Welcome to 2006....
I was bemused to see this on 911 Flogger, 9/11 "researcher" Aiden Monaghan takes on the pod theory and Judy Woods. Wha...? Seriously? Even in the fever swamps of the fringes on the truth movement does anyone actually take that that seriously anymore. Even we gave up making fun of the pod people several years ago, as fun as it was. Forty years from now we will still be seeing cutting edge research on how all the Jews stayed at home and such.
70 Comments:
In the Truth Movement, reptilian aliens are still a topic worthy of discussion. Oh, and Loose Change is on Netflix (and has been for 2 years). We're not exactly dealing with fast learners.
Yeah, small-k kooks debunking really kookie KOOKS is about all the troofers are good for today.
Also for pointing out the facts you guys like to ignore, and pointing out the errors in your arguments (when you bother to make an actual argument) is worth something.
Also for pointing out the facts you guys like to ignore, and pointing out the errors in your arguments (when you bother to make an actual argument) is worth something.
What facts have you ever pointed out that we ignore?
When have you ever pointed out the errors in our arguments?
Offtopic -- The Timecube guy is still my favorite, but this one runs a close second. (Confirmed for Truther.)
News alert: AE911Truth has figured out that Silverstein's "pull it" MAY not have have refered to explosisive CD! More at e11event11y!
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/696-faq-10-did-wtc-7-owner-larry-silverstein-admit-to-ordering-the-controlled-demolition-of-the-building-.html
Thanks for confirming, as I have been saying for years, that Mr. Silverstein's "pull it" statement is a meaningless red herring, alleged to be of significance only by bullshitters such as Kevin Barrett.
Thanks for confirming, as I have been saying for years, that Mr. Silverstein's "pull it" statement is a meaningless red herring, alleged to be of significance only by bullshitters such as Kevin Barrett.
But Dr. Sunder saying "essentially in free-fall", that's the smoking gun that proves that Dick Cheney ordered magic invisible elevator repairmen to plant invisible silent explosives and magic spray-on thermite in the towers, right Brian?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dr. Sunder didn't say "essentially in free fall", Ian. You haven't been paying attention.
Thanks to Obama, the reptilians will remain free to enslave the galaxy because the White House is shooting down the Death Star proposal:
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/isnt-petition-response-youre-looking
Quote:
"The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:
The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000.
We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
However, look carefully (here's how) and you'll notice something already floating in the sky -- that's no Moon, it's a Space Station! Yes, we already have a giant, football field-sized International Space Station in orbit around the Earth that's helping us learn how humans can live and thrive in space for long durations. The Space Station has six astronauts -- American, Russian, and Canadian -- living in it right now, conducting research, learning how to live and work in space over long periods of time, routinely welcoming visiting spacecraft and repairing onboard garbage mashers, etc. We've also got two robot science labs -- one wielding a laser -- roving around Mars, looking at whether life ever existed on the Red Planet.
Keep in mind, space is no longer just government-only. Private American companies, through NASA's Commercial Crew and Cargo Program Office (C3PO), are ferrying cargo -- and soon, crew -- to space for NASA, and are pursuing human missions to the Moon this decade.
Even though the United States doesn't have anything that can do the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs, we've got two spacecraft leaving the Solar System and we're building a probe that will fly to the exterior layers of the Sun. We are discovering hundreds of new planets in other star systems and building a much more powerful successor to the Hubble Space Telescope that will see back to the early days of the universe.
We don't have a Death Star, but we do have floating robot assistants on the Space Station, a President who knows his way around a light saber and advanced (marshmallow) cannon, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is supporting research on building Luke's arm, floating droids, and quadruped walkers.
We are living in the future! Enjoy it. Or better yet, help build it by pursuing a career in a science, technology, engineering or math-related field. The President has held the first-ever White House science fairs and Astronomy Night on the South Lawn because he knows these domains are critical to our country's future, and to ensuring the United States continues leading the world in doing big things.
If you do pursue a career in a science, technology, engineering or math-related field, the Force will be with us! Remember, the Death Star's power to destroy a planet, or even a whole star system, is insignificant next to the power of the Force.
Paul Shawcross is Chief of the Science and Space Branch at the White House Office of Management and Budget"
So while there is no new investigations into 9/11, we forced the greatest response from the White House in US history about a Death Star.
In your face, 9/11 Troofer-sad sacks.
Dr. Sunder didn't say "essentially in free fall", Ian. You haven't been paying attention.
Nobody cares.
MGF, thanks for demonstrating that the White House pays more attention to a joke petition than to the need to address unanswered questions about 9/11. You're proving the Truthers' point.
"Ian", I know nobody cares about the fact that most of what you say on this board is blatant lies. You're proving my point.
MGF, thanks for demonstrating that the White House pays more attention to a joke petition than to the need to address unanswered questions about 9/11. You're proving the Truthers' point.
Well, if you wanted the White House to pay attention to your "unanswered questions", you should get more signatures on the petition. You can't, because the truth movement is dead. Thanks for proving my point.
"Ian", I know nobody cares about the fact that most of what you say on this board is blatant lies. You're proving my point.
You have no point, Brian. You've spent 4 years posting dumbspam about "widows" on this blog, and it has gotten you nowhere. At least I've had fun humiliating you.
Ian, there is no point in petitioning Obama for anything. He is obviously owned by the same people that own Bush.
There's no need for the scare quotes around "unanswered questions". Only a liar like you would dispute the fact that the widows' 300 questions only got 27 answers.
I have a lot of points, but you continually derail discussion of their merits by forcing me to reiterate the point that you are a liar.
Ian, there is no point in petitioning Obama for anything. He is obviously owned by the same people that own Bush.
Yup, this is the kind of bitter, pathetic squealing I expect from someone who knows the truth movement has failed and yet can't accept it.
There's no need for the scare quotes around "unanswered questions". Only a liar like you would dispute the fact that the widows' 300 questions only got 27 answers.
The widows have no questions.
I have a lot of points, but you continually derail discussion of their merits by forcing me to reiterate the point that you are a liar.
It's good to see you finally admit that I've defeated you.
Skidmark, you lie and lie and lie. What happened to Old Jigglecheeks, anyway? Who's taking care of Elvis
while Willie's taking South America by storm?
Nobody cares about your homosexual obsession with Rodriguez. But I notice that, instead of actually showing evidence that there are "widows" with "questions", you just start squealing and call me "skidmark". That just proves my point.
BuawHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Remember this?
"oh Brian , not only do you have to live as a liar when you said I will never be in the news again..(I have been all over the media this week) or as a coward who refused to meet with the families of 9/11 or the victims he claims have the answers to my testimony but also you refused to face me, not once, but 3 times and last but not least with the established fact that I rejected you and your gay advances for attention and your stalking of others, how does it feel to be known in the 9/11 truth movement as the obsessed gay stalker you are?..." William Rodriguez September 5, 2010
Ian, your belief that my continuing activity of exposing the hypocrisy of this board in tolerating the blatant and shameful lies of William Rodriguez is homosexual or racist is simply more demonstration that you live in a fantasy world. Not even the gayest buttboy could develop any sexual feelings for a saggy walking manboob like Willie.
Sabba, where's Old Jigglecheeks? He ran away screaming and crying when I pointed out that his fifteen rescues didn't happen, his hundreds saved was shown by simple statistics to be a lie, and he stole his hero story from Pablo Ortiz, a true hero who died on 9/11.
Willie is a true scumbag who stole his glory from the dead. He has to travel the world looking for a place where they don't know he's a liar.
where's Old Jigglecheeks...Willie...saved hundreds...Willie....Willie...Willie.
I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!
Where is Old Jigglecheeks, anyway? He ran away screaming and crying after I exposed his hero story for a blatant lie.
Where do you guys find these pictures of people who are not me? At one time you clowns were presenting a picture of Blair Gadsby, pretending it was me.
Brian Good says:"where's Old Jigglecheeks...Willie...saved hundreds...Willie....Willie...Willie.
I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Well where is he? How come Willie's supporters always use the magician's tactic of distraction to avoid addressing issues?
Willie ran away screaming and crying because I exposed his hero story for the shameful and blatant lie that it is.
Brian Good says:Well where is he? How come Willie's supporters always use the magician's tactic of distraction to avoid addressing issues?
and again: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
and then Brian Good goes into his fantasy scene once again....
Willie ran away screaming and crying because I exposed his hero story for the shameful and blatant lie that it is. Buawhahahahahahahahahahaha
So there you go again. You can't defend Willie's blatant scummy scam and his lying hero story, so you try to change the subject to sex.
Death statistics prove that Willie's claim that he saved hundreds is a lie. He stole his story from Pablo Ortiz, a true hero who died on 9/11.
and again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
There is no reason for anyone to be sexually obsessed with Willie, unless they have a thing for manboobs, jowls, and jiggly buttcheeks.
and again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Jigglecheeks' hero story is a lie from the fifteen rescues to the 22-story collapse. He's a blatant scamster who can't even get on stage at the Freedom Law School.
Der Spiegel characterized his scam as similar to a magic trick that tries to pass a $1 bill as a $20 bill.
and again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Have you called Freedom Law School yet? I did! Buawhahahahahahahahahahahaha
So there you go again trying to distract from your inability to refute the fact that William Rodriguez is a common criminal fraudster who travels around getting money on the basis of his lying hero story.
Now you're trying to change the subject to phone calls. I don't need to call anybody. Willie is not on the roster for the March conference.
so there you go again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Have you called Freedom Law School yet? I did, you did not. Buawhahahahahahahahahahaha
Wizzie LiedRugAs wizzes on the graves of true 9/11 heroes.
Brian Good, Nobody cares about your homosexual obsession with Rodriguez.
Have you cleaned Janice's diapers today?
Rumor was that she was very sick couple of weeks ago. I hope you are not expediting her illness...
Nobody cares about your homosexual obsession with Rodriguez, Brian.
We do care about finding photos that actually are you, however, so this one should suffice:
http://911scholars.ning.com/profile/BrianGood
It definitely shows your hideous haircut the best.
Still trying to change the subject, I see. Where is Old JiggleCheeks, anyway? He ran away screaming and crying after I proved that his hero story was a lie.
This comment has been removed by the author.
The subject is "Welcome to 2006...". Read the thread title. It is not titled "My obsession with Willie" by Brian Good from Palo Alto.
Neither is tittled: "How Willie got my kicked out from Richard Gage's organisation"...
or: "How Willie Rodriguez stole the attention from me of Carol"
or: "How Rodriguez exposed my real identity as PETGOAT and I lied about it"
or: "How I ran away when Rodriguez Challenged me to a debate"
or: "How I refused to meet with survivors of 9/11 to expose willie"...
Nobody cares about your sexual obsession with Rodriguez....but you...
Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Have you changed Janice's diapers lately?
Poor Brian. He's delusional enough to think he has "proved" that American hero Willie Rodriguez is a liar.
Remember when Carol Brouillet called you delusional, Brian?
I simply asked a question. Where's Wizzie? I wanted to make sure that everyone understood that he ran away screaming and crying when I proved that his hero story is a lie.
It's you guys disputing the facts and trying to change the subject that are causing the disruption, not me. You don't change the subject to the subject of the thread. Instead you change the subject to your favorite obsession--giving me fashion tips and fantasizing about my underwear.
Brian Good says:Well where is he?
and again: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
and then Brian Good goes into his fantasy scene once again....
"Willie ran away screaming and crying because I exposed his hero story for the shameful and blatant lie that it is.
Buawhahahahahahahahahahaha
Buawhahahahahahahahahahaha? That's an answer?
You can't deny that Willie ran away. He's not here.
You can't deny that his hero story is a lie. Since 99% of the civilians under the impact zones evacuated with no help from Willie at all, the death statistics on his 39 floors are no better than the death statistics on any other floor under the impact zones. Willie's claims that he saved hundreds are this shown to be completely bogus.
He's a fraud, a common criminal, and I've proven it. Lying to people to get them to give you money is a crime. Not to mention that stealing your glory from dead heroes is scumbaggery of the lowest sort.
Poor Wizzie. For the rest of his life he's going to have to go around saying "No, I'm not that William Rodriguez. I know I look like him, but I'm not."
BUAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
He came, he proved you lied about Carol, about Richard Gage, about the dead victims and about your theories. He posted your e-mails, he posted the emails of those you lied about and then he challenged you , you did no accept, you got scared even when he called you at your house.
you avoided him like the plague and you never answered a single one of his questions when he answered your stupid ones. No need for him to "hang out" here like you do, I imagine he is a busy speaker, not like you, a failed janitor who spend all his time on the INTERNET babbling about your gay obsession with him.
Brian Good says:Well where is he?
and again: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
How is Janice's pampers?
BUAhahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!
Poor Brian Good. For the rest of his life he's going to have to go around saying "No, I'm not that freak Brian Good everyone laughs at in the Internet and the 9/11 truth movement. I know I look like him, but I'm not. Please ask Richard Gage, he vouches for me"
I didn't lie about anything, and you seem to lack the simple common sense to recognize that when a liar posts what he claims is an email only a fool would believe it's authentic. It would be like accepting a color copy of a $20 bill as a $20 bill.
I debated Wizzie right here. I proved that his hero story is a lie--he lied about the fifteen rescues, he lied about the hundreds saved, he lied about the 22-story collapse, and he lied about being the Last Man Out and the Last Survivor.
I've proven all that, there's nothing he can say, and he ran away screaming and crying.
There's no reason for me to be afraid of a simple fraudster. He made a Devil's Deal, trading his future for a few years of fun. He had to know that his lies would be found out someday--that all his threats and lies would only delay the day.
He never answered my questions, and there is no need for me to answer any of his. It's none of his business. I'm not pissing on the dead heroes like he is. I'm not defrauding my admirers like he is. I'm not lying and trying to blackmail like he is.
He never answered my questions, and there is no need for me to answer any of his. It's none of his business.
He did, you did not and yes, the rules of the debate are simple you can ask anything but you have to answer as well. You did not as you blatantly said here.
I'm not pissing on the dead heroes like he is. I'm not defrauding my admirers like he is.
no, you only pissing on the memories of those who died by claiming 9/11 was a lie. That NIST was a lie and the 9/11 Commission was a lie. By the way, you have no admirers.
I'm not lying and trying to blackmail like he is.
So Brian Good is claiming William Rodriguez blackmailed him?
and again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Baloney. No legitimate debate provides for ad hominem fishing expeditions.
I don't need to ask any questions. Willie has already made his fraudulence obvious with statements made in the internet record--on his own DVD, for instance, and on C-Span.
Willie's inability to refute the fact of the fraudulence of his claims makes debate moot. It's done. He lost. I proved my case, and he ran away screaming and crying.
Of course Willie tried to blackmail me--by trying to cause trouble with my employers, by threatening to put me in his (non-existent) movie, by making clear threats to publish fabricated emails harming people I know, and by having his friends lie about me.
All he has is his jiggle-moobs attempts at intimidation, because there are no facts on his side.
Baloney. No legitimate debate provides for ad hominem fishing expeditions.
Exactly, Ad Hominens that you started and continued to do as in every thread you have posted here.
I don't need to ask any questions.
Cope out, you did and then you refuse to answer his.
Willie has already made his fraudulence obvious with statements made in the internet record--on his own DVD, for instance, and on C-Span.
and corrected many of them and accepted many of his errors, unlike you...
Willie's inability to refute the fact of the fraudulence of his claims makes debate moot. It's done. He lost. I proved my case, and he ran away screaming and crying.
Buawhahahahahahahaha, the only one that cried here was you, every time he showed up. All you need to do is go back to all those threads and he managed to anger, frustrate and expose you.
Of course Willie tried to blackmail me--
So, Brian Good claims William tried to blackmail him, correct?
...by trying to cause trouble with my employers, Employers? we all know you are unemployed, care to mention those non existent employers? I bet you won't , they never existed. You cannot count Richard Gage, since he did not pay you.
... by threatening to put me in his (non-existent) movie
The movie you refused to appear on a debate? ha!!!!!
...by making clear threats to publish fabricated emails harming people I know, and by having his friends lie about me.
So Brian Good claims claims those e-mails were fabricated correct? they were never sent by you or those people , correct Brian Good?
All he has is his jiggle-moobs attempts at intimidation, because there are no facts on his side.
So Brian Good claims willie rodriguez tried to intimidate him correct?
Brian Good says:Well where is he? How come Willie's supporters always use the magician's tactic of distraction to avoid addressing issues?
and again: Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
An ad hominem is a logical fallacy only when it's irrelevant. Willie's criminal nature and the scumbaggery of his behavior are not ad hominems, because they are relevant to the issues of his criminal nature and scumbaggery.
I don't need to ask any questions. The proof that Willie is a fraud are all present in the public record.
Willie's lies don't expose anyone except himself. When a blatant liar threatens to publish emails, he threatens to publish fabricated
ones.
When a blatant liar threatens to publish emails, he threatens to publish fabricated
ones.
I remember very well that one, when he offered, to be open to criminal prosecution if they were fakes and posted them with the headers and gave you the opportunity to say yes or no to publish them even though he did not need any freaking permission from you, shows that he putted you against the wall. Remember he posts here with his real name and validates who he is, unlike you of course.
Guess what I will ask next time he comes around ( by the next September for sure)? to publish more of your demented e-mails, and those of those others so he can prove again what a liar you are and how you lack the guts to report him to authorities for making liable and defamatory statements using "fake" emails. It will never happen and guess what , it will be the basis for him to go legally against your ass. Therefore, those emails are true and the people that sent them also vouch for him and that it's what pisses you off.
and again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
I don't need to ask any questions.
we know, Brian, we know... That is why you do not want to answer any of his questions either...
Therefore he won the debate.
Of course Willie tried to blackmail me--
So, Brian Good claims William tried to blackmail him, correct?
...by trying to cause trouble with my employers...
Employers? we all know you are unemployed, care to mention those non existent employers? I bet you won't , they never existed. You cannot count Richard Gage, since he did not pay you.
... by threatening to put me in his (non-existent) movie
The movie you refused to appear on a debate? ha!!!!!
...by making clear threats to publish fabricated emails harming people I know, and by having his friends lie about me.
So Brian Good claims claims those e-mails were fabricated correct? they were never sent by you or those people , correct Brian Good?
All he has is his jiggle-moobs attempts at intimidation, because there are no facts on his side.
So Brian Good claims willie rodriguez tried to intimidate him correct?
and again: Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Obviously Willie has no fear of criminal prosecution when he travels around engaging in blatant fraud.
So now you're changing the subject from the proven fact that Willie is a liar and a fraud to the issue of emails. You always change the subject because you can't deny the facts.
You seem to think that posting a real-looking header somehow validates a questionable text. Show a little common sense. The faith we put in a posted putative email depends entirely on our faith in the person who posts. If Daniel Ellsberg posts an email, we suppose it's real. A proven liar and scumbag like Willie has no credibility.
Obviously Willie has no fear of criminal prosecution when he travels around engaging in blatant fraud.
says the freak who failed to get him prosecuted. If you had any conviction, guts and the truth on your side you will be able to prove those emails were not real. The are real and that is what makes you nervous. He posted those of McKinley as an example of your lies, if they were fakes how come you do not contact her family and expose him? because it proves you are a liar and he will make them available for forensic prosecution if they asked. You can scream and stomp your feet as much as you want , it won't change the fact they exposed you. Remember the assignment he gave you? to contact Richard Gage and ask him if it was ok to publish his emails? I bet you Richard Gage got nervous knowing pretty well what was in there. Since RG has a lawyer, he could have stopped Rodriguez on his tracks if they were fake. RG knew better and got your ass out of his organization.
and again: Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
I never tried to get him prosecuted. I didn't save any evidence from his talk that I could present, nor did I give him any money so I could complain that I'd been defrauded.
Just as Willie can not prove an email is real, I can't prove it's fake. Your epistemic skills are those of a child.
I don't know anything about Richard Gage's emails. It sounds like you're telling us that Willie is blackmailing Richard Gage.
What is your obsession with attacking me? A normal admirer of Willie would try to support Willie's claims and would try to refute the facts of his blatant fraudulence. Since you don't do that, I must suppose that you know that Willie's story is a lie and you don't care.
Brian Good says:I never tried to get him prosecuted.
You can't and nobody cares.
I didn't save any evidence from his talk that I could present, nor did I give him any money so I could complain that I'd been defrauded.
Try the internet.
Just as Willie can not prove an email is real,
He did and a prosecutor can do it as well. Digital forensics little mama;s boy, learn a little.
... I can't prove it's fake.
Then hire an expert, google it there are many.
I don't know anything about Richard Gage's emails. It sounds like you're telling us that Willie is blackmailing Richard Gage.
you said willie blackmailed your employers. Wasn't Gage who employed you to do that piece of shit documentary about Experts?
What is your obsession with attacking me?
says a gay obsessed attacker of others.
and Brian Good says again: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Your digital forensics authentication methodology does not apply to text posted to a blog, dumbass.
It sounds like you're admitting that Willie is blackmailing Mr. Gage. How is it that you know enough about Willie's affairs to know that?
Why are you obsessed with attacking me? A normal admirer of Willie would try to support Willie's claims and would try to refute the facts of his blatant fraudulence. Since you don't do that, I must suppose that you know that Willie's story is a lie and you don't care.
Your digital forensics authentication methodology does not apply to text posted to a blog, dumbass.
It does apply you idiot and dumbass is Janice, your mother for having an abortion for a son.
It sounds like you're admitting that Willie is blackmailing Mr. Gage. How is it that you know enough about Willie's affairs to know that?
You are the one who said William blackmailed you and influenced your employers like Richard Gage. Read back on the thread idiot.
Of course Willie tried to blackmail me--by trying to cause trouble with my employers, by threatening to put me in his (non-existent) movie, by making clear threats to publish fabricated emails harming people I know, and by having his friends lie about me.
Buahaahahahahahahahahahaah!!!!
I said Wizzie TRIED TO blackmail me. That is beyond dispute. He didn't blackmail me. Here I am , and here he is not.
You seem to have admitted that you tried to blackmail Richard Gage. You're not too smart, are you?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Why don't you prove I admitted to blackmailing anybody, I don't even know Richard Gage, you are not too smart idiot. I wonder why that bitch decided to have you instead of aborting you. Buahaahahahahahahahahahah!!!!
and Brian Good says again: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
So what time zone are you in, nutjob?
and Brian Good says again: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Poor Brian. He's being humiliated by sabba for all the usual reasons.
You could always stop posting stalker spam about American hero Willie Rodriguez, Brian.
Ian, since you don't have the smarts to recognize that William Rodriguez is a blatant con artist, you're only making a fool of yourself.
and then again, Brian Good says: I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm not homosexually obsessed with Willie...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...I'm NOT!...WILLIE!"
Post a Comment
<< Home