As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Ten-Second Rebuttal to the No-Planers
"They" managed to insert computer graphics into every video, but they didn't quite get it right so you can tell looking at YouTube and fiddling around with Flight Simulator?
"and they forgot to insert the plane at the pentagon!"
Because, like, of course the nearest 7-11 would be monitoring things which might be flying at 770ft/sec at a completely different building, man. And, like, of course, since it's like, the most important building in the area, that 7-11 would get their best cameras onto that Pentagon monitoring, man.
But you know why they didn't? It's, like, a conspiracy. They were told by their brothers in advance what, like, was going to be happening then, and to just monitor the extrance of their own building.
OK, so they managed to get a cgi of the plane somehow into every tv feed and private camera pointed at the tower. How did they get that cgi into my, and every other NYer in downtown that morning, mark 1 eyeballs?
"How did they get that cgi into my, and every other NYer in downtown that morning, mark 1 eyeballs?"
Holographic equipment mounted on a stealth missile which could almost replicate a real plane was fired from an invisible plane. This was done because actually flying the real plane into the building was deemed to complicated.
Holographic equipment mounted on a stealth missile which could almost replicate a real plane was fired from an invisible plane. This was done because actually flying the real plane into the building was deemed to complicated.
Well, when you explain it like that it makes perfect sense.
8 Comments:
wheres the clip...lol
TAM
and they forgot to insert the plane at the pentagon!
"and they forgot to insert the plane at the pentagon!"
Because, like, of course the nearest 7-11 would be monitoring things which might be flying at 770ft/sec at a completely different building, man. And, like, of course, since it's like, the most important building in the area, that 7-11 would get their best cameras onto that Pentagon monitoring, man.
But you know why they didn't? It's, like, a conspiracy. They were told by their brothers in advance what, like, was going to be happening then, and to just monitor the extrance of their own building.
OK, so they managed to get a cgi of the plane somehow into every tv feed and private camera pointed at the tower. How did they get that cgi into my, and every other NYer in downtown that morning, mark 1 eyeballs?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
[ctmode]
Because you're a SHILL!
[/ctmode]
"How did they get that cgi into my, and every other NYer in downtown that morning, mark 1 eyeballs?"
Holographic equipment mounted on a stealth missile which could almost replicate a real plane was fired from an invisible plane. This was done because actually flying the real plane into the building was deemed to complicated.
Holographic equipment mounted on a stealth missile which could almost replicate a real plane was fired from an invisible plane. This was done because actually flying the real plane into the building was deemed to complicated.
Well, when you explain it like that it makes perfect sense.
Post a Comment
<< Home