 2006 03:26, Blogger shawn said...

You attacked me on my belief, do you expect me to sit back and take it?

Belief. I'm not big into the "faith" thing.

 
At 13 July, 2006 03:26, Blogger shawn said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 13 July, 2006 15:07, Blogger Alex said...

" It is quite possible that God acts in ways that cannot be described by scientific laws, but in that case, one would just have to go by personal belief."

In other words, he saying that yes, it's possible that God acts in ways which leave no scientific evidence. We've certainly found no scientific evidence of him. But if that's the case, then the only basis for beleiving in him is blind faith. However, since we have no way of telling whose faith is right and whose is wrong, beleiving in any of them is simply a sign that you are inclined to be irrational. I could say that the only true god is the Queen of the Purple Flying Unicorns. Since you have no way to test that statement, it would make just as much sense to beleivin in it as it would to believe in the Christian, Muslim, or Jewish god.

 
At 13 July, 2006 19:58, Blogger jackhanyes said...

You do know the word agnostic was invented because a guy got tired of the term "atheist"?

Wonder why? Maybe becuse atheist means one who does not believe in God, and agnostic is one with the knowledge to know that there is a god? Hmm, big different there huh?

I don't support the President and I have serious issues with the current administration that have gone back further than 9/11. Unlike you though I actually go about solving these issues in a manner respectful of our founding fathers. Why don't you find some real issues to care about instead of crying "NWO, NWO!!"

Hey man! Ease up there! It was not I that started the cry We're moving towards a NWO! It was daddy Bush!! On 9/11/90, exactly 11 year before 9/11/01 what did he say?

"[The war in Iraq is] a rare pportunity
to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times... a New World Order can emerge."


And for can you tell me what the motto of the 33 degree masons?

Give up? I tell ya.

Ordo Ab Chao

Order from Choas

For bonus points can you discribe why the number 11 is so important to masons?

Ah shucks, I'll give you fucks the answer.

Daniel 7:8

"I considered the [10] horns, and behold, there came up among them another horn, a little one [Antichrist] ..." Bible scholars have always called Antichrist the "11th Horn".

Thus, this occult and Illuminist preoccupation with the Number 11 as they strive to produce their Antichrist, is dictated by Biblical prophecy concerning Antichrist.

What you going to say to that shawn? you nit wit!

Then you must be a very very happy man.

I wish. I'm mostly unhappy too down right depressed most of the time.

 
At 13 July, 2006 20:02, Blogger jackhanyes said...

Some 11's...


September 11, 1941 pentigon is laid
September 11, 1990 Bush giv his NWO speech
Septmeber 11. 2001 Attack on the big 11 by flight 11 where Ishtar watches over New Babylon.

 
At 13 July, 2006 20:04, Blogger jackhanyes said...

...11 years after Daddy Bush pushes for the NWO...

wait for 2012... it's going to be a fun year...

 
At 13 July, 2006 20:21, Blogger jackhanyes said...

No, I rather enjoyed getting shown up when I'm wrong.

Then you must be a very very happy man.


Do you not realize the suffering I forsee if I am right? Of course not, you're a fool.

If I'm wrong, I have nothing to worry about, thus I would be a very happy man. However, everything points to the antichrist rising in power and troubled times to come. Did you see the news today?

That an rhetorical question, btw.

 
At 14 July, 2006 05:54, Blogger Alex said...

How did you avoid getting locked up in an insane assylum? Seriously. I'm really curious.

 
At 15 July, 2006 08:17, Blogger jackhanyes said...

hahahaha! Because I'm prefectly sane.

It's not like the facts are out there. You simply choose not to look at them nor accept them. I don't blame you. Its easier believer that your government is one for the people, by the people, instead of an arm of the antichrist leading the world to the NWO. But hey, like I pointed out, I'm just repeating what other people have said and wrote when I talk about that.

Yet, I'm insane? Glad you're not the mental health commissioner. Of course they did lock3e up people with "insanities" and "crimes" of my likeness from about 1935 to 1944 in Germany. Think back to those time when you think someone should be "locked" up. If you can't, open a history book. TV will rot your mind.

I really wish I could forget about all of it. Sometime I look at the go lucky people walking in their blissful world and think back to when I was like that - as a child. I guess, I have read to many non-fiction history books. In fact, I hate fiction books.

 
At 15 July, 2006 15:55, Blogger shawn said...

Wonder why? Maybe becuse atheist means one who does not believe in God, and agnostic is one with the knowledge to know that there is a god? Hmm, big different there huh?

you do love being wrong, don't you? An agnostic doesn't believe in God, they say there's no evidence for one.

Neither believes in God.

September 11, 1941 pentigon is laid
September 11, 1990 Bush giv his NWO speech
Septmeber 11. 2001 Attack on the big 11 by flight 11 where Ishtar watches over New Babylon.


September 11, 1918 - Red Sox win their last World Series for eighty-six years.

"[The war in Iraq is] a rare pportunity
to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times... a New World Order can emerge."


There's no capitals in what he said. He said "new world order".

Knowing what you're talking about is important

wait for 2012... it's going to be a fun year...

Yeah, let's follow the end of a calendar from a long-dead people.

 
At 16 July, 2006 00:46, Blogger jackhanyes said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 16 July, 2006 01:04, Blogger jackhanyes said...

you do love being wrong, don't you? An agnostic doesn't believe in God, they say there's no evidence for one.

Neither believes in God.


You know, if you read my posts you might understand the point I'm trying.

agnostic is one that can't prove there is a God, but doesn't deny there is a God.

An atheist denies there is a God.

Hawkins does not deny there is a God. Due to his nature of work, he can't believe (which is not a good word to apply to him) there is a God because he has no solid proof there is a God. The no math theory to explain God. He see the voids and the holes of the phyics of this world and explains that to be God, yet he has not proof, and even says the is no need for God if there is no begining. But because there is a begining, somethinng had to exist. I doubt you know shit about that.

Then there is the theory of the God particle. There is nothing out there that has be observed that explains the strong force that holds everything together and provides mass. However, the Bible, written 2000 years ago, tells us that it is God himself that holds everything together.

Do you know about the string theory? The basis of all creation is based on sound. God spoke the world into creation. Shocking as it may seam, I went from an atheist to wicca to a chirstian because of what I learned reading and talking to phyicists. Odd as it may seam, my faith is based on the theories of scientists, not the teaches of the church.

You on the other hand, denies there is a God. Nor do you seam like you even want to believe there is one. That is a shame. But it is easier.

 
At 16 July, 2006 01:13, Blogger jackhanyes said...

The phrase "new world order" was first widely used in connection with Woodrow Wilson's designs in the period just after World War I, during the formation of the League of Nations.

What the don't say:

Yep, Wilson, a freemason, who brought about the FEDs (called the great fraud to the American public) was following Albert Pike's letter of three world wars to bring about the NWO and a one world government; the League of Nation and later the UN.

Never mind the fact that Pike's later maps out exactly what has happened in the last 100 years and is the direction we're going towards today.

Oh and guess what 1927 release of Pike's later said who would fight the third world war? Political Zionist and Islam.

Oh fuck! Ever mind the letter, the mason call it a fruad.

WAKE THE FUCK UP SHAWN!!!

 
At 16 July, 2006 09:25, Blogger apathoid said...

Wow, a Creationist name dropping Steven Hawking.....I've officially seen it all now.
Jack, maybe you read about how Hawking thinks the universe came into existance before declaring him a member of your "let there be light" movement. SH works off of evidence only, not beliefs. Therefore he, nor anyone else can disprove a God.

Why you think this works in your favor - I have no idea. If you read some of his works, you'll come away with a pretty good idea about how SH views the possibility of a Creator. Its not favorable.

Shocking as it may seam, I went from an atheist to wicca to a chirstian because of what I learned reading and talking to phyicists. Odd as it may seam, my faith is based on the theories of scientists, not the teaches of the church.

Obviously most cosmologists, quantum physicists, and astro-physicists believe in God just like most ASCE/ASME members believe in controlled demoloition on 9/11. Yeah, in your dreams buddy.

Jack, you're an evidence cherry-picker.
Thats why you also believe 9/11 was pulled off by the gummint.

 
At 16 July, 2006 12:40, Blogger shawn said...

Then there is the theory of the God particle.

Wow, you're dumb as dirt. They call it the god particle because of the aspects of the mythological God, not because it supports the existence of such a being.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home