Monday, September 11, 2006

The National Review on the "Scholars"

We have mentioned a couple of uncritical articles on the “Scholars” recently, which appear more like a Jim Fetzer press release, than a critical analysis of who they are and what they are claiming. Here is an excellent article in the National Review on them:

The support of “academics” such as Griffin has lent much credence to the conspiracy mongers, but how credible are these academics? Last Wednesday Britain’s Daily Mail published a story claiming: “The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an ‘inside job,’ according to a group of leading academics.” But the group in question, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, of which Griffin is the most prominent member, is in no sense a “group of leading academics.” It is a
collection of like-minded crackpot theorists who happen to have some connection to academia.
This part sounds like I could have written it:

Some members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth are or were legitimate academics of good standing at reputable institutions. Yet, of the 76 Fetzer identifies as having academic affiliations,” there are many with questionable credentials. A partial list includes a “visiting professor of English” at Kyungpook National University in Daegu, South Korea; an assistant professor of English literature at Dogus University in Istanbul; someone whose qualifications are listed only as “Radiology, Medical hypnosis”; another whose qualifications are “French language and culture”; someone who teaches at Tunxis Community College in Farmington, Conn.; another listed as “architect, communicator”; one professor of “English and theater” at the University of Guelph (that’s in Ontario); and one listed as “author, researcher 9/11, JFK, more.” These are some of the “leading academics” promoting the view that the government did 9/11. One author with an article posted on the Scholars for 9/11 Truth website goes by the name “Scooby Doo.”

Of the 76 full members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, only four are listed as having backgrounds in physics, three in engineering; the other 69 “scholars” are mostly in the humanities and social sciences. Not quite what you’d expect when you hear that a group of “leading academics” supports the theory that the government was behind the attack.

2 Comments:

At 11 September, 2006 12:58, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Fabulous article. If only he had a list with all of their actual "qualifications", and printed it at the end, that would have been the icing.

 
At 11 September, 2006 16:13, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

damn, wish i had heard that one...any chance it will be available as a stream?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home