Terror Plot Foiled in England
No doubt intended to blunt the growing acceptance of 9-11 Denial.
That's purely a miniature psy-op to blunt all this talk about 9/11 as an inside job. It's a direct response I suspect.
its a shame that some idiot islamics would do this and not wait for 9/11 truth to come out- they have just comepletely dont the opposite- if indeed this is real...
Yes, you see, in the mind of a 9-11 Denier, the terrorists did it because they were falsely accused of terrorism. As usual, we get the "this reminds me of a movie":
Reminds me of V for Vendetta....
Here's the contribution of someone misnamed "Logic":
When manufactured terror exists to set the stage, the real terror will then take it's place or mix with false flag operations eventually, making the truth so skewed people won't know what to think anymore. This was the plan all along. You take an event, shape the world and yes the real extremists will eventually mimic or co-exist with false terror. They create the environment to brew exactly what they want to fight. The extremists were always there, they will always be there.. Smoking them out of the rabbit hole is what has happened and that's what makes exposing 911 that much more important...Before it's too late.....
I'm not even sure what the heck that means.
posted by Pat @ 6:26 AM
41 comments
41 Comments:
As I said at Jref, the 8/10 Plot was actually concocted by "Truthers" as a means of diverting our attention from their 9/11 movement.
Oh, sorry...Ja wohl mein 911goosestepper
Thanks for insulting the real victims of Nazi with you paranoid playtime. I realise this is all just a game to you, but that does not mean you must be a disrespectful jerk.
Look up 'Godwin's Law' sometime, BTW.
So now you wimps have feelings? Wow, take some medication for the bipolar disorder. Raise Old Glory, drink a damn beer, throw down your crying towels and relax.
No, I just find lame-ass comparisons to brutal dictatorships that deliberately slaughter millions of its own citizens to be distasteful. Not mention extremely unoriginal and lame-brained.
Seriously, the entire English language is at your disposal, along with centuries of wit and criticism, yet all your tiny brain could come up with was "I'll compare them to NAZIS!!!"?
Oh ya, and obviously "Quirk's Exception" applies to your troublesome and hypocritical outpouring of filth.
Quirk's exception has to do with bringing Nazi's up in order to deliberately end the discussion. Doesn't apply.
You aren't very good at this, are you?
Wait you fools use words like "nutbar", "loosers",
Insults, not comparisons t omass-murdering regimes.
comparisons with the Munster's TV show,
Does Eddie have a body count that I am unaware of?
personal attacks, derogatory uses of the term "jew",
I defy you to produce that. You've seen us use the term "must have been the jooos" in mockery of the anti-semites who try to blame everything on Jews.
insinuations of mental illness,
Which in many cases may be more than an insiuation, but a statement of fact.
and a pluthora of interminable evocations,
None of which make the targets the equivelant of mass-murderers.
and you have the audacity to be offended by a metaphor.
Metaphors are supposed to be accurate. Yours isn't
Anyway back to the terror plot - the CTers pretend that every terror attack feeds the military industrial complex, the spy budgets, the globalists, etc. Ironically though, every plot is more material for Alex Jones and the rest of the insane clown posse that feeds of terrorism as material for their conspiracy websites.
Remember, terrorism is theoretically impossible. Jeff Rense says so. It simply must be a conspiracy.
1. You are lucky that mental illness is not a protected class, or you would be sued a thousand fold. Goodbye dwelling.
Irrelevant. Calling someone what they resemble is not actionable.
2.Incendiary attacks and slanderous statements against public figures for a limited purpose is actionable...And you are on notice; IP.
Another internet lawyer bully. To date, nothign sad here qualified as slander or libel. Insulting someone or stating your opinion about them does not qualify. Learn.
3.Your shrouded mocking of a religious faith in the context you have used, is only a thin veil over your nefarious intentions.
Excuse me? Its not our side that has the folks trying to blame an entire ethnic group for the trouble. Look back at dear old 'nesync' s post for a real bit of fun.
4.Godwin's Law is hearby changed to Goodwin's law--Comparisons to Jesus keep a thread healthy and promotes less animosity.
Sorry, but why are you bringing up any semblance of Christianity?
You really suck at this, don't you?
I already explained Godwin's Law to temp, the idiot doesn't get it.
And I guess following sound science makes up follow in "moronic lock-step". Excellent logic, temp. Keep up the good work.
I already explained Godwin's Law to temp, the idiot doesn't get it.
I suspect that 'doesn't get it' is a frequent statement in temps life.
You are little odd/queer aren't you tele. Your bi-polar capabilities are quite astounding.
At least he didn't make some reference to National Socialism.
Oh wait, he said queer.
You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism.
"You tough steroid"? That isn't even proper English.
You freaks have your panties in a wad over it.
Most people don't take kindly to being compared to the most heinous mass murderers in human history. Especially when we have nothing in common.
You must be running your operation out of a prison. Your attitudes and demeanor are horribly vexatious.
"Operation"? What the hell are you on?
Debate you coward...
And you prove my point yet again. The weaker, desperate side uses this tactic of forcing a debate (and of course your ad hominem helps). If someone said gravity was a myth and I proved it wasn't, should I have to debate them? Or someone saying the Earth was flat?
You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism. You freaks have your panties in a wad over it. You must be running your operation out of a prison. Your attitudes and demeanor are horribly vexatious. Debate you coward...
Is it just me or is anyone else having a hard time understanding what in the hey this dude is talking about. Debate what? Nazi references?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Debate what? Nazi references?
He's pretending to be a neutral party (I believe the proper term is a "moby"), and wants us to debate the CTers to prove our point.
You tough steriod made specific references to national socialism
It was a joke, retard. Add "humour" as #257 on the list of things you are clueless about. Now stop wasting my oxygen and go jump under a bomb with your Hezbollah buddies. I doubt anyone will miss you, you're about as usefull as a football bat.
Sam Adams would spit on you.
And Aristotle would spit on you (not that you'll understand the reference).
Heh, watch out, looks like we've got another Internet Tough Guy on our hands! We better cool it guys, or he might threaten and swear some more. I hear some of these trolls can actually make your brain haemorrhage through incessant streams of verbal diarrhoea.
Uh T-cells counts have to do with HIV, not cancer.
They're telling us that for the 5 years since 9/11 they've been allowing passengers to board planes with the implements (common household items according to Rep. Peter King on Hardball) to make a bomb inflight. ?????
Ok so first we're getting all sorts of restrictions and it's such a horrible thing and now you WANT more restrictions? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh?
Ok so first we're getting all sorts of restrictions and it's such a horrible thing and now you WANT more restrictions? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh?
Exactly. I could just see Joan at the security gate if these restrictions had been implemented...
WHAT DO YOU MEAN I CAN'T TAKE MY HAIRSPRAY ON THE PLANE!?!?! What am I gonna do, mace the pilot with it? HAHA! If I did that, Fetzer would beat me to death with his luggage! I WANT MY LAWYER!!!!
this is a story of monumental incompetence.
And if they just suddenly banned hairspray or lysol you'd be saying they were overreacting. It's just like it took 9/11 for a lot of Americans to wake up to the threat Islamism is to the West.
if they stopped them doesnt that mean someone must have thought of it?
Not neccesarily. They may simply have aroused suspicion based on appearance, attitude, or any slips they may have made while talking to security personnel. If they were then held and questioned, their stories would have started to fall apart rather quickly. Terrorists don't usualy plan much for the eventuality of being captured, so they tend not to have very good cover stories. After that it would have been a simple matter of either analyzing their luggage and coming up with a probable scenario, or simply questioning them untill one or more cracked and confessed.
No...No...the T-cell thing is already coming...The cancer is forthcoming...Sorry for misunderstanding...and sorry...
OK, I dare you to make less sense.
There was another expert on TV saying this sounded like a repeat of the "Bojinka" plot of 1995!
I said that on the SLC forum a little bit ago.
Except in Bojinka they were going to use "normal" explosives. Ramzi Yousef was gonna be part of that.
There was another expert on TV saying this sounded like a repeat of the "Bojinka" plot of 1995! So its not like they even had to outthink terrorists; they already have information that making a bomb in flight from liquid explosives is a possibility.
The Bojinka plot had the would be bombers with explosives already made. Nitroglycerin in contact lens solution bottles. Different animal.
Nitroglycerin in contact lens solution bottles.
Ouch. Never heard of that one, but damn, that sounds pretty dangeours. Although it's rather comical in a way. Just imagine...
Ramzi: We're going to miss the plane! Quickly, we must run!
....
BOOM!
(sidenote for those not familiar with explosives: nitroglycerin is EXTREMELY unstable)
why some people revel in speaking like they are a walking thesaurus is beyond me. It is either that they want to look superior to those around them or they want to confuse those around them or both.
Tempestuous;
You can rhyme off all the adjectives and what not, that you like, but you are essentially a bag of hot air, that most people here don't have time for.
Or perhaps I should refer to you as a hyperthermic pleural cavity.
See unlike you, who likely just rhymes off the medicolegal terms for self importance, I use them everyday, when I am at work, where it is APPROPRIATE. If you wish to debate facts on 9/11 (which I highly doubt you do, since you have done nothing only bad mouth others since you came here) then debate away...bring up an aspect of 9/11 you fee is untrue, and let those here who wish, argue you on the point.
Otherwise, keep it simple stupid, because when I am away from work, I like my debate in plain and simple language.
Even now, few understand that plot: Guy was no fox but a dupe ensnared by the chief minister himself in a madcap scheme to blow up King and Parliament. The real plot was royally successful: to invent a pretext for war with Spain. This fraud was the foundation of the British empire.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
But if you laugh it only means you don't understand the framework of 90% of conspiracy theories
Boggle, I used to buy this kind of stuff hook, line, and sinker. I understand conspiracy theory logic, I still find it hilarious.
No doubt intended to blunt the growing acceptance of 9-11 Denial.
No one is denyng 9/11. We only qestion who did it. Israel and the US/GOV are prime suspects.
Israel and the US/GOV are prime suspects.
Nesnyc, 9/11 denial is denying the basic facts of 9/11 - that 19 men, agents of al-Qaeda hijacked four planes and crashed/tried to crash them into landmarks.
And Boggle, it's logically fallacious to apply something that happened hundreds of years later to a past event. It's like using what happened in Rwanda to prove the Holocaust happened.
Nesnyc, 9/11 denial is denying the basic facts of 9/11 - that 19 men, agents of al-Qaeda hijacked four planes and crashed/tried to crash them into landmarks.
Those are not basic facts. Those are simply lies. The truth is the Anglo/Israeli military/political complexes orchestrated 9/11 for their gain, that's exactly what happened. The "19 hijackers" are their fairytale and unfortunately, you actually haven't the sophistication to think otherwise. It is the believers of the Osama myth that are in mass denial of the historical facts in these events.
The "19 hijackers" are their fairytale and unfortunately, you actually haven't the sophistication to think otherwise. It is the believers of the Osama myth that are in mass denial of the historical facts in these events.
Irony alert.
It's hilarious having a person completely unread in history and geopolitics tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
Keep believing your fantasy while calling reality a fairy tale.
It's hilarious having a person completely unread in history and geopolitics tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
I've read and research that version of history. It doesn't make any sense. But like I said, you lack the sophistication to tell otherwise. You actually believe the Zionist controlled press version of events and have forever trapped yourself there. It's not too late if you repent :)
No doubt intended to blunt the growing acceptance of 9-11 Denial.
Or..
- Condition you guys to better accept the next false flag
- Cove the unfolding Israeli generated humanitarian crisis in Lebanon.
That's 'cover', typo...
"No one is denyng 9/11. We only qestion who did it. Israel and the US/GOV are prime suspects."
And the Islamists who did it, admitted it, and are doing it daily around the world and just got busted attempting a similar thing again yesterday are not suspects. Move on, folks. Nothing to see here. College dropouts say so.
"The truth is the Anglo/Israeli military/political complexes orchestrated 9/11 for their gain"
Paranoid rubbish.
default.xbe is right in saying that you aren't simply "asking questions." 9-11 nutters are flat-out lying by asserting that they are "just asking questions." This is a rhetorical ploy that they think will keep you from asking them more questions. Journalists often do the same thing - attempting to disguise their beliefs and intentions by asserting that they are merely impartial observers asking questions - all the while intentionally deflecting attention away from their beliefs and biases. We weren't born yesterday, nesync and co.
This ZionistAmerikkkanaxisofdeath ubernarrative is the central belief that 9-11 denial nutters must attempt prove over and over in order to validate their religion and their emotional investment in this lunatic world they have created on the internet for themselves. It is the very sustenance of their belief system -liberalism in general, as well. No coincidence there.
A bunch of college dropouts dupe a large group of high-school kidz and college dropouts that you don't need to be educated to dupe uneducated people if you can upload something to youtube, and the cycle reproduces and remanifests itself ad nauseum.
Its like watching a virus spread, and SLC and other evidence-centric sites are the antibodies.
I've read and research that version of history. It doesn't make any sense. But like I said, you lack the sophistication to tell otherwise. You actually believe the Zionist controlled press version of events and have forever trapped yourself there. It's not too late if you repent :)
IT's not that "version" of history you idiot. It's history, period. It's what happened.
Nesnyc,
in your opinion do Islamic radicals even exist?
He's answered that before. It's his beleif that Osama is a CIA agent (or was untill someone beat him to death with a kidney dialisis machine), that every suicide bombing carried out around the world is in fact carried out by the Mossad so they can place the blame on Arabs, and that all the Hamas and Hezbollah militants we see on TV are in fact "zionist-paid-actors" trying to make us think that Arabs are evil.
And I'm not making any of that up. Well, ok, I might have gotten the kidney dialysis thing wrong, but otherwise, those are the exact beleifs he has expressed on here.
every suicide bombing carried out around the world is in fact carried out by the Mossad
I bet he thinks the Mossad doing the LTTE bombings, too.
Oh wait, nesnyc probably has no idea who the Tamil Tigers are.
He's saying a manufactured terror event will cuase extremists to fight the battle the manufacture want them to fight.
The problem is there's no evidence terror is "manufactured". As of right now, all the evidence points to terror being a tool of nationalist groups to remove (what they see) as foreign occupying forces.
Post a Comment
<< Home