Moron Hani Hanjour
To listen to the Deniers, you'd think that Hani Hanjour was the worst pilot of all time. But while re-reading the 9-11 Commission Report again the other day, this paragraph jumped out at me:
Rented small planes and took a trip to Gaithersburg, MD? But I thought "he could not fly at all"?
posted by Pat @ 3:39 PM
17 comments
17 Comments:
You forget Pat, that citing the Commission Report in order to counter CT arguments is pointless.
Every word of that report is dipped in lies and rolled in shit as far as they're concerned.
... Unless of course they find something in there that proves a point they have. That part's true then.
But the rest is shite.
Hmmm I guess the 9/11 Omission report forgot to omit something.
Does it say anything about area 51 in there?
give it up.
TAM
What the hell does the Phoenix memo have to do with any of this?
Why do twoofers always bring up totally unrelated topics to try and prove impossible concepts?
Just testing the 'debunkers' if they knew anything about the Phoenix Memo.
Oh no! Scare quotes! All my beliefs are being destroyed by people much smarter than me, let me put quotes around debunker!!!! That'll show them!!!11111ONEoneone.
Phoenix Memo =/= any evidence for you.
I do wonder how did he ever obtain a flying permit after failing several flight lessons.
I failed my first driving test. I have a license.
Wow, how does it feel getting destroyed every time you come over here?
I don't know what "=/=" means.
How surprising. Does not equal.
Thanks, tho. I do wonder how did he ever obtain a flying permit after failing several flight lessons.
When people fail, they take the class again. realy simple, yes?
Except in your case, where apparently you accused the Principle of being Zionist Illuminati when you failed basic logic 101.
Ever thought about ritalian?
I wasn't aware mocking idiots was a sign of ADHD.
Maybe they let him go because they had nothing on him?
Whoa, they let people go when they don't have evidence against them?
That's news to the inside jobbers methinks.
Maybe they let him go because they had nothing on him?
What is your point?
He has no point. Any argument he could make using that little factoid wouldn't match up in the least with the rest of his conspiracy junk. Watch:
Scenario 1:
Feds arrested Hanji then let him go so that he could take part in the 9/11 attacks
Problem:
If the hijackers were real, all the nonsense about CD's and missiles becomes irrelevant.
Scenario 2:
The feds arrested Hanji then let him go so that they could later blame him for the 9/11 attacks which, ofcourse, they pulled off themselves.
Problem:
Why arrest your scapegoat before you commit the crime? It only draws more suspicion, and has no logical reason behind it.
No matter how he tries to play it, it just doesn't make any sense. So he just yells "Phoenix Memo!!!" and then runs away into the shadows.
Of course Kean is lying. I figured that went without saying. If he told the truth, this conversation would be over.
Eh? So you think NORAD didn't lie? Ok...
No comments about Hani's terrorist roomate getting off scot free, shocking.
I got no comment about your terrorist roommate getting off scott free either. Ofcourse, that'd probabl be because I have just as much evidence against your roommate as you do against Hani's.
But while re-reading the 9-11 Commission Report
You can stop right there. It is a well established fact that the 911 commission 'report' is a lie.
It's a well established fact that you're a victim of shaken baby syndrome.
Hanjour showed a federal pilot's license and a log book cataloging 600 hours of flying experience. 600 hours! That's a lot, in particular for amateur VFR flyers like myself, with 10 to 15 hours of flying experience a year on avarage. So what explains his bad flying? Could be an aircraft he's not familiar with, combined with the fact that he hadn't flown for a while. I recently switched airplanes, and I needed at least three lessons to get it right.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Well lets look at the logic of the CTers. If a document has a few mistakes in it, than the whole document is a big lie.
In that case, EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF PSEUDO-EVIDENCE YOU GODAMN IDIOTS BRING IN HERE IS A LIE!!!
TAM
I think the point he was making is that it is standard to use != to mean does not equal.
For computer programming, sure. In math it's an equals sign with a slash through it. And the closest aproximation to that is =/=. Anyone who's done highschool math should reckognize it, whereas != would only be familiar to people who have done programming.
Post a Comment
<< Home