Debunking Controlled Demoltion

One of the complaints that the 9-11 Deniers raise about the NIST report on the collapse of the WTC Towers and WTC7 is that the possibility of controlled demolition was not examined. So Brent Blanchard of Implosion World decided to rectify that with a paper that demolishes the CD theory..

Much of it is material that we've gone over before. For example, that controlled demolition starts from the bottom, that the buildings did not collapse neatly into their own footprint, that the much-remarked "squibs" actually show compressed air being forced out of the building by the collapse, not by explosives. I did find this part interesting:

One primary difference between these two collapses and a typical building implosion was that the initianl failures occurred very high up on the structures, which lead to an extended-duration "pancake" effect down to the ground. With the weight and mass of the upper sections forcing the floor trusses below rapidly downward, there was no way for outer perimeter walls to fall in, so they had to fall out. A review of all photographic images clearly show about 95% of falling debris being forced away from the footprint of the structure creating a giant "mushroon" effect around its perimeter.

Lots of good solid information from experts in the CD industry.

Thanks to Default.xbe for pointing this out.