Well At Least Dylan Will Have a Plot For the Sequel
And Richard Grove is in his basement tying this into some nefarious plot, I am sure.
The fourth installment of Bruce Willis' "Die Hard" action series will hit theaters on June 29, distributor 20th Century Fox said Wednesday.
"Live Free or Die Hard" is scheduled to begin production next month. Len Wiseman (the "Underworld" movies) is directing. At one point, the film was titled "Die Hard 4.0."
The story centers on an attack on America's computer infrastructure that begins to shut the country down. The mysterious figure behind the scheme has figured out every digital angle but never counts on Willis' old-fashioned, "analog" character, John McClane.
posted by James B. @ 8:52 PM
6 comments
6 Comments:
Yippee-ki-yay.
Uh, Richard is surely in his mom's basement, considering how often he's been out of a job. Recall his conversation with the folks in Chicago, where he specified he'd been fired shortly before 9-11, then his conversation with the Loosers this year that said he was again "in between" assignments.
One Man.....
One City....
One Chance....
One Obnoxious Kid.....
This Summer, be prepared to Die Harder...
Bruce:So what your telling me, Dylan, is the whole planet is being run by George W and Cheney, from their glass castle atop Mount Jeruselem.
Dylan: Well of course, didn't you see my new movie, LC:FC?
Bruce turns his M16 toward Dylan.
Bruce: Sorry kid, but I'm a true American, and you...well....
Shots ring out....
Die Hard 4 - Crushing the Cockroach
Disclaimer: No Dylan Avery's were hurt in the making of this film...
Die Hard! Good show all. I don't know what this has to do with that Avery guy...a little attentuated don't you think? This is our entertainment.
There's a CT who uses movie plots to prove conspiracy theories. Perhaps you should read past posts so you don't look like a moron.
101st Fighting pawns...We eat independent thinkers for lunch...
If Avery is an independent thinker, than creationists are too. And people who believed in mediums, and bigfeet, and Loch Ness monsters, etc, etc.
its called sarcasm...a parody...it is for humor....
I'd wager the answer to your question is "the vast majority". I've talked to many members, and for the most part they've either done their time, or they're unable to meet the physical standards for acceptance to the military, mostly due to age, injury, or physical defects. Of the rest, most are much better able to serve the war effort at home than they could in the field.
Not everyone is cut out for combat, and those who can and do engage in it also need support from home, and need to know that things are still running smooth back home. I wouldn't dream of asking a talented rock star to pick up a rifle when, instead, he could write a song to raise the morale of thousands of soldiers. Similarily, why would you want a talented computer programmer, accountant, physicist, lawyer, or police officer to be sent into combat? Most of us who risk our lives in battle do so because it is the life we chose early on. After we've done our part, we'll retire and either become productive members of civilian society, or dedicated public servants in non-military occupations. If the need ever existed for us to rejoin, I'm sure many would. But as long as there's enough men and women of honour and character amongst the younger generations, the continued service of veterans is not only unneccesary, but unproductive, and the employment of older civilians who are well established in the civilian industries is pointless.
So, please, stop with the "why don't YOU join" nonsense.
Post a Comment
<< Home