The Debate
J. R. Dunn, at the American Thinker, continues to pound Jim Fetzer into the ground. This fight should have been called a long time ago.
At the end of my first response I set certain conditions. Any commentary was to be a logical, succinct, and coherent analysis of every statement I have made here, and in my article as well, following the example I have given you. I have no interest in any more factoids, none of this “I saw it someplace on the Net” stuff. Fully sourced, fully researched material – that is the minimum acceptable response.
That’s not what we have here, needless to say. I admit I wasn’t really expecting it either.
posted by James B. @ 7:03 AM
7 comments
7 Comments:
Come on! Everyone knows Dunn's Cheney's Mossad contact at the American Thinker!
The curtain of 9-11 is falling away! It was teh Joooos!!!
Hah, did you follow the link to the Portland Indymedia site? It's an article by Tom Flocco, citing no less an authority than Karl Schwarz!
For some reason, the song "Smack My Bitch Up" kept popping into my head while reading that.
For some reason, the song "Smack My Bitch Up" kept popping into my head while reading that.
Thanks Chad! I saw your comment before I read the article, so I put that song on before clicking the link! makes an excellent soundtrack to the article.
The trial of whether the official 9/11 story is truth or hoax doesn't follow those rules - "because I say that's what it is and I say it came from the Pentagon scene."
And THAT is one of the reasons we call you CT nuts.
Because evidence gathered by professionals, and expert testimony on the nature of that evidence, is not enough to convince you.
Instead, you rely on Youtube videos that basically say "I don't think that it's what they say it is".
In the real world, only one of those scenarios is considered suitable evidence. The fact that you believe in the one which is NOT tells me all I need to know about you and your beliefs.
I have got to admit, I though Fetzer was gonna come out swinging. yet all he does is quote incredibly old and well debunked photos. i mean how many times do we have to show them the true size of the hole in the pentagon before they will get rid of this stupid 16 foot hole argument.
As for the engines, large parts of the engines were recovered.
Oh my...I may take his rebuttal and correct him on all the shit Dunn didnt.
TAM
You know what's scary? Good Lieutenant is engaging in satire, pretending to be a drooling moron. But, he doesn't sound any dumber than the people who write stuff like that for real.
Post a Comment
<< Home