Wednesday, September 20, 2006

9-11 Denial Is Not Going Away

I wondered a couple of weeks ago if the interest that 9-11 Denial seemed to build over the summer would collapse after the fifth anniversary had passed. So far that doesn't seem to have happened. Oh, we certainly saw a sudden spike in interest on the weekend of 9-11-06, with traffic surging to an incredible 6,000 visitors on 9-10, followed the next day by 16,000. And we did see traffic decline every day after that for the next five days.

But. The last five days traffic has stabilized at about 2700-3100 visitors per day, which is a little over a thousand more visitors per day than we were getting in late August/early September. Remember, we get a disproportionate amount of our traffic from Google searches for "Loose Change", so we're a pretty good barometer of interest in the Loosers.

52 Comments:

At 20 September, 2006 18:09, Blogger roger_sq said...

Must be kind of depressing to know your only traffic is lost people looking for something else.

You guys get the scraps off Dylan Avery's table just like the lapdogs you are.

Beautiful, thanks for sharing.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:20, Blogger zippychippy said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:23, Blogger shawn said...

Hey, look, Mr. Ad Hominem is at it again.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:26, Blogger zippychippy said...

I'm really lazy so I just Google "Screw Loose Change" when I want to see what's up on this blog. I don't know how Google "rates" that, but I'm in no way intrested in finding out more about Loose Change.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:29, Blogger default.xbe said...

You guys get the scraps off Dylan Avery's table just like the lapdogs you are.

well if my forums are any indication they get alot of traffic of their own, here are some search terms that brought people to my forums:

screw loose change
anti loose change
screwloosechange
disproving loose change
loose change credibility
911myths
loose change fake

oh, BTW, both the blog and the forum appear higher than the official loose change site in a search for "loose change forum" that means more sites link to us than them :P

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:40, Blogger 911coverup said...

The "9/11: Press for Truth" documentry, which was released on september 7(?), has been downloaded 134000 times and received full 5 stars on 1450 votes

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1016720641536424083

Simply amazing =)

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:43, Blogger 911coverup said...

Sorry 114000 times, not 134000

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:45, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...


Must be kind of depressing to know your only traffic is lost people looking for something else.

You guys get the scraps off Dylan Avery's table just like the lapdogs you are.

Beautiful, thanks for sharing.


Must be kind of depressing to know you're fighting a losing battle that makes you look like an idiot to almost anyone lacking outright paranoia and anyone with an IQ>70.

Must be kind of depressing to know that the only thing you spend your time at is creating a sinister all evil world to replace the one that rejects you.

Shall we continue the insults, or do you ever have anything productive to say roger???

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:45, Blogger 911coverup said...

I have no doubt we'll be seeing "screw the truth" blog anytime soon...because that's basically what you've been doing.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:48, Blogger roger_sq said...

Sorry 114000 times, not 134000

Wait a few days.

Hmmm.. where's the screw press for truth blog? Maybe I'll start one and demonize upset families of the victims. I could link to screwloosechange. Cool.

Oh wait, that's right. I have alife. Never mind.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:48, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Must be kind of depressing to know your only traffic is lost people looking for something else.

Speaking of lost people....

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:48, Blogger roger_sq said...

Hey, look, Mr. Ad Hominem is at it again.

You mean the guy who calls everyone a douchebag?

Haven't seen him post here yet.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:53, Blogger default.xbe said...

I have no doubt we'll be seeing "screw the truth" blog anytime soon...because that's basically what you've been doing.

the "truth" movement already has that one covered

Hmmm.. where's the screw press for truth blog? Maybe I'll start one and demonize upset families of the victims.

as best i can tell press for truth criticizes the military's complacency pre-911, nothing more

Oh wait, that's right. I have alife. Never mind.

then go get back to it instead of posting here all the time

if i wasnt at work right now id have soemthign better to do too

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:53, Blogger 911coverup said...

Rog, I'd like to start "screw the truth" blog but I don't speak coulterism. Maybe I can learn from the guys here.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:53, Blogger 911coverup said...

Rog, I'd like to start "screw the truth" blog but I don't speak coulterism. Maybe I can learn from the guys here.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:55, Blogger shawn said...

You mean the guy who calls everyone a douchebag?

No, I meant the guy who can't make an argument to save his own life so all's he does is snipes (you know, you).

Remember, rog, there was no Roman Republic.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:57, Blogger shawn said...

Rog, I'd like to start "screw the truth" blog but I don't speak coulterism. Maybe I can learn from the guys here.

911, you might have missed it, but you already have a screw the truth blog.

 
At 20 September, 2006 18:58, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

I have no doubt we'll be seeing "screw the truth" blog anytime soon...because that's basically what you've been doing

Does this douchebag EVER say anything that makes any sense?

 
At 20 September, 2006 19:05, Blogger default.xbe said...

heres your screw the truth blog

 
At 20 September, 2006 19:37, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

You mean the guy who calls everyone a douchebag?

Who is that guy anyway?
Where has he been?

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:02, Blogger CHF said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:02, Blogger CHF said...

Hey Roger - on 9/11/06 we saw what kind of support you quacks have.

Between 800-2,000 of you showed up for your biggest-ever protest!

That's pathetic.

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:47, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

9-11 Denial is Not Going Away

Hey - Stalin and Hitler and Mao and Ho Chi Minh still have their supporters, and they are all dead.

It is hard for the Left to let go of these kind of things.

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:48, Blogger Chad said...

Between 800-2,000 of you showed up for your biggest-ever protest!

And I'd say a solid 80% of that crowd was made up of people who had to skip class to be there. The exact same demographic that sits on Google Video all day so they can give 5 STARS to their favorite Dylan Avery spin-off while smokin' the cheapest pot their night-shift at McDonalds can pay for.

Yeah. I'd be proud too.

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:50, Blogger roger_sq said...

Hey Roger - on 9/11/06 we saw what kind of support you quacks have.

Between 800-2,000 of you showed up for your biggest-ever protest!

That's pathetic.


Let's see.. I counted abby (don't kill yourself abby we love you we really do), gravy (explained a lot, seeing the guy), and two other debunkers, and a crazy lady screaming we're all gonna be under sharia laaaaaaaaaw! So let's not keep score.

Anyway I didn't feel it was appropriate to protest at ground zero, but fully respect those who did. I am sure there's plenty who feel the same. Doesn't mean a damn thing.

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:54, Blogger roger_sq said...

Must be kind of depressing to know you're fighting a losing battle that makes you look like an idiot to almost anyone lacking outright paranoia and anyone with an IQ>70.

Must be kind of depressing to know that the only thing you spend your time at is creating a sinister all evil world to replace the one that rejects you.

Shall we continue the insults, or do you ever have anything productive to say roger???


IQ well above 150.

Not paranoid,although I am definitely on a list. If I cared about being on a list, then I'd be paranoid.

And the world loves me, so I don't know what the rejection bit is about. All I want is a real investigation. The fact that you are all so vehemently opposed toanything that contradicts your worldview is your own failing.

PS= Shawn, your repunlic of rome bit is the dumbest goddam thing you've ever posted. And you're a douchebag.

Later...

 
At 20 September, 2006 20:59, Blogger default.xbe said...

IQ well above 150.

actually peopel with incredibly high IQs do tend to be paranoid, reclusive and quite eccentric

 
At 20 September, 2006 21:00, Blogger default.xbe said...

Let's see.. I counted abby (don't kill yourself abby we love you we really do), gravy (explained a lot, seeing the guy), and two other debunkers, and a crazy lady screaming we're all gonna be under sharia laaaaaaaaaw! So let's not keep score.


what about all the other people there who didnt give a crap about what you had to say? most people dont even think your worth the effort of debunking

 
At 20 September, 2006 21:25, Blogger roger_sq said...

actually peopel with incredibly high IQs do tend to be paranoid, reclusive and quite eccentric

thanks for the chuckle. Perception is reality after all. Allow me to clue you in with a translation from your IQ to a higher one.

IQ 100ish, observes paranoid- translation, understands machinations of power and oreder which are not visible to the average intellect.

IQ 100ish, observes reclusive- translation: tend not to find satisfaction engaging in discourse with large groups of total fucking imbeciles om a regular basis.

IQ 100ish, observes quite eccentric- translation: 'different' capable of independent thought, lack of desire to conform.

Make up your mind if you're going to pgeonhole. Is it <70 or >150 that are your problem. Does it not occur to you how fucking deperate you all are to make sense of everything when you cannot?

Yeah, intelligent people are what's wrong with the world today.

Alright, last conbtribution for awhile gang...I'll drop by and wish you a merry christmas. My pro bono attempts to cudgel you out of your shells has met its end for now...adieu.

douchebags.

 
At 20 September, 2006 21:42, Blogger Blind Avocado said...

All I want is a real investigation.

There have already been several real investigations. Somebody with an I.Q. "well above 150" would know that. What you really want is a kangaroo investigation that will confirm your distorted, paranoid worldview and validate your pathetic existence. I.Q. above 150? Nice try.

 
At 20 September, 2006 22:41, Blogger Triterope said...

IQ well above 150

...out of a thousand.

 
At 21 September, 2006 02:36, Blogger apathoid said...

IQ well above 150

Wow Roger, we all have 250+ IQs, so there - you're still stupid and we're still smart.
Huzzah!!!

Seriously, if you had a 90 IQ - and were over 17, I'd be really suprised based on what you type here.

 
At 21 September, 2006 02:38, Blogger apathoid said...

actually peopel with incredibly high IQs do tend to be paranoid, reclusive and quite eccentric

This is true, however - irrelevant. Roger is confirmed to be suffering from paranoid delusions, so whats a little delusion of grandeur sprinkled on top?

 
At 21 September, 2006 02:57, Blogger Good Lieutenant said...

Again, remember the key demos of this Truther "movement:"

single high-school aged males, goth losers, "punk rockers," anarchists, aging and neohippies, drug addicts, social rejects, neonazis, Hollacaust deniers, UFO conspiracists, paranoid schitzos, flim school rejects, Democrat bloggers, Democrat congresspeople, LaRouche supporters, etc.

Absolutely. Pathetic. People.

 
At 21 September, 2006 04:20, Blogger CHF said...

Roger,

All I want is a real investigation.

WHO SHOULD CONDUCT THIS "REAL" INVESTIGATION?

Give me some names already.

 
At 21 September, 2006 04:26, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

Don't mean to be a dick but I want to help Roger with some suggestions.

Queen Beatrix

Ringo Starr

Jimmy Popali from The Bloodhound Gang

Ayn Rand's disembodied floating head

A random Disney worker in a Goofy suit

Jackie Martling from the old Howard Stern show

Rowan Atkinson

Trumpy the painting Elephant(consult his agent at Trumpy@sandiegozoo.net)

 
At 21 September, 2006 05:14, Blogger shawn said...

IQ well above 150.

They must've fucked up from the test if a guy who thinks the Cold War was nothing and didn't know there was a Roman Republic scored at 150.

 
At 21 September, 2006 05:14, Blogger shawn said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 21 September, 2006 05:21, Blogger shawn said...

and a crazy lady screaming we're all gonna be under sharia laaaaaaaaaw!

Ok, so a lady who actually fears a threat that at least has some basis in reality is "crazy", yet you and all the other people who believe in an inside job fantasy are perfectly sane?

Back and to the left, rog. Back and to the left.

 
At 21 September, 2006 05:35, Blogger JoanBasil said...

Regarding going to ground zero on 9/11 - not something I'd do, just like I've never been to a political rally but I always vote. I've never been to an antiwar rally, either. I think the polls are what matter and they are already at widespread public skepticism of the official version.

 
At 21 September, 2006 05:43, Blogger shawn said...

I've never been to an antiwar rally, either

Weird, I've been to a dozen at least.

 
At 21 September, 2006 06:03, Blogger AbrashTX said...

It is hard for the Left to let go of these kind of things.

Simon Lazarus--Don't you dare lump all of "the left" in with 9-11 Deniers. 9-11 deniers are a fringe movement that combines far-left and far-right conspiracism. "The left." or the progressive culture that I belong to, doesn't want anything to do with these fools.

 
At 21 September, 2006 06:55, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Let's see.. I counted abby (don't kill yourself abby we love you we really do), gravy (explained a lot, seeing the guy), and two other debunkers, and a crazy lady screaming we're all gonna be under sharia laaaaaaaaaw! So let's not keep score.

And dont forge the THOUSANDS who were there to mourn the victims of 9-11 while you ASSHATS were there to shout, "ITS ALL ABOUT ME, ME, ME!!!"

 
At 21 September, 2006 07:05, Blogger Chad said...

I think the polls are what matter...

Thanks Joan. I spit up my coffee when I read that.

 
At 21 September, 2006 07:37, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

and a crazy lady screaming we're all gonna be under sharia laaaaaaaaaw!

a crazy lady screaming at a crazy group that thinks NASA took the flight 93 passangers.

I can hear the twilight zone theme now.

 
At 21 September, 2006 07:42, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

There have already been several real investigations. Somebody with an I.Q. "well above 150" would know that. What you really want is a kangaroo investigation that will confirm your distorted, paranoid worldview and validate your pathetic existence. I.Q. above 150? Nice try.

Well put BA!

Roger, I had previously placed you on the Douchebag list and once on the list you are not authorized to call others douchebag, douchebag.

 
At 21 September, 2006 07:47, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

I think the polls are what matter and they are already at widespread public skepticism of the official

LOL!!!
THAT IS RICH!!!
Joan,
Just when I think you cannot top your bullshit you then surprise me.
Polls for the most part are utter bullshit and DESIGNED to slant toward whatever outcomb the creator wants.

 
At 21 September, 2006 09:05, Blogger Alex said...

IQ's got nothing to do with it. I don't know if Roger really has a 150+ IQ but I know that I do, and obviously are views are diametrically opposed. IQ is a measurement of your capability to learn and to solve problems and notice patterns - it's NOT a measure of how much you know, or what you're likely to end up believing. The ability to learn and solve problems is irrelevant when you start off with flawed perceptions, and use bad data. If you want to measure peoples likelihood of becoming "twoofers", what's needed is a test to determine a persons aptitude for logical thinking and data analysis using real-world data, not simple analysis based on mathematical problems and pattern matching.

 
At 21 September, 2006 10:45, Blogger CHF said...

I think the polls are what matter

Which polls do you mean, joan?

The one that showed more support for UFO and JFK theories than 9/11 CTs?

Your "movement" is tiny and a good 80% of you probably won't vote anyway.

There will be no revolution, and no trial for Silvertein or the FDNY.

 
At 21 September, 2006 15:28, Blogger shawn said...

The left." or the progressive culture that I belong to,

The Left isn't progressive (nor is the Right). They just think they are.

 
At 21 September, 2006 15:45, Blogger default.xbe said...

thanks for the chuckle. Perception is reality after all. Allow me to clue you in with a translation from your IQ to a higher one.

my IQ = 159 asshole

as far as knowledge goes IQ is meaningless

if you know your IQ you must have taken an IQ test before, so you know they dont ask general knowledge questions, they ask you to identify patterns

problem is high IQ people tend to read too deeply into things, and identify patterns that arent there, i know this from experience

 
At 21 September, 2006 17:35, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I will not get into a pissing match over IQ here, let me just say mine stacks up with those I have seen here (except for those with the 250+...lol)

Obviously, in rogers case, IQ does not translate into common sense or logical thinking, but rather, it seems to have translated into a phenominal degree of paranoia.

TAM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home