Monday, February 25, 2013

The Latest "Breakthrough" Fiasco

The Truthers are still digging for the pony.  It's kind of sad, really, just as that joke is a little sad.  Can you imagine that poor little boy, shoveling out the manure with his hands, only to have his hopes dashed?

The latest breakthrough is a court case.  Finally, the Truthers get to present their evidence to somebody in authority!

On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.
There you go!  How could they possibly fail?  Well, basically because there is no pony under the dungheap.  But what makes it so pathetic is when you realize exactly why the Truthers are getting to present their sack of fecal material to the magistrate.

In England, the BBC is actually funded by individual licenses that TV owners pay in order to watch.  The price is pretty expensive: about 145 English pounds or about $220 at current exchange rates.  Mind you, that's just for over the air programming; it's not like our cable TV basic package.  Anyway, as you might expect, a lot of people try to get away without paying the license fee, so they have ways of checking to see if you're watching the telly without paying the fee.

Well, a particularly stupid Troofer named Tony Rooke decided not to pay his license fee and is now going to court over it.  And his defense is that there's a law that provides that you cannot provide funds to an organization that supports terrorism and because the BBC has broadcast shows debunking 9-11 Troofy Troof, it is supporting the terrorism of the real culprits.  No word yet on whom Tony Rooke has fingered as the culprits; whether it's the neocons, Israelis, or Bilderbergers.

And that's how some poor judge in Horsham is going to end up listening to the likes of conspiraloons like the idiot Niels Harrit and Ian Henshall.  Or not, as I personally doubt the magistrate will put up with more than about 15 minutes of this horsecrap before telling the Rookester to pay the fine or go to gaol.


At 25 February, 2013 10:56, Blogger "Broom Jockey" William Rodriguez Fan said...

Infowars acted as though this were groundbreaking.

At 25 February, 2013 15:42, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

We've been having fun with this over at JREF.

Published on Monday 25 February 2013 15:05

Charged with not paying his TV licence, Tony Rooke had claimed at Horsham Magistrates’ Court that the BBC’s treatment of the 9/11 attacks made it complicit in acts of terrorism.

He asked to submit evidence which he said would show that the BBC had consistently failed to report the true story.

District Judge Stephen Nicholls said that, even if he accepted and agreed with the evidence, that would not give him grounds to rule that Rooke was not guilty.

He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs.

Outside court, Rooke said the case had been a ‘score draw’ since the judge had looked at the evidence - albeit in private - and had decided not to fine him.

He called for anyone who has evidence which challenges the official version of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to pass it to the authorities.

At 25 February, 2013 15:49, Blogger snug.bug said...

The judge punted. He claimed lack of jurisdiction.

At 25 February, 2013 17:49, Blogger Pat said...

Keep digging, Brian!

At 25 February, 2013 19:39, Blogger Jon Gold said...

Tell your good friend Troy Sexton not to crank call me anymore. Thanks!

At 26 February, 2013 14:07, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

There's so much horseshit around here about torches, buddies who abuse their children, and provable lies, there must be a Pat somewhere...

At 26 February, 2013 20:36, Blogger Michael Lewis said...

Tell your good friend Troy Sexton not to crank call me anymore. Thanks!

What makes you think it was Troy? It could have been anybody.

At 26 February, 2013 20:38, Blogger James B. said...

I didn't know Troy was still around. Then again, I didn't know Jon was still around either.

At 26 February, 2013 20:59, Blogger Michael Lewis said...

Jon's here because Truthaction has finally imploded. Maybe Julian was right all along and agents shut it down. Or maybe Snowcrash was right and the Microsoft/CIA/KPN cabal did it. It certainly wasn't the inflated egos pushing their agendas.

At 27 February, 2013 10:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

What's wrong with bringing an agenda to a truth movement forum? If there are no agendas, all that's left is pointlessness.

Snowcrash certainly brought an ego. And after most of the people there had expressed exasperation with, and resentment of, the success of the controlled demolition crowd, Snowcrash turned the place into an All Demolition All the Time place which pretty much alienated everybody there.

And then Snowcrash seems to have disappeared from the truth movement.

At 27 February, 2013 20:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Idiot whines, "...And then Snowcrash seems to have disappeared from the truth movement."

Well yeah, he discovered that the "truth" movement is crawling with deranged liars like you.

To his credit, he had the integrity to recognize that you're a degenerate sex predator and see to it that you were banned from "Truth"Action.

See, even the troofers despise your sorry ass.


Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

At 27 February, 2013 23:07, Blogger snug.bug said...

I see. On Planet ButtGoo, Snowcrash resigned from the truthaction forum because of me. You have evidence for this?

At 28 February, 2013 08:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Another straw man argument, jackass? Or is this another demonstration of your third-grade reading comprehension "skills"?

I have no idea why he doesn't post to "Truth"Action, and neither do you, liar.

What is certain is that you were BANNED from "Truth"Action by Cosmos (at SnowCrash's request) when he discovered that you're a sex predator. We know this because he said as much in the SLC comment section.

You've been banned from EVERY 9/11 "truth" website on the Internet. Clearly, even the troofers will not tolerate your lies and degeneracy.



Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

At 03 March, 2013 08:53, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, so your libelous claims about me were gratuitous and had no point. Thanks for making that clear, ButtGale.

You have no evidence that I was ever a member of, let alone that I was banned from there, or why anyone was banned from there or by whom.

When I have been banned from forums (it's happened) it has been because my truths are not tolerated. I don't lie.

At 03 March, 2013 11:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

How's your buddy Wizzie LiedRugAs, by the way? What do you think about him telling his basement bombs story in Iran?


Post a Comment

<< Home