Thursday, August 10, 2006

Terror Plot Foiled in England

No doubt intended to blunt the growing acceptance of 9-11 Denial.

That's purely a miniature psy-op to blunt all this talk about 9/11 as an inside job. It's a direct response I suspect.


its a shame that some idiot islamics would do this and not wait for 9/11 truth to come out- they have just comepletely dont the opposite- if indeed this is real...


Yes, you see, in the mind of a 9-11 Denier, the terrorists did it because they were falsely accused of terrorism. As usual, we get the "this reminds me of a movie":

Reminds me of V for Vendetta....


Here's the contribution of someone misnamed "Logic":

When manufactured terror exists to set the stage, the real terror will then take it's place or mix with false flag operations eventually, making the truth so skewed people won't know what to think anymore. This was the plan all along. You take an event, shape the world and yes the real extremists will eventually mimic or co-exist with false terror. They create the environment to brew exactly what they want to fight. The extremists were always there, they will always be there.. Smoking them out of the rabbit hole is what has happened and that's what makes exposing 911 that much more important...Before it's too late.....


I'm not even sure what the heck that means.

86 Comments:

At 10 August, 2006 06:52, Blogger MarkyX said...

Ah V for Vendetta. The movie that the original author, Alan Moore, even points out that it was simple propaganda against the Bush Adminstration and nothing more.

I guess it's okay for the 9/11 Deniers to use propaganda, because they are fighting for trooth.

 
At 10 August, 2006 07:23, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

As I said at Jref, the 8/10 Plot was actually concocted by "Truthers" as a means of diverting our attention from their 9/11 movement.

 
At 10 August, 2006 07:43, Blogger Tempestuous said...

One stupid press conference and you 911goosesteppers know everything, now. Maybe you did it.

 
At 10 August, 2006 09:49, Blogger Arkan Wolfshade said...

RE: Tempestuous

Go figure, a CT'er blaming people of crimes and making allusions to fascism without evidence.

 
At 10 August, 2006 09:58, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

Ironic since every time there is a terrorist event, the CTs immediately pop up and "debunk" the whole thing, ala the 7/7 bombings.

 
At 10 August, 2006 10:40, Blogger Tempestuous said...

Oh, sorry...Ja wohl mein 911goosestepper. I hate the nutbar's as well, I just don't walk in moronic lock-step like you do.

 
At 10 August, 2006 10:46, Blogger Dog Town said...

Temp be glad you can't say that to my face!

My Aunt was to fly back from UK last nite!

 
At 10 August, 2006 10:59, Blogger tn said...

Sad day for CT nutters: Scotland yard thwarted a prime piece of conspiracy material in the making.

Just imagine if they would have been successful: 'No plane' theories, 'Planes got shot down' theories, 'Where is the wreckage?' theories, 'Planes were drones' theories galore. '21 conspirators? who pulled this off? NO WAY! Liquid Explosives? You gotta be kidding me. THERMITE, dude! Open your eyes!'

 
At 10 August, 2006 10:59, Blogger telescopemerc said...

Oh, sorry...Ja wohl mein 911goosestepper

Thanks for insulting the real victims of Nazi with you paranoid playtime. I realise this is all just a game to you, but that does not mean you must be a disrespectful jerk.

Look up 'Godwin's Law' sometime, BTW.

 
At 10 August, 2006 11:44, Blogger Tempestuous said...

So now you wimps have feelings? Wow, take some medication for the bipolar disorder. Raise Old Glory, drink a damn beer, throw down your crying towels and relax.

The squirrel and the Nuts article should apply to (squirrel=911goosestepper) and (nut=911nutbar). By the way...goosestepper is a "metaphor" boys and girls.

 
At 10 August, 2006 11:47, Blogger telescopemerc said...

So now you wimps have feelings? Wow, take some medication for the bipolar disorder. Raise Old Glory, drink a damn beer, throw down your crying towels and relax.

No, I just find lame-ass comparisons to brutal dictatorships that deliberately slaughter millions of its own citizens to be distasteful. Not mention extremely unoriginal and lame-brained.

Seriously, the entire English language is at your disposal, along with centuries of wit and criticism, yet all your tiny brain could come up with was "I'll compare them to NAZIS!!!"?

 
At 10 August, 2006 11:48, Blogger Tempestuous said...

Oh ya, and obviously "Quirk's Exception" applies to your troublesome and hypocritical outpouring of filth.

 
At 10 August, 2006 11:52, Blogger Tempestuous said...

Wait you fools use words like "nutbar", "loosers", comparisons with the Munster's TV show, personal attacks, derogatory uses of the term "jew", insinuations of mental illness, and a pluthora of interminable evocations, and you have the audacity to be offended by a metaphor.

 
At 10 August, 2006 11:53, Blogger telescopemerc said...

Oh ya, and obviously "Quirk's Exception" applies to your troublesome and hypocritical outpouring of filth.

Quirk's exception has to do with bringing Nazi's up in order to deliberately end the discussion. Doesn't apply.

You aren't very good at this, are you?

 
At 10 August, 2006 11:57, Blogger telescopemerc said...

Wait you fools use words like "nutbar", "loosers",

Insults, not comparisons t omass-murdering regimes.

comparisons with the Munster's TV show,

Does Eddie have a body count that I am unaware of?


personal attacks, derogatory uses of the term "jew",

I defy you to produce that. You've seen us use the term "must have been the jooos" in mockery of the anti-semites who try to blame everything on Jews.

insinuations of mental illness,

Which in many cases may be more than an insiuation, but a statement of fact.

and a pluthora of interminable evocations,

None of which make the targets the equivelant of mass-murderers.

and you have the audacity to be offended by a metaphor.

Metaphors are supposed to be accurate. Yours isn't

 
At 10 August, 2006 12:06, Blogger Tempestuous said...

1. You are lucky that mental illness is not a protected class, or you would be sued a thousand fold. Goodbye dwelling.

2.Incendiary attacks and slanderous statements against public figures for a limited purpose is actionable...And you are on notice; IP.

3.Your shrouded mocking of a religious faith in the context you have used, is only a thin veil over your nefarious intentions.

4.Godwin's Law is hearby changed to Goodwin's law--Comparisons to Jesus keep a thread healthy and promotes less animosity.

 
At 10 August, 2006 12:11, Blogger Pepik said...

Anyway back to the terror plot - the CTers pretend that every terror attack feeds the military industrial complex, the spy budgets, the globalists, etc. Ironically though, every plot is more material for Alex Jones and the rest of the insane clown posse that feeds of terrorism as material for their conspiracy websites.

Remember, terrorism is theoretically impossible. Jeff Rense says so. It simply must be a conspiracy.

 
At 10 August, 2006 12:36, Blogger telescopemerc said...

1. You are lucky that mental illness is not a protected class, or you would be sued a thousand fold. Goodbye dwelling.

Irrelevant. Calling someone what they resemble is not actionable.

2.Incendiary attacks and slanderous statements against public figures for a limited purpose is actionable...And you are on notice; IP.

Another internet lawyer bully. To date, nothign sad here qualified as slander or libel. Insulting someone or stating your opinion about them does not qualify. Learn.

3.Your shrouded mocking of a religious faith in the context you have used, is only a thin veil over your nefarious intentions.

Excuse me? Its not our side that has the folks trying to blame an entire ethnic group for the trouble. Look back at dear old 'nesync' s post for a real bit of fun.

4.Godwin's Law is hearby changed to Goodwin's law--Comparisons to Jesus keep a thread healthy and promotes less animosity.

Sorry, but why are you bringing up any semblance of Christianity?

You really suck at this, don't you?

 
At 10 August, 2006 12:59, Blogger shawn said...

I already explained Godwin's Law to temp, the idiot doesn't get it.

And I guess following sound science makes up follow in "moronic lock-step". Excellent logic, temp. Keep up the good work.

 
At 10 August, 2006 13:03, Blogger telescopemerc said...

I already explained Godwin's Law to temp, the idiot doesn't get it.

I suspect that 'doesn't get it' is a frequent statement in temps life.

 
At 10 August, 2006 13:49, Blogger CHF said...

In the eyes of conspiracy quacks every Islamic terror attack is a CIA operation designed to stir up hatred against Muslims who really don't hate us at all despite their continuous insistance that they do.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:06, Blogger Tempestuous said...

You are little odd/queer aren't you tele. Your bi-polar capabilities are quite astounding.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:09, Blogger shawn said...

You are little odd/queer aren't you tele. Your bi-polar capabilities are quite astounding.

At least he didn't make some reference to National Socialism.

Oh wait, he said queer.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:17, Blogger Tempestuous said...

You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism. You freaks have your panties in a wad over it. You must be running your operation out of a prison. Your attitudes and demeanor are horribly vexatious. Debate you coward...

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:21, Blogger shawn said...

You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism.

"You tough steroid"? That isn't even proper English.

You freaks have your panties in a wad over it.

Most people don't take kindly to being compared to the most heinous mass murderers in human history. Especially when we have nothing in common.

You must be running your operation out of a prison. Your attitudes and demeanor are horribly vexatious.

"Operation"? What the hell are you on?

Debate you coward...

And you prove my point yet again. The weaker, desperate side uses this tactic of forcing a debate (and of course your ad hominem helps). If someone said gravity was a myth and I proved it wasn't, should I have to debate them? Or someone saying the Earth was flat?

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:23, Blogger Abby Scott said...

You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism. You freaks have your panties in a wad over it. You must be running your operation out of a prison. Your attitudes and demeanor are horribly vexatious. Debate you coward...

Is it just me or is anyone else having a hard time understanding what in the hey this dude is talking about. Debate what? Nazi references?

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:25, Blogger Alex said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:26, Blogger Tempestuous said...

OK. Stay in your hole. Stay under your rock. Sam Adams would spit on you. You are very good at what you do and that is to insult, demean, and put folks down. Bad Charma dude...I feel sorry for you my young fool.

P.S. Thanks for the spell check soldier. I'll add it to my copy of the Centcom letter.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:26, Blogger shawn said...

Debate what? Nazi references?

He's pretending to be a neutral party (I believe the proper term is a "moby"), and wants us to debate the CTers to prove our point.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:27, Blogger Alex said...

You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism

It was a joke, retard. Add "humour" as #257 on the list of things you are clueless about. Now stop wasting my oxygen and go jump under a bomb with your Hezbollah buddies. I doubt anyone will miss you, you're about as usefull as a football bat.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:28, Blogger shawn said...

Sam Adams would spit on you.

And Aristotle would spit on you (not that you'll understand the reference).

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:37, Blogger Tempestuous said...

Listen Mr. high T-Cell count. Chill right out you cocky son of a whore. Gloves are off, clown. You are a true evil idiot.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:45, Blogger Alex said...

Heh, watch out, looks like we've got another Internet Tough Guy on our hands! We better cool it guys, or he might threaten and swear some more. I hear some of these trolls can actually make your brain haemorrhage through incessant streams of verbal diarrhoea.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:47, Blogger Tempestuous said...

No...Just curse you with cancer.

 
At 10 August, 2006 14:51, Blogger shawn said...

Uh T-cells counts have to do with HIV, not cancer.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:02, Blogger JoanBasil said...

This "British foil terror plot" story is one heck of an admission of monumental incompetence. They're telling us that for the 5 years since 9/11 they've been allowing passengers to board planes with the implements (common household items according to Rep. Peter King on Hardball) to make a bomb inflight. ?????

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:03, Blogger Tempestuous said...

No...No...the T-cell thing is already coming...The cancer is forthcoming...Sorry for misunderstanding...and sorry...

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:04, Blogger shawn said...

They're telling us that for the 5 years since 9/11 they've been allowing passengers to board planes with the implements (common household items according to Rep. Peter King on Hardball) to make a bomb inflight. ?????

Ok so first we're getting all sorts of restrictions and it's such a horrible thing and now you WANT more restrictions? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh?

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:10, Blogger MarkyX said...

Tempestuous, a perfect example on why we need abortion.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:13, Blogger JoanBasil said...

shawn,
If this story that Rep. Peter King just told on Hardball is the truth of it, that this concerns "common household items," (or even if it concerns substances that may be harder to obtain) this is a story of monumental incompetence. There are a lot of people employed in our government and other governments whose job it is to out think terrorists and nobody thought of this in 5 years, they had to foil a terrorist plot to think of it?

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:14, Blogger Alex said...

Ok so first we're getting all sorts of restrictions and it's such a horrible thing and now you WANT more restrictions? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh?


Exactly. I could just see Joan at the security gate if these restrictions had been implemented...

WHAT DO YOU MEAN I CAN'T TAKE MY HAIRSPRAY ON THE PLANE!?!?! What am I gonna do, mace the pilot with it? HAHA! If I did that, Fetzer would beat me to death with his luggage! I WANT MY LAWYER!!!!

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:20, Blogger shawn said...

this is a story of monumental incompetence.

And if they just suddenly banned hairspray or lysol you'd be saying they were overreacting. It's just like it took 9/11 for a lot of Americans to wake up to the threat Islamism is to the West.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:22, Blogger Tempestuous said...

Mark, you would support the killing of innocent children.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:22, Blogger default.xbe said...

There are a lot of people employed in our government and other governments whose job it is to out think terrorists and nobody thought of this in 5 years, they had to foil a terrorist plot to think of it?

if they stopped them doesnt that mean someone must have thought of it? unless it went down like this:

customs inspector: "why do you have aluminum foil and drain cleaner in your carryon?"

would-be terrorist: "oh, im gonna make a bomb in flight with it and theres nothing you can do about it because im alowed to bring that stuff on board"

customs inspector: "damn, sucks to be us, your clear, go on......hey wait a minute...get back here!"

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:31, Blogger Alex said...

if they stopped them doesnt that mean someone must have thought of it?

Not neccesarily. They may simply have aroused suspicion based on appearance, attitude, or any slips they may have made while talking to security personnel. If they were then held and questioned, their stories would have started to fall apart rather quickly. Terrorists don't usualy plan much for the eventuality of being captured, so they tend not to have very good cover stories. After that it would have been a simple matter of either analyzing their luggage and coming up with a probable scenario, or simply questioning them untill one or more cracked and confessed.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:37, Blogger JoanBasil said...

There was another expert on TV saying this sounded like a repeat of the "Bojinka" plot of 1995! So its not like they even had to outthink terrorists; they already have information that making a bomb in flight from liquid explosives is a possibility.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:42, Blogger telescopemerc said...

No...No...the T-cell thing is already coming...The cancer is forthcoming...Sorry for misunderstanding...and sorry...

OK, I dare you to make less sense.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:42, Blogger shawn said...

There was another expert on TV saying this sounded like a repeat of the "Bojinka" plot of 1995!

I said that on the SLC forum a little bit ago.

Except in Bojinka they were going to use "normal" explosives. Ramzi Yousef was gonna be part of that.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:44, Blogger telescopemerc said...

There was another expert on TV saying this sounded like a repeat of the "Bojinka" plot of 1995! So its not like they even had to outthink terrorists; they already have information that making a bomb in flight from liquid explosives is a possibility.

The Bojinka plot had the would be bombers with explosives already made. Nitroglycerin in contact lens solution bottles. Different animal.

 
At 10 August, 2006 15:51, Blogger Alex said...

Nitroglycerin in contact lens solution bottles.

Ouch. Never heard of that one, but damn, that sounds pretty dangeours. Although it's rather comical in a way. Just imagine...

Ramzi: We're going to miss the plane! Quickly, we must run!

....

BOOM!





(sidenote for those not familiar with explosives: nitroglycerin is EXTREMELY unstable)

 
At 10 August, 2006 16:02, Blogger Tempestuous said...

tele, sorry for the redundancy. I wasn't necessarily referring to you, but what the heck. The high T-Cell count has arrived, while your cancer diagnosis is forthcoming. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

 
At 10 August, 2006 17:08, Blogger BoggleHead said...

Well here's a chance to test a theory.

The main idea is that you have a bunch of patsies (useful idiots, dupes, fanatics, etc) and then you have government handlers provoke them into doing whatever will get them blamed for an appropriately sized scheme/plot.

So it'll be interesting to look into who these people are.

I mean, finally they caught a bunch of them alive. Usually these people blow themselves up by the dozen as police try to enter.

 
At 10 August, 2006 17:28, Blogger Dog Town said...

Not to knit pick!
BWTF is charma?
Karma is you enemy brainiac!

 
At 10 August, 2006 17:40, Blogger Dog Town said...

Ok Boggle what's the deal.
Do you sit around making this s^$@
up. You should just write fiction. You are good at THAT!

 
At 10 August, 2006 17:47, Blogger BoggleHead said...

No, dogtown, maybe you don't get it but that's what the theories are.

Moles

Operatives

Patsies

Moles keep patsies out of jail so the operatives can set up whatever it is the patsies get blamed for.

That's always been the general format for "conspiracy theories"

 
At 10 August, 2006 17:48, Blogger default.xbe said...

well boggle is actually suggesting a legit investigation to find out who these people really work for

although i suspect they work for the same people moussaui worked for

and if its said they work for anyone other than the zioluminaticons its all a big lie and no CTer would believe it anyway

 
At 10 August, 2006 17:58, Blogger Dog Town said...

Not all theories are fiction.
All Cters theories, I have seen, were fiction.See it is perspective were talken bout here!Try mine on for size.You might like it. Patsies?

 
At 10 August, 2006 18:32, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

why some people revel in speaking like they are a walking thesaurus is beyond me. It is either that they want to look superior to those around them or they want to confuse those around them or both.

Tempestuous;

You can rhyme off all the adjectives and what not, that you like, but you are essentially a bag of hot air, that most people here don't have time for.

Or perhaps I should refer to you as a hyperthermic pleural cavity.

See unlike you, who likely just rhymes off the medicolegal terms for self importance, I use them everyday, when I am at work, where it is APPROPRIATE. If you wish to debate facts on 9/11 (which I highly doubt you do, since you have done nothing only bad mouth others since you came here) then debate away...bring up an aspect of 9/11 you fee is untrue, and let those here who wish, argue you on the point.

Otherwise, keep it simple stupid, because when I am away from work, I like my debate in plain and simple language.

 
At 10 August, 2006 18:32, Blogger BoggleHead said...

"zioluminaticons"

quoted for truth

ahhahahahaha

dog town, oohhh, i get it

so the leader of the orange revolution was poisoned by the ex-KGB "asteroids" or "operatives" for real

but wouldn't that be obvious? wouldn't they worry about getting caught?

isn't it more likely that it was a coincidence that this man's soup contained poison?

and if it didn't really happen, doesn't that make it a conspiracy theory and therefore not worth even talking about?

i mean, if it were fictional, at least it would be a candidate for a conspiracy theory

am i close or what?

conspiracy theories are defined as fiction. therefore all conspiracy theories are fictional.

i totally agree i just wasn't able to identify how that was NOT a tautology

 
At 10 August, 2006 18:39, Blogger BoggleHead said...

remember remember the fifth of november

gunpowder treason and plot

i know of no reason the gunpowder treason

should ever be forgot

http://www.waronfreedom.org/peaceweek/guyfaux.html

 
At 10 August, 2006 19:54, Blogger shawn said...

Even now, few understand that plot: Guy was no fox but a dupe ensnared by the chief minister himself in a madcap scheme to blow up King and Parliament. The real plot was royally successful: to invent a pretext for war with Spain. This fraud was the foundation of the British empire.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

 
At 10 August, 2006 20:08, Blogger BoggleHead said...

But if you laugh it only means you don't understand the framework of 90% of conspiracy theories

 
At 10 August, 2006 20:15, Blogger shawn said...

But if you laugh it only means you don't understand the framework of 90% of conspiracy theories

Boggle, I used to buy this kind of stuff hook, line, and sinker. I understand conspiracy theory logic, I still find it hilarious.

 
At 10 August, 2006 20:38, Blogger BoggleHead said...

Hey it's good that you find the same joke funny over and over, 'cause here is a different version.

Let's say hypothetically I could document a government program to provoke terrorist groups into undertaking major terrorist attacks on the theory that the groups targeted are comparatively inept and not ready to carry out the plots.

And while government informants provoke them into the plot, they're also getting directly involved in the terrorist groups' finances, playing shell games with their money, rediverting it to keep the program going.

Here's the punchline: do you think they would make the plot public and say it's a major victory in the war on terror and never clearly state how it was related to the program of "infiltrating, manipulating and neutralizing" terrorist groups?

I mean I think that stuff is funny too, I'm glad we can both laugh about it. hehe

 
At 10 August, 2006 20:41, Blogger nesNYC said...

No doubt intended to blunt the growing acceptance of 9-11 Denial.

No one is denyng 9/11. We only qestion who did it. Israel and the US/GOV are prime suspects.

 
At 10 August, 2006 21:04, Blogger shawn said...

Israel and the US/GOV are prime suspects.

Nesnyc, 9/11 denial is denying the basic facts of 9/11 - that 19 men, agents of al-Qaeda hijacked four planes and crashed/tried to crash them into landmarks.

And Boggle, it's logically fallacious to apply something that happened hundreds of years later to a past event. It's like using what happened in Rwanda to prove the Holocaust happened.

 
At 10 August, 2006 21:28, Blogger nesNYC said...

Nesnyc, 9/11 denial is denying the basic facts of 9/11 - that 19 men, agents of al-Qaeda hijacked four planes and crashed/tried to crash them into landmarks.

Those are not basic facts. Those are simply lies. The truth is the Anglo/Israeli military/political complexes orchestrated 9/11 for their gain, that's exactly what happened. The "19 hijackers" are their fairytale and unfortunately, you actually haven't the sophistication to think otherwise. It is the believers of the Osama myth that are in mass denial of the historical facts in these events.

 
At 10 August, 2006 21:35, Blogger shawn said...

The "19 hijackers" are their fairytale and unfortunately, you actually haven't the sophistication to think otherwise. It is the believers of the Osama myth that are in mass denial of the historical facts in these events.

Irony alert.

It's hilarious having a person completely unread in history and geopolitics tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.

Keep believing your fantasy while calling reality a fairy tale.

 
At 10 August, 2006 21:43, Blogger Dog Town said...

For the record Boggle! I will be specific! Not one 911 theory is reality in my eyes. The others you speak of were assaults, or attacks,though sneaky! Not a large fictional web of conspiritors!
Besides you make more money with half ass fiction! Look at Dylan.S'all I'm say'en!
Carry On!

 
At 10 August, 2006 21:50, Blogger nesNYC said...

It's hilarious having a person completely unread in history and geopolitics tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.

I've read and research that version of history. It doesn't make any sense. But like I said, you lack the sophistication to tell otherwise. You actually believe the Zionist controlled press version of events and have forever trapped yourself there. It's not too late if you repent :)

 
At 10 August, 2006 22:12, Blogger nesNYC said...

No doubt intended to blunt the growing acceptance of 9-11 Denial.

Or..

- Condition you guys to better accept the next false flag

- Cove the unfolding Israeli generated humanitarian crisis in Lebanon.

 
At 10 August, 2006 22:18, Blogger nesNYC said...

That's 'cover', typo...

 
At 10 August, 2006 22:35, Blogger default.xbe said...

The truth is the Anglo/Israeli military/political complexes orchestrated 9/11 for their gain

just for the record, this isnt "questioning who did it"

that's exactly what happened.

just asking questions?

 
At 11 August, 2006 01:50, Blogger BoggleHead said...

dog town, all i took from that was that you agree with the point i'm making

 
At 11 August, 2006 04:22, Blogger Good Lieutenant said...

"No one is denyng 9/11. We only qestion who did it. Israel and the US/GOV are prime suspects."

And the Islamists who did it, admitted it, and are doing it daily around the world and just got busted attempting a similar thing again yesterday are not suspects. Move on, folks. Nothing to see here. College dropouts say so.

"The truth is the Anglo/Israeli military/political complexes orchestrated 9/11 for their gain"

Paranoid rubbish.

default.xbe is right in saying that you aren't simply "asking questions." 9-11 nutters are flat-out lying by asserting that they are "just asking questions." This is a rhetorical ploy that they think will keep you from asking them more questions. Journalists often do the same thing - attempting to disguise their beliefs and intentions by asserting that they are merely impartial observers asking questions - all the while intentionally deflecting attention away from their beliefs and biases. We weren't born yesterday, nesync and co.

This ZionistAmerikkkanaxisofdeath ubernarrative is the central belief that 9-11 denial nutters must attempt prove over and over in order to validate their religion and their emotional investment in this lunatic world they have created on the internet for themselves. It is the very sustenance of their belief system -liberalism in general, as well. No coincidence there.

A bunch of college dropouts dupe a large group of high-school kidz and college dropouts that you don't need to be educated to dupe uneducated people if you can upload something to youtube, and the cycle reproduces and remanifests itself ad nauseum.

Its like watching a virus spread, and SLC and other evidence-centric sites are the antibodies.

 
At 11 August, 2006 07:51, Blogger CHF said...

Nesnyc,

in your opinion do Islamic radicals even exist?

If every Muslim terror attack is really carried out by the CIA and the Jews then does that mean jihadists don't hate us despite their regular assurances that they do? Please explain.

 
At 11 August, 2006 08:10, Blogger shawn said...

I've read and research that version of history. It doesn't make any sense. But like I said, you lack the sophistication to tell otherwise. You actually believe the Zionist controlled press version of events and have forever trapped yourself there. It's not too late if you repent :)

IT's not that "version" of history you idiot. It's history, period. It's what happened.

 
At 11 August, 2006 09:21, Blogger apathoid said...

I've read and research that version of history. It doesn't make any sense. But like I said, you lack the sophistication to tell otherwise. You actually believe the Zionist controlled press version of events and have forever trapped yourself there. It's not too late if you repent :)

I keep yellin ya, there is medication for your extreme paranoia. One dose, and those Joos will get knocked down a peg or two.
Isn't that what you want?

 
At 11 August, 2006 11:37, Blogger Alex said...

Nesnyc,
in your opinion do Islamic radicals even exist?


He's answered that before. It's his beleif that Osama is a CIA agent (or was untill someone beat him to death with a kidney dialisis machine), that every suicide bombing carried out around the world is in fact carried out by the Mossad so they can place the blame on Arabs, and that all the Hamas and Hezbollah militants we see on TV are in fact "zionist-paid-actors" trying to make us think that Arabs are evil.

And I'm not making any of that up. Well, ok, I might have gotten the kidney dialysis thing wrong, but otherwise, those are the exact beleifs he has expressed on here.

 
At 11 August, 2006 14:41, Blogger default.xbe said...

has nessie ever brought up OBL's "im innocent" statement? because that, interpreted with the assumption hes a CIA operative makes little or no sense whatsoever

 
At 11 August, 2006 17:59, Blogger shawn said...

every suicide bombing carried out around the world is in fact carried out by the Mossad

I bet he thinks the Mossad doing the LTTE bombings, too.

Oh wait, nesnyc probably has no idea who the Tamil Tigers are.

 
At 11 August, 2006 22:46, Blogger Dog Town said...

I loved that band!

LOL!

 
At 12 August, 2006 20:25, Blogger Tempestuous said...

Hey all you fucking aetheists! Why don't you proclaim it to all

 
At 12 August, 2006 22:08, Blogger jackhanyes said...

When manufactured terror exists to set the stage, the real terror will then take it's place or mix with false flag operations eventually, making the truth so skewed people won't know what to think anymore. This was the plan all along. You take an event, shape the world and yes the real extremists will eventually mimic or co-exist with false terror. They create the environment to brew exactly what they want to fight. The extremists were always there, they will always be there.. Smoking them out of the rabbit hole is what has happened and that's what makes exposing 911 that much more important...Before it's too late.....

I'm not even sure what the heck that means.


Your simply little mind can't understand him but you can knock him! Way to go Pat! You're number one!

Let break it down as simple as I can.

He's saying a manufactured terror event will cuase extremists to fight the battle the manufacture want them to fight.

Remember, not every warrior picks up as gun. Some fight by approval.

 
At 12 August, 2006 22:15, Blogger shawn said...

He's saying a manufactured terror event will cuase extremists to fight the battle the manufacture want them to fight.

The problem is there's no evidence terror is "manufactured". As of right now, all the evidence points to terror being a tool of nationalist groups to remove (what they see) as foreign occupying forces.

 
At 06 August, 2008 01:32, Blogger herehereo said...

wow gold
buy wow gold
cheap wow gold
world of warcraft gold
runescape
runescape money
buy runescape money
wow gold
cheap wow gold
buy wow gold
world of warcraft gold
guild wars
guild wars gold
buy guild wars gold
maple story
maple story mesos
maplestory mesos
age of conan
age of conan gold
buy age of conan gold
aoc gold
buy aoc gold
age of conan
age of conan gold
buy age of conan gold
aoc gold
buy aoc gold
age of conan
age of conan gold
buy age of conan gold
aoc gold
buy aoc gold

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home